Baroness Whitaker Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Whitaker

Information between 7th April 2026 - 17th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 86 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 27 Noes - 89
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 30 Noes - 130
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 114 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 46 Noes - 117
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 156
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 231
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 55
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 173
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Whitaker voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144


Written Answers
Pupils: Roma
Asked by: Baroness Whitaker (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 10th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the report by the Runnymede Trust Excluded: Misrecognition, control and the Roma experience in Bradford schools, published on 25 March; and what plans they have to implement its recommendations.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The department recognises the issues faced by Gypsy, Roma and Traveller children and young people, and how schools and others can make a positive difference.

We are currently reviewing the report’s findings alongside existing evidence on school exclusions and ethnic disparities. This assessment will inform our ongoing work to ensure that behaviour and attendance policies are applied fairly and that schools are supported to meet the needs of all pupils, including Roma communities.

Under the Equality Act 2010, schools must not discriminate against pupils on the basis of their ethnic background. We have already published guidance for schools on complying with this duty.

Gas Cookers
Asked by: Baroness Whitaker (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 9th April 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to strengthen leak detection, odorisation and public health-related standards for gas used for cooking in domestic and other premises.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

I refer the noble Baroness to the answer I gave to question HL13613 on 2 February 2026.

There is already robust regulation in place to detect leaks and odourised gas. Gas Industry standards are set by the relevant industry standard setting bodies, for example, the Institute for Gas Engineers and Managers (IGEM), British Standards Institute (BSI) and Liquid Gas UK.

The Health and Safety Executive has regulatory responsibility for public health-related standards in commercial premises, but not in domestic homes.

Apprentices: English Language and Mathematics
Asked by: Baroness Whitaker (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 10th April 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to align apprenticeships for 16–18-year-olds with those for people aged 19 and above by removing the requirement to achieve English and maths qualifications.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The government is committed to high standards of English and maths and funds apprentices aged 16-18 at the start of their training to achieve English and maths qualifications, if they do not already hold suitable equivalent qualifications, in order to complete their apprenticeship.

This is consistent with our expectation that all young people should have a further meaningful opportunity to secure English and maths qualifications post-16, where they do not already hold them. This can be a GCSE or functional skills qualification.

Further flexibility is in place for apprentices with a learning difficulty and/or disability where there is evidence this is likely to be a barrier to them completing their apprenticeship. In these cases, they are able to achieve an entry level 3 functional skills qualification to complete. Since August 2024, this flexibility has been available to apprentices with a learning difficulty and/or disability but without an Education Health and Care Plan.

As with all apprenticeship policies, we continue to monitor the impact of the English and maths requirements, to ensure they are striking the right balance.

Benzene: Gas Cookers
Asked by: Baroness Whitaker (Labour - Life peer)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the research published by PSE Healthy Energy and Stanford University in Environmental Research Letters on 25 March on the harmfully high levels of benzene measured in UK homes emitted by gas cooktops.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has noted the published research but has not made a full assessment of the study, which is based on a small number of stoves. Currently, there are limited studies that have investigated benzene concentrations in United Kingdom homes. Further research is needed to better understand exposure to indoor air pollutants and the effects on health.

Reducing emissions of pollutants and ensuring adequate ventilation within indoor environments are important. The UKHSA continues to consider and evaluate the evidence of exposure to indoor air pollutants and the potential health effects.




Baroness Whitaker mentioned

Parliamentary Research
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26: Lords amendments - CBP-10621
Apr. 09 2026

Found: stage in the Commons by Andy Slaughter MP (PDF, new clause 25) and at Lords committee stage by Baroness Whitaker




Baroness Whitaker - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 10 a.m.
Environment and Climate Change Committee - Private Meeting
Subject: Drought Preparedness
View calendar - Add to calendar
Monday 27th April 2026 1:45 p.m.
Environment and Climate Change Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 20th May 2026 10 a.m.
Environment and Climate Change Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from SoS for Defra on waste crime and publication of Waste Crime Action Plan 23.03.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Baroness Hayman for Defra on waste crime 23.03.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Environment Agency on waste crime oral evidence session pre-questions 24.03.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Defra on Joint Fisheries Statement 24.03.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Environment Agency on 10 Point Action Plan on waste crime 20.03.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee
Monday 27th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from DESNZ on Climate Change Act 2008 (International Aviation and International Shipping) Regulations 2026 17.04.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee
Monday 27th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Environment Agency on waste crime letter dated 24 March with corrected data 22.04.2026

Environment and Climate Change Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
24 Apr 2026
Pet Parasite Medication
Environment and Climate Change Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

This short inquiry will consider pet parasite medication (PPM), with a focus on treatments containing pesticides of concern such as fipronil and imidacloprid. The inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways, and the impact of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and pet owners of alternative medications or application practices.