Baroness Cumberlege Portrait

Baroness Cumberlege

Conservative - Life peer

Became Member: 18th May 1990

Left House: 20th December 2024 (Retired)


2 APPG memberships (as of 20 Nov 2024)
First Do No Harm, Pharmacy
4 Former APPG memberships
Health, Maternity, Osteoporosis, Osteoposis
Draft Mental Health Bill (Joint Committee)
22nd Jul 2004 - 11th Jul 2005


Division Voting information

Baroness Cumberlege has voted in 734 divisions, and 23 times against the majority of their Party.

12 Jan 2021 - Medicines and Medical Devices Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 213 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 236
9 Dec 2020 - United Kingdom Internal Market Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 208 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 250
9 Nov 2020 - United Kingdom Internal Market Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 44 Conservative No votes vs 147 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 433
9 Nov 2020 - United Kingdom Internal Market Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 38 Conservative No votes vs 134 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 407
17 Jul 2019 - Northern Ireland (Executive Formation) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 12 Conservative Aye votes vs 146 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 169
17 Jul 2019 - Northern Ireland (Executive Formation) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Conservative Aye votes vs 35 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 39 Noes - 138
23 Feb 2017 - Neighbourhood Planning Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 89 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 107
15 Jul 2015 - Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 132 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 154
24 Feb 2014 - Pensions Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 136 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 210
10 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 37 Conservative Aye votes vs 47 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 267
8 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 50 Conservative Aye votes vs 63 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 314
8 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 50 Conservative Aye votes vs 50 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 278
8 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Conservative Aye votes vs 35 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 32 Noes - 163
8 Jul 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Conservative Aye votes vs 25 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 15 Noes - 84
4 Jun 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 65 Conservative Aye votes vs 79 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 390
25 Jan 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 96 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 128
6 May 2009 - Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Conservative Aye votes vs 27 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 134
28 Apr 2021 - Abortion (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2021 - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 36 Conservative Aye votes vs 156 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 93 Noes - 418
28 Apr 2021 - Abortion (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2021 - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Conservative Aye votes vs 151 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 63 Noes - 401
28 Apr 2021 - Abortion (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2021 - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 144 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 409
5 Apr 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Conservative Aye votes vs 146 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 151
5 Apr 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 143 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 151
5 Apr 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 126 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 132
View All Baroness Cumberlege Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
(35 debate interactions)
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
(14 debate interactions)
Lord Warner (Crossbench)
(13 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department of Health and Social Care
(177 debate contributions)
Wales Office
(41 debate contributions)
Attorney General
(16 debate contributions)
Leader of the House
(9 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017
(18,810 words contributed)
Health and Care Act 2022
(12,584 words contributed)
Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021
(10,248 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Baroness Cumberlege's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Baroness Cumberlege, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


1 Bill introduced by Baroness Cumberlege


A Bill to make provision for the regulation of food standards in hospitals.

Lords Completed

Last Event - 3rd Reading: House Of Lords
Monday 2nd December 2013

Baroness Cumberlege has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 32 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
23rd Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government why there is disparity in the legal prescribing rights of various professions when nurses, pharmacists, physiotherapists, podiatrists, therapeutic and diagnostic radiographers, dietitians and paramedics all undertake prescribing training together, and are assessed in the same way.

Non-medical prescribers must work within their own level of expertise. This, together with the requirements of the roles in which different professions are employed, is reflected in the differences between the legal prescribing responsibilities of these professions. Regulators keep records of which healthcare professionals can prescribe, and employers have a responsibility to ensure that non-medical prescribers undertake the relevant training and development, so that their knowledge and skills remain up to date. This is to ensure clinicians work within their sphere of competence.

Baroness Merron
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
17th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government when they will respond to the report by the Patient Safety Commissioner The Hughes Report: Options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh, published on 7 February.

The Government is carefully considering the valuable work done by the Patient Safety commissioner and the resulting Hughes Report, which set out options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh. We will be providing an update to the Patient Safety Commissioner’s Report at the earliest opportunity.

Baroness Merron
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
18th Oct 2023
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to protect patients from (1) unregulated, and (2) unqualified, non-medical ultrasound practitioners.

The Government is clear that the regulatory oversight of health and care professions must be proportionate to the risks to the public. Statutory regulation of healthcare professionals should only be used where the risks to patient protection cannot be addressed through employer oversight, system regulation, or accredited voluntary registration.

Services offering diagnostic and screening procedures that use ultrasound to examine the body must register with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Providers must demonstrate that they provide enough suitably qualified, competent, skilled, and experienced staff to meet the needs of the people using the service to comply with the CQC’s regulatory requirements to operate.

Some sonographers are qualified and registered to practice in another healthcare profession that is subject to statutory regulation. The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care manages the Accredited Registers Programme which independently assesses organisations who operate voluntary registers for practitioners who are not regulated by law. Sonographers can register with the accredited Register of Clinical Technologists.

The Government keeps the healthcare professions subject to statutory regulation under review and recently ran a consultation seeking views on the criteria used to decide when regulation is necessary, and whether there are any unregulated professions that should be brought into statutory regulation. The Government will publish its response to the consultation in due course.

Lord Markham
Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
5th Jun 2023
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have, and over what timescale, to further implement Scan4Safety and increase the percentage of NHS Trusts scanning products at the point of care.

The Medical Device Outcome Registry (MDOR) will significantly improve the quality of data available to improve patient safety and outcomes in high-risk medical device procedures.

NHS England will monitor data quality in the MDOR via regular audits and feedback reports so they can make improvements and provide additional support where required. They are also expanding upon the Data Quality provider certification and award scheme currently active in the National Joint Registry. This is with a view to covering all registry procedures with a particular emphasis on collecting data on medical devices and consultants, Patient Reported Outcome Measures and patient feedback indicators. NHS England have mandated registry submission and will be monitoring compliance and ascertainment against Secondary Uses Service procedure data, to resolve any data completeness or quality issues.

MDOR has native barcode scanning, including Unique Device Identifier (UDI) barcodes, so will result in the whole of England having an available UDI scanning solution without having to implement a separate system. The registry will accept bulk uploads from existing providers’ solutions, including Scan4Safety, that meet the data quality and completeness requirements. The Outcomes and Registries programme will support provider adoption of digital solutions that enable medical device traceability on the electronic patient record. The aim is to have full data submission by NHS England and independent sector providers by the end of the year.

NHS England will be working with various Scan4Safety programme initiatives across England and the four nations, focussing upon medical device traceability and device-based procedures to enable scanning of device data into the patient record.

Lord Markham
Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
5th Jun 2023
To ask His Majesty's Government what safeguards they have in place to ensure high quality and precise data are entered into the medical devices outcomes register.

The Medical Device Outcome Registry (MDOR) will significantly improve the quality of data available to improve patient safety and outcomes in high-risk medical device procedures.

NHS England will monitor data quality in the MDOR via regular audits and feedback reports so they can make improvements and provide additional support where required. They are also expanding upon the Data Quality provider certification and award scheme currently active in the National Joint Registry. This is with a view to covering all registry procedures with a particular emphasis on collecting data on medical devices and consultants, Patient Reported Outcome Measures and patient feedback indicators. NHS England have mandated registry submission and will be monitoring compliance and ascertainment against Secondary Uses Service procedure data, to resolve any data completeness or quality issues.

MDOR has native barcode scanning, including Unique Device Identifier (UDI) barcodes, so will result in the whole of England having an available UDI scanning solution without having to implement a separate system. The registry will accept bulk uploads from existing providers’ solutions, including Scan4Safety, that meet the data quality and completeness requirements. The Outcomes and Registries programme will support provider adoption of digital solutions that enable medical device traceability on the electronic patient record. The aim is to have full data submission by NHS England and independent sector providers by the end of the year.

NHS England will be working with various Scan4Safety programme initiatives across England and the four nations, focussing upon medical device traceability and device-based procedures to enable scanning of device data into the patient record.

Lord Markham
Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
27th Apr 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure the standards set out in NHS service specifications for rare and complex diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, are adhered to; and to what extent these represent a statutory expectation of care that patients should expect to receive at a minimum.

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member.

Lord Kamall
Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)
3rd Feb 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Bethell on 8 June 2021 (HL Deb cols 1219–20), what improvements they have made to the process for patients opting out of their medical data being used for research and planning; and how each patient can see where data about them are used.

Whilst no recent changes have been made to the patient opt-out process, we are considering further engagement with the public, patients, service users, staff and stakeholders. This will include raising awareness of the opt-out system, with the aim of making the process simpler and more transparent and how tools such as a transparency statement could help patients understand how their data is used. We will provide further details in the data strategy for health and social care, due for publication in spring 2022.

Lord Kamall
Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)
13th Jan 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Bethell on 8 June 2021 (HL Deb, col 1319–20), what improvements they have made to the process for patients opting out of their health data being used for research and planning; and how each patient can see where data about them is used.

In July 2021, we committed that the General Practice Data for Planning and Research programme will not access patient data until the following criteria has been met:

- the ability to delete data if patients choose to opt-out of sharing their data with NHS Digital, even if this is after their data has been uploaded;

- the backlog of opt-outs has been fully cleared;

- a trusted research environment has been developed and implemented by NHS Digital; and

- patients have been made more aware of the scheme through a campaign of engagement and communication.

NHS Digital is redesigning the programme with input from stakeholders to take account of these commitments and professional, public and stakeholder feedback. Data collection will begin when the National Data Guardian, the Royal College of General Practitioners and the British Medical Association are satisfied with the proposed arrangements. As part of our data strategy, we will engage on how the opt-out system works in practice, with the aim of making the process simpler and more transparent.

Patients can view how data is used through NHS Digital’s data release register. This shows monthly information on who data has been shared with, which data has been shared and for what specific purpose.

Lord Kamall
Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)
21st Jul 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the report by the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review First do No Harm, published on 8 July 2020, what negotiations have taken place between the Department of Health and Social Care and Her Majesty’s Treasury about redress for those who have suffered harm from (1) Primodos, (2) sodium valproate, and (3) pelvic mesh.

The Department engaged with HM Treasury on redress prior to cross-Government approval of the response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.

5th Jul 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people have registered an opt-out with their GP practice to prevent the sharing of personal data outside of their GP practice except for their own care as at 5 July; and how many people have registered an opt-out covering the broader health and care system, that is the National Data opt-out, as at 5 July.

Data on how many people have registered such an opt-out is not held centrally. NHS Digital reports that the current number of registered national data opt-outs is 3,066,543.

15th Mar 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will undertake a review to assess the benefits of home haemodialysis compared to in-centre dialysis for supporting dialysis patients safely to shield from COVID-19.

NHS England and NHS Improvement have advised that there are currently no plans to undertake such a review. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence COVID-19 rapid guideline: dialysis service delivery, sets out guidance for clinicians to maximise the safety of patients on dialysis during the pandemic, both at home and in dialysis units. It contains recommendations for providers to continue and maintain current home dialysis provision where possible and to consider the possibility of increasing provision for new incident patients. A copy of the guideline is attached.

15th Mar 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to encourage greater uptake of home haemodialysis, in line with the NICE Guidelines, COVID-19 rapid guidelines: dialysis service delivery, published on 20 March 2020.

NHS England and NHS Improvement are undertaking a national Renal Transformation Programme starting later in 2021. As part of this, ways to incentivise home dialysis will be considered, which may include use of tariffs or other commissioning levers.

15th Mar 2021
To ask Her Majesty's Government what discussions, if any, they have had with the NHS about updating the National Tariff Payment for dialysis to encourage greater uptake of home haemodialysis therapies.

NHS England and NHS Improvement are undertaking a national Renal Transformation Programme starting later in 2021. As part of this, ways to incentivise home dialysis will be considered, which may include use of tariffs or other commissioning levers.

14th Jun 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the average time from diagnosis to treatment for patients with metastatic kidney cancer in England.

No assessment has been made. NHS England collects data on cancer waiting times and these data are published on their website. The data comprises of organisational performance against operational standards that support waiting time commitments laid out in the NHS Constitution. These include the standard that 96% of patients should begin first definitive treatment for all cancers within a maximum of 31 days from diagnosis.

In April 2016 97.4% of patients waited 31 days from diagnosis to first definitive treatment for all cancers and 94.9% for urological cancers.

The data is collected at tumour group level and it is not possible to identify metastatic kidney cancer.

14th Jun 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether cancer treatments submitted to, but not assessed by, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) before 1 April will be approved under the new NICE framework for cancer treatments.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has confirmed that appraisals of cancer technologies started prior to 1 April 2016 will be considered using the updated NICE methods and processes which came into effect on 1 April 2016. Companies whose technologies fall under this scenario have been offered the opportunity to make a case for consideration within the Cancer Drugs Fund.

14th Jun 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of how England compares with other European countries in (1) one, (2) five, and (3) 10-year survival rates for patients diagnosed with metastatic kidney cancer.

No formal assessment has been made.

Although cancer survival rates are at a record high and continue to improve, we know that we have to strive to be better. The independent Cancer Taskforce report, Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes: A strategy for England 2015-2020, published in July last year, recommends improvements across the cancer patient pathway. A copy of the report is attached.

NHS England is currently working with partners across the health system to deliver the Cancer Taskforce’s recommendations. An implementation plan, Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes: Taking the strategy forward, was published on 12 May 2016 and we hope to see great progress as it is delivered. A copy of the implementation plan is attached.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what measures NHS England is putting in place to ensure the development of a national policy for molecular diagnostic testing before existing legacy arrangements expire in 2016; who will lead those plans; when they will begin; and when progress will be reported.

NHS England is leading a range of activities relating to the future of molecular diagnostics which over time will begin to inform new approaches to the prediction and prevention of disease as well as the application of new targeted therapies, in support of delivering the ambitions set out in the 5 Year Forward View. These include: the re-procurement of Genomics Local Laboratory Hubs; the establishment of a Task Force to oversee development of a new national strategy for cancer; and the coordination of the NHS contribution to the 100,000 Genomes Project which includes the building of a new molecular pathology network. In addition to this, NHS England is conducting analysis to clarify legacy arrangements for commissioning molecular diagnostics and identify future commissioning mechanisms.

Earl Howe
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
23rd Feb 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are the terms of reference for the forthcoming consultation on the National Tariff.

Section 118 of the Health and Social Care Act sets out the terms of reference under which consultation for Tariff proposals should be undertaken. As the consultation is statutory it has to be undertaken as stated in the Act. In addition, the proposals were subject to consultation by virtue of section 69(7) of that Act.

Earl Howe
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
23rd Feb 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what commissioning policies and interventions are in place to ensure uninterrupted access to molecular diagnostics from 1 April 2015 whilst a more robust system is being developed.

NHS England is leading a range of activities relating to the future of molecular diagnostics which over time will begin to inform new approaches to the prediction and prevention of disease as well as the application of new targeted therapies, in support of delivering the ambitions set out in the 5 Year Forward View. These include: the re-procurement of Genomics Local Laboratory Hubs; the establishment of a Task Force to oversee development of a new national strategy for cancer; and the coordination of the NHS contribution to the 100,000 Genomes Project which includes the building of a new molecular pathology network. In addition to this, NHS England is conducting analysis to clarify legacy arrangements for commissioning molecular diagnostics and identify future commissioning mechanisms.

Earl Howe
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
23rd Feb 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government which pharmaceutical companies have informed NHS England about the withdrawal of their funding for molecular testing; and what plans NHS England has in place to ensure continuity of funding and access for affected patients.

NHS England is leading a range of activities relating to the future of molecular diagnostics which over time will begin to inform new approaches to the prediction and prevention of disease as well as the application of new targeted therapies, in support of delivering the ambitions set out in the 5 Year Forward View. These include: the re-procurement of Genomics Local Laboratory Hubs; the establishment of a Task Force to oversee development of a new national strategy for cancer; and the coordination of the NHS contribution to the 100,000 Genomes Project which includes the building of a new molecular pathology network. In addition to this, NHS England is conducting analysis to clarify legacy arrangements for commissioning molecular diagnostics and identify future commissioning mechanisms.

Earl Howe
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
23rd Feb 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what focus the NHS Five Year Forward View taskforce on cancer services, chaired by Cancer Research UK, will give to molecular diagnostics.

The independent Cancer Taskforce has been set up to produce a new cross-system national cancer strategy to take us through the next five years to 2020, building on NHS England’s vision for improving cancer outcomes set out in the NHS Five Year Forward View. It has been set up in partnership with the cancer community and other health system leaders, and is chaired by the Chief Executive of Cancer Research UK.

The new strategy will set a clear direction covering the whole cancer pathway from prevention to end of life care, including molecular diagnostics. The Taskforce will produce a statement of intent this month, and the new strategy will be published in summer 2015.

Earl Howe
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
23rd Feb 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when the NHS Five Year Forward View taskforce on cancer services will report back on their initial assessment of opportunities to improve cancer care before March 2015; and when in 2015 they will present the new five year strategy.

The independent Cancer Taskforce has been set up to produce a new cross-system national cancer strategy to take us through the next five years to 2020, building on NHS England’s vision for improving cancer outcomes set out in the NHS Five Year Forward View. It has been set up in partnership with the cancer community and other health system leaders, and is chaired by the Chief Executive of Cancer Research UK.

The new strategy will set a clear direction covering the whole cancer pathway from prevention to end of life care, including molecular diagnostics. The Taskforce will produce a statement of intent this month, and the new strategy will be published in summer 2015.

Earl Howe
Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
7th Sep 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether, in the light of the report by Maternity Action and the Refugee Council <i>When maternity doesn’t matter: dispersing pregnant women seeking asylum</i>, they plan to publish revised guidance on procedures for dispersing and accommodating pregnant women seeking asylum in the United Kingdom.

The revised guidance will be published shortly.

26th Mar 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government which sections of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 have not yet been commenced.

Sections 7, 8(2), 14, 18-28 (with the exception of 26(8)(b)), 31, 39 and 40 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 have not yet been commenced.

18th Jun 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth on 15 May (HL7448), when section 7 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 will be brought into force.

A coming into force date for Section 7; Sections 18 – 31 and Sections 39 and 40 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 are yet to be confirmed.

A coming into force date for Section 8 (2) (Content of development plan documents) has not yet been confirmed.

18th Jun 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth on 15 May (HL7448), when section 8(2) of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 will be brought into force.

A coming into force date for Section 7; Sections 18 – 31 and Sections 39 and 40 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 are yet to be confirmed.

A coming into force date for Section 8 (2) (Content of development plan documents) has not yet been confirmed.

18th Jun 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth on 15 May (HL7448), when sections 18–28 and 31, except section 26(8)(b), of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 will be brought into force.

A coming into force date for Section 7; Sections 18 – 31 and Sections 39 and 40 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 are yet to be confirmed.

A coming into force date for Section 8 (2) (Content of development plan documents) has not yet been confirmed.

18th Jun 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth on 15 May (HL7448), when sections 39 and 40 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 will be brought into force.

A coming into force date for Section 7; Sections 18 – 31 and Sections 39 and 40 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 are yet to be confirmed.

A coming into force date for Section 8 (2) (Content of development plan documents) has not yet been confirmed.

18th Jun 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth on 15 May (HL7448), when section 13 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 will be brought into force.

Section 13 (1), (2) (Statement of community involvement) will be brought into force on 31 July 2018, as set out in the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 (Commencement No. 3) Regulations 2018.

1st May 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government what provisions of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 have not yet been brought into force.

My Department can confirm the following provisions from the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 have not been brought into force:

Section 6: Assistance in connection with neighbourhood planning

Section 7: Engagement by examiners with qualifying bodies

Section 13: Statements of community involvement

Section 8(2): Content of development plan documents

Sections 18 – 28 and 31: Temporary possession of land (except section 26(8)(b))

Sections 39 and 40: Other provisions relating to compulsory purchase