Lord Alton of Liverpool Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Alton of Liverpool

Information between 23rd July 2025 - 21st September 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 33 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 27 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and against the House
One of 11 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198


Speeches
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 2 speeches (1,115 words)
Committee stage: Part 1
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 2 speeches (1,423 words)
Committee stage: Part 2
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: “Hillsborough Law”
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 1 speech (229 words)
Thursday 24th July 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice


Written Answers
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 24th July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the lessons learned from the Afghanistan data loss incident.

Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has commissioned several audits at various times since the data protection incident relating to the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy to inform remediation plans. All recommendations from these audits have been accepted and are either complete or work-in-progress.

It is a key priority of this Government to reinforce data handling practices. Within the Defence Afghan Relocation and Resettlement (DARR) team we have introduced a new casework management system which prioritises data protection. We also recently completed a comprehensive review on legacy data held within this casework management system and historic email accounts to ensure information is held at the right security classification and within the right location, which also enhances the case-working capability. This includes the application of need-to-know principles, with shared sites locked down and proactively managed.

A new senior civil servant level Chief Information Officer was appointed within the DARR team in October 2024 with responsibility for a larger and more skilled data and information management team. They produced a data strategy in line with the Government Digital Services’ data maturity assessment and this is shaped by priorities as identified from the myriad internal and external audits.

We regularly emphasise the need to complete the relevant mandatory training across DARR and all current staff have completed it. Bespoke induction training includes security briefings and data protection training, and there are regular communications on protecting information and expected behaviours, including discussions at senior leadership level.

We are continuously investing in our cybersecurity infrastructure to ensure we remain resilient against evolving threats. Through targeted interventions, campaigns, and role-specific training, we are embedding a culture where every individual understands their role in safeguarding Defence. By reinforcing positive cyber habits and reducing human cyber risk, we are building a workforce that is confident, capable, and cyber secure.

Ethiopia: Genocide Convention
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 25th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are taking steps, alone or in partnership with other countries, to initiate proceedings against Ethiopia before the International Court of Justice for violations of the Genocide Convention.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Our approach to genocide determination does not, and has not, prevented us from taking action to call out and seek to address atrocities, or work to build resilience in places where there are risks of instability and violence. Where we see immediate risks of atrocities, we raise our concerns bilaterally with the countries involved and multilaterally through international organisations.

On 15 November 2023, the UK jointly with Canada, Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands filed a declaration of intervention at the International Court of Justice in order to set out our interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Genocide Convention before the Court. This, and Written Observations submitted to the Court in March 2025, are intended to assist the court in its independent deliberations.

The UK has not initiated proceedings against the Government of Ethiopia. It is the long-standing policy of the UK Government that any formal determination as to whether genocide has occurred should be made following a judgment by a competent national or international court. This policy is consistent with our obligations under the Genocide Convention, providing a clear, impartial and independent measure for the determination of whether genocide has occurred.

Ethiopia: Crimes against Humanity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 25th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to initiate a structural investigation into international crimes in Ethiopia.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The UK co-sponsored the establishment of the Independent Commission on Human Rights in Ethiopia (ICHREE). The UK welcomed the 2023 ICHREE report and its recommendations. We repeatedly call, publicly and privately, for independent investigations into conflict related human rights violations and for perpetrators to be held to account. The UK is financing international monitors from Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOHCR) and building the investigative capacity of the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (EHRC) through our human rights and peacebuilding programme. We also support multiple dialogue initiatives across Ethiopia to find political solutions to conflict and help end conflict related human rights abuses. Where we see immediate risks of atrocities, we raise our concerns bilaterally with the countries involved and multilaterally through international organisations.

Lebanon: Christianity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 25th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made with the government of Lebanon regarding protections for Christian churches in Lebanon.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Continued escalation across the Israel-Lebanon Blue Line, and its impact upon communities on both sides of the border is deeply concerning. The Government of Lebanon has cited its commitment to freedom of religion. We encourage Lebanon to meet its international obligations and uphold the values of equality and religious coexistence that are enshrined in its national laws. The UK Government remains steadfast in its commitment to promoting and protecting the right to freedom of religion or belief globally.

Algeria: Christianity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 28th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, following the Arab Parliament’s defence of Algeria’s religious freedom record, what assessment they have made of restrictions on religious freedom faced by Christian communities in Algeria.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The UK champions Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) for all. It is our firm opinion that no one should live in fear because of what they do or do not believe. Our Embassy in Algiers raises FoRB with the Algerian authorities, doing so most recently when our Ambassador met the Minister of Religious Affairs on 10 February. Our Embassy remains in regular contact with minority religious groups on how best to support FoRB. We will continue to raise the issue and advocate for freedom of expression, including for Christian communities in Algeria.

Syria: Children
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 28th July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the situation of children in Syria, including those held in camps and detention and rehabilitation facilities in north-east Syria; and what assistance they are providing for child-focused humanitarian initiatives in that country.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

There are over seven million children in need of humanitarian assistance in Syria and more than two million out of school. Through INGOs and UN organisations, the UK aims to help children across the country, including in North-East Syria, through multi-sectoral support including water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH), education, health, nutrition and child protection services.

British National (Overseas): Oppression
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Wednesday 30th July 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to assess and prevent transnational repression of Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa holders and their families in the United Kingdom, particularly through the misuse of financial, tax, immigration or identity data by foreign governments.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The National Security Act 2023 has provided a comprehensive suite of powers to counter the threat of Transnational repression (TNR). The Government, working alongside operational partners, have mature mechanisms in place to prevent, assess and respond to potential threats in the UK. We will continue to take action as necessary to tackle those threats.

The safety and security of Hong Kongers in the UK is of the upmost importance, and the UK will always stand up for the rights of the people of Hong Kong. Any foreign state-directed crime against an individual in the UK will not be tolerated. TNR can take on many forms, but acts of TNR tend to be targeted and specific against individuals who a foreign state perceives as a threat or otherwise seeks to control. This often includes vocal critics, dissidents, or activists or those connected to that foreign state.

Solar Power: Manufacturing Industries
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 31st July 2025

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in relation to recent spending by Great British Energy on solar panels for use by schools and hospitals, what assessment they have made of the merits of (1) sourcing solar panels from manufacturers outside China, and (2) spending money from this scheme on creating solar panel manufacturing capacity in the United Kingdom.

Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

For solar projects, the Department for Education (DfE), the Department for Health & Social Care (DHSC) and their partners are procuring the solar panels in line with strict procurement controls. While these panels could come from anywhere in the world, we know that around 95% of global polysilicon, ingot and wafer production, required for the manufacture of solar panels, happens in China [1].

Whilst China has a long-established strong position in conventional solar, there are emerging opportunities in solar supply chains which the UK can capture by leaning into our strengths as a scientific and innovation superpower. Alongside Great British Energy delivering over £200m investment for local and community energy, we have several other pioneering companies developing the next generation of cutting-edge solar technologies, including perovskite and thin film. In the Solar Roadmap, we have committed to consider the case to further support companies looking to scale up the production of these parts – so that UK companies don’t just generate innovative ideas but build them as well.

[1]Based on previous estimates from the International Energy Agency (IEA): https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/

Solar Power: China
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 31st July 2025

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to ensure that Chinese-made solar panels purchased by Great British Energy for use in UK schools and hospitals have not been manufactured by slave labour; whether these purchases conform with section 3(2)(e) of Great British Energy Act 2025; and who is responsible for assessing this.

Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

There are strict procurement controls in place for schools and hospitals to ensure as far as possible any solar panels are free from forced labour.

This includes the Procurement Act which will enable contracting authorities to reject bids and terminate contracts with suppliers which have previously committed an offence under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, or where there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the supplier has engaged in this conduct.

We take this issue extremely seriously and will also be placing reporting commitments around the procurement process on panels as part of the funding agreements.

Through Great British Energy we will help build the supply chains needed to support a new era of clean homegrown power, bringing jobs and investment.

Balochistan: Honour Based Violence
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 4th August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the reported honour killing in Balochistan; and how UK aid to Pakistan seeks to strengthen protections for those at risk of extra-judicial murders or subjected to violence due to their minority status, ethnic origins or religion or belief.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The UK Government condemns honour-based violence, including the reported case in Balochistan. Through UK Overseas Development Assistance (ODA), we are supporting progress on human rights in Pakistan through dialogue, technical assistance, and targeted programming. The UK-funded Aawaz II programme convenes influential community leaders and minority representatives to change social behaviours and promote interfaith harmony. At the community level, Aawaz II has reached over 24 million people with information and awareness about rights and government services.

Telegraph Media Group: RedBird IMI
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Tuesday 5th August 2025

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Twycross on 22 July (HL Deb col 136–40), what consideration they are giving to the legal opinion by Tom Cross KC on 16 July that the Secretary of State is required to undertake a fuller investigation of the proposed acquisition of the Telegraph Media Group by Redbird Capital, having particular regard to evidence of the latter's links to China; and whether they will issue a response to that opinion.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Secretary of State takes her quasi-judicial responsibilities under the Enterprise Act 2002 very seriously. She will take all relevant information available into consideration when determining whether any of the public interest tests or conditions for foreign state influence are met in any proposed purchase of the Telegraph Media Group. DCMS will keep Parliament updated on decisions relating to the transaction.

Telegraph Media Group: Redbird IMI
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Tuesday 5th August 2025

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to issue, under Schedule 6B of the Enterprise Act 2002, a foreign state intervention notice in relation to the sale of the Telegraph Media Group to RedBird Capital Partners.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Secretary of State takes her quasi-judicial responsibilities under the Enterprise Act 2002 very seriously. She will take all relevant information available into consideration when determining whether any of the public interest tests or conditions for foreign state influence are met in any proposed purchase of the Telegraph Media Group. DCMS will keep Parliament updated on decisions relating to the transaction.

Syria: Human Rights
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 1st August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the interim Syrian authorities on preventing human rights violations, protecting all Syrians, and immediately ending all forms of sectarian violence.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

During the Foreign Secretary's recent visit to Damascus he underlined the importance of an inclusive political transition and protecting the rights of all Syrians, and offered UK support in achieving this. Further to the outbreak of violence in southern Syria, he spoke to Syria's Foreign Minister, on 18 July, to express our concerns about the latest escalation and the need for a full investigation into these crimes. We continue to press the Syrian Government on the importance of improving their response to sectarian violence, protecting the rights of all Syrians, and holding all those responsible to account.

Syria: Violence
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 1st August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent violent sectarian conflict between ethnic groups in Syria, and what assessment they have made of the threat to Christian minorities in Syria as a result of further sectarian violence and destabilisation.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We are deeply concerned about sectarian tensions and violence in Syria. We have consistently advocated for an inclusive, representative and non-sectarian political transition and underlined the importance of protecting the rights of all Syrians, both publicly and as part of our engagement with the Syrian Government. We are pressing the Syrian Government on the need to improve their response to sectarian violence and hold those responsible to account. The Foreign Secretary raised these issues during his recent visit to Damascus, and during his call with Syria's Foreign Minister on 18 July. We will continue to judge the Syrian Government by its actions, not its words.

Syria: Violence
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 1st August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of Israel's involvement in the sectarian violence and clashes between Druze and other groups in Suwayda; and what efforts they are undertaking to prevent the fragmentation and territorial annexation of parts of Syria by Israel.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We are deeply concerned by the recent violence between different groups in southern Syria. We have been working closely with international partners to press for de-escalation and for all sides to engage in dialogue. We continue to call on Israel to respect Syria's territorial integrity, and uphold their obligations to peace, stability and security under international law. As the Foreign Secretary made clear during his call with Israel's Foreign Minister on 21 July, Israel's attacks in Damascus risk destabilising Syria. We reiterate that respect for Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity is crucial for both Syrian security and that of its neighbours. The only path to a better future for Syria is through an inclusive, representative and non-sectarian political process, that respects the rights of all Syrians, regardless of ethnic or religious background.

Israel: Syria
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 1st August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether the government of Israel is seeking to execute the Yinon Plan in Syria; and what steps they are taking to prevent the break up of Syria into Alawite, Kurdish, Sunni and Druze zones.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We are deeply concerned by the recent violence between different groups in southern Syria. We have been working closely with international partners to press for de-escalation and for all sides to engage in dialogue. We continue to call on Israel to respect Syria's territorial integrity, and uphold their obligations to peace, stability and security under international law. As the Foreign Secretary made clear during his call with Israel's Foreign Minister on 21 July, Israel's attacks in Damascus risk destabilising Syria. We reiterate that respect for Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity is crucial for both Syrian security and that of its neighbours. The only path to a better future for Syria is through an inclusive, representative and non-sectarian political process, that respects the rights of all Syrians, regardless of ethnic or religious background.

Syria: Christianity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 1st August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to protect the rights and safety of (1) Armenian, and (2) Arab Orthodox Christian, communities in Syria; what discussions they have had with interim Syrian authorities about the protection of Syria's Christian minorities; and what guarantees, if any, they received from the Syrian authorities in those discussions.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We are deeply concerned about sectarian tensions and violence in Syria. We have consistently advocated for an inclusive, representative and non-sectarian political transition and underlined the importance of protecting the rights of all Syrians, both publicly and as part of our engagement with the Syrian Government. We are pressing the Syrian Government on the need to improve their response to sectarian violence and hold those responsible to account. The Foreign Secretary raised these issues during his recent visit to Damascus, and during his call with Syria's Foreign Minister on 18 July. We will continue to judge the Syrian Government by its actions, not its words.

Syria: Politics and Government
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 1st August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what pressure they have placed upon the Syrian transitional authorities to work seriously and transparently to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased Syrian transitional process.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We have consistently advocated for an inclusive political transition and underlined the importance of protecting the rights of all Syrians. The Foreign Secretary discussed this with President al Sharaa and Foreign Minister al Shaibani when he visited Damascus on 5 July. We welcome President al Sharaa's commitment to hold free and fair elections, and the announcement of the Supreme Electoral Committee for the People's Assembly Elections. This is an important step in building legitimate legislative and electoral processes. It is vital now that the political transition proceeds in a genuinely inclusive way, is representative, and respects the rights of all Syrians. We continue to press the Syrian Government on these issues. We will judge the Syrian Government by its actions not its words.

Democratic Republic of the Congo: Floods
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 7th August 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of reports that artisanal miners are buried in mines in the South Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo following severe flooding; and what action they are taking to mobilise international non-governmental organisations and other governments to provide equipment, medical aid and trained rescue teams.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The UK is saddened by reports of artisanal miners trapped underground in the Lomera gold mining site. We extend our condolences to those affected and continue to monitor the situation. The UK is working to address the underlying causes of flooding and climate vulnerability in the DRC, through programmes that aim to protect standing forests and develop nature-based solutions. The UK supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which promotes transparency and good governance in the mining sector. We are also a member of the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, which guide extractive companies in maintaining safety.

Mental Health Services: Children
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Tuesday 16th September 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many children have been detained in adult mental health wards (1) in total, and (2) for over 48 hours, in the past year; and what estimate they have made of the cost of removing all children from those facilities.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England has confirmed that across the services, there have been a total of 12 children, all aged between 16 and 18 years old, who have been detained in adult mental health wards in the 2024/25 financial year. All 12 patients were detained for over 48 hours.

Neither the Department nor NHS England have made an estimate of the cost of removing all children and young people from these facilities.

Jimmy Lai
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Tuesday 16th September 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of statements made during the trial of Jimmy Lai that appear to characterise his engagement with foreign governments as a criminal act.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

This Government has been clear that Jimmy Lai's prosecution is politically motivated and that he should be released immediately. Mr Lai's prosecution is evidence that the National Security Law is being used to silence China's critics. Diplomats have attended Jimmy Lai's trial throughout, and his case remains a major priority.

Hong Kong: Human Rights
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Wednesday 17th September 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that political activists, journalists and human rights defenders, including Jimmy Lai, are protected from politically motivated prosecution or extradition from Hong Kong.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

This Government will never allow a situation where Hong Kongers or any other nationality is extradited for politically motivated purposes. UK courts have extensive powers under the Extradition Act 2003 to assess whether any individual extradition would be compatible with the requested person's human rights or if it is politically motivated. If a UK judge ever determines any extradition request is politically motivated, they have the power to bar extradition.

The 1997 UK-Hong Kong Extradition Treaty remains suspended and the government is updating Hong Kong's designation under the Extradition Act 2003 to reflect the absence of international extradition arrangements with the UK. This formalises the severing of ties between the British and Hong Kong extradition systems for the purposes of the Extradition Act.

Hong Kong: Extradition
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 18th September 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the criteria used to determine whether an extradition request from Hong Kong is politically motivated, particularly where charges are presented as criminal offences; and what safeguards are in place to prevent the authorities in Hong Kong from misusing criminal law as a means of targeting political opponents and seeking their extradition.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

This Government remains resolutely committed to ensuring that no individual is extradited from the United Kingdom for politically motivated purposes, including in cases where charges are presented as criminal offences. The Extradition Act provides statutory safeguards and judicial oversight. It is for an independent UK court to determine whether any request for extradition is made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing an individual on account of their political opinions, or whether if extradited they might be prejudiced at their trial or punished, detained or restricted in their personal liberty by reason of their political opinions and, if it is, there is a statutory bar to the extradition.

The extradition process under the Extradition Act 2003 affords judicial oversight and includes the protections in the European Convention on Human Rights. In all UK extradition proceedings, the court considers whether the requested person's extradition would be compatible with their human rights. These are defined as Convention rights within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998. The court must order the requested person's discharge from their extradition proceedings if extradition would not be compatible with their Convention rights.




Lord Alton of Liverpool mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Daesh Crimes: Accountability (JCHR Report)
23 speeches (12,899 words)
Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Grand Committee

Mentions:
1: Lord Callanan (Con - Life peer) Like other Members, I wish the noble Lord, Lord Alton of Liverpool, a very swift recovery. - Link to Speech
2: Lord Katz (Lab - Life peer) detailed debate.As every other noble Lord has done, I begin by paying tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Alton of Liverpool - Link to Speech

Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
167 speeches (48,736 words)
Committee stage
Monday 8th September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Lord German (LD - Life peer) know most noble Lords will have read about in the newspaper, which involved the noble Lord, Lord Alton of Liverpool - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 17th September 2025
Agendas and papers - Special Inquiry Committee proposals 2026

Liaison Committee (Lords)

Found: 21: Letter from Baroness Bull and Lord Tarassenko 63 Proposal 22: Letter from Lord Crisp, Lord Alton of Liverpool

Friday 12th September 2025
Special Report - 4th Special Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Government Response

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia

Thursday 11th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Minister for State for the department of Health and Social Care regarding the Mental Health Bill dated 11 September 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: www.parliament.uk From the Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights Lord Alton of Liverpool

Thursday 11th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Secretary of State for the Home Department regarding the proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000 dated 11 September 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Yours Lord Alton of Liverpool Chair, Joint Committee on Human Rights 9 Ministry

Monday 8th September 2025
Government Response - Government Response - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill

Constitution Committee

Found: The Government thanks the Joint Committee on Human Rights (“JCHR”) and its Chair the Lord Alton of Liverpool

Thursday 4th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Security Minister dated 7 August 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Security Minister 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF www.gov.uk/home-office The Lord Alton of Liverpool

Thursday 4th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Dr Alison Storey dated 29 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: FAO: UK Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights 29th July 2025 Dear Lord Alton of Liverpool

Thursday 4th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Lord Ponsonby dated 12 August 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice The Lord Alton of Liverpool

Wednesday 30th July 2025
Report - 7th Report - Transnational repression in the UK

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia

Thursday 24th July 2025
Report - 6th Report - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia



Parliamentary Research
Debate on the duty of candour for public authorities and legal representation for bereaved families - CDP-2025-0171
Aug. 04 2025

Found: families 10 Commons Library Debate Pack, 4 August 2025 In a letter dated 11 April 2025 to Lord Alton of Liverpool

Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Bill: HL Bill 127 of 2024–25 - LLN-2025-0029
Jul. 24 2025

Found: Mr Jarvis also made these points in a letter to Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench), chair of the Joint



Bill Documents
Sep. 04 2025
HL Bill 101-V Fifth marshalled list for Committee
Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: After Clause 45 LORD GERMAN BARONESS BRINTON LORD ALTON OF LIVERPOOL 151_ After Clause 45, insert

Sep. 01 2025
HL Bill 101-IV Fourth marshalled list for Committee
Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: After Clause 45 LORD GERMAN BARONESS BRINTON LORD ALTON OF LIVERPOOL 151_ After Clause 45, insert

Jul. 24 2025
Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Bill: HL Bill 127 of 2024–25
Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Bill 2024-26
Briefing papers

Found: Mr Jarvis also made these points in a letter to Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench), chair of the Joint




Lord Alton of Liverpool - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 10th September 2025 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: Human Rights of Children in the Social Care System in England
At 2:15pm: Oral evidence
Lynn Perry MBE - CEO at Barnardo’s
Matt Blow - Policy and Public Affairs Manager at Become
Stewart MacLachlan - Legal and Policy Manager at Coram Children’s Legal Centre
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Thursday 24th July 2025
Report - 6th Report - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 25th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Minister for Industry regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 22 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 25th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Lord Ponsonby dated 21 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 30th July 2025
Report - 7th Report - Transnational repression in the UK

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 4th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Security Minister dated 7 August 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 4th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Dr Alison Storey dated 29 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 4th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Lord Ponsonby dated 12 August 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 19th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Secretary of State for the Home Department regarding Article 8 dated 19 September 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 11th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Minister for State for the department of Health and Social Care regarding the Mental Health Bill dated 11 September 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 11th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Secretary of State for the Home Department regarding the proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000 dated 11 September 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 12th September 2025
Special Report - 4th Special Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Government Response

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 10th September 2025
Oral Evidence - Barnardo’s, Become, and Coram Children’s Legal Centre

Human Rights of Children in the Social Care System in England - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 26th September 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Baroness Merron regarding NHS Supply Chains dated 8 September 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)


Select Committee Inquiry
23 Jul 2025
Proposal for a draft Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2025
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Background

Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that in proceedings under that Act in respect of a judicial act done in good faith, damages may not be awarded except in two circumstances. The first is to compensate a person to the extent required by Article 5(5) of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’) (deprivation of liberty). The second is to compensate a person for a judicial act that is incompatible with Article 6 ECHR (right to fair trial) in circumstances where the person is detained and, but for the incompatibility, the person would not have been detained or would not have been detained for so long.

In the case of Re W (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140, the Court of Appeal found that accusations of professional misconduct against a witness made by a Family Court judge breached her rights under Article 8 of the ECHR (right to respect for private life).

In its judgment of 22 June 2021 in SW v United Kingdom (Application no. 87/18), the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the ECHR (right to an effective remedy), because the effect of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was that the witness could not bring a claim for damages in respect of a judicial act that was incompatible with Article 8.

Government proposals

On 17 July 2025, the Government laid before both Houses of Parliament its proposal for a Remedial Order to amend the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposed order is intended to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in SW v United Kingdom, by remedying the incompatibility of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 with Article 13 of the ECHR.

The Government proposes to address this incompatibility by amending section 9(3) to allow damages to be awarded to compensate a person for a judicial act on an additional basis: that the judicial act is incompatible with Article 8 on the ground that it was done in such a procedurally defective way as to amount to a breach of the requirements of procedural fairness under that Article.

Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was previously amended by the Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2020 to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Hammerton v United Kingdom (Application no. 6287/10). See the Fifteenth Report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights of Session 2017-19, and its Second Report of Session 2019-21.

 

 

Remedial Orders

Section 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives Ministers of the Crown the power to make remedial orders.

The section applies if it appears to the Minister that, having regard to a finding of the European Court of Human Rights in proceedings against the United Kingdom, a provision of legislation is incompatible with an obligation of the United Kingdom arising from the Convention.

In those circumstances, the Minister may by order make such amendments to the legislation as the Minister considers necessary to remove the incompatibility, if the Minister considers that there are compelling reasons for doing so.

Reporting on the proposal

The Joint Committee on Human Rights is required to report to Parliament on any proposal for a remedial order to be made under the Human Rights Act 1998. 

The Committee has 60 sitting days to report to each House its recommendation whether a draft order in the same terms as the proposal should be laid before the House.

25 Jun 2025
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Background

In recent years there has been growth in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. These can be used for a wide variety of applications.

There is no universally agreed definition of AI or AI technologies. The then Government’s 2023 policy paper on “A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation” defined Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI systems or AI technologies as “products and services that are ‘adaptable’ and ‘autonomous’.” Adaptability refers to AI systems, after being trained, developing the ability to perform new ways of finding patterns and connections in data that are not directly envisioned by their human programmers. Autonomy refers to AI systems making decisions without the intent or ongoing control of a human.

Many argue that AI technologies can offer great benefits to individuals and society – for example, assisting in decision-making and improving productivity. Others are concerned about risks such as:

  • Perpetuation of societal biases and discrimination (for example, through the use of biased training data for AI models)
  • Potential conflict with an individual’s right to privacy and freedom of expression (for example, where AI might be used in surveillance)
  • Challenges for individuals in exercising their right to an effective remedy where their rights have been violated (for example, where it might be difficult to know how a model produced a particular output, and who is liable for that output).

On 5 September 2024, the UK signed the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. It is the first legally binding treaty in this area and "aims to ensure that activities within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems are fully consistent with human rights, democracy and the rule of law, while being conducive to technological progress and innovation."

The UK also adheres to the OECD’s AI Principles, which were the “first intergovernmental standard on AI”. The five principles are:

  1. Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being;
  2. Human rights and democratic values, including fairness and privacy;
  3. Transparency and explainability;
  4. Robustness, security and safety; and
  5. Accountability.

The UK Government has signalled its intention to “bring forward legislation which allows us to safely realise the enormous benefits and opportunities of the most powerful AI systems for years to come.” (PQ 41098 on Artificial Intelligence: Regulation, 31 March 2025)

Against this backdrop, the Joint Committee on Human Rights will explore what regulation might be required in order to safeguard human rights when AI technologies are being developed and used, and any implications this might have for future legislation.  

The inquiry will not be considering topics such as social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms,[3] or how malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy.[4] While these are important topics, they are outside the scope of this inquiry.

 

[1] POSTbrief 57, Artificial intelligence: An explainer, 14 December 2023    

[2] UK Parliament, Artificial Intelligence (AI) glossary, January 2024

[3] The subject of a report by the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee: Social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms

[4] The subject of a current inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee: Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy