Contaminated Blood and Blood Products
Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Peter Bottomley(7 years, 9 months ago)
Commons ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sir Peter Bottomley
Does the hon. Lady agree that, whoever administers the scheme, if there are anomalies or cases that come outside the rules, they should be free to tell the Government that they should change them?
Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
May I interrupt? The winding-up speech is meant to be very brief. I do not mind, but there is a big debate to follow with a lot of speakers, and we are eating into that time.
Housing and Planning Bill
Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Peter Bottomley
Mr Deputy Speaker
I must now put the Question on the remaining Lords amendments that have not been certified.
Lords amendments 61 to 87, 182, 183, 185 to 188, 190, 191, 195, 196 and 200 to 214 agreed to, with Commons financial privilege waived in respect of Lords amendment 185.
Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con)
On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. Lords amendments 92 and 93 were moved by Lord Young of Cookham with the understanding of the Government. Amendment 92 deals, it says, with tenants—in fact, it is leaseholders—and amendment 93 deals with leaseholders in a commonhold agreement. Am I right in saying that they give powers to Government to propose to Parliament statutory instruments, which we can consider separately?
Mr Deputy Speaker
As a man who has been here longer than most, you will know that that is not for the Chair to interpret.
After Clause 128
Neighbourhood right of appeal