Baroness Jenkin of Kennington Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Jenkin of Kennington

Information between 6th July 2026 - 14th September 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 38 Noes - 133
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 220
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 138
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 239
8 Jul 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 202
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 171
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 119 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 188
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165


Speeches
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington speeches from: Creative Education Access Bill [HL]
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington contributed 1 speech (713 words)
2nd reading
Friday 11th September 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington speeches from: Contemporary Cultural Boycotts
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington contributed 1 speech (593 words)
Thursday 9th July 2026 - Grand Committee
Cabinet Office
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington speeches from: International Development Outcomes for Women and Girls
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington contributed 1 speech (436 words)
Thursday 9th July 2026 - Grand Committee


Written Answers
Medical Records
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 13th July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government when NHS England plan to update the version of the Core Information Standard on its website to reflect changes made by the Professional Record Standards Body which make the recording of sex mandatory in electronic patient records.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Professional Record Standards Body’s (PRSB) updates to the sex and gender data item representation for clinical use in the Core Information Standard have not yet been updated in the NHS England Standards Directory repository. Although these changes leave the PRSB specification and the NHS England Standards Directory out of step, it is proposed that the work to update the Standards Directory will commence this week.

Gender Dysphoria
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 13th July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on 26 February (HCWS1369), when they expect the data linkage study research approvals to be granted.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

In common with other publicly funded research, the Data Linkage Study is subject to the formal approval of the Health Research Authority (HRA) before the study can begin. For the Data Linkage Study, this requires the consideration of an ethics committee and the Confidentiality Advisory Group.

As the study application remains in active progress with the HRA, and it remains important for the approvals process to be undertaken independently, it is unfortunately not possible to provide an expected date for the HRA approval process to be concluded.

The Department continues to support NHS England in progressing the study.

Gender Dysphoria
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 21st July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on 26 February (HCWS1369), what steps (1) the Department for Health and Social Care, and (2) NHS England, are taking to ensure that all relevant clinics share data to facilitate the data linkage study.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England has undertaken further due diligence on the data sources that will underpin the study, and taken time to re-engage with data-sharing organisations, on which the study will be dependent, including refining the study design and data sharing requirement following discussion with adult gender clinics.

We now expect all commissioned adult gender services to collaborate with the study to enable its successful completion.

The Department continues to support NHS England in progressing the study.

No disciplinary action has been taken.

Gender Dysphoria
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 21st July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on 26 February (HCWS1369), whether disciplinary action has been taken within the NHS in relation to those clinics which refused to share data.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England has undertaken further due diligence on the data sources that will underpin the study, and taken time to re-engage with data-sharing organisations, on which the study will be dependent, including refining the study design and data sharing requirement following discussion with adult gender clinics.

We now expect all commissioned adult gender services to collaborate with the study to enable its successful completion.

The Department continues to support NHS England in progressing the study.

No disciplinary action has been taken.

Candidates: Equality
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 14th September 2026

Question

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, to amend section 104 of the Equality Act 2010 to allow political parties to exclude men from standing in their leadership elections.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

Under section 104 of the Equality Act 2010, registered political parties in the UK are permitted to use positive action, including reserved places on shortlists, where proportionate to address the under representation of candidates with certain protected characteristics.

Section 104(7) currently provides a specific exception allowing for this to include single-sex shortlists commonly all-women shortlists) if it is proportionate to reduce unequal representation.

Political parties can reserve all the places on their shortlist for one sex if this will reduce unequal representation. If a political party had an under-representation of women, there could be a ‘women-only’ shortlist.

Positive action is voluntary and political parties cannot be forced to do it.




Baroness Jenkin of Kennington mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) re, follow up from oral evidence session on 9 June, 2 July 2026

Women and Equalities Committee

Found: Williams – on behalf of Lord Young of Norwood Green • Caroline Ffiske – on behalf of Baroness Jenkin of Kennington