Information between 29th April 2024 - 6th September 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 208 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 209 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 166 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 175 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 217 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 222 |
14 May 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 222 |
14 May 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 195 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 213 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 179 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 192 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 194 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 208 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 188 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 198 |
23 May 2024 - Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 108 Conservative No votes vs 13 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 111 |
Speeches |
---|
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington speeches from: Relationships, Sex and Health Education: Statutory Guidance
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington contributed 1 speech (78 words) Thursday 16th May 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Education |
Written Answers |
---|
Alcoholic Drinks: Crime
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 13th May 2024 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the success of sobriety tagging schemes, particularly for those convicted of serious assaults or domestic violence where alcohol was a factor. Answered by Lord Bellamy In advance of legislating for the introduction of the Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement (AAMR) for community based sentences to tackle alcohol related offending, the Government contributed to funding for two pilots to ensure robust evaluation of the effectiveness of the measure. The pilots were carried out in London and in the North East of England and findings informed the introduction of AAMR in 2020. AAMR enables courts to impose an alcohol ban of up to 120 days on adult offenders who are not alcohol dependent, compliance is monitored using an alcohol tag. Alcohol monitoring on licence was introduced in 2021 and enables probation to include an additional licence condition banning or restricting the consumption of alcohol, where a criminogenic need related to alcohol misuse is identified as an increase to risk. Funding has been allocated for evaluation of the processes, impact and value for money. A process and interim impact evaluation are expected to be published by the end of 2025. A full reoffending analysis and value-for-money assessment are expected by the end of 2026. Evaluations published to date can be accessed via the links below: MOPAC’s AAMR Final Impact Evaluation Report, December 2020 - aamr_final_impact_report_100521.pdf (london.gov.uk). Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement: A review of process and performance from Year 2, July 2018 - aamr_final_process_performance_y2_report_final.pdf (london.gov.uk). Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement The pan London roll out: A review of process and performance from year 1, July 2017 - AAMR Interim Report (london.gov.uk). Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement: South London Pilot Indicative Impact Report, April 2017 - Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement (london.gov.uk). HNLY Pilot Process Evaluation Report, October 2019 - Evaluation-of-the-AAMR-tagging-pilot.pdf (northyorkshire-pfcc.gov.uk).
The AAMR pilot in the North-East focused on domestic abuse perpetrators, the process evaluation shows that 31% of wearers were convicted of a domestic violence offence. Compliance with the alcohol ban shows that the devices did not register a tamper or alcohol alert on 97.4% of the days worn. The impact evaluation (including for reoffending) is underway for this pilot and is also intended to be published. The evaluations to date and published statistics have shown a strong uptake of alcohol monitoring by courts and probation. The number of individuals fitted with an alcohol monitoring (AM) device as at 31 March 2024 was 2,862, a 27% increase over the previous 12 months. There were 12,506 new alcohol monitoring orders imposed across England and Wales in the year ending 31 March 2024. Overall, 24,305 new alcohol monitoring orders have been imposed since their introduction against an ambition of 12,000 by 2025 and compliance with the alcohol ban has remained consistent at over 97% for the total of days monitored. Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, March 2024 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk). |
Alcoholic Drinks: Crime
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 13th May 2024 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of sobriety tagging schemes. Answered by Lord Bellamy In advance of legislating for the introduction of the Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement (AAMR) for community based sentences to tackle alcohol related offending, the Government contributed to funding for two pilots to ensure robust evaluation of the effectiveness of the measure. The pilots were carried out in London and in the North East of England and findings informed the introduction of AAMR in 2020. AAMR enables courts to impose an alcohol ban of up to 120 days on adult offenders who are not alcohol dependent, compliance is monitored using an alcohol tag. Alcohol monitoring on licence was introduced in 2021 and enables probation to include an additional licence condition banning or restricting the consumption of alcohol, where a criminogenic need related to alcohol misuse is identified as an increase to risk. Funding has been allocated for evaluation of the processes, impact and value for money. A process and interim impact evaluation are expected to be published by the end of 2025. A full reoffending analysis and value-for-money assessment are expected by the end of 2026. Evaluations published to date can be accessed via the links below: MOPAC’s AAMR Final Impact Evaluation Report, December 2020 - aamr_final_impact_report_100521.pdf (london.gov.uk). Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement: A review of process and performance from Year 2, July 2018 - aamr_final_process_performance_y2_report_final.pdf (london.gov.uk). Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement The pan London roll out: A review of process and performance from year 1, July 2017 - AAMR Interim Report (london.gov.uk). Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement: South London Pilot Indicative Impact Report, April 2017 - Alcohol Abstinence Monitoring Requirement (london.gov.uk). HNLY Pilot Process Evaluation Report, October 2019 - Evaluation-of-the-AAMR-tagging-pilot.pdf (northyorkshire-pfcc.gov.uk).
The AAMR pilot in the North-East focused on domestic abuse perpetrators, the process evaluation shows that 31% of wearers were convicted of a domestic violence offence. Compliance with the alcohol ban shows that the devices did not register a tamper or alcohol alert on 97.4% of the days worn. The impact evaluation (including for reoffending) is underway for this pilot and is also intended to be published. The evaluations to date and published statistics have shown a strong uptake of alcohol monitoring by courts and probation. The number of individuals fitted with an alcohol monitoring (AM) device as at 31 March 2024 was 2,862, a 27% increase over the previous 12 months. There were 12,506 new alcohol monitoring orders imposed across England and Wales in the year ending 31 March 2024. Overall, 24,305 new alcohol monitoring orders have been imposed since their introduction against an ambition of 12,000 by 2025 and compliance with the alcohol ban has remained consistent at over 97% for the total of days monitored. Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, March 2024 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk). |
Transgender People
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 7th August 2024 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to make it a criminal offence to misgender an individual. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) This Government has no such plans. |
Civil Servants: Clothing
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 7th August 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what is their policy on civil servants wearing fetish clothing in the workplace. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Within the Civil Service, workplace dress code is delegated to individual departments to decide as part of their terms and conditions of service. Civil Servants are required to dress appropriately for work and this would not include fetish clothing. |
Civil Servants: Equality
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 12th August 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the then Minister without Portfolio in the Cabinet Office on 14 May (HCWS464), whether they will place in the Library of the House a list of every diversity network recognised (1) across government, and (2) within individual departments, broken down by department. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) There are no current plans to place a list of every diversity network recognised (1) across government, and (2) within individual departments, broken down by department in the Library of the House.
|
Civil Servants: Sexuality
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 12th August 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the motion proposed at the PCS Union’s annual conference 2023 requesting the establishment of a staff support network for Bondage, Domination, Sadism, and Masochism; and what representations, if any, they have received from PCS Union in this regard. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The PCS union has not made any representations to the Cabinet Office with regard to this matter and therefore we have not made any assessment of the motion.
|
Sexuality
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 12th August 2024 Question To ask His Majesty's Government whether they consider Bondage, Domination, Sadism, and Masochism to be a protected characteristic within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Equality Act (2010) contains nine protected characteristics, which include age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. Section 12 defines sexual orientation as being an orientation toward people of the same, oppositie, or either sex. The Equality Act protects orientation – sexual acts such as those described are not included within that definition.
|
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Thursday 9th May 2024
Oral Evidence - Food Standards Agency Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Q217 Baroness Jenkin of Kennington: As you mentioned, the science of all this is evolving. |
Thursday 9th May 2024
Oral Evidence - Preet Kaur Gill Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Brooke of Alverthorpe; Baroness Browning; The Earl of Caithness; Lord Colgrain; Baroness Goudie; Baroness |
Tuesday 7th May 2024
Oral Evidence - Department of Health and Social Care, Department of Health and Social Care, and Department of Health and Social Care Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe; Baroness Browning; Earl of Caithness; Lord Colgrain; Baroness Goudie; Baroness |
Thursday 2nd May 2024
Oral Evidence - Bite Back, Bite Back, and Bite Back Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Q218 Baroness Jenkin of Kennington: Do you approach Bite Back? How do you find it? |
Thursday 2nd May 2024
Oral Evidence - Food Foundation, Food Foundation, Food Foundation, and Food Foundation Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Q200 Baroness Jenkin of Kennington: Kathleen, your children are grown up 4 now. |
Monday 29th April 2024
Oral Evidence - Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Q217 Baroness Jenkin of Kennington: As you mentioned, the science of all this is evolving. |
Monday 29th April 2024
Oral Evidence - Nomad Foods, Danone UK & Ireland, and Itsu Food, Diet and Obesity - Food, Diet and Obesity Committee Found: Brooke of Alverthorpe; Baroness Browning; The Earl of Caithness; Lord Colgrain; Baroness Goudie; Baroness |
Calendar |
---|
Thursday 9th May 2024 9:45 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Food, Diet and Obesity View calendar |
Tuesday 7th May 2024 2:30 p.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Food, Diet and Obesity View calendar |
Tuesday 4th June 2024 11 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Thursday 12th September 2024 9:45 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Thursday 5th September 2024 9:45 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Thursday 5th September 2024 9:45 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Food, Diet and Obesity View calendar |
Thursday 10th October 2024 9:45 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Food, Diet and Obesity View calendar |
Thursday 12th September 2024 9 a.m. Food, Diet and Obesity Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Food, Diet and Obesity View calendar |