Baroness Jenkin of Kennington Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Jenkin of Kennington

Information between 6th September 2026 - 26th October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Thursday 29th October 2026
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)

Debate - Main Chamber
Subject: Implementation and impact of Personal Independence Payment
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109
14 Oct 2026 - ACAS Code of Practice on Time Off for Trade Union Duties and Activities - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 52 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 56 Noes - 82
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 57 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 168
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 168
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 153 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 173


Speeches
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington speeches from: Creative Education Access Bill [HL]
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington contributed 1 speech (713 words)
2nd reading
Friday 11th September 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport


Written Answers
Candidates: Equality
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 14th September 2026

Question

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, to amend section 104 of the Equality Act 2010 to allow political parties to exclude men from standing in their leadership elections.

Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

Under section 104 of the Equality Act 2010, registered political parties in the UK are permitted to use positive action, including reserved places on shortlists, where proportionate to address the under representation of candidates with certain protected characteristics.

Section 104(7) currently provides a specific exception allowing for this to include single-sex shortlists commonly all-women shortlists) if it is proportionate to reduce unequal representation.

Political parties can reserve all the places on their shortlist for one sex if this will reduce unequal representation. If a political party had an under-representation of women, there could be a ‘women-only’ shortlist.

Positive action is voluntary and political parties cannot be forced to do it.

Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to extend to school uniform requirements of a religious character the right of withdrawal which applies to collective worship under section 71 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

School leaders, including those of faith schools, are responsible for making decisions on the uniform requirements for their school. Where schools have faith-based policies, the department expects that those policies are clearly communicated, applied fairly and compliant with the Equality Act.

The department has published the non-statutory guidance ‘Developing school uniform policy’, which sets out schools’ obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Equality Act 2010, as well as general equality and discrimination considerations.

Our guidance is clear that schools should aim for their uniform policy to be as inclusive as possible so that all pupils are able to wear the uniform. They should engage with parents and pupils when developing the policy. The department does not routinely gather data on individual schools’ uniform policies and does not hold information on schools requiring articles of religious clothing.

There are no current plans to update the guidance on school uniform in this respect, or to extend this to uniform of a religious character the right of withdrawal which applies to collective worship under section 71 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998.

Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many state-funded schools in England have uniform policies which require pupils to wear items of religious dress.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

School leaders, including those of faith schools, are responsible for making decisions on the uniform requirements for their school. Where schools have faith-based policies, the department expects that those policies are clearly communicated, applied fairly and compliant with the Equality Act.

The department has published the non-statutory guidance ‘Developing school uniform policy’, which sets out schools’ obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Equality Act 2010, as well as general equality and discrimination considerations.

Our guidance is clear that schools should aim for their uniform policy to be as inclusive as possible so that all pupils are able to wear the uniform. They should engage with parents and pupils when developing the policy. The department does not routinely gather data on individual schools’ uniform policies and does not hold information on schools requiring articles of religious clothing.

There are no current plans to update the guidance on school uniform in this respect, or to extend this to uniform of a religious character the right of withdrawal which applies to collective worship under section 71 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998.

Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to revise the Department for Education’s guidance on school uniform to state that a state-funded school may not make the wearing of religious dress compulsory for any pupil.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

School leaders, including those of faith schools, are responsible for making decisions on the uniform requirements for their school. Where schools have faith-based policies, the department expects that those policies are clearly communicated, applied fairly and compliant with the Equality Act.

The department has published the non-statutory guidance ‘Developing school uniform policy’, which sets out schools’ obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Equality Act 2010, as well as general equality and discrimination considerations.

Our guidance is clear that schools should aim for their uniform policy to be as inclusive as possible so that all pupils are able to wear the uniform. They should engage with parents and pupils when developing the policy. The department does not routinely gather data on individual schools’ uniform policies and does not hold information on schools requiring articles of religious clothing.

There are no current plans to update the guidance on school uniform in this respect, or to extend this to uniform of a religious character the right of withdrawal which applies to collective worship under section 71 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998.




Baroness Jenkin of Kennington mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Introduction: Lord Sanders of Hallingdal
1 speech (1 words)
Thursday 15th October 2026 - Lords Chamber

Mentions:
1: None East Knoyle in the County of Wiltshire, was introduced and took the oath, supported by, Baroness Jenkin of Kennington - Link to Speech