Information between 20th March 2026 - 30th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick speeches from: Northern Ireland After Brexit (Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee Report)
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick contributed 2 speeches (1,567 words) Wednesday 25th March 2026 - Grand Committee Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Carbon Emissions: Shipping
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Friday 20th March 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether shipping businesses operating out of Northern Ireland will be able to access the decarbonisation support funds made available under the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition and the Zero Emission Vessels and Infrastructure competition. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) UK SHORE funding is open to organisations in all four nations of the UK, including Northern Ireland which is subject to the Windsor Framework. There has been at least one project involving businesses from Northern Ireland in each round of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competitions, and we anticipate Northern Irish businesses will apply for both the seventh round of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition (CMDC7) and second round of the Zero Emission Vessels and Infrastructure competition (ZEVI2). For full details of the subsidy control and eligibility criteria, prospective applicants will be able to seek further information from Innovate UK who are running roadshow events on the funding across the UK, including in Northern Ireland. |
|
Carbon Emissions: Shipping
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Friday 20th March 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the compatibility of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition and the Zero Emission Vessels and Infrastructure competition with the Windsor Framework’s rules on state aid. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) UK SHORE funding is open to organisations in all four nations of the UK, including Northern Ireland which is subject to the Windsor Framework. There has been at least one project involving businesses from Northern Ireland in each round of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competitions, and we anticipate Northern Irish businesses will apply for both the seventh round of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition (CMDC7) and second round of the Zero Emission Vessels and Infrastructure competition (ZEVI2). For full details of the subsidy control and eligibility criteria, prospective applicants will be able to seek further information from Innovate UK who are running roadshow events on the funding across the UK, including in Northern Ireland. |
|
Pornography: Internet
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to enabling the British Board of Film Classification to perform a formal auditing role for online pornography platforms to ensure online-offline regulatory parity. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government announced the joint pornography team as part of the VAWG strategy in December. In March, it committed to produce a delivery plan setting out how the government can most effectively close the gap between the regulation of online and offline pornographic content. This will test audit and reporting functions and will consider which regulatory frameworks can best address the issue, noting the interactions with the BBFC’s existing remit and that of Ofcom under the Online Safety Act. |
|
Vaccination
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 5 February (HL13800), whether they plan to conduct periodic reviews of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation's cost-effectiveness methodology to ensure that it remains up-to-date and appropriate. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) We have one of the most comprehensive vaccination programmes in the world. Our approach to evaluating vaccination programmes is informed by expert recommendations and advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). Working closely with the UK Health Security Agency‑based JCVI secretariat, the Department ensures that the cost-effectiveness methodology for assessing vaccination programmes continues to enable the committee to advise on programmes that deliver the greatest health benefit to the greatest number of people. The Department maintains oversight of this methodology on an ongoing basis, with particular focus when the range of available evidence and underlying evidence landscape changes over time. Those changes may arise from time to time at irregular intervals, and so it is unlikely to be helpful to review the methodology at fixed and regular intervals. |
|
Vaccination
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 5 February (HL13800), what assessment they have made of whether a health-systems focus on the benefits of vaccines and immunisations may disadvantage prevention within the health technology appraisals process. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The cost-effectiveness methodology used by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) ensures that decisions are objective, consistent, and based on high-quality data on health benefits and costs. This approach is not understood to disadvantage vaccinations and immunisations as a form of prevention when compared with treatments, therapeutic health measures, or other forms of prevention. This is because, similar to the JCVI, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence also applies a health‑sector perspective when appraising preventative and treatment interventions. Beyond vaccines, many other health interventions can generate wider societal or economic benefits, and so applying an appraisal approach across the health system which is consistently focused on health benefits does not uniquely disadvantage vaccinations or immunisations. |
|
Agricultural Products: UK Trade with EU
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they plan to take to maintain collection of plant biosecurity risk data when routine border controls are removed as part of the future UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government is currently negotiating a Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement to make agrifood trade with our biggest market cheaper and easier, cutting costs and removing trade barriers for British producers and retailers. While those negotiations are ongoing, the Government cannot comment further on the SPS agreement, but it will mean the UK will work jointly with the EU on threats to the UK’s biosecurity. |
|
Trees: Imports
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of measures requiring checks of large, mature tree imports as part of the UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement on preventing the introduction of novel pests or pathogens. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government is currently negotiating a Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement to make agrifood trade with our biggest market cheaper and easier, cutting costs and removing trade barriers for British producers and retailers. While those negotiations are ongoing, the government cannot comment further on the SPS agreement, but it will mean the UK will work jointly with the EU on threats to the UK’s biosecurity. |
|
UK Emissions Trading Scheme: Ferries
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026 on Northern Ireland’s ferry operators. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Government assessed the implications of extending the UK Emissions Trading Scheme to domestic maritime through a published impact assessment. Analysis does not assess the impact on individual operators, as costs vary widely by fleet, route and commercial arrangements. However, to support policy development, case study analysis of specific routes was carried out, including Great Britain–Northern Ireland ferries. This showed that, even assuming full cost passthrough, the effect on passenger fares was minimal. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 10:30 a.m. Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026 10:30 a.m. Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 13th April 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Childhood Vaccinations View calendar - Add to calendar |