Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what was their rationale for the short duration of the call for evidence in relation to jointly owned leasehold properties, from Thursday 21 March to Friday 5 April.

Answered by Baroness Swinburne

The Government has discretion about the length of calls for evidence.

In this instance, the call ran from Thursday 21 March to Friday 5 April 2024 and as a result this was a short duration.

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact that construction defects relating to fire safety in residential blocks have on the asset value of those buildings.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

The Department does not hold information on the impact of construction defects, relating to fire safety, on the asset value of whole buildings. However, I refer the Earl of Lytton to the answer given to Question UIN 22129 On 24 April 2024 on the selling price of individual flats.

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what is their definition of "life-critical defects" in relation to fire safety risks in buildings.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

The definition of “life-critical defects” is in Annex 1 of the developer remediation contract.

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government by what date they expect all buildings over 11 metres that require a work assessment to have had their assessments completed.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

Developers that signed the developer remediation contract are required to assess and remediate relevant buildings as soon as reasonably practicable. The length of time it may reasonably take to assess and remediate a building will vary depending on factors including the scale of works required, co-operation of third parties in granting access to the building and finalising a works contract, and risk-based prioritisation by the developer of assessments and remedial works across the portfolio of buildings for which the developer is responsible.

The Government publishes monthly data on progress that developers have made towards assessing and remediating buildings for which they are responsible under the contract.

As at end of November 2023, fire risks assessments had been undertaken on 97.6% of all buildings reported 11m+ in height which are the responsibility of social housing providers, with a further 1.5% planned in the next nine months. As at end January 2024, developers had yet to obtain an assessment for 1,607 of the 4,614 11m+ buildings for which developers had accepted responsibility under the developer remediation contract.

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether the total number of buildings for which developers have accepted responsibility for remediation under their contract is now confirmed to be 4614, as indicated in the Developer Remediation Contract Data Release: January 2024.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

As of 31 January 2024, developers that signed the remediation contract had accepted responsibility for 4,614 buildings. Of the 4,614 buildings covered by the contract, 1,501 buildings (33%) have been identified as having life-critical fire safety defects that require remediation under the terms of the contract.

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government which types of defect data they collect when assessing the prevalence of non-cladding defects in residential buildings.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

The Department receives quarterly updates from Registered Providers of social housing on progress towards remediating buildings for which they are the Responsible Entity. This includes data on buildings with external and/or internal life-critical fire safety defects. In addition to unsafe cladding, relevant defects may include but are not limited to: compartmentation between dwellings or between dwellings and common parts; inadequate fire stopping or fire barriers; incorrect or missing fire escape signage; inadequate or defective fire detection and alarm systems; unprotected means of escape; and inadequate or defective firefighting equipment or installations.

The Department also receives quarterly updates from developers that have signed the developer remediation contract. This too includes data on buildings with external and/ or internal life-critical fire safety defects.

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to ensuring that building owners, whether freeholders, commonhold associations or enfranchised leaseholders, who are required to remedy non ‘life-critical fire safety defects’ have an automatic remedy against the person responsible for the defective construction.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

Interested parties including freeholders, leaseholders, commonhold associations or enfranchised leaseholders can potentially look to pursue a previous freeholder, developer and any associated company or person for remediation costs through a remediation contribution order. They also have the potential to pursue developers, contractors, or manufacturers where they are liable for defects which meant one or more dwelling in the building was not fit for habitation when the relevant works were completed.

Found: Kirkharle 95 Proposal 43: Letter from Baroness Browning and Lord Touhig 98 Proposal 44: Letter from the Earl

Found: Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] 10 THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON ★_ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Construction product

Found: After Schedule 12 THE EARL OF LYTTON 93B_ After Schedule 12, insert the following new Schedule

Found: After Clause 116 THE EARL OF LYTTON 105C★_ After Clause 116, insert the following new Clause

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON 78C_ After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause— “Incurring of costs

Found: THE EARL OF LYTTON _ After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause— “Value for money (1