Debates between Baroness Tyler of Enfield and Baroness Watkins of Tavistock during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Wed 21st Nov 2018
Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL]
Lords Chamber

Report: 1st sitting: House of Lords

Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL]

Debate between Baroness Tyler of Enfield and Baroness Watkins of Tavistock
Baroness Tyler of Enfield Portrait Baroness Tyler of Enfield
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I support this group of amendments. One or two offer a slightly different definition or slightly different words but the key point for me, having moved a similar amendment in Committee, is that we have now removed the phrase “unsound mind” from the Bill. I know this is welcomed here and will be hugely welcomed by many in the sector. It means we will get rid not only of a very old-fashioned and stigmatising term but one on which there were also concerns—as I understood from my conversations with the Royal College of Psychiatrists—that it had no real clinical meaning. The term “mental disorder”—or the few more words added by other amendments—not only brings us in line with the Mental Health Act, which is good, but I am advised that it will also help to provide diagnostic clarity. That has to be a good thing too. I support this group of amendments.

Baroness Watkins of Tavistock Portrait Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I support this group of amendments and I am delighted that the Minister has had his mind changed. Not using this phrase will change how people feel about their relatives who may be suffering from mental disorders. I am also optimistic that, in the longer term, using such modern nomenclature will make mental health professions more attractive to young people.