Information between 15th October 2025 - 25th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 175 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 27 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 32 Noes - 57 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Scott of Bybrook voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Scott of Bybrook speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness Scott of Bybrook contributed 2 speeches (468 words) Report stage: Part 1 Wednesday 22nd October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness Scott of Bybrook speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness Scott of Bybrook contributed 3 speeches (1,067 words) Report stage: Part 2 Wednesday 22nd October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness Scott of Bybrook speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness Scott of Bybrook contributed 7 speeches (669 words) Report stage: Part 3 Wednesday 22nd October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness Scott of Bybrook speeches from: New Homes Target
Baroness Scott of Bybrook contributed 1 speech (110 words) Tuesday 21st October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness Scott of Bybrook speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness Scott of Bybrook contributed 7 speeches (1,967 words) Report stage part one Monday 20th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness Scott of Bybrook speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness Scott of Bybrook contributed 2 speeches (425 words) Report stage part two Monday 20th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Community Infrastructure Levy
Asked by: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the administration of the Community Infrastructure Levy following reports that homeowners in some areas have been issued with bills of up to £70,000 for residential extensions and annexes. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 (as amended) make a number of provisions for charging authorities to grant exemptions from the levy. This includes those who extend their own homes or erect residential annexes within the grounds of their own homes. Further information is set out in the CIL guidance. Councils are ultimately responsible for their own decisions on charging and enforcement, but we expect them to consider each case carefully. The government recognises that there are issues with how some exemptions from the levy are working in practice, and is therefore giving serious consideration to these issues as part of our commitment to making the developer contributions system as clear and effective as possible. On routes to challenge or seek review of a CIL calculation, I refer the Noble Baroness to the answer to Question UIN 58857 on 19 June 2025. |
|
Community Infrastructure Levy: Appeals
Asked by: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure greater transparency and consistency in local authority Community Infrastructure Levy review processes so that homeowners understand their rights to challenge charges. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 (as amended) make a number of provisions for charging authorities to grant exemptions from the levy. This includes those who extend their own homes or erect residential annexes within the grounds of their own homes. Further information is set out in the CIL guidance. Councils are ultimately responsible for their own decisions on charging and enforcement, but we expect them to consider each case carefully. The government recognises that there are issues with how some exemptions from the levy are working in practice, and is therefore giving serious consideration to these issues as part of our commitment to making the developer contributions system as clear and effective as possible. On routes to challenge or seek review of a CIL calculation, I refer the Noble Baroness to the answer to Question UIN 58857 on 19 June 2025. |
|
Community Infrastructure Levy: Appeals
Asked by: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what options are available to individuals who believe they have been wrongly charged Community Infrastructure Levy. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 (as amended) make a number of provisions for charging authorities to grant exemptions from the levy. This includes those who extend their own homes or erect residential annexes within the grounds of their own homes. Further information is set out in the CIL guidance. Councils are ultimately responsible for their own decisions on charging and enforcement, but we expect them to consider each case carefully. The government recognises that there are issues with how some exemptions from the levy are working in practice, and is therefore giving serious consideration to these issues as part of our commitment to making the developer contributions system as clear and effective as possible. On routes to challenge or seek review of a CIL calculation, I refer the Noble Baroness to the answer to Question UIN 58857 on 19 June 2025. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
20 Oct 2025, 5:33 p.m. - House of Lords "support. Now, I'm speaking ahead of the lower Baroness Scott of Bybrook, " Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2025, 5:33 p.m. - House of Lords "the lower Baroness Scott of Bybrook, " Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2025, 6:13 p.m. - House of Lords "and the environment, the noble Baroness Scott of Bybrook in the last group of amendments talked " Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 4:25 p.m. - House of Lords "to take it to a vote, we on these benches will support him. Now, the noble Baroness Scott of Bybrook has " Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 4:25 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Baroness Scott of Bybrook has not yet had the opportunity to move " Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 9:48 p.m. - House of Lords ">> The solution on offer from the noble Baroness Scott of Bybrook in the other. Amendments in this group " Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 9:42 p.m. - House of Lords "Amendment is by leave withdrawn. Become now to amendment 73. Baroness Scott of Bybrook. " AMDT 73 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 10:29 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Amendment 75 Baroness Scott of Bybrook. And amendment 76. " Division - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 10:19 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Amendment 74 Baroness Scott of Bybrook wish to test the opinion of the House. The question is that amendment 74. " Division - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 22nd October 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Peter Hendry AHO0008 - Affordability of Home Ownership Affordability of Home Ownership - Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee Found: Baroness Scott of Bybrook: Shadow Housing, Communities & Local Government Minister spoke about the Central |