Information between 19th January 2026 - 8th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 153 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 156 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 53 Noes - 116 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 159 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 147 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 183 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 191 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 144 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 140 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 166 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 180 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 62 Noes - 295 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 2 speeches (508 words) Committee stage Friday 6th February 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: China: Jimmy Lai
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 3 speeches (187 words) Monday 2nd February 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 1 speech (17 words) Committee stage Friday 30th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 1 speech (210 words) Committee stage Thursday 29th January 2026 - Grand Committee Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 2 speeches (104 words) Committee stage Friday 23rd January 2026 - Lords Chamber |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Companies House: Proof of Identity
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of company directors successfully completed their identity verification with Companies House by the deadline of 18 November 2025; and whether feedback is being sought on the difficulties of completing the web-based verification process. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Directors were not required to verify their identities by 18 November 2025. This date marked the start of a 12-month transition period during which existing directors must verify their identities by providing their personal code with the relevant companies' confirmation statement. This could only be done after the start of the transition period. The deadline for filing the confirmation statement determines the deadline for verification for existing directors. No significant decrease in the timeliness of confirmation statement filings has been observed. Companies House continuously seeks feedback from its customers and is providing focussed support to those required to verify. |
|
Schools: Allergies
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the adequacy of school allergy-management policies. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Section 100 of the Children and Families Act 2014 places a duty on maintained schools, academies and pupil referral units in England to make arrangements for supporting pupils with medical conditions. The accompanying statutory guidance makes clear to schools what is expected of them in taking reasonable steps to fulfil their legal obligations and to meet the individual needs of pupils with medical conditions, including allergies.
We intend to consult later this year on revised statutory guidance on ‘Supporting pupils at school with medical conditions’. This will seek views from schools, parents, health professionals, and other stakeholders on proposals to strengthen how schools meet their duties, including improvements to allergy safety and broader medical condition management. Our aim is to ensure that every child can access education safely and confidently, regardless of their health needs or allergy. |
|
Property Management Companies: Qualifications
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 5th February 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to introduce legislation to require all property managing agents to be suitably qualified. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The government is committed to ensuring that those living in the rented and leasehold sectors are protected from abuse and poor service at the hands of unscrupulous property agents.
Property agents must already belong to a government-approved redress scheme. This legislative requirement is currently enforced by local authorities and National Trading Standards’ Lettings and Estate Agency Team, who have the power to issue warnings and banning orders to rogue estate and letting agents.
The redress schemes publish data on the number of complaints they receive, the amount awarded to consumers, and maintain a public list of agents that have been expelled from their respective schemes.
Managing agents play a key role in the maintenance of multi-occupancy buildings and freehold estates. Their importance will only increase as we transition toward a commonhold future, and so we are looking again at Lord Best’s 2019 report on regulating the property agent sector, particularly in light of the recommendations in the final Grenfell Inquiry report.
Many leaseholders face persistent delays and high costs when trying to sell their properties. Currently, freeholders and managing agents are responsible for providing essential sales information, but they often have little incentive to do so efficiently. Homeowners living on private or mixed tenure estates, who contribute to the maintenance and upkeep of communal areas, can face similar challenges when trying to obtain relevant information from their estate manager. The government will take forward measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LFRA) which will speed up the provision of information for leaseholders and homeowners on private or mixed tenure estates who wish to sell their property, and protect sellers from unreasonable fees when requesting this information.
The previous government committed to regulate the property agent sector in 2018 and asked a working group Chaired by Lord Best to advise them how to do it, yet it failed to respond to their findings from 2019. Managing agents play a key role in the maintenance of multi-occupancy buildings and freehold estates, and their importance will only increase as we transition toward a commonhold future, and so we are looking again at Lord Best’s 2019 report on regulating the property agent sector, particularly in light of the recommendations in the final Grenfell Inquiry report.
On 4 July 2025, we launched a wide-ranging consultation on proposals to hold landlords and managing agents to account for the services they provide and the charges and fees they levy. This included the introduction of mandatory qualifications for managing agents and estate managers on freehold estates. This consultation closed on 26 September 2025, and we are analysing responses.
On 6 October 2025, the government announced the biggest shake-up to home buying in this country’s history, including proposing a future consultation on mandatory qualifications for estate and letting agents. We also propose introducing a code of practice setting out the minimum standards expected of all residential property agents including estate, letting and managing agents.
We will set out our full position on regulation of estate, letting and managing agents in due course.
|
|
Vehicle Number Plates: Fraud
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Friday 6th February 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of non-compliant number plates on the ability to trace and prosecute hit-and-run drivers. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) Under the new Road Safety Strategy, the Government has announced firm action to tackle non-compliant or ‘ghost’ numberplates. This includes consulting on tougher penalties, including penalty points and vehicle seizure, more robust checks on number plate suppliers, and higher industry standards for numberplates. We also intend to commission targeted research to explore the potential use of AI to identify illegal plates.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
6 Feb 2026, 5:28 p.m. - House of Lords " Could I again thank the Baroness >> Could I again thank the Baroness Smith of Newnham and the Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town for sharing? Quite significant, probably painful experiences? Could I also thank the " Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Built Environment Committee
3 speeches (85 words) Tuesday 27th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: None members of the Select Committee, in place of Baroness Anelay of St Johns, Lord Frost, Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town - Link to Speech 2: None Selection, Lord Barber of Ainsdale, Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill, Lord Fuller and Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 21st January 2026
Oral Evidence - Home Office European Affairs Committee Found: present: Lord Ricketts (The Chair); Lady Anelay of St Johns; Baroness Ashton of Upholland; Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town |
|
Wednesday 14th January 2026
Scrutiny evidence - Exhibits from the Promoter Royal Albert Hall Bill [HL] Committee Found: Members Baroness Fairhead Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town Lord German Lord Naseby Baroness Hale of Richmond |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026
Oral Evidence - Broadfield Law UK LLP, Royal Albert Hall, and Royal Albert Hall Royal Albert Hall Bill [HL] Committee Found: Members Baroness Fairhead Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town Lord German Lord Naseby Baroness Hale of Richmond |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 10 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:00am: Oral evidence Sarah Cardell - CEO at Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) Lawrence Tallon - CEO at Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Dame Melanie Dawes - Chief Executive at Ofcom View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:30am: Oral evidence Rebecca Shrubsole - Director for Ministerial, Growth & Resilience at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs John Fingleton CBE - Chair at Fingleton Dan Corry OBE - Non-Executive Director at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:30am: Oral evidence Lord Willetts - Chair at Regulatory Innovation Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:30am: Oral evidence Blair McDougall MP - Minister at Department for Business and Trade David Lunn - Regulation Directorate at Department for Business and Trade View calendar - Add to calendar |