All 3 Ministerial Corrections debates in the Commons on 18th Jan 2011

Ministerial Corrections

Tuesday 18th January 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tuesday 18 January 2011

Ex-servicemen: Radiation Exposure

Tuesday 18th January 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chris Evans Portrait Chris Evans
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what benchmarking assessment his Department has made of the provisions for nuclear test veteran compensation under the US Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

[Official Report, 8 December 2010, Vol. 520, c. 281W.]

Letter of correction from Mr Andrew Robathan:

An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for Islwyn (Chris Evans) on 8 December 2010.

The full answer given was as follows:

Lord Robathan Portrait Mr Robathan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No benchmarking has taken place.

In the United Kingdom evidence was provided in the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) reports of the three follow-up studies on the health of over 20,000 nuclear test participants and a matched group of military controls. For the United States atomic veterans no comparable large scale epidemiological US study was carried out.

The Ministry of Defence also provides pensions automatically to nuclear test veterans who have one of a list of 22 cancers presumed to be causally linked to service. For other cancers, claims may be accepted on the basis of calculated radiation exposure assessment. In the US, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) will pay a one time lump sum of 75,000 US dollars for cancers on their own list.

The correct answer should have been:

Lord Robathan Portrait Mr Robathan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No benchmarking has taken place.

In the United Kingdom evidence was provided in the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) reports of the three follow-up studies on the health of over 20,000 nuclear test participants and a matched group of military controls. For the United States atomic veterans no comparable large scale epidemiological US study was carried out.

The US Department for Veterans Affairs provides pensions automatically to nuclear test veterans who have one of a list of 22 cancers presumed to be causally linked to service. For other cancers, claims may be accepted on the basis of calculated radiation exposure assessment. In the US, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) will pay a one time lump sum of 75,000 US dollars for cancers on their own list.

Air Force: Scotland

Tuesday 18th January 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Angus Robertson Portrait Angus Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department has spent on redevelopment work at each Royal Air Force base in Scotland in each of the last 10 years; and what estimate he has made of his Department's likely expenditure on such work in each of the next five years.

[Official Report, 16 December 2010, Vol. 520, c. 891W.]

Letter of correction from Mr Nick Harvey:

An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for Moray (Angus Robertson) on 16 December 2010.

The full answer given was as follows:

Nick Harvey Portrait Nick Harvey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The expenditure on redevelopment (defined as capital expenditure and minor new works) for the major RAF stations in the UK since financial year 2006-07 is shown in the following table:

Expenditure by station

£ million

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

RAF Kinloss

5.3

3.9

1.9

1.8

RAF Leuchars

4.7

4.3

5.6

9.4

RAF Lossiemouth

5.6

1.8

4.5

6.1



Information prior to the financial year 2005-06 is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Some of the expenditure has been split between individual financial years on an estimated basis.

The Ministry of Defence is in the process of completing its annual planning round which will allocate future programme budgets. This is expected to conclude in early 2011.

The correct answer should have been:

Nick Harvey Portrait Nick Harvey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The expenditure on redevelopment (defined as capital expenditure and minor new works) for the major RAF stations in the UK since financial year 2006-07 is shown in the following table:

Expenditure by station

£ million

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

RAF Kinloss

5.3

3.9

1.9

1.8

RAF Leuchars

4.7

24.5

5.6

9.4

RAF Lossiemouth

5.6

1.8

4.5

6.1



Information prior to the financial year 2005-06 is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Some of the expenditure has been split between individual financial years on an estimated basis.

The Ministry of Defence is in the process of completing its annual planning round which will allocate future programme budgets. This is expected to conclude in early 2011.