Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

Information between 3rd March 2026 - 23rd March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 146
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 158 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 183
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 40 Noes - 123
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 161 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 112 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 110 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 107 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 106 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107


Speeches
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town contributed 4 speeches (783 words)
Committee stage
Friday 20th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Political Parties: Finance
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 13th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to commence sections 10 and 11 of the Political Parties and Elections Act 2009.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We have no plans at present to commence these provisions. Overseas electors have the right to participate in UK parliamentary elections, and this includes the right to donate to parties or candidates they support. Political parties and other donees can only accept donations from registered electors. Overseas electors are subject to the same counter-fraud measures as domestic electors, including having their identity confirmed as part of the registration process.

The government has commissioned the Rycroft Review to consider whether political finance laws could be strengthened. We look forward to the findings of this independent review, due in late March, and we anticipate that they will inform the Representation of the People Bill.

Puberty Suppressing Hormones: Side Effects
Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer)
Monday 23rd March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many yellow card reports of serious adverse effects have been received in each of the past 15 years for children aged (1) 0–9 years old, and (2) 10–16 years old, who were prescribed puberty blockers to treat central precocious puberty, including goserilin, leuprorelin, triptorelin and other gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists; and whether any of those reports included adverse effects on bone health.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for ensuring medicines, medical devices, and blood components for transfusion meet applicable standards of safety, quality, and efficacy. The MHRA rigorously assesses the available data, including from the Yellow Card scheme, and seeks advice from the Commission on Human Medicines, the MHRA’s independent advisory committee, where appropriate, to inform regulatory decisions, including amending the product information.

Puberty blockers are also known as gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues or ‘GnRH analogues’. These medicines are licenced for conditions such as young children who enter puberty too early, also known as precocious puberty, prostate cancer, and endometriosis. The GnRH analogues included in this search were buserelin, leuprorelin, goserelin, gonadorelin, nafarelin, and triptorelin. Please note it is not mandatory to provide information on indication when submitting an adverse drug reaction report.

The MHRA has received a total of 17 serious United Kingdom suspected adverse drug reaction reports in the past 15 years of GnRH analogues in children aged between zero to nine years old, with 16 reports, and 10 to 16 years, with one report, between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2025, where the indication for use was reported as precocious puberty. Of these 17 reports, two included an adverse effect on bone health, namely bone marrow failure and epiphysiolysis, or growth plate fracture.

It is important to note that a reaction reported to the Yellow Card scheme does not necessarily mean it has been caused by the medicine, only that the reporter had a suspicion it may have. Underlying or concurrent illnesses may be responsible, or the events could be coincidental.




Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 18th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter from TUC to Blair McDougall and Baroness Hayter - Industry and Regulators Committee - 9th March 2026

Industry and Regulators Committee

Found: for Small Business and Economic Transformation Department for Business and Trade CC: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

Monday 16th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Blair McDougall MP, Minister for Small Businesses and Economic Transformation to the Chair of the Industry and Regulator Committee, 10 March 2026 re Regulators and Growth follow-up

Industry and Regulators Committee

Found: Place Whitehall London SW1A 2DY The Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

Tuesday 10th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Lord Johnson to Lord Stockwood re FTA scrutiny (9 March 2026)

International Agreements Committee

Found: in an exchange of letters between one of my predecessors as Chair of the Committee, Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

Tuesday 3rd March 2026
Declarations of interest - All members- Regulators and growth declarations of interest

Industry and Regulators Committee

Found: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town Interests as set out in the Register of Lords’ Interests Lord Teverson

Tuesday 24th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Business and Trade, and Department for Business and Trade

Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee

Found: Regulators and growth Tuesday 24 February 2026 10.30 am Watch the meeting Members present: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town




Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 17th March 2026 10:30 a.m.
Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Regulators and growth
At 10:30am: Oral evidence
The Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary at HM Treasury
Jessica Glover - Director General, growth and productivity at HM Treasury
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11 a.m.
Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 28th April 2026 11 a.m.
Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 3rd March 2026
Written Evidence - Federation of Small Businesses (FSB)
RAG0124 - Regulators and growth

Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee
Tuesday 3rd March 2026
Declarations of interest - All members- Regulators and growth declarations of interest

Industry and Regulators Committee
Tuesday 24th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Business and Trade, and Department for Business and Trade

Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee
Wednesday 11th March 2026
Written Evidence - Legal Services Board
RAG0126 - Regulators and growth

Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee
Wednesday 11th March 2026
Written Evidence - BUUK Infrastructure
RAG0024 - Regulators and growth

Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee
Monday 16th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Blair McDougall MP, Minister for Small Businesses and Economic Transformation to the Chair of the Industry and Regulator Committee, 10 March 2026 re Regulators and Growth follow-up

Industry and Regulators Committee
Wednesday 18th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter from TUC to Blair McDougall and Baroness Hayter - Industry and Regulators Committee - 9th March 2026

Industry and Regulators Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury

Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee