Debates between Baroness Wheeler and Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames during the 2024 Parliament

Thu 16th Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill
Lords Chamber

Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons

Crime and Policing Bill

Debate between Baroness Wheeler and Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames Portrait Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I entirely accept the point made by the noble Lord on the Woolsack about the inadequacy of an apology for late arrival in the Chamber, and I am bound to say it is not something I have ever had to make before, but I was late into the Chamber today and I apologise to the House, after others, that I was late for the start of this group. I will speak briefly, if the House permits. The Motion from the noble Lord, Lord Walney, to permit designation—

Baroness Wheeler Portrait Captain of the King’s Bodyguard of the Yeomen of the Guard and Deputy Chief Whip (Baroness Wheeler) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I stress that the Deputy Speaker made it clear that people who arrive late for the debate are not allowed to speak. I think it is difficult for the noble Lord, having heard the explanation and the discussion, to stand up and speak. I am sorry.

Court Reporting Data

Debate between Baroness Wheeler and Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames
Wednesday 11th February 2026

(2 months, 1 week ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Wheeler Portrait Captain of the King’s Bodyguard of the Yeomen of the Guard and Deputy Chief Whip (Baroness Wheeler) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, this is a 10-minute Urgent Question, so questions must be brief. We will now move on to the Lib Dems.

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames Portrait Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we are all committed to open justice, but so we are to the protection of sensitive personal data. Minister Sackman told the Commons yesterday, as has the Minister here, that Courtsdesk had been sharing with an AI company, no doubt for commercial purposes, personal data of defendants and victims, including full names, personal addresses and birth dates. Minister Sackman said that at least 700 individual cases were involved in that direct breach of contract by Courtsdesk, which Courtsdesk has accepted was a breach.

I suggest that we accept both Ministers’ accounts as accurate, as, notably, did Conservative MP Sir Julian Lewis, who, unlike his Front Bench—and indeed the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen—rightly described this as a “cause of great concern”. How and when do the Government propose to replace Courtsdesk with an alternative provider? Meanwhile, can the Minister say how HMCTS will deliver accurate information in a more easily accessible and digestible form? By all accounts, journalists are currently finding the MOJ’s presentation of data to be fragmented, impractical and difficult to navigate.