Ministerial Corrections

Tuesday 23rd January 2024

(10 months, 4 weeks ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tuesday 23 January 2024

Education

Tuesday 23rd January 2024

(10 months, 4 weeks ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
SEND Provision and Funding
The following is an extract from the Backbench Business debate on SEND Provision and Funding on Thursday 11 January 2024.
David Johnston Portrait David Johnston
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have a universal SEND services programme, which more than 11,000 staff have already accessed to improve their knowledge and skills. We are also funding the training of 7,000 early years staff with a level 3 SENCO qualification, as my hon. Friend the Chair of the Education Committee said. Some 5,200 staff have begun that training, so we are on track with that target.

[Official Report, 11 January 2024, Vol. 743, c. 524.]

Letter of correction from the Under-Secretary of State for Education, the hon. Member for Wantage (David Johnston):

An error has been identified in my speech in the debate on SEND Provision and Funding. The correct statement should have been:

David Johnston Portrait David Johnston
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have a universal SEND services programme, which more than 11,000 staff have already accessed to improve their knowledge and skills. We are also funding the training of 7,000 early years staff with a level 3 SENCO qualification, as my hon. Friend the Chair of the Education Committee said. Some 5,200 staff have registered for that training, so we are on track with that target.

Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

Tuesday 23rd January 2024

(10 months, 4 weeks ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Voter ID: Election Turnout
The following is an extract from Levelling Up, Housing and Communities questions on 22 January 2024:
Anum Qaisar Portrait Ms Anum Qaisar (Airdrie and Shotts) (SNP)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government’s voter ID requirements, which allow travel cards for older people but not the young person’s equivalent, are unfair at best, but the reality is that this is political opportunism. As has just been said, analysis by the Electoral Commission following England’s 2023 local elections found that 14,000 people were unable to vote due to voter ID requirements. There is real concern, based on that data, that there will be a potential impact in the forthcoming general election. Voters at local elections are often a smaller group of more politically informed people, whereas the larger group of voters who wish to cast their vote at a general election may be less aware of the requirements. Does the Minister agree with the words of his former Cabinet colleague, the right hon. Member for North East Somerset (Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg), that

“Parties that try and gerrymander end up finding their clever scheme comes back to bite them, as… we found by insisting on voter ID for elections”?

Simon Hoare Portrait Simon Hoare
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not agree with that, and nor will I take any lessons on political opportunism from the SNP. I am tempted to say that I would WhatsApp my answer to the hon. Lady, but she would probably delete it before she read it. A lot will depend on whether the identification has the relevant hologram. I also point out to the hon. Lady that—[Interruption.] She chunters from a sedentary position without wanting to listen to the answer, but of the 14,000 who did not have the right identification, 7,000 came back.

[Official Report, 22 January 2024, Vol. 744, c. 8.]

Letter of correction from the Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, the hon. Member for North Dorset (Simon Hoare):

An error has been identified in my response to the hon. Member for Airdrie and Shotts (Ms Qaisar) during Levelling Up, Housing and Communities questions. The response should have been:

Simon Hoare Portrait Simon Hoare
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not agree with that, and nor will I take any lessons on political opportunism from the SNP. I am tempted to say that I would WhatsApp my answer to the hon. Lady, but she would probably delete it before she read it. A lot will depend on whether the identification has the relevant hologram. I also point out to the hon. Lady that—[Interruption.] She chunters from a sedentary position without wanting to listen to the answer, but of the 37,000 who did not have the right identification, 14,000 did not come back.

Defence

Tuesday 23rd January 2024

(10 months, 4 weeks ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Service Accommodation
The following is an extract from the Westminster Hall debate on Service Accommodation on 19 December 2023.
James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As of 13 November, some 84% of rooms met the standard. That means that 13,347 did not, which falls well short of where we need to be. However, the intent is that, by April 2024, a further 30% of those will be upgraded. In the longer term, the Department will invest around £5.3 billion in SLA over the next 10 years to get homes up to standard. That will see us deliver approximately 40,000 new or refurbished bed spaces.

[Official Report, 19 December 2023, Vol. 742, c. 499WH.]

Letter of correction from the Minister for Defence Procurement, the hon. Member for South Suffolk (James Cartlidge):

An error has been identified in my response to the debate. The correct information should have been:

James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As of 13 November, some 84% of rooms met the standard. That means that 13,347 did not, which falls well short of where we need to be. However, the intent is that, by April 2024, a further 30% of those will be upgraded. In the longer term, the Department will invest around £2 billion in SLA over the next 10 years to get homes up to standard. That will see us deliver approximately 40,000 new or refurbished bed spaces.