Baroness Redfern Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Redfern

Information between 8th January 2025 - 7th February 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 170 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 162
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 159
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 70 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 112
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 138
8 Jan 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 228
28 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 116 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 120 Noes - 105
5 Feb 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 127
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 132
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 187 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 130
5 Feb 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 116 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 123 Noes - 117
5 Feb 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Redfern voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 116 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 112


Speeches
Baroness Redfern speeches from: Sterling: Rise in Yields on 30-year Gilts
Baroness Redfern contributed 1 speech (71 words)
Tuesday 14th January 2025 - Lords Chamber
HM Treasury


Written Answers
Employers' Contributions: Women
Asked by: Baroness Redfern (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 21st January 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government how they intend to ensure that the increase in employer National Insurance contributions does not result in job losses among lower paid women with caregiving responsibilities.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Office for Budget Responsibility’s October 2024 Economic and Fiscal Outlook expects that the Employer National Insurance contributions package will lead to a reduction in the participation rate of 0.1 per cent from 2025-26 onwards. Overall, once the impact of all budget measures are taken into consideration, the OBR expect the employment level to increase from 33.1 million in 2024 to 34.3 million in 2029.

Employers have a choice about how they respond to the NICs increase. The Government recognises that employers may respond by increasing employees’ wages more slowly than they would have otherwise, alongside absorbing pressures through prices, efficiencies or lower profits.

The Government is protecting the lowest paid by increasing the National Living Wage. This limits the ability of employers to pass on increases in costs to those on lower pay. The Government has also introduced important protections for workers as part of the Plan to Make Work Pay.

The Government is partnering with business to maximise women’s contribution to the economy. In line with the ambition of the Invest in Women Taskforce to expand access to funding for female entrepreneurs, the British Business Bank is investing £50 million in women-led funds. HMT’s Women in Finance Charter is supporting financial services firms to make the most of their female talent.

NHS: Drugs
Asked by: Baroness Redfern (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 4th February 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to fully review the medicines supply market, particularly with regard to shortages of medicines and their costs.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

There are no plans to fully review the medicines supply market. Medicine supply chains are complex, global, and highly regulated, and there are a number of reasons why supply can be disrupted, many of which are not specific to the United Kingdom and outside of Government control, including manufacturing difficulties, access to raw materials, sudden demand spikes, or distribution and regulatory issues. We have drawn on up-to-date intelligence and data on the root causes of medicine supply issues, with manufacturing problems being the most dominant root cause.

The resilience of UK supply chains is a key priority, and the Department and NHS England are committed to helping to build long term supply chain resilience for medicines. We are continually learning and seeking to improve the way we work, to both manage and help prevent supply issues and avoid shortages. The Department, working closely with NHS England, is taking forward a range of actions to improve our ability to mitigate and manage shortages and strengthen our resilience. As part of that work, we continue to engage with industry, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and other colleagues across the supply chain as we progress work to co-design and deliver solutions.

Musculoskeletal Disorders: Preventive Medicine
Asked by: Baroness Redfern (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 4th February 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to incorporate a role for chiropractors in national musculoskeletal health prevention strategies.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Improving health outcomes for the over 17 million people in England with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions forms a key part of the Government's missions to build a National Health Service fit for the future and kickstart economic growth.

Prevention, early detection, and treatment of these conditions using a multidisciplinary approach can enable people to live in good health and remain independent. As such, the Government recognises the role chiropractic treatment can play in supporting people with MSK-related pain.

Sewage: Waste Disposal
Asked by: Baroness Redfern (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 5th February 2025

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, following the announcement by Ofwat that water bills will increase over the next five years, what proportion of storm overflows resulting in harmful nutrients entering rivers they expect to be reduced over this period; and what financial consequences will be applied to water companies who do not meet overflow targets.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

For Price Review 24, which runs from 2025 – 2030, water companies are investing almost £12 billion to improve 2,800 storm overflows. This expenditure has a price control deliverable (PCD), which sets out Ofwat’s expectations for delivery.

Ofwat also sets specific performance targets for water companies. Ofwat is expanding these performance commitments for Price Review 24 to include an ambitious storm spill reduction target. If achieved, this would see average spills per storm overflow reducing by 45% by 2029 compared to 2021 levels across the industry.

Where required outcomes are not met, companies must reimburse customers, thereby holding water companies to account to deliver the investment.

Beyond storm overflows, £6 billion will be invested to reduce harmful nutrients, including phosphorous, by 28% over 2025-30, through upgrading treatment works and promoting sustainable farming.