All-party Parliamentary Groups

(Limited Text - Ministerial Extracts only)

Read Full debate
Wednesday 19th July 2023

(9 months, 1 week ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Johnny Mercer Portrait The Minister for Veterans’ Affairs (Johnny Mercer)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move,

That this House approves the Eighth Report of the Committee on Standards, Session 2022-23, HC 228, on All-Party Parliamentary Groups: final proposals and, with effect from 16 October, the Rules for All-Party Parliamentary Groups contained in the Annex of that Report, subject to any transitional arrangements agreed by the Committee on Standards.

I think I heard the hon. Member for Rhondda (Sir Chris Bryant) shout “Really?” from a sedentary position, at the thought that I am here for this debate, but he must understand that I have had a deep and long interest in all-party parliamentary groups.

APPGs play a valuable role in our parliamentary system. They bring together parliamentarians and external experts to further cross-party consideration of important issues. It is paramount that any new rules do not deter APPGs, particularly those that are self-funded, from meeting, because these forums aid the development of public policy on matters that otherwise may not be considered by Parliament. Rather, the new rules should seek to increase transparency, limit undue influence and secure the parliamentary estate, while allowing APPGs to perform their vital functions.

The Government are grateful to the Standards Committee for reviewing the rules governing these groups to ensure that they remain fit for purpose. It is right that we give existing APPGs an opportunity to comply with the new system, so I am grateful to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards for outlining the need for transitional arrangements to implement the rules.

APPGs are able to play an important role in Parliament by virtue of their informal status, but I believe these groups should be held to high standards and operate in keeping with the broader principles shared across the Houses, which are that Parliament should be transparent, protected from undue influence, and boast a reputation that is cherished at home and envied abroad. The reforms being proposed represent an important step towards this objective, and as per the Government’s response in June, we welcome the Committee’s consideration of whether the rules on foreign contributions could be strengthened at a later stage. I look forward to this debate, and I commend the motion to the House.

Eleanor Laing Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call the shadow Leader of the House.

--- Later in debate ---
Johnny Mercer Portrait Johnny Mercer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will be very brief. It has been a fascinating debate and there are strongly held views on all sides. The Committee has been tasked with looking at how we tackle this problem, and I think everyone agrees there is an issue with APPGs. I urge colleagues not to divide today—

Chris Bryant Portrait Sir Chris Bryant
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Again, I will try to be helpful. If we vote down the motion today, it will mean that we cannot even take action on telling APPGs that they cannot take money from foreign Governments and I think that that would be a terrible mistake. If we carry the motion today, I undertake, having listened to all the contributions, that, at the next meeting of the Committee in September, we will make such adjustments as we think suitable—we are entitled to do so under the rules—to meet some of the issues that Members have raised. I would be grateful if Members could write to me with specific suggestions that they think might help, but we might also revisit the idea of when the transitional period will end.

Johnny Mercer Portrait Johnny Mercer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I strongly urge Members to take that course of action. Voting down the motion would be extremely self-defeating.

Peter Bottomley Portrait Sir Peter Bottomley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hope that what the Chair of the Committee has just said can be interpreted as including not only the transitional arrangements, but some of the minor arrangements that are no threat to the major purposes behind this.

Johnny Mercer Portrait Johnny Mercer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure the Chair of the Committee has heard that remark—

Chris Bryant Portrait Sir Chris Bryant
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have taken my hearing aid out, but I did hear what the Father of the House said.

--- Later in debate ---
Johnny Mercer Portrait Johnny Mercer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Fantastic. I commend the motion to the House.

Question put and agreed to.

Resolved,

That this House approves the Eighth Report of the Committee on Standards, Session 2022–23, HC 228, on All-Party Parliamentary Groups: final proposals and, with effect from 16 October, the Rules for All-Party Parliamentary Groups contained in the Annex of that Report, subject to any transitional arrangements agreed by the Committee on Standards.