Information between 24th March 2025 - 13th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 156 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 162 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 151 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 143 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 157 |
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172 |
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 173 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142 |
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 129 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 148 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216 |
Speeches |
---|
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 6 speeches (1,353 words) Committee stage part two Tuesday 1st April 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: Spring Statement
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 2 speeches (99 words) Thursday 27th March 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
Written Answers |
---|
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office: Dismissal
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 9th April 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what action they are taking to determine the number and identity of people who were dismissed from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office as a result of the ban on homosexuality for serving officers in the Diplomatic Service; and whether they will apologise to those who were dismissed on these grounds. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) officials have continued looking into this and I am eager to bring this to a resolution further to the apology for the ban from Sir Philip Barton (then Permanent Under-Secretary) in 2021. We continue to learn the lessons of the MOD's Etherton Review but it has become apparent how different the circumstances of the ban were, therefore requiring a different response. The FCDO are currently looking at the best way to address this, engaging with Cabinet Office and other relevant Government departments to find the best solution. Specifically, the new Permanent Under-Secretary is engaged on this issue and we are talking to officials and Ministers across Government to find the most appropriate solution. |
Data, Statistics and Research On Sex and Gender Independent Review
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will implement the recommendations set out in the report Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender, published by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology on 19 March. Answered by Lord Vallance of Balham - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Sex and gender in data, statistics and research is an important area of discussion, and this review contributes to this ongoing dialogue. Given the wide breadth of recommendations, the government has ensured that the review has been shared with all the relevant departments and policy teams, who will consider the findings in light of their ongoing policy work. |
House of Lords: Staff
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 3rd April 2025 Question To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker, following the publication on 19 March of the report by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender, whether the House of Lords Administration, in collecting personal data for employment purposes, will ensure that (1) any question about sex should by default concern biological sex, and (2) the form of such questions should be “what is your sex” and the options for response are “male” or “female”. Answered by Lord Gardiner of Kimble The House of Lords Administration collects personal data from all employees which is recorded on the HR system and provided to HMRC. Employees must provide the sex recorded on their birth certificate or Gender Recognition Certificate (female or male). The House of Lords Administration is not within the scope of the independent review commissioned by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT). However, the absence of a single source of authoritative guidance on data collection on sex and gender and the need for attention to maintain impartiality on issues including gender noted in the review are as relevant to the Administration as they are to public bodies within the report’s scope. The way in which data about sex and gender is collected by the House of Lords Administration is subject to periodic review. Work is currently underway to consider how we approach these issues in survey and data collection undertaken by the Administration, and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology review will be a helpful contribution.
|
Bill Documents |
---|
Apr. 10 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments – 10 April 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL _ After Clause |
Apr. 08 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments - 8 April 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL _ After Clause |
Apr. 03 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments - 3 April 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL _ After Clause |
Apr. 02 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments - 2 April 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL _ After Clause |
Apr. 01 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments - 1 April 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL _ After Clause |
Mar. 28 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments – 28 March 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 63 LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL |
Mar. 28 2025
HL Bill 49-V Fifth marshalled list for Committee House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: THE EARL OF DUNDEE 102_ Clause 4, page 2, line 16, at beginning insert “The rest of” BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN |
Mar. 27 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments – 27 March 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 63 LORD BEST LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM BARONESS HAYTER OF KENTISH TOWN BARONESS THORNHILL |