Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon

Information between 8th July 2025 - 18th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 158
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 148
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 148
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 191
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 119 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 121
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 136
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150



Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Friday 18th July 2025
Formal Minutes - Women and Equalities Committee

Women and Equalities Committee

Found: Juliet Campbell; Lord Dholakia; Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws; Afzal Khan; Tom Gordon; Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon

Monday 14th July 2025
Report - 5th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Crime and Policing Bill

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Dholakia (Liberal Democrat; Life peer) Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws (Labour; Life peer) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon

Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report - Legislative scrutiny: Mental Health Bill: Government Response

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Dholakia (Liberal Democrat; Life peer) Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws (Labour; Life peer) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon

Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - Second Special Report: Accountability For Daesh Crimes: Government Response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2024 - 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Dholakia (Liberal Democrat; Life peer) Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws (Labour; Life peer) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon

Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Oral Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, and AWO (a data rights agency)

Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Found: Juliet Campbell; Lord Dholakia; Tom Gordon; Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws; Afzal Khan; Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon




Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon - Select Committee Information

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to the Security Minister regarding Deprivation of Citizenship Orders dated 10 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report - Legislative scrutiny: Mental Health Bill: Government Response

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 11th July 2025
Special Report - Second Special Report: Accountability For Daesh Crimes: Government Response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2024 - 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Minister for Energy regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 2 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the NCA regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 26 June 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Rights Lab, University of Nottingham
FLS0063 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Usdaw
CPB0012 - Crime and Policing Bill

Crime and Policing Bill - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Peter Frankental
FLS0070 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - PRI
FLS0074 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - TechUK
FLS0073 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - BSI
FLS0071 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Walk Free
FLS0064 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - RenewableUK
FLS0067 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Aston University, University of Westminster, and The University of St Andrews
FLS0021 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - WALK FREE
FLS0075 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 10th July 2025
Written Evidence - Westminster Council
FLS0068 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 14th July 2025
Report - 5th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Crime and Policing Bill

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Oral Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, and AWO (a data rights agency)

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Oral Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, and AWO (a data rights agency)

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Trades Union Congress (TUC)
FLS0069 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Rights Lab at the University of Nottingham
FLS0078 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - The University of Greenwich
FLS0076 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Leigh Day
FLS0077 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Beyond Human Rights Compliance
FLS0020 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Leigh Day
FLS0052 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0051 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Sikhs for Justice
TRUK0058 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Daebas Alem
TRUK0052 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0028 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0046 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0047 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0027 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0053 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0056 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0055 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0054 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Halkevi Turkish and Kurdish Community Centre
TRUK0140 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0133 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Blue revolution
TRUK0121 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0124 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0137 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0160 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Volant Media UK / Iran International TV
TRUK0128 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - FairSquare
TRUK0127 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - SANAD Human Rights Organisation
TRUK0098 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Falun Dafa Association UK
TRUK0122 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Rizwangul NurMuhammad
TRUK0102 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0108 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD)
TRUK0168 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - The UK-EU committee of Assembly of Citizens’ Representatives, Hong Kong (ACRHK)
TRUK0126 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0082 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0086 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0097 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0060 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0062 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0065 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0059 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0066 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0081 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Eritrea Focus
TRUK0077 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Sikhs for Justice
TRUK0058 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - Sikh Federation (UK)
TRUK0080 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Written Evidence - The Freedom And Justice Partnership, and The Freedom And Justice Partnership
FLS0066 - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th July 2025
Written Evidence - Cambridge University
TRUK0166 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0054 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0039 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence with the Minister for Women and Equalities on the appointment of the Chair of the Equalities and Human rights Commission, July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Security Minister regarding Transnational repression dated 04 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Secretary of State for Business & Trade relating to the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 30 June 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 18th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Foreign Secretary relating to aid and human rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Yonas Teklehaimanot
TRUK0025 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Written Evidence - British Sikh Activists, and British Sikh Activists
TRUK0021 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation
TRUK0035 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0115 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 21st July 2025
Written Evidence - TRUK0114 - Transnational repression in the UK

Transnational repression in the UK - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 24th July 2025
Report - 6th Report - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 25th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from the Minister for Industry regarding the Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Inquiry dated 22 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 25th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Committee from Lord Ponsonby dated 21 July 2025

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 29th July 2025
Gender balance statistics - Gender balance of House of Lords Select Committee membership - July 25

Committee of Selection (Lords)
Wednesday 30th July 2025
Report - 7th Report - Transnational repression in the UK

Human Rights (Joint Committee)


Select Committee Inquiry
10 Jul 2025
Human Rights of Children in the Social Care System in England
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Out of nearly 12 million children living in England, over 400,000 are in the social care system at any one time.[1] Out of these, nearly 84,000 children in England are” in care” (i.e. being looked after by local authorities).[2] Across the UK, it is estimated that 107,000 children are in care.[3]  

In 2023, the then Government proposed a plan to reform children’s social care, in its “Stable Homes, Built on Love” strategy. It proposed a series of “missions” to improve the quality of the support provided to children and their families, such as providing better training to social workers, and listening more to children and young people. In 2024, the current Government announced the “biggest overhaul in a generation to children’s social care”, with the stated aim to provide a “wide range of new reform measures… to deliver better outcomes and a more secure life for children across the country”.[4]

Against this background, this inquiry will consider the extent to which the human rights of children in England are protected in the social care system. This inquiry will have a particular focus on children in care (“looked after children”), but wider aspects of the children’s social care system will be relevant, for example in regard to the availability of additional support to families with disabled children or to the efficacy of early intervention measures.

 

[1] This figure includes children in care as well as children assessed as needing help and protection as a result of risks to their development or health. Ofsted, Main findings: children’s social care in England 2024.

[2] Ofsted, Main findings: children’s social care in England 2024. A child is in care, or is a “looked after child” if they are in local authority care by reason of a care order or are being provided with accommodation under section 20 of the 1989 Act for more than 24 hours with the agreement of the parents, or of the child if the child is aged 16 or over (section 22(1) and (2) of the 1989 Act).

[3] Become, Why the care system has to change

[4] Biggest overhaul in a generation to children’s social care - GOV.UK

23 Jul 2025
Proposal for a draft Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2025
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Background

Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that in proceedings under that Act in respect of a judicial act done in good faith, damages may not be awarded except in two circumstances. The first is to compensate a person to the extent required by Article 5(5) of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’) (deprivation of liberty). The second is to compensate a person for a judicial act that is incompatible with Article 6 ECHR (right to fair trial) in circumstances where the person is detained and, but for the incompatibility, the person would not have been detained or would not have been detained for so long.

In the case of Re W (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140, the Court of Appeal found that accusations of professional misconduct against a witness made by a Family Court judge breached her rights under Article 8 of the ECHR (right to respect for private life).

In its judgment of 22 June 2021 in SW v United Kingdom (Application no. 87/18), the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the ECHR (right to an effective remedy), because the effect of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was that the witness could not bring a claim for damages in respect of a judicial act that was incompatible with Article 8.

Government proposals

On 17 July 2025, the Government laid before both Houses of Parliament its proposal for a Remedial Order to amend the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposed order is intended to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in SW v United Kingdom, by remedying the incompatibility of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 with Article 13 of the ECHR.

The Government proposes to address this incompatibility by amending section 9(3) to allow damages to be awarded to compensate a person for a judicial act on an additional basis: that the judicial act is incompatible with Article 8 on the ground that it was done in such a procedurally defective way as to amount to a breach of the requirements of procedural fairness under that Article.

Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was previously amended by the Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2020 to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Hammerton v United Kingdom (Application no. 6287/10). See the Fifteenth Report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights of Session 2017-19, and its Second Report of Session 2019-21.

 

 

Remedial Orders

Section 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives Ministers of the Crown the power to make remedial orders.

The section applies if it appears to the Minister that, having regard to a finding of the European Court of Human Rights in proceedings against the United Kingdom, a provision of legislation is incompatible with an obligation of the United Kingdom arising from the Convention.

In those circumstances, the Minister may by order make such amendments to the legislation as the Minister considers necessary to remove the incompatibility, if the Minister considers that there are compelling reasons for doing so.

Reporting on the proposal

The Joint Committee on Human Rights is required to report to Parliament on any proposal for a remedial order to be made under the Human Rights Act 1998. 

The Committee has 60 sitting days to report to each House its recommendation whether a draft order in the same terms as the proposal should be laid before the House.

25 Jun 2025
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI
Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 5 Sep 2025)


Background

In recent years there has been growth in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. These can be used for a wide variety of applications.

There is no universally agreed definition of AI or AI technologies. The then Government’s 2023 policy paper on “A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation” defined Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI systems or AI technologies as “products and services that are ‘adaptable’ and ‘autonomous’.” Adaptability refers to AI systems, after being trained, developing the ability to perform new ways of finding patterns and connections in data that are not directly envisioned by their human programmers. Autonomy refers to AI systems making decisions without the intent or ongoing control of a human.

Many argue that AI technologies can offer great benefits to individuals and society – for example, assisting in decision-making and improving productivity. Others are concerned about risks such as:

  • Perpetuation of societal biases and discrimination (for example, through the use of biased training data for AI models)
  • Potential conflict with an individual’s right to privacy and freedom of expression (for example, where AI might be used in surveillance)
  • Challenges for individuals in exercising their right to an effective remedy where their rights have been violated (for example, where it might be difficult to know how a model produced a particular output, and who is liable for that output).

On 5 September 2024, the UK signed the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. It is the first legally binding treaty in this area and "aims to ensure that activities within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems are fully consistent with human rights, democracy and the rule of law, while being conducive to technological progress and innovation."

The UK also adheres to the OECD’s AI Principles, which were the “first intergovernmental standard on AI”. The five principles are:

  1. Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being;
  2. Human rights and democratic values, including fairness and privacy;
  3. Transparency and explainability;
  4. Robustness, security and safety; and
  5. Accountability.

The UK Government has signalled its intention to “bring forward legislation which allows us to safely realise the enormous benefits and opportunities of the most powerful AI systems for years to come.” (PQ 41098 on Artificial Intelligence: Regulation, 31 March 2025)

Against this backdrop, the Joint Committee on Human Rights will explore what regulation might be required in order to safeguard human rights when AI technologies are being developed and used, and any implications this might have for future legislation.  

The inquiry will not be considering topics such as social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms,[3] or how malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy.[4] While these are important topics, they are outside the scope of this inquiry.

 

[1] POSTbrief 57, Artificial intelligence: An explainer, 14 December 2023    

[2] UK Parliament, Artificial Intelligence (AI) glossary, January 2024

[3] The subject of a report by the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee: Social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms

[4] The subject of a current inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee: Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy