Lord Alton of Liverpool Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Alton of Liverpool

Information between 10th July 2025 - 20th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and against the House
One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 26 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 36 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 16 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 41 Crossbench Aye votes vs 7 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 28 Crossbench Aye votes vs 3 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and against the House
One of 6 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 25 Crossbench Aye votes vs 5 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153


Speeches
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Syria: Druze Community
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 1 speech (105 words)
Thursday 17th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 4 speeches (945 words)
Committee stage: Part 1
Thursday 10th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
Syria: Religious Freedom
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 14th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the government of Syria and international partners following the attack at Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church on 22 June; what assessment they have made of the implications of this attack for religious freedom in Syria; and what steps they are taking to support accountability and the safeguarding of religious minorities in Syria.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK strongly condemns the horrific terrorist attack at Mar Elias Church and remains committed to combatting terrorism. The Minister for the Middle East sent a personal message to Syrian Foreign Minister Al-Shaibani, expressing condolences and the UK's continued support. On 25 June our Special Representative for Syria visited Damascus and discussed the assessment of the situation with the Foreign Minister. We will continue to underline the importance of an inclusive political transition and protection of the rights of all Syrians, as well as advocate for the right to Freedom of Religion or Belief for all.

Syria: Human Rights
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 14th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the government of Syria to ensure that survivors of Syria’s detention systems have their rights to justice, reparations and access to rehabilitation upheld.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK has long condemned the gross human rights violations committed by the Assad regime, including those in Syria's detention systems. We support the Syrian Government in establishing Syrian-led processes, such as the National Commissions on Transitional Justice and Missing Persons. We have urged the Syrian Government to engage collaboratively with civil societies and the UN to ensure these are inclusive, comprehensive and transparent. During the Foreign Secretary's meeting with President al Sharaa in Damascus on 5 July, he raised the importance of accountability and transitional justice for a sustainable political transition, and offered UK support.

Democratic Republic of the Congo: Humanitarian Situation
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 18th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the humanitarian situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, including the issue of conflict-related sexual violence; and how they are engaging the United Nations to ensure that the commission of inquiry is established as a matter of urgency.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The humanitarian crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) remains one of the world's most severe. In Eastern DRC, conditions have worsened-of the 28 million people facing acute food insecurity nationwide, 10 million are in the three conflict-affected eastern provinces. Civilians face grave risks, including sexual and gender-based violence. The UK provided over £80 million in humanitarian aid last financial year and remains committed to helping those most in need. Following the M23/Rwandan Defence Force (RDF) conflict escalation in January and February, the UK gave emergency funding to Panzi Hospital to ensure it could continue supporting its globally recognized care for survivors of sexual violence in South Kivu. Through our partnership with United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), we continue supporting essential sexual and reproductive health services. Human rights in the DRC are a UK priority. We work with the UN and others to promote them, including most recently at the Human Rights Council where the UK's Permanent Representative encouraged the establishment of the independent Commission of Inquiry. Our Ambassador and Ministers also regularly raise human rights concerns with the DRC government, urging accountability and adherence to international humanitarian law.

Syria: Human Rights
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Tuesday 15th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the government of Syria to ensure that those responsible for torture and other human rights violations against survivors of Syria’s detention systems are properly investigated and that perpetrators are held accountable.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK has long condemned the gross human rights violations committed by the Assad regime, including those in Syria's detention systems. We support the Syrian Government in establishing Syrian-led processes, such as the National Commissions on Transitional Justice and Missing Persons. We have urged the Syrian Government to engage collaboratively with civil societies and the UN to ensure these are inclusive, comprehensive and transparent. During the Foreign Secretary's meeting with President al Sharaa in Damascus on 5 July, he raised the importance of accountability and transitional justice for a sustainable political transition, and offered UK support.

Primodos: Research
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Wednesday 16th July 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 1 July (HL8570), whether any scientific studies authored by Michael Briggs were included in the Expert Working Group review, published in November 2017.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

An Expert Working Group (EWG) of the Commission on Human Medicines reviewed the available evidence on the possible association between hormone pregnancy tests and adverse outcomes in pregnancy. Its review considered all available scientific evidence, including information collected from a public call for evidence.

The purpose of the EWG was to ascertain whether the available data could establish a causal association between the use of hormone pregnancy tests during early pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

One publication by Briggs was considered as part of the review of non-clinical evidence of reproductive and developmental toxicity for norethisterone acetate and ethinylestradiol and is therefore referenced on page 97 of this review. This publication is not cited within the text of the report as it did not contribute towards the final paper and its conclusions.

The EWG reported its findings in November 2017 and concluded that the totality of the available scientific data does not support a causal association between the use of hormone pregnancy tests during early pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency remains committed to reviewing any new scientific data which becomes available following the conclusion of the EWG.

Armenia: Religious Freedom
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Wednesday 16th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the rights to freedom of religion or belief, and of association and assembly, in Armenia; and what representations they have made to the government of Armenia in this regard in recent months.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

The UK Government remains firmly committed to promoting and protecting the right to freedom of religion or belief, as well as the rights to freedom of association and peaceful assembly, globally. Upholding international human rights is essential to ensure everyone can enjoy these freedoms without fear or discrimination. The UK raised human rights issues during Armenia's recent Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council on 1 May, where a number of recommendations were made.

Armenia: Politics and Government
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Wednesday 16th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the recent arrests of actual or perceived opposition leaders in Armenia, including Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, on allegations of plotting terrorist acts to seize power.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

The UK is monitoring the recent arrests of opposition figures in Armenia, including Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan. It is important that due process is allowed to take its course, ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly under the law and that judicial proceedings remain transparent and impartial. The UK Government remains firmly committed to promoting and protecting the right to freedom of religion or belief globally.

Pakistan: Religious Freedom
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 18th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what recent representations they have made to the government of Pakistan concerning the persecution of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, including the demolition of mosques, targeted killings and grave desecrations; and what steps they are taking to engage with Pakistan and its approach to supporting peacebuilding and the protection of religious freedom in that region.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

We are deeply concerned by the demolition of Ahmadi mosques in Pakistan and continue to monitor the situation. Our High Commission in Islamabad regularly raises concerns over the persecution of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community with the Government of Pakistan at the highest levels. The Minister for the Middle East raised the deteriorating situation for Ahmadi Muslims, including the impact of extremist groups such as Tehreek-e-Labbaik, with Pakistan's Minister of State for Interior in March 2025. In June 2025, ahead of Eid al-Adha, the Minister for the Middle East also raised the safety and dignity of Ahmadis seeking to practice their faith with Pakistan's Human Rights Minister. We will continue to urge the Government of Pakistan to guarantee the rights of all people in accordance with international standards.

Ethiopia: Internally Displaced People
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 18th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are taking steps to refer the situation in Ethiopia to the International Criminal Court, following the approach taken with regard to Bangladesh and Myanmar, having regard to the mass forced displacement of Tigrayans from Ethiopia.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK is concerned by increasing risks of atrocities across the globe, including in Ethiopia. We raise our concern of risks of atrocities in both the multilateral space and bilaterally, where possible. We respect the independence of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in determining crimes against humanity, including in the context of Myanmar and Bangladesh.

Eritrea: Ethiopia
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 18th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government when they last conducted a joint analysis of conflict and stability for Ethiopia, and whether they will review the situation again to take account of the escalating conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

A Joint Analysis of Conflict and Stability (JACS) Update was completed in June 2024 to refresh cross-government understanding of the drivers of conflict, insecurity and instability in Ethiopia and assess implications for UK response. The JACS continues to be used to inform regular monitoring of conflict and stability risks and to guide a cross-government approach to support peace and stability in Ethiopia.

CK Hutchison Holdings: National Security
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 17th July 2025

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the national security implications of the ownership of UK critical infrastructure by CK Hutchison, in the light of recent reports that Hong Kong authorities intervened in the company's overseas divestment decisions with regard to sale of ports on the Panama Canal.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government works closely with CNI operators, alongside our National Technical Authorities and industry partners, to ensure resilience and preparedness to the broad and diverse range of threats and risks the UK faces.

As is longstanding practice, the Government does not generally comment on individual investors or investments in the national security context.




Lord Alton of Liverpool mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
107 speeches (29,053 words)
Committee stage: Part 2
Thursday 10th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Baroness Ludford (LD - Life peer) speak to Amendment 206, tabled by my noble friend Lady Hamwee, with me and the noble Lord, Lord Alton of Liverpool - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence with the Minister for Women and Equalities on the appointment of the Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, July 2025

Women and Equalities Committee

Found: Yours, Lord Alton of Liverpool Sarah Owen MP Chair, Joint Committee on Human Rights

Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence with the Minister for Women and Equalities on the appointment of the Chair of the Equalities and Human rights Commission, July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Yours, Lord Alton of Liverpool Sarah Owen MP Chair, Joint Committee on Human Rights

Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Security Minister regarding Transnational repression dated 04 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Security Minister 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF www.gov.uk/home-office The Lord Alton of Liverpool

Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Secretary of State for Business & Trade relating to the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 30 June 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Place Whitehall London SW1A 2DY The Lord Alton of Liverpool

Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Foreign Secretary relating to aid and human rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs King Charles Street London SW1A 2AH Lord Alton of Liverpool

Monday 14th July 2025
Report - 5th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Crime and Policing Bill

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia

Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report - Legislative scrutiny: Mental Health Bill: Government Response

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia

Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - Second Special Report: Accountability For Daesh Crimes: Government Response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2024 - 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia

Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the NCA regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 26 June 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Murray Director Threat Leadership National Crime Agency Alexander.Murray@nca.gov.uk Lord Alton of Liverpool

Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Security Minister regarding Deprivation of Citizenship Orders dated 10 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Alton of Liverpool Chair, Joint Committee on Human Rights 5 JCHR, ‘Accountability for Daesh

Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Oral Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, and AWO (a data rights agency)

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: and the regulation of AI Wednesday 2 July 2025 2.25 pm Watch the meeting Members present: Lord Alton of Liverpool



Parliamentary Research
Humanitarian situation in Sudan - CDP-2025-0167
Jul. 17 2025

Found: Sudan: Armed Conflict 8 Jul 2025 | HL8679 Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool To ask His Majesty's




Lord Alton of Liverpool - Select Committee Information

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Security Minister regarding Deprivation of Citizenship Orders dated 10 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report - Legislative scrutiny: Mental Health Bill: Government Response

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - Second Special Report: Accountability For Daesh Crimes: Government Response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2024 - 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Minister for Energy regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 2 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the NCA regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 26 June 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Rights Lab, University of Nottingham
FLS0063 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Usdaw
CPB0012 - Crime and Policing Bill

Crime and Policing Bill - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Peter Frankental
FLS0070 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - PRI
FLS0074 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - TechUK
FLS0073 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - BSI
FLS0071 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Walk Free
FLS0064 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - RenewableUK
FLS0067 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Aston University, University of Westminster, and The University of St Andrews
FLS0021 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - WALK FREE
FLS0075 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Westminster Council
FLS0068 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 14th July 2025
Report - 5th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Crime and Policing Bill

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Oral Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, and AWO (a data rights agency)

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Oral Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, and AWO (a data rights agency)

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Trades Union Congress (TUC)
FLS0069 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Rights Lab at the University of Nottingham
FLS0078 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - The University of Greenwich
FLS0076 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Leigh Day
FLS0077 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Beyond Human Rights Compliance
FLS0020 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Leigh Day
FLS0052 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0051 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Sikhs for Justice
TRUK0058 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Daebas Alem
TRUK0052 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0028 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0046 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0047 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0027 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0053 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0056 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0055 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0054 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Halkevi Turkish and Kurdish Community Centre
TRUK0140 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0133 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Blue revolution
TRUK0121 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0124 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0137 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0160 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Volant Media UK / Iran International TV
TRUK0128 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - FairSquare
TRUK0127 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - SANAD Human Rights Organisation
TRUK0098 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Falun Dafa Association UK
TRUK0122 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Rizwangul NurMuhammad
TRUK0102 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0108 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD)
TRUK0168 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - The UK-EU committee of Assembly of Citizens’ Representatives, Hong Kong (ACRHK)
TRUK0126 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0082 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0086 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0097 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0060 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0062 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0065 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0059 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0066 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0081 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Eritrea Focus
TRUK0077 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Sikhs for Justice
TRUK0058 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Sikh Federation (UK)
TRUK0080 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Written Evidence - The Freedom And Justice Partnership, and The Freedom And Justice Partnership
FLS0066 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th July 2025
Written Evidence - Cambridge University
TRUK0166 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0054 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0039 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence with the Minister for Women and Equalities on the appointment of the Chair of the Equalities and Human rights Commission, July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Security Minister regarding Transnational repression dated 04 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Secretary of State for Business & Trade relating to the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 30 June 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Foreign Secretary relating to aid and human rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Yonas Teklehaimanot
TRUK0025 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - British Sikh Activists, and British Sikh Activists
TRUK0021 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation
TRUK0035 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0115 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0114 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 24th July 2025
Report - 6th Report - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 25th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Minister for Industry regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 22 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 25th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Lord Ponsonby dated 21 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 30th July 2025
Report - 7th Report - Transnational repression in the UK

Human Rights (Joint Committee)


Select Committee Inquiry
10 Jul 2025
Human Rights of Children in the Social Care System in England
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Out of nearly 12 million children living in England, over 400,000 are in the social care system at any one time.[1] Out of these, nearly 84,000 children in England are” in care” (i.e. being looked after by local authorities).[2] Across the UK, it is estimated that 107,000 children are in care.[3]  

In 2023, the then Government proposed a plan to reform children’s social care, in its “Stable Homes, Built on Love” strategy. It proposed a series of “missions” to improve the quality of the support provided to children and their families, such as providing better training to social workers, and listening more to children and young people. In 2024, the current Government announced the “biggest overhaul in a generation to children’s social care”, with the stated aim to provide a “wide range of new reform measures… to deliver better outcomes and a more secure life for children across the country”.[4]

Against this background, this inquiry will consider the extent to which the human rights of children in England are protected in the social care system. This inquiry will have a particular focus on children in care (“looked after children”), but wider aspects of the children’s social care system will be relevant, for example in regard to the availability of additional support to families with disabled children or to the efficacy of early intervention measures.

 

[1] This figure includes children in care as well as children assessed as needing help and protection as a result of risks to their development or health. Ofsted, Main findings: children’s social care in England 2024.

[2] Ofsted, Main findings: children’s social care in England 2024. A child is in care, or is a “looked after child” if they are in local authority care by reason of a care order or are being provided with accommodation under section 20 of the 1989 Act for more than 24 hours with the agreement of the parents, or of the child if the child is aged 16 or over (section 22(1) and (2) of the 1989 Act).

[3] Become, Why the care system has to change

[4] Biggest overhaul in a generation to children’s social care - GOV.UK

23 Jul 2025
Proposal for a draft Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2025
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Background

Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that in proceedings under that Act in respect of a judicial act done in good faith, damages may not be awarded except in two circumstances. The first is to compensate a person to the extent required by Article 5(5) of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’) (deprivation of liberty). The second is to compensate a person for a judicial act that is incompatible with Article 6 ECHR (right to fair trial) in circumstances where the person is detained and, but for the incompatibility, the person would not have been detained or would not have been detained for so long.

In the case of Re W (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140, the Court of Appeal found that accusations of professional misconduct against a witness made by a Family Court judge breached her rights under Article 8 of the ECHR (right to respect for private life).

In its judgment of 22 June 2021 in SW v United Kingdom (Application no. 87/18), the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the ECHR (right to an effective remedy), because the effect of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was that the witness could not bring a claim for damages in respect of a judicial act that was incompatible with Article 8.

Government proposals

On 17 July 2025, the Government laid before both Houses of Parliament its proposal for a Remedial Order to amend the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposed order is intended to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in SW v United Kingdom, by remedying the incompatibility of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 with Article 13 of the ECHR.

The Government proposes to address this incompatibility by amending section 9(3) to allow damages to be awarded to compensate a person for a judicial act on an additional basis: that the judicial act is incompatible with Article 8 on the ground that it was done in such a procedurally defective way as to amount to a breach of the requirements of procedural fairness under that Article.

Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was previously amended by the Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2020 to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Hammerton v United Kingdom (Application no. 6287/10). See the Fifteenth Report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights of Session 2017-19, and its Second Report of Session 2019-21.

 

 

Remedial Orders

Section 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives Ministers of the Crown the power to make remedial orders.

The section applies if it appears to the Minister that, having regard to a finding of the European Court of Human Rights in proceedings against the United Kingdom, a provision of legislation is incompatible with an obligation of the United Kingdom arising from the Convention.

In those circumstances, the Minister may by order make such amendments to the legislation as the Minister considers necessary to remove the incompatibility, if the Minister considers that there are compelling reasons for doing so.

Reporting on the proposal

The Joint Committee on Human Rights is required to report to Parliament on any proposal for a remedial order to be made under the Human Rights Act 1998. 

The Committee has 60 sitting days to report to each House its recommendation whether a draft order in the same terms as the proposal should be laid before the House.

25 Jun 2025
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 5 Sep 2025)


Background

In recent years there has been growth in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. These can be used for a wide variety of applications.

There is no universally agreed definition of AI or AI technologies. The then Government’s 2023 policy paper on “A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation” defined Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI systems or AI technologies as “products and services that are ‘adaptable’ and ‘autonomous’.” Adaptability refers to AI systems, after being trained, developing the ability to perform new ways of finding patterns and connections in data that are not directly envisioned by their human programmers. Autonomy refers to AI systems making decisions without the intent or ongoing control of a human.

Many argue that AI technologies can offer great benefits to individuals and society – for example, assisting in decision-making and improving productivity. Others are concerned about risks such as:

  • Perpetuation of societal biases and discrimination (for example, through the use of biased training data for AI models)
  • Potential conflict with an individual’s right to privacy and freedom of expression (for example, where AI might be used in surveillance)
  • Challenges for individuals in exercising their right to an effective remedy where their rights have been violated (for example, where it might be difficult to know how a model produced a particular output, and who is liable for that output).

On 5 September 2024, the UK signed the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. It is the first legally binding treaty in this area and "aims to ensure that activities within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems are fully consistent with human rights, democracy and the rule of law, while being conducive to technological progress and innovation."

The UK also adheres to the OECD’s AI Principles, which were the “first intergovernmental standard on AI”. The five principles are:

  1. Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being;
  2. Human rights and democratic values, including fairness and privacy;
  3. Transparency and explainability;
  4. Robustness, security and safety; and
  5. Accountability.

The UK Government has signalled its intention to “bring forward legislation which allows us to safely realise the enormous benefits and opportunities of the most powerful AI systems for years to come.” (PQ 41098 on Artificial Intelligence: Regulation, 31 March 2025)

Against this backdrop, the Joint Committee on Human Rights will explore what regulation might be required in order to safeguard human rights when AI technologies are being developed and used, and any implications this might have for future legislation.  

The inquiry will not be considering topics such as social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms,[3] or how malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy.[4] While these are important topics, they are outside the scope of this inquiry.

 

[1] POSTbrief 57, Artificial intelligence: An explainer, 14 December 2023    

[2] UK Parliament, Artificial Intelligence (AI) glossary, January 2024

[3] The subject of a report by the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee: Social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms

[4] The subject of a current inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee: Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy