Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer

Information between 3rd March 2024 - 2nd April 2024

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 69 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 69 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 169
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 71 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 180
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 172
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 71 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 171
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 66 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 184
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 66 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 160
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 69 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 171
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 71 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 71 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214


Speeches
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer speeches from: Local Government Finances
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer contributed 1 speech (710 words)
Thursday 21st March 2024 - Lords Chamber
Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities


Written Answers
Sewage: Waste Disposal
Asked by: Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 12th March 2024

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to revoke the Sludge (Use in Agriculture) Regulations 1989 that regulate sewage sludge and bring sewage sludge regulation within the Environmental Permitting Regime; and if so, when.

Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Government is working with the Environment Agency to assess the regulatory framework for sludge. We recognise the importance of improving the regulatory framework, however, further work is required before any proposal for change may be progressed.

Sugar Beet: Neonicotinoids
Asked by: Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 21st March 2024

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the Statement of reasons for the decision on the application for emergency authorisation for the use of Cruiser SB on sugar beet crops in 2024, updated on 18 January, what steps they are taking to ensure that sugar beet growers are able to comply with the conditions of emergency use, in particular that (1) "Only a specific list of crops, none of which flower before harvest, are permitted to be planted in the same field as treated sugar beet within 32 months", and (2) "no further use of thiamethoxam seed treatments on the same field within 46 months"; and what assessment they have made of likely compliance from sugar beet growers given restrictions on land supply and restrictions on reuse of a field for sugar beet cultivation that may take place before 46 months has passed since the last same usage.

Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

All pesticide use in the UK is regulated through HSE’s overarching programme of enforcement and compliance. This includes extensive monitoring and intelligence-led enforcement activities to ensure that the supply and use of pesticides complies with legal requirements.

All UK sugar beet is grown under commercial contracting arrangements. Growers are used to meeting a range of requirements and are supported throughout the season by weekly monitoring and advice provided by the British Beet Research Organisation (BBRO). This provides a robust control mechanism for stewardship.

As part of the stewardship programme, all growers are fully advised of the requirements for use of seeds treated with Cruiser SB. The restrictions on the planting of succeeding crops are designed to limit levels of neonicotinoids in the environment and to be capable of incorporation into typical arable crop rotation patterns.

Farmers can decide whether or not they wish to grow sugar beet in a given year and, if so, whether they wish to use Cruiser SB. The restrictions on succeeding crops will be a factor in that decision; those farmers that opt to grow sugar beet with Cruiser SB will have considered how to accommodate the restrictions within their crop rotation plans.

Sugar Beet: Neonicotinoids
Asked by: Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 21st March 2024

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government with regard to the ban on the use of neonicotinoids, what is their rationale for allowing a derogation in 2024 year for sugar beet growers; and for how many years an emergency authorisation can be in place.

Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

A statement of reasons for the emergency authorisation of Cruiser SB in 2024 can be found attached to this answer.

An emergency authorisation cannot run from year to year. This authorisation is for the 2024 sugar beet crop only and is valid for 120 days. Use of Cruiser SB or a similar product in any subsequent years would require the submission of a further application. Any future applications would be carefully assessed against the regulatory framework for emergency authorisations.




Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 19th March 2024
Oral Evidence - British Beer & Pub Association, and UK Hospitality

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee

Found: Paddington; Baroness Eaton; Lord Faulkner of Worcester; Viscount Hanworth; Baroness Janke; Lord Mair; Baroness

Tuesday 12th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Locality, and Power to Change

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee

Found: Bailey of Paddington; Baroness Eaton; Viscount Hanworth; Baroness Janke; Lord Mair; Lord Mawson; Baroness

Tuesday 5th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), Financial Times, and The National Association of British Market Authorities (NABMA)

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee

Found: Baroness Eaton; Lord Faulkner of Worcester; Viscount Hanworth; Baroness Janke; Lord Mair; Lord Mawson; Baroness




Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 12th March 2024 10:30 a.m.
Built Environment Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: High streets in towns and small cities
View calendar
Tuesday 19th March 2024 10:30 a.m.
Built Environment Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: High streets in towns and small cities
View calendar
Tuesday 26th March 2024 10:30 a.m.
Built Environment Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: High streets in towns and small cities
View calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 5th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), Financial Times, and The National Association of British Market Authorities (NABMA)

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 12th March 2024
Correspondence - Letter from Rt Hon. Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to Lord Moylan, 8 March 2024

Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 12th March 2024
Written Evidence - Mr Andrew Grinter
HSC0001 - High streets in towns and small cities

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 12th March 2024
Written Evidence - -
HSC0003 - High streets in towns and small cities

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 12th March 2024
Written Evidence - British Chambers of Commerce
HSC0002 - High streets in towns and small cities

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 12th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Locality, and Power to Change

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 19th March 2024
Written Evidence - The National Association of British Market Authorities (NABMA)
HSC0005 - High streets in towns and small cities

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 19th March 2024
Written Evidence - WAKEFIELD CIVIC SOCIETY
HSC0004 - High streets in towns and small cities

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 19th March 2024
Written Evidence - The Bartlett School of Planning, UCL
HSC0006 - High streets in towns and small cities

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 19th March 2024
Oral Evidence - British Beer & Pub Association, and UK Hospitality

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 26th March 2024
Correspondence - Letter from Lee Rowley MP, Minister of State for Housing, Planning and Building Safety, to Lord Moylan, 20 March 2024

Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 26th March 2024
Correspondence - Letter from Lord Moylan to Lee Rowley MP, Minister of State for Housing, Planning and Building Safety, 26 March 2024

Built Environment Committee
Wednesday 3rd April 2024
Declarations of interest - Declarations of interest

Built Environment Committee
Tuesday 26th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Local Government Association (LGA), and District Councils' Network (DCN)

High streets in towns and small cities - Built Environment Committee