United Kingdom Internal Market Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Baroness Scott of Bybrook

Main Page: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative - Life peer)

Department Debates - View all Baroness Scott of Bybrook's debates with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy


Arrangement of Business

United Kingdom Internal Market Bill

Baroness Scott of Bybrook Excerpts

Future Day:
Tue 10th Nov 2020
House of Lords
Committee stage & Committee: 5th sitting (Hansard) & Committee: 5th sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Monday 9th November 2020

(3 years, 12 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Share Debate
Read Full debate United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 View all United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 135-V Fifth Marshalled list for Committee - (4 Nov 2020)
22:41

Division 2

Ayes: 165

Conservative: 147
Democratic Unionist Party: 5
Independent: 5
Crossbench: 4
Labour: 2
Ulster Unionist Party: 1
Liberal Democrat: 1

Noes: 433

Labour: 156
Crossbench: 116
Liberal Democrat: 80
Conservative: 44
Independent: 22
Bishops: 9
Green Party: 2
Plaid Cymru: 1

Baroness Scott of Bybrook Portrait Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con)
- Hansard -
-

My Lords, the result is clear and we have already agreed in the usual channels that Clause 43 is consequential on Clause 42.

Clause 43: Unfettered access to UK internal market for Northern Ireland goods

Amendments 158 to 160 not moved.
--- Later in debate ---
Baroness Scott of Bybrook Portrait Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con)
- Hansard -
-

My Lords, the result is clear, and we have already agreed in the usual channels that Clauses 45, 46 and 47 are consequential on Clause 44.

Amendments 162 and 163 not moved.
Return to start of debate - Return to top of page