Welfare of Wild Animals in Travelling Circuses (England) Regulations 2012

Debate between Baroness Fookes and Lord Kirkhill
Wednesday 24th October 2012

(12 years, 1 month ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Kirkhill Portrait Lord Kirkhill
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lady Chairman—is that the correct form of address?

Baroness Fookes Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees
- Hansard - -

In fact, I am the Lord Chairman, but we follow the normal custom of addressing Members of the Committee as “My Lords”.

Lord Kirkhill Portrait Lord Kirkhill
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I fully accept that definitive assessment.

My view is that Defra has been playing around with this for many a long day without real purpose. It is clear that primary legislation is required to ban the use of wild animals in circuses. What we are told—and one has to accept it because it is obvious—is that primary legislation takes some time to create.

Nevertheless, while one can concede—and I do—that these regulations are an improvement on the existing situation, we have to remember that the whole concept of the circus is built on cruelty. It is built on prodding and whipping the animals. It is built on the fact that poor-quality staff are employed; and behind the scenes cruel practice exists in training. Although the committee of experts suggested that the animals were not at hazard, were well fed, watered and so on, nevertheless they are cribbed, cabined and confined. They have to travel around and they are much restricted. You only have to see behind the scenes, as I have done over the years, a trainer raising a whip and an animal immediately or very often subsiding. It is clear that much cruelty is involved.