To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Teachers: Workplace Pensions
Monday 9th February 2026

Asked by: Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government how much was paid to retired teachers in pension payments in 2024; and what estimate they have made of the total pension payments to retired teachers in (1) 2040, and (2) 2050.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

A total of £2.921 billion was paid by members into the Teachers’ Pension Scheme in the 2024/25 financial year, and £8.866 billion was paid by employers over the same period.

In the 2024/25 financial year, £10.253 billion was paid to retired members of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme.

The Teachers’ Pension Scheme does not produce long‑term forecasts beyond its normal planning horizon. Estimates for 2040 and 2050 are therefore not available.


Written Question
Teachers: Workplace Pensions
Monday 9th February 2026

Asked by: Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government how much in total was paid to the Teachers' Pension Scheme by (1) teachers, and (2) employers, in 2024.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

A total of £2.921 billion was paid by members into the Teachers’ Pension Scheme in the 2024/25 financial year, and £8.866 billion was paid by employers over the same period.

In the 2024/25 financial year, £10.253 billion was paid to retired members of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme.

The Teachers’ Pension Scheme does not produce long‑term forecasts beyond its normal planning horizon. Estimates for 2040 and 2050 are therefore not available.


Division Vote (Lords)
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB) voted No and against the House
One of 5 Crossbench No votes vs 18 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 147
Division Vote (Lords)
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 25 Crossbench No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 183
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 15 Crossbench Aye votes vs 14 Crossbench No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 159
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB) voted No and in line with the House
One of 18 Crossbench No votes vs 17 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 30 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150
Division Vote (Lords)
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 15 Crossbench Aye votes vs 20 Crossbench No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169
Written Question
Apprentices: Finance
Monday 5th January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government what was the apprenticeship budget for the Department for Education in 2024–25; what proportion of that budget was spent in total; and what proportion was spent on (1) training for apprenticeships with levy-paying employers, (2) training for apprenticeships with non-levy-paying employers, and (3) other activities.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

In the 2024-25 financial year, the English apprenticeships budget was fully spent.

The following table provides a breakdown of total spend for the 2024-25 financial year, including the proportion of total spend on training for apprenticeships with levy paying employers and training for apprenticeships with non-levy paying employers in England.

In addition, the table reflects the spend on apprenticeships that started prior to the introduction of the apprenticeships levy and new funding system, as well as non-apprenticeships participation spend, such as the cost of running digital services and marketing and communications campaigns.

Apprenticeships spend from the department’s apprenticeships budget

2024-25 financial year (£million)

Proportion of total spend (%)

Levy paying employers

1,979

71%

Non-levy paying employers

742

27%

Pre-reform apprenticeships

-1

0%

Non-apprenticeships training

49

2%

Total

2,769

100%


Written Question
Local Government: Apprentices and Training
Monday 22nd December 2025

Asked by: Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of developers’ ability under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to support apprenticeships and upskilling across local authorities as well as in specified developments, and to that end provide wage support as well as direct training costs.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Section 106 planning obligations are legally binding agreements made to mitigate the impacts of a proposed development. These obligations are an essential part of the planning system, ensuring that developments contribute positively to their surrounding area and address specific concerns that arise as a result of their implementation.

All contributions under Section 106 must adhere to the three statutory tests set out in regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) regulations. Any contribution must be:

  • Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
  • Directly related to the development; and
  • Reasonable in scale and kind.

Ultimately, the responsibility for determining whether a planning obligation is necessary to make a development acceptable lies with the local planning authority – including any obligation around to apprenticeships and skills.

Current planning practice guidance encourages local planning authorities to facilitate the process of agreeing planning obligations by using and publishing standard forms and templates. These resources may include model agreements and clauses, some of which have already been published by other organisations. Making these documents publicly available assists both authorities and applicants during the planning application process.

Guidance additionally states that policies regarding planning obligations should be clearly set out in local plans and subject to public examination, ensuring transparency and consistency in their application.