A Bill to make provision about the safeguarding and welfare of children; about support for children in care or leaving care; about regulation of care workers; about regulation of establishments and agencies under Part 2 of the Care Standards Act 2000; about employment of children; about breakfast club provision and school uniform; about attendance of children at school; about regulation of independent educational institutions; about inspections of schools and colleges; about teacher misconduct; about Academies and teachers at Academies; repealing section 128 of the Education Act 2002; about school places and admissions; about establishing new schools; and for connected purposes.
This is not the latest version of the Bill
Available Versions
Relevant Documents
Your selections will update the bill and amendment list to show only amendments matching your chosen criteria.
Page 1
Part 1
Children’s social care
Family group decision-making
Page 2
Child protection and safeguarding
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Support for children in care, leaving care or in kinship care and carers
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Accommodation of children
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Regulation of children’s homes, fostering agencies etc
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Care workers
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Corporate parenting
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Employment of children
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Part 2
Schools
Breakfast clubs etc
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
School uniforms
Page 50
Children not in school
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Independent educational institutions
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Inspections of schools and colleges
Page 107
Page 108
Teacher misconduct
Page 109
Page 110
School teachers’ qualifications and induction
Academies
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Teachers’ pay and conditions
School places and admissions
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Establishment of new schools
Page 120
Page 121
establishment of new schools
Page 122
Page 123
Part 3
General
Page 124
Page 125
Schedules
Relevant authorities
Part 1
List of relevant authorities
Page 126
Part 2
Power to modify
Page 127
Children not in school: consequential amendments
Children Act 1989
Education Act 1996
“Offence of failure to secure regular attendance at school of registered pupil
“Offences: general
Page 128
“Interpretation of Chapter
School Standards and Framework Act 1998
Sentencing Act 2020
Pay and conditions of Academy teachers: amendments to the Education Act
2002
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Establishment of new schools: amendments to Schedule 2 to the Education
and Inspections Act 2006
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
“Proposals to establish Academy
Page 136
Page 137
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 53, page 115, line 26, at end insert—
“85ZB Co-operation in providing parents with admissions information
(1) A local authority in England and the governing body of a maintained school in England must co-operate in the provision of admissions information to parents.
(2) The governing body of such a school, where it is the admissions authority for the school, must provide the local authority with such admissions information as is specified in regulations in the electronic format set out in those regulations, within the timescale set out in those regulations.
(3) Within one month of the deadline for schools to provide that information, a local authority must publish the information so provided and the equivalent information for schools for which it is the admissions authority in the same electronic format.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that complete, accurate, and consistent admissions information is available to all parents.
Tabled: 10 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 March 2025
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: factory shutdowns and school attendance
(1) On the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must order a review of the effect of factory shutdowns on local school attendance.
(2) The review must consider the merits of varying local school holiday dates to minimise the impact of factory shutdowns on school attendance.
(3) The review must be published within six months of the day on which this Act is passed and must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer) - 10 Mar 2025This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 54, leave out lines 40 to 44 and insert—
“(b) the names and home addresses of the parent or parents who are taking responsibility for the education of the child;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to identify the minimum requirement for providing information for the register and ensures that information is only included on parents who have responsibility for educating the child.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Access to extracurricular sport and recreation opportunities
A child educated at home is entitled to reasonable access to extracurricular sport and recreation opportunities offered and co-ordinated by local maintained schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides home-educated children with access to sport and recreational activities offered by maintained schools.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—
“Purpose
(1) The purpose of this Act is to—
(a) improve the safety and wellbeing of children;
(b) improve the regulation of children’s homes, fostering agencies and other settings where looked after children are accommodated;
(c) improve safety and standards and remove barriers to opportunity in schools in England and Wales;
(d) make provision regarding children not in school.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 53, page 115, line 26, at end insert—
“85ZB Managed moves and the Fair Access Protocol
(1) Before the initiation of any managed move of a registered pupil from one maintained school or Academy to another, the pupil must be considered under the local authority’s Fair Access Protocol.
(2) The consideration under subsection (1) must include consultation with—
(a) the current school,
(b) the proposed receiving school, and
(c) the parent or carer of the pupil, and where appropriate, the pupil.
(3) The local authority must keep and maintain a record of all managed moves occurring to, from, or within its area.
(4) Where a managed move results in the registration of a pupil at a school within the area of a different local authority, the responsibility for monitoring the educational outcomes and welfare of the pupil following the move shall transfer to that receiving local authority upon the pupil's registration at the new school.
(5) The duty imposed by subsection (1) above does not apply—
(a) in circumstances where the child of compulsory school age is removed from the roll of one school and registered at another school solely as a consequence of the child's change of ordinary residence, provided that—
(i) the change of residence is documented and verified, and
(ii) arrangements for re-registration at a new school are underway or have been made within a reasonable period.
(6) A record under subsection (3) must include—
(a) the reasons for the move,
(b) the schools involved,
(c) whether the move was voluntary or directed, and
(d) the outcome for the pupil.
(7) Each local authority must submit an annual report to the Secretary of State containing a summary of managed moves conducted under this section.
(8) The Secretary of State may issue guidance to local authorities and schools on the implementation of this section, to which they must have regard.
(9) In this section—
“managed moves” means a permanent change of the pupil’s school registration, where a move is not a result of—
(a) a permanent exclusion under Section 51A of the Education Act 1996;
(b) a transfer to a special school pursuant to Section 42 of the Children and Families Act 2014;
(c) a change of registration due to school closure;
(d) movement between educational phases;
(e) change in school type as a consequence of the Academy Act 2010.
“school” has the same meaning as in Part 4 of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT CALLED
After Clause 53, insert the following new Clause—
“Placement of permanently excluded children of compulsory school age with unregistered providers
In the Education Act 1996, in section 19 (exceptional provision of education in pupil referral units or elsewhere), after subsection (4A) insert—
“(4B) Local authorities may not discharge their duty of providing suitable education under subsection (1) for children of compulsory school age, by reason of permanent exclusion, through full-time placement in an unregistered school or the equivalent of a full-time placement in multiple unregistered schools, unless the provider is, or the providers are, working towards registration.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment aims to prevent the long-term placement of permanently excluded pupils with unregistered providers, which lack regular inspection and formal oversight. It includes an exception for providers actively working towards registration, acknowledging both the shortage of registered alternative provision in some local authority areas and the valuable support offered by many unregistered settings.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 1, page 1, leave out lines 7 to 10 and insert—
“(1) When a local authority starts formal child protection proceedings in relation to a child, the authority must offer a family group decision-making meeting to the child’s parents or any other person with parental responsibility for the child.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the offer of a family group decision making meeting when formal child protection proceedings are initiated and / or when the child protection plan is failing to protect the child instead of before the local authority makes an application for a care and supervision order as the trigger for offering the meeting.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Sharing local authority best practice on home education
(1) All local authorities must provide an annual report to the Secretary of State setting out—
(a) the total number of home educators in their area (A),
(b) the number of complaints they have received from home educators in the preceding year (B), and
(c) the number of School Attendance Orders they have issued in the preceding year (C).
(2) The Secretary of State must make funding and resources available to any local authority which performs in the top ten percent of both—
(a) B as a percentage of A, and
(b) C as a percentage of A,
to facilitate those local authorities sharing best practice regarding management of home education with local authorities performing in the bottom ten percent of the same metrics.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Harm to the child: prevention of legal action
(1) No parent can be subject to criminal prosecution, penalty, or sanction (“legal action”) under any provision in sections 30 to 35 if the condition in subsection (2) applies.
(2) The condition is that legal action in subsection (1) would result—
(a) in harm to a child’s welfare, or
(b) on balance, in greater harm to a child’s education than if the legal action was not pursued.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)—
(a) harm to a child’s welfare is determined with reference to section 1 of the Children Act 1989 (welfare of the child), and
(b) harm to a child’s education is determined with reference to—
(i) section 9 of the Education Act 1996 (pupils to be educated in accordance with parents’ wishes), and
(ii) Article 2 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to education).
(4) Nothing in this section prevents proportionate civil measures, support, or intervention intended to secure the welfare of the child, provided such measures do not have the effect of undermining the child’s access to suitable education.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent prosecution of parents if this would lead to any harm to the child’s welfare and greater harm the child’s education than if legal action was not pursued.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 1, page 1, line 9, leave out from “parents” to the end of line 10 and insert “and any other person with parental responsibility for the child, or the child, if they have reached the age of 16.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to extend the right to Family Group Conferencing to children aged 16 and 17 so they are able to agree their own care plan.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Leave out Clause 54, and insert the following new Clause—
“Local authority and academy admission intervention threshold
For section 96 of School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (Direction to admit child to specified school) substitute—
“96 Local authority and academy admission intervention threshold
(1) A local authority may only directly intervene to admit pupils to a school where—
(a) the admission authority has demonstrably failed to meet admissions obligations, or
(b) there is clear evidence of disadvantage or unfair treatment of the pupil involved.
(2) Any local authority direction for admission under subsection (1) must—
(a) be justified with clear evidence, or
(b) be preceded by formal consultation with the relevant admission authority.
(3) An admission authority which is an academy trust may independently determine admission criteria for schools under its control, provided such criteria—
(a) comply with basic fairness and minimum national standards, and
(b) are published and transparent.
(4) Before making significant changes to admission criteria under subsection (3), the admissions authority must consult—
(a) local authorities,
(b) parents of pupils attending schools within the Trust, and
(c) other relevant stakeholders as determined appropriate by the Trust.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment limits local authority powers to intervene in admissions to situations where the admission authority has failed to meet its admissions obligations or has treated pupils unfairly. It also outlines the procedure for academy admissions.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 1, page 1, line 10, at end insert—
“(1A) A family group decision-making meeting must be offered by the relevant local authority when a family is going through private law proceedings.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to reduce the conflict in private law proceedings by offering a family group decision making meeting, allow other family members to support the child as well as to identify where there are significant safeguarding risks to the child/children. It seeks to strengthen the intention that mediation and reconciliation out of court are better for the child.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 36, page 79, line 16, at end insert—
“(c) institutions in England that cater for children placed with them for alternative provision by local authorities.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to bring unregistered alternative provision within the scope of routine oversight.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 54, insert the following new Clause—
“Power to direct admission not to have regard to maintained or Academy status
In section 96 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (direction to admit child to specified school), after subsection (2) insert—
“(2A) A direction under this section may not take into account whether a school is a maintained school or an Academy.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the decisions regarding pupil admissions numbers do not take into account whether the school is an Academy or a local authority maintained school.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 55, page 117, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) a child is otherwise vulnerable, including children with refugee or humanitarian protection, or on resettlement schemes, but who do not qualify as an Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Child.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name of Baroness Garden of Frognal broaden the scope of the LA’s new power to include all refugee and asylum-seeking children, not just unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 1, page 1, line 10, at end insert—
“(1A) The family group decision-making meeting, or meetings, must follow an evidence based approach including the appointment of an independent and suitably trained coordinator, including in relation to domestic abuse.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that family group decision-making meetings follow an evidence based approach.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 36, page 79, line 16, at end insert—
“but an institution which provides religious instruction as an addition to the education which its students receive elsewhere is not an independent educational institution.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 36, page 79, line 29, at end insert—
“(e) provide that several separate organisations should be considered as one organisation for the purposes of this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow the government to counter evasion based on dividing a child’s education between several institutions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 1, line 10, at end insert—
“(1A) Before a child is reunited with any family member after a period of being looked after, a local authority must offer a family group decision-making meeting to the child’s parents or any other person with parental responsibility.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that family group decision-making meetings are held before family reunification.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 55, page 118, line 2, at end insert "and this may include a child in the asylum process or who has refugee status"
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name Baroness Garden of Frognal broaden the scope of the LA’s new power to include all refugee and asylum-seeking children, not just unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 36, page 80, line 18 leave out line 18 and insert—
“(d) an Academy, University Technical College or studio school;”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include academies, University Technical Colleges and studio schools as excepted institutions for the purposes of the new section 92 in the Education and Skills Act 2008.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Lord Agnew of Oulton gives notice of his intention to oppose the Question that Clause 55 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 3, after second “meeting” insert “process including preparation”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 7, at end insert—
“(4A) The family group decision making meeting must—
(a) be facilitated by a trained coordinator, who has no decision-making responsibility for the child, and
(b) include private time for the family network members attending the meeting and the child, if in attendance, to draw up their proposal to address concerns about the child’s welfare.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 55, insert the following new Clause—
“Governance of managed moves by the local authority
After section 96 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, insert—
“96A Governance of managed moves by the local authority
(1) Managed moves of a registered pupil from one maintained school or Academy to another must be arranged through the local authority’s fair access panel, as governed by the area’s Fair Access Protocol.
(2) The duty imposed by subsection (1) does not apply in circumstances where the child of compulsory school age is removed from the roll of one school and registered at another school solely as a consequence of the child’s change of ordinary residence, provided that the change of residence is documented and verified.
(3) The local authority must keep and maintain a record of all managed moves occurring to, from, or within its area and this record must include—
(a) the reasons for the move,
(b) the schools involved,
(c) whether the move was voluntary or directed, and
(d) the outcome for the pupil.
(4) Where a managed move results in the registration of a pupil at a school within the area of a different local authority, the responsibility for monitoring the educational outcomes and welfare of the pupil following the move transfer to the receiving local authority upon the pupil’s registration at the new school.
(5) Each local authority must submit an annual report to the Secretary of State containing a summary of managed moves conducted under this section.
(6) The Secretary of State may issue guidance to local authorities and schools on the implementation of this section, to which they must have regard.
(7) In this section—
“managed moves” means a permanent change of the pupil’s school registration, where a move is not a result of—
(a) a permanent exclusion under section 51A of the Education Act 2002,
(b) a transfer to a special school pursuant to section 42 of the Children and Families Act 2014,
(c) a change of registration due to school closure,
(d) movement between educational phases,
(e) a change in school type as a consequence of the Academy Act 2010;
“school” has the same meaning as in Part 4 of the Education Act 1996.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires all schools to route all managed moves through the local area’s existing Fair Access Protocol (FAP) and local authorities to report on their use to the Department for Education. This would subject managed moves to a collaborative peer review and ensure appropriate local authority and the Department of Education knowledge and oversight.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 36, page 80, line 23, at end insert—
“(h) an institution—
(i) that is only providing religious instruction or guidance,
(ii) where parents or guardians of attendees have registered at their Local Authority that they provide suitable out-of-school education separate from or in addition to any attendance at the institution, and
(iii) where the institution demonstrates to the Local Authority that it provides the required safeguarding measures.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 56, page 118, line 29, at end insert—
“(4A) Where making a decision the adjudicator must take into account—
(a) the performance of the school, and
(b) whether the school is oversubscribed.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the adjudicator must consider the performance and the subscription of the school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 7, at end insert—
“(4A) The local authority must work with the child and their family network to implement the proposal made in (4)(b), where it addresses the local authority’s concerns about the child’s welfare.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was STOOD PART
Lord Lucas gives notice of his intention to oppose the Question that Clause 36 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This is intended to allow discussion of this clause in general, the intended regulations, and the effect on various classes of entity including after-school religious instruction.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 1, page 2, line 7, at end insert—
“(4A) A family group decision-making meeting must be chaired by a systemic family therapist or other similarly qualified professional.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require family group decision-making meetings to be chaired by a family therapist or other professional with equivalent qualifications.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 37, page 81, line 36, at end insert—
“(1B) Powers under subsection (1) may not be exercised in relation to an academy.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment specifies that the Secretary of State should rely on the provisions in Funding Agreements as regards to academies.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 56, page 118, leave out lines 33 to line 38
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the regulation-making power which would specify the matters the adjudicator must consider if changing the pupil admissions number.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 9, leave out from “welfare” to “and” in line 11
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 37, page 81, line 41, at end insert—
“(3B) Before the Secretary of State may prescribe any standard under subsection (3A), they must lay before Parliament a statement certifying that the proposed standard will not limit independent educational institutions’ independence with respect to admissions, the curriculum, or examinations, except if necessary to secure the safeguarding, wellbeing, or the spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development of pupils.
(3C) Before the Secretary of State may issue any guidance or publish any document which a proprietor of any independent educational institution must have regard to by virtue of the independent educational institution standards (including any standard prescribed by virtue of subsection (3A)), the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement certifying that the proposed guidance or document will not interfere with independent educational institutions’ independence with respect to admissions, the curriculum, or examinations, except if necessary to secure the safeguarding, wellbeing, or the spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development of pupils.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lexden (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the Government’s power to require independent educational institutions to have regard to guidance on topics where these institutions are not already subject to Government control.
Tabled: 10 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 56, page 119, line 7, at end insert—
“88IB Admission authority appeals
(1) An admission authority may appeal decisions made by the schools' adjudicator regarding admissions numbers or arrangements.
(2) Appeals under subsection (1) must be made to an independent panel appointed by the Secretary of State, whose decision is to be final.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer) - 10 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to provide admission authorities with an explicit right to appeal adjudicator decisions in relation to admission numbers.
Tabled: 10 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 March 2025
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 14, at end insert—
“(5A) A family group decision-making meeting may only be attended by such members of the “family network” as are agreed by those persons listed in subsection (1) and subject to subsection (3).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer) - 10 Mar 2025
Tabled: 10 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 56 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) - 10 Mar 2025This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 37 page 81, line 41 at end insert—
“(3B) A standard may not be prescribed in relation to the proprietor of an academy school, an alternative provision academy, a non-maintained special school, a University Technical College, a city technology college, a city college for the technology of arts or a 16 to 19 Academy.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would exempt academy schools, non-maintained special schools, city technology colleges, city colleges for the technology of arts or 16 to 19 Academies from the standard setting powers in Clause 37.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: rural school admissions policies
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a review of school admission policies in rural areas.
(2) The review under subsection (1) must include an assessment of whether admissions policies in these areas are affected by the availability of home to school transport.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 20, at end insert—
“(7A) Where a local authority is not intending to make an application under section 31 of the Children Act 1989, or issue a letter before proceedings in relation to a child, but where a Director of Children’s Services is satisfied that holding a family group decision-making meeting would assist in formulating a plan to help meet the needs of the child the Director must arrange for an offer of a family group decision making meeting to be made to—
(a) the child’s parents,
(b) any other person with parental responsibility for the child, and
(c) the child, if they have reached the age of sixteen.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 37, page 82, line 16, at end insert—
“(3A) Omit sections 106 (Independent inspectorates) and 107 (Quality assurance of independent inspectorates).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Non-affiliated - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would remove sections 106 and 107 of the Education and Skills Act 2008 which give the Secretary of State powers to approve bodies to inspect independent schools (such as the Independent Schools Inspectorate) and requires the Chief Inspector to report on those bodies. The amendment seeks to probe the Government’s readiness for the Independent Schools Inspectorate to become part of OFSTED.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 21 to 23 and insert—
“(8) The child should be invited to be involved in their family-group decision-making meeting, where consistent with their welfare.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“50% cap on all new faith school admissions
(1) Any newly established maintained school or academy of a religious character that is selective on the basis of faith must adopt admissions criteria that provide that, if oversubscribed, at least 50% of its places available each year will be allocated without reference to faith-based admission criteria.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an Academy established by virtue of a maintained school being converted into an Academy under section 4 of the Academies Act 2010, unless it applied to the maintained school prior to conversion.
(3) In subsection (1), “newly established” means schools established more than two months after the date on which this Act comes into force.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would require all new schools with faith-based admissions (other than those which were pre-existing maintained schools that have converted to being academies) to apply a 50% cap on faith-based admissions places when oversubscribed, in line with the cap for new academies and free schools.
This amendment was AGREED
Clause 37, page 86, line 4, leave out from beginning to “(see” in line 5 and insert “In subsection (1), the reference to providing education or supervised activity does not include providing boarding accommodation or activities necessary to ensure the welfare of boarders”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment clarifies that the offence of providing education or supervised activity while the registration of an independent educational institution is suspended is not committed by providing boarding accommodation (which may be prohibited separately) or activity necessary to ensure the welfare of boarders, such as supervised meals or fire safety instruction.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 21 to 26 and insert—
“(8) The child in relation to whom the family group decision-making meeting is held must be supported to attend all or part of the meeting if they wish to do so, unless the local authority determines this not to be in the best interests of the child, in which instance efforts must be made to ensure their views are represented.
(9) In exercising functions under this section in relation to a child, the local authority must, so far as is reasonably practicable and consistent with the child’s welfare—
(a) ascertain the child’s wishes and feelings, and
(b) give due consideration (having regard to the child’s age and understanding) to such wishes and feelings of the child as they have been able to ascertain.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure the views of the child are explicitly sought and given due weight as part of the family group decision-making process, in decisions affecting the child.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Reporting of faith-based selection in school admissions
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, collect and publish data on the individual admission arrangements used by all schools.
(2) The Secretary of State must, on an annual basis—
(a) require schools, via the school census, to report their current admission policy, specifying the proportion of places that may be allocated based on faith-related criteria such as proof of religious affiliation;
(b) include information on school admissions and faith-based selection in all relevant education data publications, including national education statistics, Department for Education published data files, and the ‘Get Information About Schools’ service.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Burt of Solihull (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new Clause would introduce a requirement for regular and transparent reporting of individual school admission arrangements. It seeks to clarify the extent to which schools with a religious character use faith-based criteria—such as proof of faith—for selecting pupils.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 37, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of independent educational institution standards
(1) The Secretary of State must publish a report on the predicted impact of section 37(2) of this Act (independent educational institution standards).
(2) The review must include the predicted impact of that subsection on—
(a) academy schools;
(b) alternative provision academies;
(c) non-maintained special schools;
(d) university technical colleges;
(e) city technology colleges;
(f) city colleges for the technology of arts;
(g) 16 to 19 academies.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, and another in the name of Baroness Barran, seeks to prevent section 37(2) of the Act from coming into force until the Secretary of State has published a report on the predicted impact of that subsection on the academic institutions set out in this amendment.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Limits on objections to changes to PAN
In section 88H of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (reference of objections to adjudicator), after subsection (2) insert—
“(2A) No objection may be referred to the adjudicator which—
(a) objects to an increase in a school’s published admissions number, or
(b) objects to a school’s published admissions number remaining at the same level.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit objections pupil admissions numbers if they increase or remain stable.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 26, at end insert—
“(10) If the child is under the age of two, the family group decision-making conference must not delay the timetable for the making of permanent arrangements regarding the child’s care.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is designed to ensure that the offer of a family group decision-making meeting does not unduly delay making permanent arrangements regarding the child’s care.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 38, insert the following new Clause—
“Unregistered independent educational institutions: inspection powers
Section 97 of the Education and Skills Act 2008 (Unregistered independent educational institutions: inspection) is amended as follows—
(a) at the beginning of subsection (1)(a) insert “without a warrant,”
(b) at the beginning of subsection (1)(b) insert “compel the production of,”.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow discussion of the efficiency and effectiveness of Ofsted’s powers in regard to investigating unregistered independent schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 26, at end insert—
“(10) Nothing in this section permits an extension to the 26-week limit for care proceedings in section 14(2)(ii) of the Children and Families Act 2014.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify that where a family group decision making process is used, it does not delay care proceedings beyond the 26 week limit.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“High performing schools to be allowed to expand PAN
In section 88D of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (determination of admission numbers), after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Where a school—
(a) being a primary school, has over 60% of its pupils meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined in the Key Stage 2 national curriculum assessments,
(b) being a secondary school, is performing above +0.5 on Progress 8,
wishes to increase its published admissions number, the admission authority must reflect that wish in its determination.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow high performing schools to be able to increase their pupil admission numbers.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 38, insert the following new Clause—
“Unregistered independent educational institutions: offences
After section 96 of the Education and Skills Act 2008 (Unregistered independent educational institutions: offence), insert—
“96A Premises of unregistered independent educational institutions: offence
(1) The proprietor or owner of a property (or their agent) who provides premises for an unregistered independent educational institution under section 96 (Unregistered independent educational institutions: offence) is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (or to both).
96B Assisting or encouraging the administration of an unregistered independent educational institution: offence
(1) A person who assists or encourages the administration of an unregistered independent educational institution under section 96 (Unregistered independent educational institutions: offence) is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (or to both).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Blackstone (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to create two offences: (1) providing premises for an illegal school (including primary or subleasing landlords, and letting agents) and (2) assisting or encouraging the administration of an illegal school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 39, page 96, leave out lines 17 and 18
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the inclusion of a change in the buildings occupied and made available for student use within the definition of a material change.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 26, at end insert—
“(10) If the child is to be looked after by other family members as a result of the family group decision-making meeting, the local authority must make arrangements for the safety and welfare of the child concerned and where necessary, draw up a child protection plan.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that if a child is going to be looked after by other family members, the local authority takes appropriate action to ensure their safety and welfare.
Tabled: 10 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 57 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) - 10 Mar 2025NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Prohibition of smartphones during the school day
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, all schools in England must have a policy that prohibits the use and possession of smartphones by pupils during the school day.
(2) Any policy implemented under subsection (1)—
(a) may provide for exemptions from the policy, or for an alternative policy, for sixth form students, in so far as such exemptions or alternative policies do not negatively impact upon the wider policy,
(b) may provide for exemptions for medical devices,
(c) is to be implemented as the relevant school leader considers appropriate, and
(d) may, where implemented by a boarding school or residential school, include appropriate guidance for the use of certain devices during other periods in which their pupils are on school premises, subject to such policies safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children in accordance with relevant national standards.
(3) For the purposes of this section—
“smartphones” means a mobile telephone that is able to connect to the internet and whose main purpose is not the support of learning or study;
“the school day” includes all time between the start of the first lesson period and the end of the final lesson period.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 4
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause requires schools to ban the use of smartphones during the school day.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 39, page 96, line 43, at end insert—
“(2D) Subsection (2)(i) does not prevent any special institution from making special provision for any child after they have been admitted to the institution if, in the professional opinion of the institution, that child has a type or types of special needs for which the school does not ordinarily make special provision and which could only be identified after admission.
(2E) In the case of any school relying on the provisions of subsection (2D), they may make a material change application if they reasonably expect that the special provision will be required for more than two academic terms, or if the exemption will apply to three or more pupils on their roll.
(2F) In making this material change application, it is not to be considered retrospective, nor will a school relying on the provisions of subsection (2D) suffer any detriment or adverse judgement, even if the application is made after the special provision begins, provided that they make the application within two academic terms of the provision beginning.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lexden (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment reflects the concerns of some independent special institutions that the requirement to submit a material change application before offering new special needs provision would make it impossible to support pupils who are admitted presenting one need, but are later discovered to have further special needs.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 1, page 2, line 26, at end insert—
“(10) In exercising functions under this section in relation to a child, a local authority must regularly reconsider the right of the child removed from their parents’ care to have relationships with their “family network” as defined in subsection (5).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that a child’s changing needs are considered throughout childhood and enable any necessary support to facilitate these relationships.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 1, page 2, line 26, at end insert—
“(10) If a child is to be looked after by other family members as a result of the family group decision-making meeting, the local authority must make arrangements to ensure the safety and welfare of the child and prepare a child protection plan that reflects this.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that if a child is going to be looked after by other family members, the local authority takes appropriate action, that is reflected in the child protection plan, to assure their safety and welfare.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 39, page 96, line 43, at end insert—
“(2D) The Secretary of State must issue guidance for relevant institutions on how subsection (2)(g) is to be understood.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This would require the Secretary of State to issue guidance to independent schools on how to apply subsection (2)(g).
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After subsection (2)(d) insert—
“(e) may provide for exemptions for educational purposes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Lab - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
The amendment seeks to ensure that schools may return smartphones to students during the school day for educational purposes such as media literacy lessons.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 42, page 100, line 31, at end insert—
“(f) search the premises.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Blackstone (Lab - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow the HM lnspectors to search premises for evidence it is conducting an offence of operating an illegal school without need for a warrant.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty for schools to report acts of violence against staff to the police
(1) Where an act which meets the conditions set out in subsection (2) takes place which involves the use or threat of force against a member of a school’s staff, the school must report the incident to the police.
(2) An act must be reported to the police where—
(a) it is directed towards a member of school staff or their property, and
(b) it takes place—
(i) on school property, or
(ii) because of the victim’s status as a member of a school’s staff.
(3) The provisions of this section do not require or imply a duty on the police to take specific actions in response to such reports.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 3
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This new clause seeks to create a duty for all schools to report acts or threats of violence against their staff to the police. It would not create a requirement for the police to charge the perpetrator.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—
“Cessation of child protection plans
When proceedings are initiated or a care or supervision order is issued under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 (care and supervision), if there is any cessation of a child protection plan for a child under five years old, the cessation must be signed off by the relevant Director of Children’s Services or Head of Social Work Practice.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the relevant Director of Children’s Services or Head of Social Work Practice must sign off any cessation of child protection plans for children under five years old once proceedings have been initiated or once a care or supervision order has been issued.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“National tutoring guarantee
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish a report outlining the steps necessary to introduce a national tutoring guarantee.
(2) A “national tutoring guarantee” means a statutory requirement on the Secretary of State to ensure access to small group academic tutoring for all disadvantaged children who require academic support.
(3) A report published under this section must include an assessment of how best to deliver targeted academic support from qualified tutors to children—
(a) from low-income backgrounds,
(b) with low prior attainment,
(c) with additional needs, or
(d) who are young carers.
(4) In preparing a report under this section, the Secretary of State must consult with—
(a) headteachers,
(b) teachers,
(c) school leaders,
(d) parents of children from low-income backgrounds,
(e) children from low-income backgrounds, and
(f) other individuals or organisations as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(5) A report under this section must be laid before Parliament.
(6) Within three months of a report under this section being laid before Parliament, the Secretary of State must take steps to begin implementation of the recommendations contained in the report.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to publish a report outlining the steps required to introduce a national tutoring guarantee, and to begin implementing its recommendations.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 2, page 2, line 31, leave out subsections (2) to (4) and insert—
“(2) In subsection (3)—
(a) omit paragraph (a) in the definition of “relevant agency”;
(b) at the end of the definition of “safeguarding partner”, insert—
“(d) those relevant agencies which are designated childcare or education agencies.”.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a relevant agency is a “designated childcare or education agency” if it—
(a) has functions relating to the provision of childcare or education (or both), and
(b) is designated as such by regulations made by the Secretary of State.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary) - 07 Mar 2025Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to expand the definition of safeguarding partner to include all “designated childcare and education agencies” by default. It also seeks to remove the requirement that “relevant agencies” are designated by the Secretary of State.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“School inspections: multi-academy trusts
In section 5(2)(d) of the Education Act 2005, after “schools”, insert “and trusts””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Blunkett (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 2, line 35, after “agencies” insert “or family hubs”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This and other amendments to Clause 2 in the name of Lord Farmer add family hubs, which support families as the primary means by which children are safeguarded, to the list of new agencies which have to be included in safeguarding arrangements.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Transfer of the Independent Schools Inspectorate functions to Ofsted
(1) The Education and Inspections Act 2006 is amended as follows.
(2) After section 156, insert—
“156A Transfer of the Independent Schools Inspectorate functions to the Office
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations transfer the functions of the Independent Schools Inspectorate to the Office.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations under this section within one year of the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 is passed.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Non-affiliated - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This probing amendment seeks to clarify the Government’s readiness for the Independent Schools Inspectorate to become part of OFSTED.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Establishment of a national body for SEND
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, establish a national body for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in relation to children.
(2) The functions of the national body for SEND will include, but not be limited to—
(a) national coordination of SEND provision for children,
(b) supporting the delivery of SEND support for children with very high needs, and
(c) advising on funding needed by local authorities for SEND provision for children.
(3) Any mechanism used by the national body for SEND in advising on funding under subsection (2)(c) should be based on current need and may disregard historic spend.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Addington (LD - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to establish a national body for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in relation to children.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty of school governing bodies regarding mental health provision
(1) Subject to subsection (3), the governing body of a maintained or academy school in England has a duty to make arrangements for provision in the school of a dedicated education mental health practitioner.
(2) In subsection (1) “education mental health practitioner” means a person with a graduate-level or postgraduate-level qualification of that name earned through a course commissioned by NHS England.
(3) Where a school has 100 or fewer pupils, the duty under subsection (1) may be satisfied through collaborative provision between several schools.
(4) The Secretary of State must provide, or make arrangements for the provision of, appropriate financial and other support to school governing bodies for the purposes of facilitating the fulfilling of the duty in subsection (1).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the governing body of a maintained or academy school in England to make arrangements for provision in the school of a dedicated education mental health practitioner.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 5, after “agency” insert “or family hub”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This and other amendments to Clause 2 in the name of Lord Farmer add family hubs, which support families as the primary means by which children are safeguarded, to the list of new agencies which have to be included in safeguarding arrangements.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Intervention powers for underperforming multi-academy trusts
(1) The Secretary of State must monitor the educational performance of multi-academy trusts (“MATs”) to identify those that are significantly underperforming relative to their local peer group.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a MAT is significantly underperforming if—
(a) over a period of three consecutive academic years, the weighted average educational outcomes across all academies within the trust that qualify to be included in the national league tables, fall below the tenth percentile when compared to schools serving similar levels of deprivation within the same local authority area or statistical neighbour group, and
(b) the trust demonstrates insufficient progress in addressing identified weaknesses despite support and intervention measures.
(3) The educational outcomes referred to in subsection (2)(a) include—
(a) in respect of the primary phase, Key Stage 2 attainment measures in reading, writing and mathematics;
(b) in respect of the secondary phase, Key Stage 4 attainment and progress measures;
(c) such other measures as the Secretary of State may specify by regulations.
(4) When assessing performance under subsection (2), the Secretary of State must adjust comparisons to account for levels of deprivation.
(5) Where the Secretary of State is satisfied that a MAT meets the criteria in subsection (2), the Secretary of State may—
(a) commission Ofsted to inspect the MAT at group level and report to the Department for Education and publicly on areas of weakness,
(b) issue a notice to improve specifying areas where improvement is required and timescales,
(b) require the trust to engage with a specified school improvement partner,
(c) terminate the master funding agreement and all supplemental funding agreements, or
(d) take such other steps as appear necessary to secure improvement, including rebrokering all or some of the schools to another local MAT or MATs.
(6) Before exercising powers under subsection (5), the Secretary of State must—
(a) give the trust written notice of the intention to intervene, specifying the grounds and proposed actions,
(b) provide the trust with an opportunity to make representations within 28 days,
(c) consider any representations made, and
(d) notify the trust in writing of the final decision and reasons.
(7) A MAT may appeal a decision under subsection (5) to the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days of receiving notice of the decision.
(8) The Secretary of State must publish an annual report on—
(a) the number of MATs identified as underperforming,
(b) interventions undertaken, and
(c) any outcomes achieved through intervention measures.
(9) The Secretary of State may make regulations by statutory instrument which—
(a) specify additional educational outcome measures under subsection (3)(c);
(b) prescribe deprivation indicators under subsection (4);
(c) set out detailed procedures for performance assessment and intervention;
(d) define “local peer group” and “statistical neighbour group” for the purposes of this section.
(10) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Multi-academy trusts: inspection
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish an inspection regime for multi-academy trusts (MATs), to be discharged by His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools.
(2) The inspection regime must assess the effectiveness and value for money of MATs.
(2) The inspections under the regime must prioritise MATs—
(a) which are seeking to enter into new partnerships with schools,
(b) whose schools are on average significantly under-performing, or
(c) which are not providing value for money.
(3) The inspection regime must take into account—
(a) varying MAT models, and
(b) the level of centralisation in the structure of the MAT.
(4) Inspections must be informed by—
(a) school-level inspections, and
(b) financial information held by the Department for Education regarding the MAT.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Spielman (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to establish an inspection regime for multi-academy trusts.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 6, leave out “or education (or both)” and insert “, education or family support (or all three)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This and other amendments to Clause 2 in the name of Lord Farmer add family hubs, which support families as the primary means by which children are safeguarded, to the list of new agencies which have to be included in safeguarding arrangements.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to provide relationships and sex education and PSHE to persons who have not attained the age of 18 at further education institutions
(1) The Children and Social Work Act 2017 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 34 (education relating to relationships and sex)—
(a) at the end of subsection (1)(b) insert—
“(c) relationships and sex education to be provided to persons who have not attained the age of 18 and who are receiving education at post-16 education institutions in England.”;
(b) in subsection (2)(a), after “schools” insert “and further education providers”;
(c) in subsection (2)(b), after “schools” insert “and further education providers”;
(d) in subsection (2)(c), after “schools” insert “and further education providers”.
(3) In section 35 (other personal, social, health and economic education)—
(a) at the end of subsection (1)(b) insert—
“(c) to persons who have not attained the age of 18 and who are receiving education at post-16 education institutions in England.”;
(b) in subsection (2)(a), after “schools” insert “and further education providers”;
(c) in subsection (2)(b), after “schools” insert “and further education providers”;
(d) in subsection (2)(c), after “schools” insert “and further education providers”.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would extend the existing provision of relationships and sex education and PSHE under the Children and Social Work Act 2017 to people under the age of 18 who are receiving education at post-16 education institutions in England.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Reporting of racist incidents in schools
Local authorities must require all schools under their authority to record and report any incidents of racism and faith-based bullying, and any subsequent action taken.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Whitaker (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to require schools to record and report racist incidents and the action taken.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 9, at end insert—
“(4A) In subsection (3)—
(a) omit the “and” after paragraph (b) in the definition of “relevant agency”;
(b) after paragraph (b) in the definition of “relevant agency” insert “and
(c) those agencies which are designated childcare or education agencies.”.
(4B) After subsection (3) insert—
“(4) Before making regulations under subsection (3) the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) childcare and education agencies in England including primary, secondary and further education providers;
(b) local authorities in England;
(c) such other persons (if any) as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(5) Before making regulations under subsection (3) the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) the effectiveness of the arrangements set out in subsections (1) and (2);
(b) the range of structures created;
(c) whether sufficient time has passed to judge the effectiveness of these arrangements and structures.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would give a power to the Secretary of State to make childcare and education agencies a local statutory safeguarding partner.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 45, page 108, line 13, at end insert “qualified,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to extend investigations to those qualified teachers currently teaching overseas. The effect being that should they return to the UK, or seek employment with employers who make a prohibition check with the Teaching Regulation Authority, incidents carried out overseas will be covered.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 45, page 109, line 28, at end insert—
“(4A) In section 141C (list of persons prohibited from teaching etc) at the end of subsection (5) insert “, including making reasonable efforts to include any changes of name by such persons.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment addresses concerns that person prohibited from teaching are using name changes to evade detection in prohibition order checks.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Spiritual, moral, social and cultural education in assemblies
(1) Chapter VI of Part II of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (religious education and worship) is amended as follows.
(2) For section 70(1) (requirements relating to collective worship) substitute—
“(1) Subject to section 71, each pupil in attendance at—
(a) a community, foundation or voluntary school in Wales,
(b) a foundation or voluntary school in England which is designated with a religious character, or
(c) an Academy in England which is designated with a religious character,
must take part in an act of collective worship at least one time per week.”
(3) In section 70(2), for “community, foundation or voluntary school”, substitute “school to which subsection (1) applies”.
(4) After section 70, insert—
“70A Requirements relating to assemblies
(1) This section applies to schools in England that are—
(a) maintained schools without a religious character,
(b) non-maintained special schools,
(c) City Technology Colleges, and
(d) academies without a religious character.
(2) Each pupil in attendance at a school to which this section applies must at least once during the school week take part in an assembly which is principally directed towards furthering the spiritual, moral, social and cultural education of the pupils regardless of religion or belief.
(3) In relation to any school to which this section applies—
(a) the local authority responsible for education (in the case of maintained schools) and the governing body must exercise their functions with a view to securing, and
(b) the head teacher must secure,
that subsection (2) is complied with.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Burt of Solihull (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment removes the requirement for daily collective worship in England for maintained schools and academies without a religious character, non-maintained special schools, and city technology colleges, and instead introduces a requirement for a minimum weekly assembly furthering spiritual, moral, social and cultural education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 11, leave out “16E(2A)(b) or (3)” and insert “16E(4)(b)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Bichard seek to expand the definition of safeguarding partner to include all “designated childcare and education agencies” by default.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 11, at end insert—
“(6) The Secretary of State must produce a report on the impact of the inclusion of childcare and education agencies in safeguarding arrangements on the resources and costs of education and childcare organisations in England.
(7) A report under subsection (6) must be made within two years of the day on which this Act is passed and annually thereafter.
(8) The Secretary of State must lay a report made under subsection (6) before Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to report on the impact on the inclusion of childcare and education agencies in safeguarding arrangements on the resources and costs of education and childcare organisations.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Relationship, sex, and health education curriculum
All external resources used in schools within the relationship, sex, and health education curriculum and teaching time must be published, citable, and accessible for public and regulatory scrutiny.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 4
Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that only resources that are accessible in the public domain are used to teach the RSHE curriculum.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 46, page 110, line 17, at end insert—
“(1A) In section 133 (requirement to be qualified), in subsection (1), after “work” insert “in relation to National Curriculum subjects only””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 46, page 110, line 17, at end insert—
“(1A) In section 133 (requirement to be qualified) after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) The requirement in subsection (1)(a) only applies after a person has been carrying out such work in a school for five years.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow schools a 5 year period for teaching staff to gain QTS.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Relationship, sex, and health education curriculum (No. 2)
(1) The Secretary of State must issue guidance to schools on parental access to RSHE school curriculum materials.
(2) The guidance issued under subsection (1) must include—
(a) a clear instruction to schools that they must not prevent parents from requesting and viewing copies of school curriculum materials on the grounds that this could risk a breach of copyright, but may remind them of copyright law around copying and replication, and
(b) a clear instruction that schools must not enter into commercial confidentiality arrangements with third party providers who provide curriculum material for use with children in schools which purport to prevent their disclosure to parents and carers.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 4
Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure parents are able to view materials in the RSHE curriculum as existing copyright law already allows for limited copying and sharing of published material and seeks to prevent schools from entering into commercial confidentiality arrangements around curriculum material.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 11, at end insert—
“(6) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, place a duty on the local authority to identify a single point of contact to support education providers in their responsibilities under this Act.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe whether all education and children organisations can contact the LADO.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 2, page 3, line 11, at end insert—
“(6) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, place a duty on education providers to identify a single point of contact to take part in the strategic safeguarding arrangements.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe how education providers will be involved in strategic safeguarding arrangements.
This amendment was NOT CALLED
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Alternative systems of education
(1) The Secretary of State may, if so requested, make a declaration that an alternative system of education is expected, when carefully followed, to be a suitable education for most children.
(2) The Secretary of State may take whatever advice they deem appropriate in arriving at such a conclusion.
(3) If the Secretary of State, having been so requested, refuses to make such a declaration, they shall publish in full their reasons for refusal.
(4) If the Secretary of State makes such a declaration, they must publish a full account of the alternative system of education concerned.
(5) In deciding whether to grant such a declaration, the Secretary of State may not require of the alternative system of education standards better than those obtaining, on average, in the worst 10 per cent of English state schools.
(6) The Secretary of State may at any time reconsider a decision to grant or refuse a declaration.
(7) A parent may appeal to the Tribunal against a decision of the secretary of state to refuse to make a declaration.
(8) An appeal under subsection (7) must be brought within a period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the Secretary of State’s decision was notified to the parent.
(9) On an appeal, the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision of the Secretary of State, or
(b) direct that the Secretary of State should make a declaration.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to provide a route for the in-principle approval of religious and other systems of education, for example, Charedi schooling. This will allow discussion of how the government intends to approach these systems.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 46, page 110, line 17, at end insert—
“(1A) In section 133 (requirement to be qualified) after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Where a person is carrying out such work for the purposes of teaching a shortage subject, the requirement in subsection (1)(a) does not apply.
(1B) For the purposes of this section, “shortage subject” means any subject in relation to which the recruitment targets set by the department for initial teacher training have not been met in the most recent years for which such statistics exist.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow schools to employ teachers who do not hold QTS for shortage subjects.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Child rights impact assessment
(1) A Minister of the Crown must prepare and publish a child rights impact assessment in relation to any legislative provision, policy decision, budgetary decision, or other decision of a strategic or operational nature that has or will have a direct or indirect impact on children’s wellbeing,social care or education, which are undertaken by virtue of the provisions in this Act.
(2) The purpose of a child rights impact assessment is to secure better or further effect of the rights set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).
(3) A child rights impact assessment must include consideration of the views, wishes and feeling of children and young people affected by the decision, insofar as the Minister is able to ascertain those views.
(4) A child rights impact assessment should be undertaken on all relevant legislation, policy and budget development which are undertaken by virtue of the provisions in this Act at the earliest possible opportunity and prior to making final decisions.
(5) The UNCRC includes the rights and obligations set out in—
(a) the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Part 1;
(b) Articles 1 to 6(1), 6(3) and 7 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict;
(c) Articles 1 to 10 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography;
(d) any other Optional Protocols to the UNCRC that the United Kingdom may in future ratify.
(6) The UNCRC rights and obligations for the purposes of this Act are subject to any reservations, objections or interpretative declarations by the United Kingdom as may be in force at the time.
(7) The UNCRC rights and obligations for the purposes of this Act should be interpreted in the light of General Comments prepared by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child under rule 77 of its procedure and Concluding Observations made by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in response to a United Kingdom report under Article 45 paragraph (d) of the Convention.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment will introduce a statutory requirement for Ministers – and thereby government departments – to routinely prepare and make publicly available a children’s rights assessment of the impact and/or expected impact of any proposed legislation, policy, budgetary decision or other strategic or operational decision undertaken by virtue of the provisions in this Act as they relate to children’s wellbeing, social care or education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 46, page 110, line 18, after “qualified),” insert—
“(za) after subsection (1), insert—
“(1A) The specified requirements in subsection (1)(b) may include that the person is a practitioner, in a particular profession, skill, business or other relevant pursuit who has the necessary expertise to assist a child’s learning experience in a formal learning environment.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 2 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This seeks to probe how the Government expects this Clause to work in practice both operationally and strategically.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 3, page 3, leave out lines 25 and 26
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify what support the Secretary of State will require multi-agency partners to offer.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 46, page 110, line 22, at end insert—
“(2A) In section 133, after subsection (6), insert—
“(7) “qualified teacher” shall include individuals who, though not possessing formal teacher training certification, hold a university-level qualification directly related to the subject they are teaching, and who demonstrate competency through practical teaching experience or relevant professional experience in their subject area.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include in the definition of “qualified teacher” individuals who have significant subject-specific qualifications and practical teaching or professional experience, recognising the expertise they bring to educational settings without a traditional teaching qualification.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty on UK Ministers
(1) A Minister of the Crown must, when exercising any or all of their functions under this Act, as they relate to children’s wellbeing, social care or education, have due regard to the rights and obligations set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).
(2) In complying with the duty under subsection (1), Ministers of the Crown must take account of the relevant views, wishes and feelings of children insofar as the Minister is able to ascertain those views.
(3) When discharging their duties under the provisions in this Act, Ministers of the Crown must promote public awareness and understanding of the UNCRC as it relates to children’s wellbeing, social care or education, including among children, public authorities, and those performing public functions impacting children’s wellbeing, social care or education.
(4) In complying with this duty, Ministers of the Crown must prepare and publish child rights impact assessments in relation to any legislative provision, policy decision, budgetary decision, or other decision of a strategic or operational nature that has or will have a direct or indirect impact on children’s wellbeing, social care or education, which are undertaken by virtue of the provisions in this Act.
(5) As soon as is practicable after the end of each three-year period, the Secretary of State must publish (in such a manner as they deem appropriate) a report of the steps taken in that period specifically to secure implementation of the rights and obligations set out in the UNCRC, as they relate to children’s wellbeing, social care or education.
(6) A report published under subsection (5) must include—
(a) an assessment of the extent to which the UNCRC is being implemented for children and young people in relation to wellbeing, social care and education;
(b) steps taken to promote understanding and awareness of the rights of children, as they relate to wellbeing, social care or education.
(7) The UNCRC includes the rights and obligations set out in—
(a) the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Part 1;
(b) Articles 1 to 6(1), 6(3) and 7 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict;
(c) Articles 1 to 10 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography;
(d) any other Optional Protocols to the UNCRC that the UK may in future ratify.
(8) The UNCRC rights and obligations for the purposes of this Act are subject to any reservations, objections or interpretative declarations by the United Kingdom as may be in force at the time.
(9) The UNCRC rights and obligations for the purposes of this Act should be interpreted in light of General Comments prepared by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child under rule 77 of its procedure and Concluding Observations made by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in response to a UK report under Article 45 paragraph (d) of the Convention.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The purpose of this amendment is to require Ministers to have due regard to the rights and obligations set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) when exercising their functions under this Act, as they relate to children’s wellbeing, social care or education.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 46 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Inclusion of non-religious beliefs in religious education
(1) Section 375 of the Education Act 1996 is amended as follows.
(2) Omit subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) Every agreed syllabus shall—
(a) reflect the fact that the religious traditions in Great Britain are in the main Christian, and
(b) take account of the teachings of the other principal religions and non-religious beliefs represented in Great Britain.
(3A) In subsection (3)(b), the reference to non-religious beliefs is to non-religious philosophical convictions that—
(a) are explicitly non-religious, and
(b) are philosophical convictions within the meaning of Article 2 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights.
(3B) In subsection (3A)(b) “the European Convention on Human Rights” means the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, agreed by the Council of Europe at Rome on 4 November 1950, as it has effect for the time being in relation to the United Kingdom; and “the First Protocol”, in relation to that Convention, means the protocol to the Convention agreed at Paris on 20 March 1952.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Burt of Solihull (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires non-religious beliefs to be taught in religious education, and defines non-religious beliefs for those purposes.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 3, page 3, line 27, leave out from beginning to end of line 11 on page 4
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to confirm that Local Authorities can use their discretion in how the MACPTs are implemented operationally in their areas.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 4, line 3, at end insert—
“(e) representatives from any other relevant agencies.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that there is an effective multi-agency team.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 46, insert the following new Clause—
“Fast-track teacher qualification access for home educators
A parent who has home educated for at least three years may apply for fast-tracked access to a qualified teacher status pathway, without requiring additional in-school experience.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to acknowledge the teaching experience of home educators by enabling direct access to teacher qualification pathways without repeating basic training.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Establishment of a national children’s wellbeing measurement programme
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a national children’s wellbeing measurement programme.
(2) A programme established under this section must—
(a) conduct an annual online national survey of the wellbeing of children in relevant schools in England;
(b) provide central analysis of data and support for schools in the administration of the survey;
(c) make provision for school, parental and student consent to participation in the survey, ensuring that participation is voluntary and that results are handled confidentially;
(d) regularly publish the results of the survey and provide relevant data to participating schools, local authorities and other public bodies for the purposes of improving children’s wellbeing.
(3) For the purposes of this section, “wellbeing” includes the drivers of wellbeing, including nutrition, physical activity, participation in arts, culture and entertainment and any other factors the Secretary of State deems relevant.
(4) For the purposes of this section, “relevant schools” includes academy schools, alternative provision, maintained schools, non-maintained special schools, independent schools, and pupil referral units.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord O'Donnell (XB - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to convert underperforming schools to community learning hubs
Where Ofsted rates a school as inadequate for three consecutive years, a majority vote of local home-educating families may petition for its conversion into a community learning hub.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment empowers communities to repurpose failing schools into shared learning centres for home-educated children, promoting community-led education and flexible use of public assets.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 46, insert the following new Clause—
“Anti-bullying training for school staff and inspectors
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that anti-bullying training is a core component of—
(a) all initial teacher training programmes;
(b) induction training for Ofsted inspectors.
(2) The Secretary of State must ensure all school staff in England and Ofsted inspectors are provided with continuing professional development (CPD) in anti-bullying strategies with refresher training to be provided at appropriate intervals.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 4, line 3, at end insert—
“(e) a member of the Children With Disabilities Team.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Fraser of Craigmaddie (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include a member of Children’s Disabilities Team into the multi-agency child protection team.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 3, page 4, leave out lines 8 to 11
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment aims to leave discretion about the qualifications of those who are part of MACPTs to the relevant agency responsible. It also aims for clarity about where the Secretary of State might lift the requirement for qualifications in this work.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 47, page 111, line 13, at end insert—
“(5A) Subsection (1)(b)(ii) does not apply in relation to an educational institution that has received an OFSTED rating of Good or equivalent in the last three years.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Agnew seeks to ensure that academies which are rated as “Good” are not required to follow the National Curriculum.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Curriculum materials
All external resources used in schools must be published, citable, and accessible for public and regulatory scrutiny.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that only resources that are accessible in the public domain are used, so that parents can at all times know what their children are being taught.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of off-rolling in schools
(1) Within 12 months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish a review into the practice of off-rolling in schools.
(2) The review must produce proposals outlining the steps necessary to eliminate the practice of off-rolling in schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Addington (LD - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to review the practice of off-rolling and to produce proposals to eliminate the practice.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 3, page 4, line 14, at end insert—
“(7A) The local authority must provide the resources to enable continuous professional development training to be provided to all teachers and teaching assistants with responsibilities for supporting vulnerable children that interact with multi agency child protection teams.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that schools have the resources to meet their statutory commitments.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 47, page 111, line 16, at end insert, “, except that an Academy school is not obliged to deliver the National Curriculum to a child with SEND, provided that, if appropriate, assisted technology is used to support the child's learning.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Addington (LD - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove an obligation to deliver the National Curriculum to a child with SEND, provided the child is offered appropriate assistive technology to support their learning.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 4, line 15, at end insert—
““Children’s Disabilities Team” means any team provided by a local authority that is providing services under section 17 of the Children Act 1989;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Fraser of Craigmaddie (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 47, page 111, line 28, at end insert “, unless the Academy school has received an OFSTED rating of Good or equivalent in the last three years.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Agnew seeks to ensure that academies which are rated as “Good” are not required to follow the National Curriculum.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Educational cessation
Where a child has demonstrably completed a course of education equivalent to five GCSEs at grades 4–9, they shall no longer be subject to compulsory education requirements under Part VI of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow children who have already completed the equivalent of GCSE-level work to be exempt from further compulsory education. This acknowledges that some children may exceed the educational requirements before the traditional age of 16.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Experimental home education zones
The Secretary of State may designate up to three local authority areas as experimental education zones, exempt from national education regulation for a period of ten years.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to create experimental zones where communities may opt out of national education laws to trial alternative education systems including in relation to home education and gather long-term data.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 4, line 41, at end insert—
“(5) Any arrangements made under this section must have due regard to the existing multi-agency child and adult protection arrangements in the area.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify how the new statutory MACPTs will work with existing local multi agency safeguarding arrangements, both statutory and non-statutory.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
In Clause 47, page 112, line 25, leave out subsection (5) and insert—
“(5) Section 96 of the Education Act 2002 (procedure for making certain orders and regulations) is amended as follows—
(a) at the beginning of subsection (7), insert “Subject to subsection (8),”;
(b) after subsection (7) insert—
“(8) An order made under any provision of this Part which would amend primary legislation, or regulations made under section 91, does not apply to an Academy school.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Carter of Haslemere (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent orders made under section 96 of the Education Act 2002 which would amend primary legislation, or regulations under section 91 of the Act, from applying to an Academy School.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 47 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 4, line 41, at end insert—
“16EC Report on work and impact of multi-agency child protection teams
(1) The Secretary of State must report annually on the work and impact of multi-agency child protection teams.
(2) A report under this section shall include analysis of—
(a) the membership of multi-agency child protection teams,
(b) the specific child protection activities undertaken by such teams,
(c) best practice in multi-agency work, and
(d) the impact of multi-agency child protection teams on—
(i) information sharing,
(ii) risk identification, and
(iii) joining up services between children’s social care, police, health services, education and other agencies, including the voluntary sector.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to report on the effectiveness of multi-agency child protection teams.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Early graduate certificate for advanced learners
A child who has demonstrably completed education equivalent to A-levels before the age of 16 is entitled to an official certificate of graduation issued by the Secretary of State.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment enables early academic achievers to receive formal recognition, ensuring they can progress to further education or employment without being held back by age-based constraints.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Wellbeing support for schools
(1) The Secretary of State must provide statutory guidance for all relevant schools on whole school approaches to mental health and wellbeing.
(2) Such guidance should include, but not be limited to—
(a) identifying and measuring children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing;
(b) the collation of appropriate wellbeing data to adapt both internal and external support within settings;
(c) appropriate training and development for teachers and other school staff;
(d) access to mental health support within schools;
(e) further specialist provision as required within community services.
(3) The Secretary of State must report to Parliament each year on progress made in implementing the guidance and how wellbeing data collected is informing appropriate support offered through community services.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to provide statutory guidance on whole school approaches to mental health and wellbeing and to report to Parliament annually on progress.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 5, line 19, leave out subsection (4)
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the adequacy of resources available for this part of the Bill to be delivered effectively.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 47, insert the following new Clause —
“Flexibility to take into account local circumstances when following the National Curriculum
(1) The Education Act 2002 (establishment of the National Curriculum for England by order) is amended as follows.
(2) In section 87, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) In any revision to the National Curriculum for England, the Secretary of State must ensure that the National Curriculum shall consist of—
(a) a core framework, and
(b) subjects or areas of learning outside the core framework that allow flexibility for each school to take account of their specific circumstances.”
(3) In section 210 (orders and regulations), after subsection (3)(e) insert—
“(ea) section 87, or”.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to increase flexibility to take into account local circumstances when following the National Curriculum and to make any changes to the National Curriculum subject to Parliamentary approval.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Approved free schools in pre-opening
The Secretary of State must make provision for the opening of all free schools whose applications were approved prior to October 2024.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to proceed with the opening of free schools whose opening was paused in October 2024.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 5, line 43, leave out “only”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, along with another in the name of Baroness O’Neill, seeks to clarify how cases that cross local authority borders will be managed.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 49, page 113, leave out lines 21 to 33 and insert—
“(1) Where the proprietor of an Academy—
(a) has breached a relevant duty, or
(b) otherwise has acted unreasonably with respect to the performance of a relevant duty, the proprietor must take such steps as are necessary to remedy the breach or unreasonable action and secure the proper performance of the relevant duty.
(2) Where the proprietor of an Academy has acted unreasonably with respect to the exercise of a relevant power, the proprietor must take such steps as are necessary to ensure the reasonable exercise of the relevant power.
(2A) The proprietor must remedy any breach identified under subsection (1) or (2) within such reasonable period as the circumstances require, having regard to—
(a) the nature and seriousness of the breach;
(b) the impact or likely impact on pupils' education or welfare;
(c) the complexity of the remedial action required;
(d) any other relevant circumstances.
(2B) Where the Secretary of State is reasonably satisfied that the proprietor of an Academy has breached a relevant duty or otherwise has acted unreasonably with respect to the performance of a relevant duty the Secretary of State may serve notice on the proprietor of an Academy specifying—
(a) the breach that has been identified;
(b) the relevant duty or power in question;
(c) the period within which the proprietor must remedy the breach.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent Clause 49 from granting the Secretary of State the power to (1) issue a direction to an Academy that is “likely” to have breached a relevant duty, and (2) prescribe exactly how any breach should be remedied. Instead, it seeks to give Academies discretion in how they remedy an actual breach of a relevant duty.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 113, leave out lines 24 and 25
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment removes the Secretary of State’s power to direct in cases where proprietor has acted, or proposes to act, unreasonably.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Financial governance of local authority schools
(1) Local authority maintained schools must—
(a) ensure that their accounts are externally audited between the end of the academic year and 31st December annually, and
(b) publish these accounts on their school website by no later than 31st January of the following year.
(2) The relevant local authority must monitor the resolution by the school of any material issues raised in these audit reports.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the same standard of financial governance exists between academy schools and local authority schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 3, page 5, line 44, at end insert “or in other local authorities where appropriate to meet the safeguarding needs of the child.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, along with another in the name of Baroness O’Neill, seeks to clarify how cases that cross local authority borders will be managed.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 3 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Educational attainment of children with a parent in prison
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must commission a report on the educational attainment of school age children with a parent who is in prison.
(2) The report must make recommendations for how the educational attainment of those children can be improved.
(3) The Secretary of State must publish the report and lay it before Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bishop of Gloucester (Bshp - Bishops)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 113, line 26, leave out from “may” to the end of line 33 and insert “exercise their powers under the funding agreement to terminate or require performance of the funding agreement in accordance with its terms.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would limit the Secretary of State’s power of direction should an Academy breach, or act unreasonably in respect of, the performance of a relevant duty.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Consultation on registration and regulation of youth workers etc
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, consult on—
(a) the establishment as a registered profession of those that work with young people in relation to educational and recreational activities under section 507B of the Education Act 1996 and are conducting a regulated activity under section 6 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 either in a professional or voluntary capacity;
(b) the appointment of a regulator for such persons.
(2) Within six months of the completion of a consultation held under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must publish a report outlining the findings and conclusions of the consultation.
(3) Where a consultation held under this section concludes, the Secretary of State may make provision for—
(a) the establishment as a registered profession under the Professional Qualifications Act 2022 of such professions that the consultation held under this section concludes;
(b) the appointment of a regulator for such persons.
(4) A regulator may have responsibility for—
(a) establishing and maintaining a register of, and
(b) establishing and overseeing accreditation of,
such persons that the consultation held under this section concludes.
(5) Where a regulator has established accreditation to be used by registered persons, no person may—
(a) claim or purport to be, or
(b) use any titles, logos or other designations reserved for,
registered or accredited persons if they are not so registered or accredited.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Blunkett (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Apprenticeship provision
The Secretary of State must promote sufficient provision of apprenticeship places up to level 3 to ensure that every qualified applicant aged 16 to 18 receives an offer of a place.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Layard (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 113, line 26, leave out from “as” to the end of line 28 and insert “are necessary to secure compliance with statutory duties, the requirements of a Funding Agreement, or charity law.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the Secretary of State’s power of direction should an Academy breach, or act unreasonably in respect of, the performance of a relevant duty.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 4, page 6, line 11, leave out from beginning to end of line 19 on page 7
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is a probing amendment which seeks to question the effectiveness of the drafting of 16LA
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Leave out “3” and insert “7”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to broaden the discussion to include higher levels of apprenticeship.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 113, line 32, leave out from “as” to the end of line 33 and insert “are necessary to secure compliance with statutory duties, the requirements of a funding agreement, or charity law.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the Secretary of State’s power of direction should an Academy act unreasonably in respect of the performance of a relevant duty.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 113, line 33, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must make an annual statement to both Houses of Parliament, which must include—
(a) the number of times the Secretary of State exercised the powers under this section,
(b) the actions taken, and
(c) the reasons for taking such actions.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the Secretary of State to make a statement to Parliament annually that sets out how often the Secretary of State has directed the powers of the proprietor of an Academy.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“School: hair requirements
Pupils must not be denied opportunities to take part in classes, or any other school activities, by reason of their hair style or cut, unless for reasons of health and safety.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause aims to ensure children are not denied education or other school-related opportunities for reasons of hair cut or style.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 6, leave out lines 16 and 17
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable discussion on the breadth of meaning of subsection (1)(b) of inserted section 16LA, which might be read very widely.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 6, line 30, at end insert “, and in that context consideration must be given to whether or not the parent with care is subject to domestic abuse before disclosing data.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
As abusive parents are often on the scene in such circumstances, this amendment seeks to enable discussion of how the government intends to safeguard abused parents and their children.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Parental complaints (maintained schools)
(1) After section 29 of the Education Act 2002 insert—
“29ZA Parental complaints: appeals
(1) A complainant may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) where—
(a) the complaint was against a maintained school in England under section 29(1),
(b) the complainant was a parent of a registered pupil at the school at the time they first pursued the complaint,
(c) the complaint specified one or more legal duties listed in Schedule 1A of which the school was alleged to be in breach,
(d) the complaints process under section 29(1) was completed,
(e) the complaint was not fully upheld in respect of one or more of the matters specified as described in paragraph (c), and
(f) the complainant does not have and has not had any other prescribed right of appeal apart from that provided under section 29(1) and this section.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations about appeals to the First-tier Tribunal in respect of subsection (1), including—
(a) making and determining appeals;
(b) the powers of the tribunal on determining an appeal.
(3) Regulations under subsection (2) may include provision conferring power on the First-tier Tribunal, on determining an appeal against a matter, to make recommendations in respect of other matters (including matters against which no appeal may be brought).
(4) A person commits an offence if without reasonable excuse that person fails to comply with any requirement—
(a) in respect of the discovery or inspection of documents, or
(b) to attend to give evidence and produce documents,
where that requirement is imposed by Tribunal Procedure Rules in relation to an appeal under this section or regulations under subsection (2).
(5) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.”
(2) After Schedule 1 to the Education Act 2002 insert—
“Schedule 1A
LEGAL DUTIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 29ZA
1 (1)The legal duties to which section 29ZA applies are as follows.
(2)The Education Act 1996—
(a)section 9 (Education in accordance with parental wishes),
(b)section 402 (Obligation to enter pupils for public examinations),
(c)sections 403 to 405 (Sex education),
(d)sections 406 to 407 (Politics) and
(e)section 542(1) (Prescribed standards for school premises);
(3)The Education Act 2002—
(a)sections 78 to 80B (General duties in respect of the curriculum), and
(b)section 175(2) and (3) (Duties ... in relation to welfare of children);
(4)The School Standards and Framework Act 1998—
(a)section 1(6) (Duty in relation to infant class size),
(b)sections 69 to 71 (Religious education and worship), and
(c)section 114A (Requirements for food and drink provided on school premises etc);
(5)Childcare Act 2006, section 40 (Duty to implement Early Years Foundation Stage);
(6)Children Act 1989, sections 87 and 87C (Welfare of children in boarding schools and colleges and national minimum standards) and
(7)The Education and Inspections Act 2006, sections 88 to 94 (School Discipline).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 114, line 1, leave out “a direction” and insert “notice”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, connected with another in the name of Baroness Barran, seeks to prevent Clause 49 from granting the Secretary of State the power to (1) issue a direction to an Academy that is “likely” to have breached a relevant duty, and (2) prescribe how any breach should be remedied. Instead, it seeks to give Academies discretion in how they remedy an actual breach of a relevant duty.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 114, line 10, leave out “direction” and insert “notice”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, connected with another in the name of Baroness Barran, seeks to prevent Clause 49 from granting the Secretary of State the power to (1) issue a direction to an Academy that is “likely” to have breached a relevant duty, and (2) prescribe how any breach should be remedied. Instead, it seeks to give Academies discretion in how they remedy an actual breach of a relevant duty.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Draft legislative proposal: early years strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a draft Bill containing legislative proposals for a comprehensive early years strategy.
(2) The draft Bill required by subsection (1) must include—
(a) provisions to support the rollout of the Start for Life and Family Hubs programme nationally,
(b) adequate funding for government departments to improve data collection on the wellbeing of children in social care,
(c) a workforce plan for the children’s social care workforce, to complement the NHS Workforce Plan and support multi-disciplinary working in teams for the most vulnerable children, and
(d) guidelines for the recording of children’s early health and development as key data points contributing to consistent identifiers required by section 16LB of the Children Act 2004.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay the draft Bill under subsection (1) before Parliament within six months of the day on which this Act is passed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Russell of Liverpool (XB - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 4, page 6, line 30, at end insert—
“(3A) Where the relevant person considers that the disclosure would be more detrimental to the child than not disclosing the information, this decision must be recorded.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require that decisions made not to disclose information must be recorded.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 5, at end insert—
“(6A) Where information is disclosed under this section, the recipient must consider the safety and welfare of others to whom the information may relate or involve and take steps to promote their safety and welfare, particularly in cases of domestic abuse or elder abuse.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that other vulnerable members of a household are not inadvertently put at risk by the sharing of information, and that safety plans are put in place where needed.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Parental complaints (independent educational institutions, including academies)
After section 137 of the Education and Skills Act 2008 (Service of notice etc) insert—
“137A Parental Complaints: appeals
(1) A complainant may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) where—
(a) the complaint was against an independent educational institution in England under Part 7 of the Schedule of The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014,
(b) the complainant was a parent of a registered pupil at the institution at the time they first pursued the complaint, and
(c) the complaint specified one or more—
(i) Independent School Standard Regulations that apply to the institution, or
(ii) terms of any funding agreements between the proprietor of the institution and the Secretary of State, or
(iii) obligations under the memorandum and articles of the proprietor company, or
(iv) the proprietor’s charitable objects, or
(v) legal requirements that apply to the institution under the Academies Act 2010,
in relation to the institution’s provision for pupils with which the proprietor is alleged to be in breach, and
(d) the complaints process under (a) has been completed,
(e) the complaint was not fully upheld in respect of one or more of the matters specified as described in (c), and
(f) the complainant does not have and has not had any other prescribed right of appeal beyond that provided in Part 7 of the Schedule of The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 and this section.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations about appeals to the First-tier Tribunal in respect of subsection (1), including—
(a) making and determining appeals,
(b) the powers of the tribunal on determining an appeal.
(3) Regulations under subsection (2) may include provision conferring power on the First-tier Tribunal, on determining an appeal against a matter, to make recommendations in respect of other matters (including matters against which no appeal may be brought).
(4) A person commits an offence if without reasonable excuse that person fails to comply with any requirement—
(a) in respect of the discovery or inspection of documents, or
(b) to attend to give evidence and produce documents,
where that requirement is imposed by Tribunal Procedure Rules in relation to an appeal under this section or regulations under subsection (2).
(5) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause would afford to parents the ability to appeal complaints about an independent educational institution failing to comply with its legal duties in educational provision to the first-tier tribunal in circumstances where the institution’s internal complaints process has been completed and has not upheld their complaint. Independent Educational Institutions include academies.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 49, page 114, line 11, at end insert—
“(6A) An Academy proprietor may appeal a mandatory order made in this section to a regional advisory body within 28 days of the issuing of the order.
(6B) A regional advisory body under subsection (6A) must be made up of headteachers of academies, at least half of whom must be elected, and other members must be appointed by the Secretary of State.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The amendment seeks to ensure the use of directions is made transparently and fairly following proper process.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Parental complaints (non-maintained special schools)
After section 342C of the Education Act 1996 insert—
“342D Parental complaints: appeals
(1) A complainant may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) where—
(a) they have pursued a complaint against a non-maintained special school in England under paragraph 31 of the Schedule of the Non-Maintained Special Schools (England) Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/728),
(b) the complainant was the parent of a registered pupil at the school at the time of first pursuing the complaint,
(c) the complaint specified one or more—
(i) non-maintained Special School Regulations
(ii) obligations under the memorandum and articles of any proprietor company, or
(iii) obligations imposed under any trust deed of the school
in relation to the institution’s provision for pupils with which the proprietor is alleged to be in breach,
(d) the complaints process under (a) has been completed,
(e) the complaint was not fully upheld in respect of one or more of the matters specified as described in (c), and
(f) the complainant does not have and has not had any other prescribed right of appeal beyond that provided in paragraph 31 of the Schedule of the Non-Maintained Special Schools (England) Regulations 2015 and this section.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations about appeals to the First-tier Tribunal in respect of subsection (1), including—
(a) making and determining appeals;
(b) the powers of the tribunal on determining an appeal.
(3) Regulations under subsection (2) may include provision conferring power on the First-tier Tribunal, on determining an appeal against a matter, to make recommendations in respect of other matters (including matters against which no appeal may be brought).
(4) A person commits an offence if without reasonable excuse that person fails to comply with any requirement—
(a) in respect of the discovery or inspection of documents, or
(b) to attend to give evidence and produce documents,
where that requirement is imposed by Tribunal Procedure Rules in relation to an appeal under this section or regulations under subsection (2).
(5) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause would afford to parents the ability to appeal complaints about a non-maintained special school failing to comply with its legal duties in educational provision to the first-tier tribunal in circumstances where the school’s internal complaints process has been completed and has not upheld their complaint.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 5, at end insert—
“(6A) Where information is disclosed under this section, the recipient must consider the safety and welfare of others to whom the information may relate or involve and take steps to promote their safety and welfare, particularly in cases of domestic abuse.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that other vulnerable members of a household are not inadvertently put at risk by the sharing of information, and that safety plans are put in place where needed.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 49 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Amendment of the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order 2010
The Secretary of State may by regulations make such amendments to the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order 2010, the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008, and any other relevant subordinate legislation as are necessary or expedient in consequence of, or in connection with, sections (Parental Complaints (Maintained Schools)), (Parental Complaints (Independent educational institutions, including academies)), and (Parental Complaints (Non-maintained Special Schools)) of this Act.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause allows the Secretary of State to make amendments to secondary legislation for tribunals as a consequence of the amendments proposed on parental complaints.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 7, at end insert—
“(7A) Where the relevant person discloses any information under subsection (2) they must keep a record that they have disclosed the information.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require all information sharing decisions to be recorded.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 50, page 114, leave out lines 18 to 39, and insert—
“(a) in subsection (A1), at the end insert “unless the Secretary of State determines that no suitable sponsor is available”;
(b) after subsection (A1) insert—
“(A2) Where the Secretary of State determines that no suitable sponsor is available, the Secretary of State must, within 14 days, publish a plan to secure appropriate governance and leadership of the school and to secure its rapid improvement.
(A3) A plan published under subsection (A2) must include—
(a) the parties with responsibility for the school and its improvement,
(b) the parties who will take action to improve provision in the school,
(c) the resources that will be provided to the relevant parties, including who will provide the resources and when the resources will be provided, and
(d) the intended outcomes of the plan, with the relevant timetables for the outcomes.
(A4) The Secretary of State must report annually to Parliament on—
(a) the number of times the Secretary of State has published a plan under subsection (A2),
(b) the resources which have been provided as part of any plans, and
(c) the outcomes of any plans.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to retain the existing requirement to make an academy order unless the Secretary of State determines there is no suitable sponsor available.
Tabled: 07 Feb 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 February 2025
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 7, at end insert—
“(7A) Where the relevant person does not disclose information because the information falls within subsection (3) they must keep a record that they have not disclosed the information.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) - 07 Feb 2025Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require all information sharing decisions to be recorded.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 50, page 114, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) after subsection (1) insert—
“(1ZA) When making an order under subsection (1)(b) of this section and within the meaning of section 62 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 (school requiring special measures), the Secretary of State must make an order to—
(a) transfer the school to a high performing multi-academy trust, or
(b) merge the school with a high performing maintained school serving a similar cohort of children (by demographic background and prior attainment), provided that school is within the same local authority or geographical area,
unless the Secretary of State believes that there is good reason to undertake another course of action.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Blunkett (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Royal Commission on the education attainment gap
(1) On the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make arrangements to establish a Royal Commission to investigate the education attainment gap for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).
(2) The Commission must investigate and make recommendations relating to—
(a) the education attainment gap for individual special educational needs and disabilities;
(b) the education attainment gap at each level of examination, including Key Stage 2, GCSE, A-Level and other relevant qualifications;
(c) the level of understanding of the social model of disability in teacher training and schools.
(3) The Commission must publish recommendations and recommend a deadline by which the SEND education attainment gap must be closed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 14, at end insert—
“(9A) The relevant person must maintain a record of processing of the disclosures made under this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires that the record of processing should be explicit in order to increase public trust in the expanded use of a national identifier.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“School mentorship scheme for children with SEND
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a school mentorship scheme for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).
(2) The mentorship scheme must—
(a) involve members of local communities, business and wider society who are disabled people or have other relevant lived experience to offer to support children with SEND,
(b) offer appropriate, relevant and contextualised advice from mentors, and
(c) include the delivery of mentors’ advice gained from lived experience, work experience opportunities and other experience as appropriate.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 50, page 114, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) after subsection (7), insert—
“(7A) No application or petition for judicial review may be made or brought in relation to a decision taken by the Secretary of State to make an Academy order.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent a judicial review being brought if the Secretary of State makes an academy order.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 50, page 114, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) after subsection (1), insert—
“(1ZA) The Secretary of State must make an Academy order in respect of a maintained school in England if—
(a) Ofsted has judged the school to require significant improvement, or
(b) a Regional Improvement for Standards and Excellence team has judged the school to be significantly underperforming when compared with neighbouring schools with similar demographics.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require an Academy order to be made to a maintained school if Ofsted has judged the school to require significant improvement or a RISE team have judged the school to be significantly underperforming.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Curriculum review: recommended physical activity
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must undertake a curriculum review on how the levels of physical activity recommended by the Chief Medical Officer can form part of physical education provision within schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 4, page 7, leave out from beginning of line 20 to end of line 41 on page 8
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable a general discussion of inserted section 16LB.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 50 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Education technology: guiding principles
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument make provision for the regulation of education technology deployed in schools in England.
(2) The regulations made under subsection (1) must ensure that education technology used in schools in England—
(a) is inclusive by design,
(b) is accessible to all,
(c) is transparent with regard to its training data and, where applicable, its algorithmic make-up,
(d) is labelled clearly if it uses artificial intelligence,
(e) does not sell or provide data to third parties, and
(f) does not store personal data at a location other than that of the school in which it is being used.
(3) A statutory instrument that contains regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 4, page 7, leave out lines 21 to 27 and insert—
“(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision relating to the consistent identifier.
(2) For the purposes of this section the NHS number is the consistent identifier.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the single use identifier is described on the face of the Bill.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: conversion to maintained schools
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a report setting out proposals for converting—
(a) academy chains,
(b) individual academies, and
(c) free schools,
to maintained schools under local authority control.
(2) The review must consider—
(a) legislative changes required to enable the conversion process,
(b) how a conversion process for a school would be triggered,
(c) the potential role of different levels of local government in school oversight,
(d) how conversion would impact the ownership of school land and buildings, and
(e) the resources made available to local authorities when schools are converted.
(3) Within six months of the completion of the review, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the findings and conclusions of the review.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Procurement standard for education technology
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish guidance for schools on procurement standards for education technology.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 22, at end insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State must specify the NHS number as the consistent identifier for children for the purposes of this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the government to confirm the use of the NHS number as the single unique identifier for children.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 22, at end insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State must place a requirement on all designated persons listed in section 11 to include the consistent identifier in the information processed about a child no later than March 2029.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require full implementation of a single unique identifier for children before the anticipated next General Election in line with the government’s manifesto commitment.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Teacher training review
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a review of teacher training in England.
(2) The review must assess the extent to which teacher training includes physical and mental literacy and the challenges of new technologies.
(3) The review must—
(a) report within 12 months of the day on which it is established, and
(b) recommend a new teacher training offer which includes—
(i) artificial intelligence,
(ii) sport and physical literacy,
(iii) data literacy,
(iv) media literacy, and
(v) financial literacy.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—
“Extension of power to innovate to academy proprietors
(1) The Education Act 2002 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1(3) (purpose and interpretation of Chapter 1), in the definition of “qualifying body”, after paragraph (h), insert—
“(i) an academy proprietor;””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to extend the power to innovate to Academy trusts.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—
“Academy order for an academy school to be converted into a school maintained by the local authority
The Academies Act 2010 is amended as follows—
(a) in section 4, after subsection (10) insert—
“(10A) The Secretary of State may make an Academy reversal order to convert an academy school into a school maintained by the local authority if the Secretary of State receives representations from an academy school governing body, staff, parents or the local authority in support of converting the academy school into a maintained school.”;
(b) in section 5, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Before an academy is converted into a maintained school, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as they think appropriate about whether the conversion should take place.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause allows the Secretary of State to make an Academy reversal order in the event that the Secretary of State receives representations from an academy school governing body, staff, parents or the local authority supporting an academy school returning to be maintained by the local authority.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Character education
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a review of the research, evidence and practice in relation to character education in schools in England.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, leave out lines 26 and 27
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify what is meant by ‘a similar set of identifiers that is of general application’.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Curriculum review: AI
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must undertake a curriculum review to explore how children can receive teaching, learning and a curriculum which recognises any opportunities and challenges of technologies including, but not limited to, artificial intelligence.
(2) The curriculum review must investigate how children can be equipped with the learning and skills to flourish through their use of technology in all subjects in the National Curriculum.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Schedule 3, page 128, line 24, at end insert—
“1A In section 120(1)(a), after “teachers”, insert—
“(aa) academy schools Chief Executive Officers’ pay,””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Bousted (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 27, at end insert—
“but must not include any form of physical identifier added to a child.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to rule out tattooing and electronic tagging.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 7, line 27, at end insert—
“(2A) The regulations prescribed in subsection (1) must specify—
(a) what information may be held in connection with the identifier,
(b) how information is added to the register containing the identifier,
(c) security arrangements in connection with the identifier,
(d) how access to registers containing the identifier is to be controlled,
(e) how completeness and accuracy of the identifier is to be maintained,
(f) how a register records what documents or cases are linked to the identifier to enable users to find out what else is known about a child, and
(g) what happens when a child reaches 18.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable a detailed discussion of how the identifier will be used.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“SEND provision review
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must undertake a review of provision for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND provision) in schools in England.
(2) The review must report within 12 months of the day on which it is established.
(3) The review must produce recommendations, including on how the Secretary of State should fund SEND provision required by law.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Power to prescribe pay and conditions for teachers
The Secretary of State must, within three months of the passing of this Act—
(a) make provision for the power of the governing bodies of maintained schools to set the pay and working conditions of school teachers to be made equivalent with the relevant powers of academies;
(b) provide guidance to all applicable schools that—
(i) pay levels given in the School Teachers’ Pay and Conditions Document are to be treated as the minimum pay of relevant teachers;
(ii) teachers may be paid above the pay levels given in the School Teachers’ Pay and Conditions Document;
(iii) they must have regard to the School Teachers’ Pay and Conditions Document but may vary from it.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would make the pay set out in the School Teachers’ Pay and Conditions Document a “floor”, and extend freedoms over pay and conditions to local authority maintained schools.
This amendment was NOT CALLED
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Attendance code of practice
(1) The Secretary of State must issue an attendance code of practice giving guidance to the following bodies on their functions in relation to school attendance—
(a) local authorities in England,
(b) admission authorities in England,
(c) the governing bodies of schools,
(d) the proprietors of Academies, and
(e) the management committees of pupil referral units.
(2) The Secretary of State may revise the code from time to time.
(3) The bodies listed in subsection (1) must have regard to the code in exercising their functions in relation to school attendance.
(4) Those who exercise functions on behalf of the bodies in subsection (1) in relation to school attendance must also have regard to the code.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, line 7, at end insert—
“(c) it has complied with specified measures to prevent the information being attached to the wrong child.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Teacher’s pay and conditions: right to be accompanied
(1) Section 123 of the Education Act 2002 (Order under section 122: scope) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1), after paragraph (j) insert—
“(k) make provision for a teacher’s right to be accompanied at a disciplinary or grievance hearing by a person who has been certified in writing by a professional body as having relevant experience, or as having received relevant training.”
(3) After subsection (4) insert—
“(5) In this section—
“professional body” means any organisation, which is authorised by a regulation made by the Secretary of State under subsection (6);
“relevant experience” means experience of acting as a worker’s companion at disciplinary or grievance hearings;
“relevant training” means training to act as a worker’s companion at disciplinary or grievance hearings.
(6) The Secretary of State may make a regulation or regulations authorising any organisation as a professional body for the purposes of this section.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 3
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, leave out lines 8 and 9
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seek to allow debate of how this provision interacts with the professional responsibilities of medical practitioners.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: physical and mental wellbeing standards
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish standards for schools in England on the physical and mental wellbeing—
(a) teaching,
(b) training, and
(c) care and support,
which they provide to children.
(2) The standards must include delivery targets to which schools must adhere.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“National survey on bullying
(1) The Secretary of State must arrange for the collection and publication of national data on bullying experienced by children and young people in schools in England on an annual basis.
(2) The survey must include—
(a) the groups of children most at risk of experiencing bullying;
(b) the nature and type of bullying experienced, including, but not limited, to sexual, sexist, racial, and online bullying;
(c) the interventions and responses perceived as most effective in reducing bullying;
(d) how schools in England are responding to bullying, including in both in-person and online contexts.
(3) The report must be published annually and the Secretary of State must lay the report before Parliament which outlines the findings and a proposed policy response.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, leave out lines 10 to 13
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate on consistent identifiers and GDPR.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, line 30, at end insert—
“(13A) The Secretary of State must by regulations specify penalties for the breach by any person of the requirements of this section or of regulations made under it.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable a discussion of how compliance is to be incentivised and effectively policed.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: educational attainment
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review into the impact of this Act on the educational attainment of children.
(2) The review must consider the merits of commencing section 34 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (Transfer of arrears) and uncommenced sections of the Child Support Collection (Domestic Abuse) Act 2023 for the purposes of improving the educational attainment of children.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Coffey (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 4, page 8, leave out lines 31 to 34
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that SUIs can be used for research and commissioning purposes in order to improve outcomes for babies, children and young people.
Tabled: 07 Mar 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: number of teachers unable to stand in local elections
With six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review of the anticipated impact of this Act on the number of teachers in maintained schools who will, because of their employment, be unable to stand for election to local education authorities.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer) - 07 Mar 2025NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to access to nature
(1) The Secretary of State shall have a duty to promote school pupils' access to nature, with the aim of ensuring that each pupil spends an average of one hour per week as a minimum during term time in a natural setting during class time.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, lay before Parliament a report on progress on achieving this goal.
(3) For the purposes of this section, “natural environment” has the same meaning as in section 44 of the Environment Act 2021.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment aims to improve pupils' exposure to and knowledge of natural environments.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, line 34, at end insert—
“(14A) Before making regulations under this section the Secretary of State must establish a strategy to ensure accurate and secure collection, recording and storage of any data obtained under this section and publish that strategy.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is a probing amendment which seeks to understand how the Government will manage erroneous recording.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, line 34, at end insert—
“(14A) Draft regulations under subsection (1) must be published within the period of one month after the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 is passed and must include—
(a) the description of the consistent identifier,
(b) the description of the designated person,
(c) the description of all persons or services to which this section applies, and
(d) the process by which the Secretary of State will ensure accurate collection of data.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to get clarity on which services this section applies to.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of the Act
(1) The Secretary of State must—
(a) carry out a review of the operation and effect of this Act,
(b) set out the conclusions of the review in a report,
(c) publish the report, and
(d) lay a copy of the report before Parliament.
(2) The report must be published before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.
(3) The report must, in particular—
(a) assess the extent to which the objectives intended to be achieved by this Act have been achieved, and
(b) assess whether those objectives remain appropriate and, if so, the extent to which they could be achieved more effectively in any other way.
(4) In carrying out the review, the Secretary of State must publish an invitation for interested parties to make submissions on the operation of the Act.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Norton of Louth (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Financial education in primary schools
(1) All primary schools must teach financial education from Year 1.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “financial education” is the teaching of knowledge, skills and behaviours that allow an individual to understand and manage money.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Sater (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, line 34, at end insert—
“(14A) Consequential amendments may be made to other legislation to ensure that the consistent identifier is established and recorded at the earliest appropriate moment.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow other legislation to be amended so that the consistent identifier was established when a birth was registered, as part of immigration or visa processes, etc.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 4, page 8, line 35, at end insert—
““NHS Number” means the number, consisting of 10 numeric digits, which serves as the national unique identifier used for the purpose of safely, accurately and efficiently sharing information relating to a registered patient across the whole of the health service in England;
“the health service” has the meaning given in section 275 (index of defined expressions) of the National Health Service Act 2006;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Fraser of Craigmaddie (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The amendments seeks to mandate that the single use identifier must be the child’s existing NHS number.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Anti-Bullying Lead
(1) In pursuance of their duty under section 89 (1)(b) of the Education and Inspections Act 2006, the head teacher of a relevant school in England must appoint a member of staff who is the school’s Anti-Bullying Lead.
(2) The role of the Anti-Bullying Lead will include developing the school’s written anti-bullying strategy.
(3) The anti-bullying strategy must include details of—
(a) the steps taken by the school to prevent all forms of bullying among pupils, including those with protected characteristics.
(b) how the school records incidences of bullying.
(c) the training that the school makes available for staff related to bullying.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to protect children from bullying by requiring head teachers to appoint an Anti-Bullying Lead to develop an Anti-Bullying Strategy in applicable schools.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty on public authorities
(1) A public authority must, in the exercise of a relevant function, have due regard to the desirability of exercising that function in a way that is consistent with the UNCRC requirements.
(2) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about how a public authority is to comply with the duty under subsection (1) (including provision about things that the authority may, must or must not do to comply with the duty).
(3) A court or tribunal is exempt from subsection (1).
(4) The Secretary of State may, by regulations, exempt from the duty in subsection (1)—
(a) a public authority, or
(b) a relevant function.
(5) The power under subsection (4) may only be exercised if the Secretary of State is satisfied that the duty under subsection (1) should not apply to a public authority or a relevant function because it will not result in any adverse impacts on the wellbeing and safety of children.
(6) Regulations made under subsections (2) and (4) are to be made by statutory instrument and may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.
(7) A power to make regulations under this section includes the power to make—
(a) consequential, incidental, supplementary, transitional or saving provision;
(b) different provision for different purposes.
(8) The Secretary of State must—
(a) on or before 31 January 2026, and
(b) at or before the end of each successive period of five years,
publish a report on how the Government has complied with the duty under this section.
(9) The Government must lay before Parliament a copy of each report published under subsection (8).
(10) For the purposes of this section—
“public authority” has, subject to the specific provision made above about courts and tribunals, the same meaning as in section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998;
“relevant function” means a function exercised under this Act.
(11) In this section—
“the Convention” means the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989;
“the UNCRC requirements” means the rights and obligations from the Convention, and the articles of the first optional protocol and the second optional protocol as referred to above.
(12) The UNCRC requirements have effect for the purposes of this Act subject to any reservations, objections or interpretative declarations by the United Kingdom as may be in force from time to time.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Banner (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Child contact centres
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations—
(a) require all child contact centres and organisations that offer child contact services to be accredited in accordance with national standards in relation to safeguarding and preventing domestic abuse;
(b) require all child contact centre staff and volunteers to undertake mandatory safeguarding and domestic abuse training which must establish processes to centre the voice and experience of the child and parent or carer at all stages of parental involvement;
(c) establish mechanisms to support and develop the role of contact centres in multi-agency risk assessment at a local level;
(d) set out a system-wide approach to risk assessment and risk management in child contact centres, including the provision of specialist support for parents, carers and children;
(e) ensure adequate funding and investment into child contact centres to ensure locally accessible and affordable provision.
(2) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse
(1) The Children Act 2004 is amended as follows.
(2) After section 16LB insert—
“16LC Reporting of child sexual abuse
Subject to the provisions of section 16LD(7), (8), and (10) and section 16LF, providers of any one or more of the activities set out in Schedule 1A, who know of, or have reasonable grounds for suspecting the commission of, sexual abuse of children in their care, must, as soon as is practicable after it comes to their knowledge or attention, report it to—
(a) the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO),
(b) Local Authority Children’s Services, or
(c) such other single point of contact with the local authority as that authority may designate for that purpose.
16LD Process
(1) If the report under section 16LC is made orally, the maker of the report must confirm the report in writing no later than seven days thereafter.
(2) Section 16LC applies whether or not the activities are defined in any enactment as regulated activities involving children.
(3) Section 16LC applies whether a commission of sexual abuse takes place, or is alleged or suspected to have taken place, in the setting of the activity or elsewhere.
(4) For the purposes of section 16LC the operators of a setting in which the activity takes place and staff employed at any such setting in a managerial or general welfare role are deemed to stand in a position of trust and are deemed to have direct contact with children in their care whether or not such children are or have been attended by them.
(5) For the purposes of section 16LC all other employed or contracted staff or voluntary staff and assistants are deemed to stand in a position of trust only if they have had direct contact with and have attended such children during their time in such a position.
(6) For the purposes of section 16LC children are or are deemed to be in the care of the providers of the activities set out in Schedule 1A—
(a) in the case of the operators of any setting in which the activity takes place and of staff employed by the operators at any such setting in a managerial or general welfare role, for the period of time during which the operators are bound contractually or otherwise to accommodate or to care for such children, whether such children are resident or in daily attendance wherever the activity is provided, and
(b) in the case of all other employed or contracted staff or voluntary staff and assistants, for the period of time only in which they are personally attending such children in the capacity for which they were employed, or their services were contracted for.
(7) The Secretary of State may, in exceptional cases, issue a suspension document to rescind or temporarily suspend the duty referred to in section 16LC in the case of any specified child or children if it appears to the Secretary of State that the child’s welfare, safety or protection would be prejudiced or compromised by the fulfilment of the duty.
(8) Where it appears to the Secretary of State that the welfare, safety and protection of children is furthered, they may exempt—
(a) any specified organisation that works with children generally, and its members, or
(b) any specified medical officer,
from compliance with the duty referred to in section 16LC provided that no allegation is made against that entity or person.
(9) The Secretary of State may make regulations varying or adding to or deleting from the list of activities in Schedule 1A, whether or not such activities are defined in any enactment as regulated activities involving children.
(10) A person who makes a report under section 16LC in good faith, or who does any other thing required by sections 16LC to 16LF, may not by so doing be held liable in any civil or criminal or administrative proceeding, and may not be held to have breached any code of professional etiquette or ethics, or to have departed from any acceptable form of professional conduct.
(11) Reports under section 16LC and the identities of the persons making them must be received and held by their proper recipients in confidence.
16LE Offences
(1) Failure to fulfil the duty set out in section 16LC following the procedure described in section 16LD before the expiry of the period of seven days of the matter, allegation or suspicion first coming to the knowledge or attention of the provider or of any person whose services are used by the provider as defined in section 16LD is an offence.
(2) A person who causes or threatens to cause any detriment to a mandated person, being a person placed under the duty to report pursuant to section 16LC above, or to another person, either wholly or partly related to the mandated person’s actual or intended provision of a report under section 16LC, is guilty of an offence.
(3) Detriment includes any personal, social, economic, professional, or other detriment to the person.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable on summary conviction to a level 5 fine on the standard scale.
(5) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (2) is liable on summary conviction to a level 4 fine on the standard scale.
16LF Defences
It is a defence—
(a) for any person to show that the Secretary of State acting pursuant to section 16LD(7) has issued a suspension document;
(b) for any person employed by or operating as an organisation that works with children or for any medical officer to show that the Secretary of State has by a suspension document, whether temporarily or permanently, exempted it and its members or any medical officer from compliance with the duty in section 16LC;
(c) to show that a report of the commission of the known or suspected child abuse has been made by any other party to the body or person under section 16LC(a) to (c) before or during the seven days referred to in section 16LE(1).
16LG Definitions
In sections 16LC to 16LF—
“children” means persons under the age of 18 years;
“operators of a setting” , in the case of schools, sixth form colleges, and colleges of further education in private ownership, includes the proprietors, members of governing bodies, and board members in the case of ownership by a limited liability company;
“providers of activities” has the same meaning as in section 6 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006.”
(3) After Schedule 1, insert—
“Schedule 1ASection 16LC
REGULATED AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
1 Education including—
(a) schools;
(b) sixth form colleges;
(c) colleges of further education;
(d) pupil referral units;
(e) residential special schools;
(f) hospital education trusts;
(g) settings of education other than at schools;
(h) private tuition centres.
2 Healthcare including—
(a) hospitals;
(b) hospices;
(c) GP surgeries;
(d) walk-in clinics;
(e) outpatient clinics.
3 Others including—
(a) child nurseries and kindergarten provision;
(b) childminders and childcare providers registered on the early years register or the compulsory or voluntary part of the childcare register;
(c) registered social care providers and managers for children;
(d) children’s homes;
(e) children’s hospices;
(f) youth offender institutions;
(g) the Probation Service;
(h) private institutions contracted by public bodies to provide services to children;
(i) organisations providing activities to children, such as sports clubs, music, dance or drama groups, youth clubs, and Ministry of Defence cadet forces including Sea Cadets, the Volunteer Cadet Corps, the Army Cadet Force, the Air Training Corps and the Combined Cadet Force, Fire Cadets;
(j) organisations providing holidays for children or supervising children while on holiday;
(k) churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, and other places of worship and religious organisations, and other organisations holding non-religious worldviews;
(l) services offered to children by local authorities outwith their statutory duties;
(m) services offered to children by the police outwith their statutory duties;
(n) transport services including taxis and coaches commissioned by the providers of the regulated activities in this Schedule.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Application of Part 2
Nothing in Part 2 of this Act shall apply if it would have the effect of impeding the right of parents to ensure access to such education and teaching for their children as is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carter of Haslemere (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment disapplies any provision of Part 2 if its effect would be to impede the right of parents to educate their children consistently with their own religious and philosophical beliefs.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“National strategy for physical education and sport in schools
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a national strategy for physical education and sport in schools.
(2) The strategy must include recommendations related to—
(a) the delivery of a minimum of 60 minutes of school sport and physical activity per day;
(b) physical and mental wellbeing;
(c) incentivising pupils to continue sport and physical activity throughout their school careers;
(d) full and integrated sports provision for disabled students;
(e) integrating physical education and sport into the teaching of other school subjects;
(f) integrating outdoor recreation, non-traditional sport, physical activity and natural facilities into sports provision in schools;
(g) meeting swimming attainment standards through school sport provision;
(h) the levels of investment in and effectiveness of primary physical education and sport premium funding;
(i) the role of volunteering in the teaching of sport and physical education in schools, including qualifications, standards, and engagement of external coaches and parents with qualifications recognised by the governing bodies of sport in Great Britain;
(j) a duty of care for all schoolchildren participating in sport;
(k) the development of a list of key performance indicators to measure outcomes of the national strategy.
(3) The national strategy must be reviewed, updated and laid before both Houses of Parliament annually.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Abolition of common law defence of reasonable punishment
(1) The Children Act 2004 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 58 (reasonable punishment: England), omit subsections (1) to (4).
(3) After section 58, insert—
“58A Abolition of common law defence of reasonable punishment
(1) The common law defence of reasonable punishment is abolished in relation to corporal punishment of a child taking place in England.
(2) Corporal punishment of a child taking place in England cannot be justified in any civil or criminal proceedings on the ground that it constituted reasonable punishment.
(3) Corporal punishment of a child taking place in England cannot be justified in any civil or criminal proceedings on the ground that it constituted acceptable conduct for the purposes of any other rule of the common law.
(4) For the purposes of subsections (1) to (3) “corporal punishment” means any battery carried out as a punishment.
(5) The Secretary of State may make regulations for transitory, transitional or saving provision in connection with the coming into force of this section.
(6) The power to make regulations under subsection (5) is exercisable by statutory instrument.
(7) This section comes into force six months after the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 comes into force.
58B Promotion of public awareness and reporting
(1) The Secretary of State must take steps before the coming into force of section 58A to promote public awareness of the changes to the law to be made by that section.
(2) The Secretary of State must, five years after its commencement, prepare a report on the effect of the changes to the law made by section 58A.
(3) The Secretary of State must, as soon as practicable after preparing a report under this section—
(a) lay the report before Parliament, and
(b) publish the report.
(4) The Secretary of State may make regulations for transitory, transitional or saving provision in connection with the coming into force of this section.
(5) The power to make regulations under subsection (4) is exercisable by statutory instrument.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would abolish the common law defence of reasonable punishment in relation to corporal (physical) punishment of a child taking place in England, amend certain provisions of the Children Act 2004 relating to corporal punishment of children and place a duty on the Secretary of State to report this change.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty on local authorities to provide family support services for children and families
After section 19 of the Children Act 1989, insert—
“19A Duty on local authorities to provide family support services for children and families
(1) A local authority has a duty to provide, so far as is reasonably practical, family support services to all children and parents residing in their area.
(2) Family support services provided by a local authority must—
(a) be provided within the authority area,
(b) seek to improve the health and educational outcomes of children in the relevant area, and
(c) seek to reduce the number of children in their area who suffer ill treatment or neglect.
(3) In this section, “family support services” refer to services which provide children and parents with—
(a) advice, guidance or counselling,
(b) social, cultural or recreational activities, or
(c) accommodation while receiving services provided under subsections (3)(a) and (b).
(4) In fulfilling its duty under subsection (1), a local authority must have regard to—
(a) the availability of and demand for family support services in its area,
(b) the availability of and demand for family support services in its area which are capable of meeting different needs, and
(c) the location of family support services and the equality of access across the authority area.
(5) A local authority must publish information about family support services—
(a) on the authority’s website, and
(b) in all public libraries in the local authority area.
(6) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision relating to the provision of family support services by local authorities.
(7) In this section—
“children and parents” means—
(a) a child under the age of 18;
(b) a young person aged 18-25 who has a diagnosis of special educational needs;
(c) the parents of a child or young person;
(d) a person who has parental responsibility for a child or young person; or
(e) a person who is pregnant.
“local authority” means—
(a) a county council in England;
(b) a district council in England;
(c) a London borough council;
(d) the Common Council of the City of London (in their capacity as a local authority);
(e) the Council of the Isles of Scilly;
(f) a combined authority established under section 103 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009;””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would introduce a requirement on local authorities to provide family support services for all children and parents in their area.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Curriculum review: physical education programmes of study
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must undertake a curriculum review which investigates how sport provision in schools can help ensure that pupils—
(a) develop competence in a broad range of competitive and physically demanding activities;
(b) are physically active for a sustained period of time equal to or in excess of the minimum time recommended by the Chief Medical Officer;
(c) can engage in competitive sports and activities in a way which supports their health and fitness;
(d) can lead healthy, active lives and help embed values such as fairness and respect.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Code of practice on the efficacy of education technology in schools
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare a statutory code of practice on the efficacy of educational technology (“EdTech”) for supporting learning in schools.
(2) The code of practice must set standards for the use of EdTech in schools, including digital products, software or services used for teaching, learning, assessment, administration, or communication.
(3) The standards under subsection (2) must—
(a) consider all types of schools;
(b) require transparency and efficacy of EdTech products and services in line with pedagogical standards currently used for measurement of attainment and the wellbeing of children in the provision of education.
(4) In preparing a code or amendments under this section, the Secretary of State must–
(a) have regard to the fact that children may have different requirements at different ages and stages of development,
(b) have regard to the costs of EdTech products and services to school budgets,
(c) have regard to the need to support innovation to enhance children’s education and learning opportunities, including testing of novel products and supporting the certification and development of standards, and
(d) ensure that the benefits from EdTech products and services developed using children’s data accrue to the United Kingdom.
(5) In preparing a code or amendments under this section, the Secretary of State must consult with—
(a) educators,
(b) children,
(c) parents,
(d) persons who appear to the Secretary of State to represent the interests of teachers,
(e) persons who appear to the Secretary of State to represent the interests of children,
(f) persons who appear to the Secretary of State to represent the interests of schools,
(g) child development experts,
(h) curriculum and subject experts,
(i) trade associations,
(j) the AI Security Institute, and
(k) the relevant education department for each nation of the United Kingdom.
(6) The Secretary of State must prepare a report, in consultation with persons listed in subsection (5), on the steps required to develop a certification scheme for EdTech products and services to enable the industry to demonstrate the efficacy of its products in line with the standards under subsection (2).
(7) The certification scheme under subsection (6) must be a minimum requirement for the procurement of EdTech products and services in schools (of any status) in England.
(8) Where requested, evidence of compliance with the code under subsection (1) or a certification standard prepared under subsection (6) must be provided by relevant providers of EdTech products and services in a manner that satisfies the obligations of education providers under the Code.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is a probing amendment that considers the rapid introduction of Ed Tech in school and seeks to understand what pedagogical standards Ed Tech in schools is or will be subject to after the passage of the Bill.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Common open data standard: children’s wellbeing
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations establish a common open data standard for relevant bodies to use in respect of their statutory duties relating to the safeguarding and welfare of children.
(2) Any standard established under subsection (1) must be—
(a) non-proprietary, that is not dependent on vendor-specific software;
(b) documented such that the structure is publicly available;
(c) platform-independent, that is usable across systems;
(d) royalty-free or under open licence.
(3) “Common open data standard” means a common data rule that allows any user to create compatible and consistent products, processes and services that is publicly available.
(4) For the purposes of this section, a “relevant body” means—
(a) a local authority;
(b) a state-funded school;
(c) a children's home;
(d) any regulated body with statutory duties relating to children which the Secretary of State may designate by regulations.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Spielman (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would give the Secretary of State the power to establish by regulations a common data standard for information relating to the safeguarding and wellbeing of children so it can be more easily shared between relevant public bodies.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Curtailment of rights of contact
(1) The High Court may remove or curtail the rights of parental contact of a person convicted of a domestic abuse, child abuse or child sexual abuse.
(2) The High Court must publish annually the total number of times they have removed or curtailed rights of parental contact under subsection (1).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Minimum standards of safety technology deployed in schools
(1) The Secretary of State must set out the minimum standards for technologies used to safeguard children in schools (“SafetyTech”).
(2) The code of practice must set standards for the use of SafetyTech in schools, used in the management, monitoring, filtering and any other safeguarding that the Secretary of State requires, on any digital products, software or services used for safeguarding, teaching, learning, assessment, administration, or communication.
(3) The standards under subsection (2) must—
(a) ensure schools have a nominated SafetyTech lead, with access to information and training from the Department for Education,
(b) reflect the Department for Education’s filtering and monitoring standards, and
(c) have been audited, accredited or certified to ensure compliance.
(4) This code of practice must be subject to assessment by Ofsted and be responsive to emerging digital capabilities and review by the Department for Education each school year.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require guidance for the use of SafetyTech and put it on a statutory bases, introduce the requirement to audit or certify and ensure that SafetyTech being in place and working is part of Ofsted inspections.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to keep schools open for in person attendance
(1) So far as reasonably possible, public authorities must ensure that, during the period of any civil emergency, schools are kept open for in person attendance by children and young people.
(2) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, make provision about how public authorities should discharge the duty under subsection (1), including provision specifying—
(a) steps that a public authority may or must take to comply with the duty, and
(b) actions that a public authority is prohibited from taking.
(3) Regulations made under subsection (2) must be made by statutory instrument.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (2) may not be made unless a draft has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.
(5) A power to make regulations under this section includes the power to make—
(a) consequential, incidental, supplementary, transitional or saving provision;
(b) different provision for different purposes.
(6) A public authority must not, in response to a civil emergency, take or facilitate any action (including making regulations, issuing directions, issuing orders, giving guidance, or making recommendations) that—
(a) results in, or encourages, the closure of schools, or
(b) otherwise prevents or restricts lawful attendance at such institutions or premises by children and young people,
unless the requirements of subsection (7) are met.
(7) Before taking any action of the kind described in subsection (6), the public authority must first, unless the urgency of the civil emergency precludes this—
(a) request the advice of the Children’s Commissioner on the likely impact of such action on the children and young people who will be affected by the action,
(b) provide the Children’s Commissioner with full and complete information about the nature of and reasons for the proposed action, and
(c) have due regard to the Children’s Commissioner’s advice in determining whether to proceed with the action.
(8) If any action of the kind described in subsection (6) is taken prior to seeking the advice of the Children’s Commissioner due to urgency—
(a) as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event within 7 days of taking the action, the public authority must provide the Children’s Commissioner with full and complete information about the nature of and reasons for that action;
(b) the Children’s Commissioner must then promptly, and in any event within 14 days of the action having been taken, provide the public authority with its advice in relation to the impact of that action on children and young people;
(c) the public authority, having due regard to the Commissioner’s advice, shall determine whether the action continues to be justified or whether it should be revoked.
(9) If action of the kind described in subsection (6) continues beyond 14 days, and in relation to each such period of 14 days thereafter, the Secretary of State must—
(a) lay before Parliament a copy of the Children’s Commissioner’s advice, and
(b) seek approval from the House of Commons for the continuation of the action.
(10) If the House of Commons does not approve continuation under subsection (9)(b) within 14 days of the advice of the Children’s Commissioner being laid before Parliament under subsection 9(a), the relevant action automatically lapses, and any measures (including regulations, directions, orders, guidance, or recommendations made in support of or continuance of the relevant action) become legally void.
(11) Where under any of the above provisions the advice of the Children’s Commissioner is sought, the Children’s Commissioner shall set out in writing his or her advice on the following matters—
(a) the foreseeable impacts of any closures of schools on the affected children and young people,
(b) any reasonable actions that could be taken to mitigate those impacts,
(c) whether the anticipated benefits for those children of the closures identified by the public authority appear to him or her to outweigh the foreseeable impacts of closures for those children, and
(d) any other matters which appear to him or her to be relevant.
(12) The Children’s Commissioner is entitled to require the public authority or the Secretary of State to provide such further information, assistance, and resources as he or she considers necessary in order to set out his or her advice on a particular action and the public authority or the Secretary of State, as the case may be, shall provide such information, assistance or resources as soon as reasonably practicable.
(13) For the purposes of this section—
“children” means persons under the age of 18;
“civil emergency” shall include any emergency situation which could constitute an emergency for the purposes of section 1 of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 or which has otherwise been identified as a risk in the UK’s National Security Risk Assessment. For the avoidance of doubt an emergency need not be the subject of measures taken under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to be a civil emergency for the purposes of this Act.
“closure” in relation to schools, means any action to discourage, restrict or prevent in person attendance at those institutions or premises by children and young people who would ordinarily be entitled to attend, or any sub-group or class of such children or young people;
“open for in person attendance” in relation to schools, means being open for the attendance by all of the children who would ordinarily, and but for the occurrence of a civil emergency, be entitled to attend those institutions or premises, during their normal hours of operation;
“open for in person attendance” does not include the provision of online learning or other remote learning services nor the keeping of such institutions or premises open for physical attendance only for a sub-group or class of those children or young people who would ordinarily be entitled to attend;
“public authority” has the same meaning as in section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998” save that a court or tribunal is not included for these purposes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Young of Acton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The purpose of the amendment is to enact a statutory duty to keep schools open for in person attendance in future public health and other civil emergencies, unless Parliament expressly approves, and continues every two weeks to approve, any closures.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Parent-equivalent care by local authorities
In section 22 of the Children Act 1989 (general duty of local authority in relation to children looked after by them), after subsection (3)(a) insert—
“(aa) to provide care as would be reasonable to expect a parent to give to them; and””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the nature and level of parental care expected for children within their own families also applies to corporate parents and to the children’s care system. It replaces amendment 146A.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Use of seclusion (including isolation rooms) in schools
(1) For the purposes of this section, "seclusion" means the involuntary confinement and isolation of a child or young person, in a room or space from which they are not free to leave, whether or not a member of staff is physically present.
(2) The Secretary of State may by regulations, following consultation with relevant stakeholders, make provision for the regulation and oversight of the use of seclusion in schools.
(3) If regulations are made under this section, they must include provision ensuring that—
(a) seclusion is not used as a form of discipline or behaviour management;
(b) any use of seclusion is recorded, and reported to the child’s parent or carer on the same day;
(c) any incident involving seclusion is reviewed by a person with lead responsibility for safeguarding within the setting;
(d) data on the use of seclusion is collected, monitored, and made available for external scrutiny.
(4) For the purposes of subsection (3)(c), “a person with lead responsibility for safeguarding within the setting” means the individual who holds primary designated responsibility for child protection or safeguarding matters in that educational setting.
(5) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as they consider appropriate, including representative organisations of education staff, providers, children and young people, and families, and organisations representing those with special educational needs or disabilities.
(6) When making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must have regard to relevant duties under the Equality Act 2010 and the Human Rights Act 1998.
(7) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this Act is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause is proposed as a probing amendment to support parliamentary debate on legal safeguards for the use of seclusion in schools. It does not impose direct duties on schools. Instead, it invites the Secretary of State to consider enabling regulation, following sector-wide consultation.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 5, page 9, line 12, at end insert—
“(iii) kinship families.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Earl of Effingham (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure the needs and experiences of all members of kinship families are considered and those family members are able to access the support they need, so children can thrive in safe, loving homes within their family network.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 5, page 9, line 26, at end insert—
“(e) legal support;
(f) family group decision making.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to include, in the kinship local offer, information on any legal support available including advice services and information on when family group decision making is offered.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Safe and Resilient Schools Plan
(1) All new school buildings must be net zero in operation, and designed for a 2°C rise in average global temperatures and future-proofed for a 4°C rise.
(2) All new school buildings must be built to adapt to the risks of climate change, including increased flooding and higher indoor temperatures.
(3) The Secretary of State must within two years of the day on which this Act is passed—
(a) publish a national Safe and Resilient Schools Plan which sets out how existing school buildings can reach net zero and be resilient to climate risks, and
(b) set a target date, using the affirmative resolution procedure, and delivery roadmap for implementation of the Safe and Resilient Schools Plan.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Boycott (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would make the Department for Education’s guidance around new school buildings statutory, and require government to publish and implement a plan which ensures that existing school buildings are resilient to climate risks, like overheating and flooding, and reach net zero.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Preventing school exclusion and strengthening support for vulnerable children
(1) Where a child is subject to police involvement or is known to youth justice services, a youth justice practitioner must be invited to attend any school exclusion hearing or appeal concerning that child, to assist the child and their family and the school in identifying appropriate support to maintain the child’s engagement in education.
(2) In cases where a child has suspected or recognised special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) or neurodivergence, there shall be a presumption against permanent or fixed-term exclusion.
(3) An alternative educational plan must be developed, including a timely assessment of the child’s learning needs.
(4) Where police are called to a school in relation to a child known to youth justice or other statutory services, the school must notify the relevant agency to ensure coordinated decision-making and safeguarding.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 5, page 10, line 5, at end insert—
“(8) In fulfilling its duties under subsection (7) a local authority must annually consult and collect feedback from children in kinship care and their carers about its kinship local offer.
(9) Feedback received under subsection (8) must be published annually.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Earl of Effingham (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to consult children and carers when reviewing their kinship care offer.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 5, page 10, line 5, at end insert—
“(8) A local authority must from time to time publish—
(a) comments about its kinship local offer it has received from or on behalf of children, kinship carers and others with lived experience of aspects of kinship care;
(b) the authority's response to those comments (including details of any action the authority intends to take).
(9) Comments published under subsection (8)(a) must be published in a form that does not enable the person making them to be identified.
(10) Regulations made by statutory instrument may make further provision about—
(a) information to be included in an authority's kinship local offer;
(b) how an authority's kinship local offer is to be published;
(c) who is to be involved and consulted by an authority in developing, preparing and reviewing its kinship local offer;
(d) how an authority is to involve children, kinship carers and others with lived experience of aspects of kinship care in the development, preparation and review of its local kinship offer;
(e) the publication of comments on the kinship local offer, and the local authority's response, under subsection (8)(b) (including circumstances in which comments are not required to be published).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would give the Secretary of State explicit power to set out in regulations how the kinship local offer should be published, when it should be reviewed, and how children and families are to be involved in developing it.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Mandatory training in SEND and neurodivergence
(1) Within one year of the passing of this Act, all school teaching staff must receive mandatory training in the identification and support of children with SEND and neurodivergence.
(2) The Secretary of State must issue guidance on the content, frequency and delivery of such training, and ensure it is embedded in initial teacher training and continuing professional development.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty on schools to work with youth courts to provide assessment of special educational needs and neurodivergence
Schools must, when requested, provide courts with an assessment of a child’s special educational needs or neurodivergence, including but not limited to—
(a) whether the child has SEND or neurodivergence;
(b) whether appropriate adaptations and support were in place during their schooling;
(c) whether further expert assessment is required.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—
“Removal of unregistered status for approved kinship carers
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/959) and the Children Act 1989, no placement of a child with a kinship carer that is approved by the Director of Children’s Services, shall be considered an unregistered placement.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow local authorities to place a child with a kinship carer without needing to meet the fostering placement standards, where it is judged by the local authority to be in the best interests of the child, as a registered placement, including for the purposes of Ofsted inspection.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—
“Kinship carers: early permanence
In section 10(5B) of the Children Act 1989 (power of court to make section 8 orders), for “of at least one year immediately preceding the application” substitute “determined by the court”.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the requirement for kinship carers to have lived with the child for whom they are making a Section 8 order under the Children Act 1989 for at least one year.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty on schools to support reintegration and rehabilitation for children post-custody
(1) Schools must collaborate with social services, mental health providers and youth justice services to embed post-custody reintegration planning for children with special education needs.
(2) The Secretary of State must publish an annual assessment of how effectively schools in England support the reintegration and rehabilitation of children post-custody.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—
“Requirements for kinship care approval
Regulation 26 of the Fostering Services (England) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011/581) (assessment of prospective foster parents) does not apply to kinship carers.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the requirement for kinship carers who have been approved by the Director of Children’s Services, including after a family group decision-making process, to be reassessed by the fostering panel.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new clause—
“Inclusive education standards for teachers
(1) All teachers employed in state-funded special schools in England and Wales must possess Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) in addition to the Special Educational Needs Coordinators National Professional Qualification, unless—
(a) they are undergoing a recognised programme of initial teacher training leading to QTS, or
(b) they are under the direct supervision of a qualified teacher.
(2) The Secretary of State must ensure that all approved providers of initial teacher training include in their curriculum—
(a) mandatory training in inclusive education principles and practice,
(b) understanding of the barriers faced by Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, and
(c) practical strategies for supporting diverse learners in mainstream and specialist settings.
(3) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, issue regulations made by statutory instrument requiring schools to ensure that all teaching staff participate in regular continuing professional development that includes—
(a) inclusive pedagogy,
(b) Universal Design for Learning, and
(c) working in multidisciplinary teams to support Disabled pupils.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (3) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
(5) All schools must ensure that Disabled pupils’ access to the curriculum and opportunities is not reliant on a single member of staff, including by—
(a) developing inclusive practice as a whole-school approach, and
(b) ensuring consistency in teaching quality and support across subjects and key stages.
(6) The Secretary of State must publish statutory guidance on the implementation of inclusive education training and qualification requirements under this section within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed.
(7) In preparing the guidance, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the Children’s Commissioner for England,
(b) teaching unions,
(c) organisations led by Disabled people, and
(d) experts in inclusive and special education.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—
“Kinship care report
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of day on which this Act is passed, carry out a full review assessing the effectiveness of the current pathways for approval of kinship carers.
(2) The Secretary of State must lay a report setting out the findings of the review before each House of Parliament.
(3) Following the publication of the report in subsection (1), the Secretary of State must introduce regulations for the approval of kinship carers.
(4) These regulations must seek to—
(a) improve the safety and wellbeing of children in kinship care,
(b) reduce barriers to becoming a kinship carer,
(c) establish the requirement for a kinship child protection plan which is monitored by the local authority for a minimum period and until the arrangements for the child are judged to be safe and the welfare of the child is being promoted, and
(d) reduce the burden for local authorities and the family courts.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this Act may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the Secretary of State to review and update the approval requirements for kinship carers.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Transparency and reporting of special educational needs and disabilities funding in state funded schools
(1) All state-funded schools in England, including maintained schools and academies, must submit to the Secretary of State an annual report detailing the allocation and expenditure of funds designated for supporting pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).
(2) Each school’s report must include—
(a) the total amount of—
(i) the notional SEND budget allocated to the school;
(ii) any additional high-needs (top-up) funding received via the local authority;
(iii) any funding received through the Early Years SEN Inclusion Fund or similar grants;
(b) a detailed breakdown of how SEND funding was allocated, including but not limited to the following categories—
(i) staffing costs specifically for SEND provision, including Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Coordinators, teaching assistants, therapists and any other relevant roles;
(ii) costs of external specialist services, including speech and language therapy, educational psychology and any other relevant services;
(iii) training and professional development related to SEND, inclusion, or disability equality;
(iv) assistive technology, specialist equipment, and adaptive learning materials;
(v) SEND-specific interventions or curriculum adaptations, including small-group and individual support;
(vi) expenses related to preparing and delivering provision under education, health and care plans (EHCPs);
(c) identification of funding spent on system-level or whole-school inclusive practice, such as—
(i) universal design for learning strategies;
(ii) inclusive classroom design or accessibility improvements;
(iii) engagement of families of children with SEND;
(d) a statement evaluating the outcomes of SEND funding, including—
(i) progress made by pupils with SEND, including those with EHCPs;
(ii) how funding contributed to meeting pupils’ individual needs and EHCP objectives;
(iii) any measurable improvements in attendance, engagement, or inclusion of pupils with SEND;
(e) any underspend or unallocated SEND funding and how the school plans to use it in the following academic year.
(3) The Secretary of State must issue statutory guidance outlining an annual deadline and the standardised format and content requirements for the SEND funding report to ensure consistency and comparability across schools.
(4) Schools must adhere to this guidance when preparing their annual SEND funding reports.
(5) School governing bodies are responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements set out in this clause.
(6) Failure to comply with the publication requirements may result in appropriate remedial actions as determined by the Secretary of State.
(7) The Secretary of State must publish all schools’ reports received under this section within one month of receiving them.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Cross-sector data collection and reporting
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a cross-sector data management system to track children through education, health and social care systems using a unique reference number.
(2) The Secretary of State must publish annual reports using data collected from the cross-sector management system under subsection (1) to assess how many children who are—
(a) excluded from school, and
(b) in social care settings,
have been diagnosed with special educational needs.
(3) Annual reports must include disaggregation by diagnosis and Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) status.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—
“Temporary care
In Regulation 24 of the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010 (temporary approval of relative, friend or other person connected with C), omit sub-section (2)(c) and the “and” before it.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the requirement for local authorities to undertake a full assessment of a temporary carer as if they were a foster carer, if they are to get temporary approval.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 6, page 11, line 4, leave out subsection (2)
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate on the implications of adding “and others” before section 23ZZA of the Children Act 1989.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Education about food growing and preparation
(1) The Secretary of State shall have a duty to promote school pupils’ knowledge of food growing and food preparation, with the aim of ensuring that each pupil spends an average of one hour per week as a minimum during term time in education on such topics.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, lay before Parliament a report on progress on achieving this goal.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment aims to improve pupils’ exposure to and knowledge of food growing and preparation, with a view towards both improving public health and food security, particularly in times of crisis.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Benefits of nature-based learning to children’s wellbeing
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, conduct a review on the benefits of nature-based learning to children's health and wellbeing, including but not limited to—
(a) the desirability of bringing nature into schools through greening physical spaces and encouraging horticulture,
(b) the desirability of outdoor learning for developing skills, including those relevant to a nature-positive economy, and
(c) the barriers to nature-based learning, and potential policy solutions to overcome those barriers.
(2) A report on the review must be published within six months of the conclusion of the review.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Willis of Summertown (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require government to review and report on the benefits of nature based learning to children’s health and wellbeing
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 6, page 11, line 9, at end insert “, and publish what steps it has taken.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to make local authorities’ performance in relation to the education achievement of children in need or in kinship care more visible, so as to drive improvement, including for children placed in alternative provision.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 6, page 11, line 15, at end insert—
“(c) all children who were previously looked-after and who are adopted.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to extend the steps local authorities take to promote educational achievement to all previously looked-after children who are adopted.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Civil preparedness
Every school must demonstrate appropriate age-specific training for all children across the school for local individual or mass casualty emergencies.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of climate adaptation of schools
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and then biannually thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a review of the level of preparedness of grant maintained schools, and other schools, for increasing extremes of climate, particularly high temperatures, taking into consideration—
(a) the preparedness of buildings and grounds;
(b) the suitability of uniform provision;
(c) the suitability of transport provision;
(d) the level of emergency planning to protect pupil health and wellbeing, including regulations or rules about maximum temperatures in classrooms;
(e) such other issues as may be considered relevant.
(2) In preparing such a report, the Secretary of State shall take advice from the Committee on Climate Change, the chief medical officer, and such other individuals as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) Within six months of the completion of the review, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the findings of the review and any recommendations for improvements.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 6, page 11, line 26, at end insert—
“(e) to improve career and employment opportunities for children within subsection (2).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include career and employment opportunities as a part of educational achievement.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 6, page 11, line 32, at end insert—
“(7) The Secretary of State may by regulations specify how local authorities should report on the educational achievements of children in need or in kinship care.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to make local authorities’ performance in relation to the education achievement of children in need or in kinship care more visible, so as to drive improvement, including for children placed in alternative provision.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Education Act 2002: exemptions related to school performance
In section 216 (commencement) of the Education Act 2002, after subsection (3), insert—
“(3A) The following provisions come into force on the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 is passed—
(a) section 6,
(b) section 7,
(c) section 8,
(d) section 9, and
(e) section 10.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to commence Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Education Act 2002 (Exemptions related to school performance), which would allow well-performing schools to be exempt from curriculum provision and pay and conditions provision.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Exemption from duty to follow National Curriculum
(1) The Education Act 2002 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 78 (general requirements in relation to curriculum), after subsection (1), insert—
“(1A) Any school which has an Ofsted rating of outstanding or any equivalent Ofsted rating is exempt from the requirements under this section.”
(3) In section 80 (basic curriculum for every maintained school in England), after subsection (2A), insert—
“(2B) Any school which has an Ofsted rating of outstanding or any equivalent Ofsted rating is exempt from the requirements under this section.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 6, page 11, line 32, at end insert—
“(7) All children of secondary school age in kinship care must be offered a funded boarding school place in a state secondary school as near as practically possible to the address of the kinship carer.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seek to encourage higher levels of participation in kinship caring through the provision of boarding places for children in kinship care.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 6, page 12, line 5, at end insert—
“(5) Before commencement of subsections (1) to (3) of this section, the Secretary of State must undertake and publish a review of the role, remit and effectiveness of virtual school heads, including the allocation of resources for virtual schools to be able to carry out their duties under this section.
(6) Within six months of the completion of the review, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the findings and conclusions of the review.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bellingham (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to carry out a review of the role and remit of the virtual school in regard to all cohorts under the virtual school umbrella, including the allocation of resources for virtual schools to be able to carry out their duties for each of these cohorts, and to report back to Parliament.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Guidance for schools on gender questioning children
(1) The Secretary of State must publish statutory guidance for schools on gender questioning children on the day on which this Act is passed.
(2) A relevant school must have regard to the guidance on gender questioning children published by the Secretary of State under this section.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the Department for Education to publish the guidance for schools on gender questioning children and schools must have regard for the guidance.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Permanent exclusion: assessment
After being informed that a pupil has been permanently excluded from a school or academy, the local authority must carry out an assessment under paragraph 3 (assessment of children’s needs) of Schedule 2 of the Children Act 1989.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Nash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the local authority to undertake an assessment of the needs of the child if they are permanently excluded from school.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 7, page 12, line 8, after “support” insert “and staying put support”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, leave out lines 16 to 18 and insert—
“(2) The authority must assess what staying close support is required in the interests of the person’s welfare, having due regard to the person’s—
(a) wishes and preferences,
(b) accommodation requirements,
(c) emotional and practical support needs, and
(d) existing support network.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify the scope of the staying close scheme.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Allergy safety provisions in schools
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, all schools in England must—
(a) adopt a school allergy and anaphylaxis policy,
(b) obtain individual healthcare and anaphylaxis action plans for all pupils with allergies,
(c) purchase and store in-date adrenaline auto-injectors on school property,
(d) provide training for school staff on allergy awareness and administrating adrenaline auto-injectors, and
(e) record any allergic reactions in the pupil’s individual healthcare and anaphylaxis action plan.
(2) The Secretary of State must provide guidance to schools on the implementation of subsection (1) within six months of the day on which this Bill is passed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Non-affiliated - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to introduce mandatory allergy safety policies for all schools in England.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Statutory standards of filtering and monitoring systems deployed in schools
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument specify minimum standards for filtering and monitoring technologies used to safeguard children in schools.
(2) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
(3) These regulations apply to any filtering and monitoring systems procured by or deployed in schools.
(4) The standards in subsection (1) must—
(a) meet the standards of the Department for Education’s Keeping children safe in education statutory guidance;
(b) meet the standards of the Department for Education’s Meeting digital and technology standards in schools guidance, including its filtering and monitoring standards for schools and colleges;
(c) meet the standards of the Department for Education’s Generative AI: product safety expectations;
(d) prevent filtering and monitoring systems’ barriers to accessing illegal content from being switched off.
(5) Filtering and monitoring standards set out in subsection (4) must be certified by an accreditation scheme sanctioned by the Department for Education.
(6) Certification must be dependent on the completion of a real-time test each term, delivered remotely or in person, to ensure compliance with the requirements of subsection (4).
(7) When inspecting a school, the Secretary of State must require OFSTED to ensure that—
(a) schools have a certified filtering and monitoring system;
(b) real-time tests, set out in subsection (6), are conducted and recorded;
(c) incidents or breaches are recorded.
(8) In this section, “school” means an entity that provides education to children in the United Kingdom including early years providers, nursery schools, primary schools, secondary schools, sixth form colleges, city technology colleges, academies, free schools, faith schools, special schools, state boarding schools, and private schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 17, after “support” insert “or staying put support”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 20, after “support” insert “or staying put support”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Code of practice on Children’s Data and Education
(1) The Information Commissioner’s office must prepare a code of practice which contains such guidance as the Commissioner considers appropriate on the processing of data in connection with the provision of education to children.
(2) Guidance under subsection (1) must include consideration of—
(a) all aspects of the provision of education including learning, school management and safeguarding;
(b) all types of schools and learning settings;
(c) the need for transparency and evidence of efficacy on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the provision of education;
(d) the collection of data for the purpose of training AI systems used in schools, including the collection of data by the Department for Education during trials of AI systems,
(e) the impact of profiling and automated decision-making on children’s access to education opportunities;
(f) the principle that children have a right to know what data about them is being generated, collected, processed, stored and shared;
(g) the principle that those with parental responsibility have a right to know how their children's data is being generated, collected, processed, stored and shared;
(h) the safety and security of children’s data;
(i) the need to ensure children's access to and use of counselling services and the exchange of information for safeguarding purposes are not restricted.
(3) In preparing a code or amendments under this section, the Commissioner must have regard to—
(a) the fact that children are entitled to a higher standard of protection than adults with regard to their personal data as set out in the United Kingdom GDPR, and the ICO’s Age Appropriate Design code;
(b) the need to prioritise children's best interests and to uphold their rights under UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and General Comment 25;
(c) the fact that children may require different protections at different ages and stages of development;
(d) the need to support innovation to enhance United Kingdom children’s education and learning opportunities, including facilitating testing of novel products and supporting the certification and the development of standards;
(e) ensuring the benefits from product and service developed using United Kingdom children’s data accrue to the United Kingdom.
(4) In preparing a code or amendments under this section, the Commissioner must consult with—
(a) children,
(b) educators,
(c) parents,
(d) persons who appear to the Commissioner to represent the interests of children,
(e) the AI Safety Institute, and
(f) the relevant Education department for each nation of the United Kingdom.
(5) The Code applies to data processors and controllers that—
(a) are providing education in school or other learning settings;
(b) provide services or products in connection with the provision of education;
(c) collect children's data whilst they are learning;
(d) use education data, education data sets or pupil data to develop services and products;
(e) build, train or operate AI systems and models that impact children’s learning experience or outcomes;
(f) are public authorities that process education data, education data sets or pupil data.
(6) The Commissioner must prepare a report, in consultation with the EdTech industry and other stakeholders set out in subsection (4), on the steps required to develop a certification scheme under Article 42 of the United Kingdom GDPR, to enable the industry to demonstrate the compliance of EdTech services and products with the United Kingdom GDPR, and conformity with this Code.
(7) Where requested by an education service, evidence of compliance with this Code must be provided by relevant providers of commercial products and services in a manner that satisfies the education service’s obligations under the Code.
(8) In this section—
“AI” means technology enabling the programming or training of a device or software to perceive environments through the use of data, interpret data using automated processing designed to approximate cognitive abilities, and make recommendations, predictions or decisions; and includes generative AI, meaning deep or large language models able to generate text and other content based on the data on which they were trained,
“EdTech” means a service or product that digitise education functions including administration and management information systems, learning and assessment and safeguarding, including services or products used within school settings and at home on the recommendation, advice or instruction of a school,
“education data” means personal data that forms part of an educational record,
“education data sets” means anonymised or pseudonymised data sets that include Education Data or Pupil Data,
“efficacy” means that the promised learning outcomes can be evidenced,
“learning setting” means a place where children learn including schools, their home and extra-curricular learning services, for example online and in-person tutors,
“pupil data” means personal data about a child collected whilst they are learning which does not form part of an educational record, and
“safety and security” means that it has been adequately tested.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Prevention of the transmission of respiratory and other diseases
(1) The Secretary of State shall have a duty to ensure that the levels of ventilation and where necessary filtration of air within classrooms and other school buildings are at the best possible levels for the reduction of the transmission of respiratory diseases, and that other appropriate measures are in place to reduce the transmission of all diseases.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, lay before Parliament a report on progress on achieving this goal.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that schools provide the safest and most resilient environment possible against the spread of infectious diseases.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 21, after “support” insert “or staying put support”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) Where staying close support is provided, it must be provided with due regard to the wishes of the relevant person and a record must be kept of that person’s wishes.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Earl of Effingham (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require local authorities to take account of the wishes of the relevant young person when providing staying close support and keep a record of those wishes.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Education for voting
(1) The Secretary of State shall have a duty to promote school pupils’ knowledge of the electoral system at all levels of government and the process of voting within it, such that by the age of 16 all pupils have had contact with and practical experience of all the processes involved in an election, including schools facilitating mock elections giving all students opportunities to experience standing for election, campaigning and voting.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 24 months thereafter, lay before Parliament a report on progress on achieving this duty.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
In the light of the Government’s intention of lowering the age of voting to 16 in General Elections, this amendment seeks to probe what practical steps the Government is taking to ensure full preparation for the change within schools.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“School complaints procedure
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a central complaints handling system for use by—
(a) the Department for Education,
(b) His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools (“Ofsted”),
(c) the Teacher Regulation Agency, and
(d) schools in England.
(2) The system must review the complaint and direct it to the most appropriate person or body.
(3) The system must enable complaints to be submitted via the GOV.UK website.
(4) Complaints submitted under the system must be stored in a single database, to which the Department for Education and Ofsted must have access.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Spielman (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to establish a central complaints system for the education system in England, to avoid the duplication of complaints to multiple organisations.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 7, page 12, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) Where staying close support is provided, it must be provided with due regard to the wishes of the relevant person and a record must be kept of that person’s wishes.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to take account of the wishes of the relevant young person when providing staying close support, and keep a record of those wishes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 24, after first “support” insert “and staying put support”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Annual review of burdens and sunset of ineffective measures
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed and annually thereafter, conduct a review of the operation of all measures introduced by this Act to determine whether they—
(a) achieve their stated purpose, and
(b) impose unnecessary or disproportionate bureaucratic burdens on local authorities, parents, schools, or the Department.
(2) Where a review under subsection (1) finds that any measure does not achieve its stated purpose, or imposes unnecessary burdens disproportionate to its benefits, the Secretary of State must—
(a) by regulations made by statutory instrument repeal that measure, or
(b) provide exemptions, modifications, or other adjustments to reduce the burden, consistent with the principle of value for money.
(3) Any measure introduced by this Act which has failed the tests under subsection (1) and which has not been rectified by regulations under subsection (2) shall automatically cease to have effect two years after the date of the review in which it was identified.
(4) A report on each review under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament, setting out—
(a) the evidence relied upon,
(b) the costs and benefits assessed, and
(c) the steps taken under subsection (2).
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment establishes an annual review of all measures in the Act to ensure they achieve their purpose without imposing unnecessary bureaucratic burdens. Measures found ineffective or disproportionately burdensome must be repealed or amended, with a sunset clause ensuring that no such measure can persist beyond two years without correction.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Substantive fairness in ministerial action
(1) In exercising any function under this Act, whether by issuing guidance or by reviewing parental appeals, the Secretary of State must act in a manner that is substantively fair, proportionate, and consistent with the best educational interests of the child.
(2) To be compliant with subsection (1) it is not sufficient for the Secretary of State to frame guidance or decisions in terms which appear compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998 or the European Convention on Human Rights where the effect in practice is to impose unfair, excessive, or coercive obligations on parents.
(3) In any challenge brought before a court, the court must have regard to the actual operation and impact of the guidance or decision on parents and children, and not merely to its formal wording or stated purpose.
(4) Guidance issued under this Act must—
(a) not extend beyond what is necessary to secure lawful compliance by local authorities and schools, and
(b) avoid creating undue burdens on parents.
(5) Nothing in this section prevents the Secretary of State from issuing guidance designed to protect children from significant harm, provided such guidance is necessary, proportionate, and capable of practical implementation without undermining parental rights.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment prevents the Secretary of State from relying on superficial or merely formal compliance with human rights standards to shield their actions from judicial review. It ensures that courts may assess the real-world impact of guidance and appeal decisions, thereby protecting parents and children from unfair or coercive state interference.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 32, at end insert—
“(4A) “Staying put” has the meaning given by section 23CZA(2) of the Children Act 1989 (arrangements for certain former relevant children to continue to live with former foster parents).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, together with others to this Clause in the name of Lord Watson of Invergowrie, would include staying put support in the support provided by local authorities under this section and extend the provision of ‘staying put’ for young people to the age of 25.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 38, at end insert—
“(c) any other support the local authority deems appropriate.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow the local authority to use its discretion to offer additional support to a care leaver under the age of 25.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Restriction on collection of data relating to children in education
(1) Public authorities, schools, or any state body may only collect, retain, or process personal data relating to a child in an educational setting where such collection is strictly necessary to protect the child from significant harm as defined by section 31 of the Children Act 1989 (care and supervision).
(2) Data collected under subsection (1) must not exceed what is proportionate and essential to the specific risk of harm identified.
(3) No personal data may be collected for the purposes of profiling, monitoring, or assessing a child beyond what is necessary for safeguarding under subsection (1).
(4) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish guidance setting out the limits of permissible data collection in accordance with this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent the excessive collection of children’s data in educational settings by limiting state powers of collection to circumstances strictly necessary for protecting a child from harm, as defined by the statutory threshold in the Children Act 1989.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Use of powers in the Act
(1) From the day six months after the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must ensure that the measure in subsection (2) is ready to be enforced at any time.
(2) In the event of a national emergency or authoritarian governance, the courts have the final authority to safeguard the primacy of parental rights to determine their child's education in their best interests.
(3) Authoritarian governance means a situation where emergency regulations or executive actions suspend, limit, or derogate from rights protected under the Human Rights Act 1998 or the European Convention on Human Rights.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to protect the legal rights of parents to determine their child's education in exceptional national circumstances by placing judicial oversight above executive restrictions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 38, at end insert—
“(5A) A person specified in subsection (1) can refuse the offer of staying close support.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow care leavers to opt out of Staying Close support.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 7, page 12, line 40, at end insert—
“(7) A local authority must publish an annual summary of actions taken under this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to make local authorities’ performance in relation to “staying close support” more visible, so as to drive improvement.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to opt out from device-based homework
(1) Before the beginning of the 2026/27 academic year, the Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, confer a right for parents to elect, by giving notice in writing to a school, for their child to receive, complete and submit homework tasks otherwise than by means of a computer or a personal electronic device.
(2) Any regulations made under subsection (1)—
(a) must apply to all schools in England;
(b) may provide for parents to withdraw any notice previously given to a school, provided they give reasonable warning;
(c) may provide for schools temporarily to disregard any such notice in relation to certain or all subjects—
(i) by agreement with the parents,
(ii) if the headteacher reasonably considers in relation to a particular pupil that it is necessary to do so to accommodate the medical or educational needs of that pupil and provided that the school has first consulted with the parents, or
(iii) in exceptional circumstances if the headteacher reasonably considers that it is necessary to do so to maintain continuity of educational provision for particular pupils or for all pupils attending the school.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(4) For the purposes of this section “parent”, “pupil” and “school” have the meanings given in the Education Act 1996 (see sections 3, 4 and 576 of that Act).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment establishes a right for parents to ensure their child is able to complete homework without the use of a computer or personal device.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Device-based examinations: secondary education examinations
(1) Before the beginning of the 2026/27 academic year the Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, require examination boards to ensure that all secondary education examinations are completed by pupils by hand, and not by means of a computer or a personal electronic device.
(2) Any regulations made under subsection (1) may provide for exceptions—
(a) in relation to the examination of subjects for which computer or device use proficiency is a core element of the subject, such as computing and music technology, or
(b) where completing an exam by means of a computer or a personal electronic device—
(i) is more appropriate for a pupil with special educational needs or disabilities, or
(ii) is required by a pupil’s education, health and care plan.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament
(4) For the purposes of this section “pupil” has the meaning given by the section 3 of the Education Act 1996 (definition of pupil etc).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that secondary education examinations are completed by hand and without pupils needing to use a computer or a personal electronic device, subject to relevant subject or SEND exceptions.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 8, page 13, line 7, at end insert—
“(2A) In subsection (2), after paragraph (f) insert—
“(g) financial literacy and financial support.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would introduce a requirement on local authorities to publish information about the services they provide to support care leavers to develop financial literacy and to better understand their financial entitlements as part of their Local Offer for Care Leavers.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 8, page 13, line 25, at end insert—
“(e) setting out the transition arrangements for health and primary care for care leavers.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include robust transition arrangements for health and into primary care for care leavers.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Device-based examinations: reception baseline assessments
(1) Before the beginning of the 2026/27 academic year, the Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, require that reception baseline assessments are completed by pupils otherwise than by means of a computer or a personal electronic device.
(2) Any regulations made under subsection (1) may provide for exceptions for pupils with special educational needs or disabilities.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(4) For the purposes of this section “pupil” has the meaning given by the section 3 of the Education Act 1996 (definition of pupil etc).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure that the reception baseline assessment is completed without pupils needing to be able to use a computer or a personal electronic device, unless relevant SEND exceptions apply.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Behaviour improvement: presumption against reinstatement for children who engage in extremely serious behaviour
(1) The School Discipline (Pupil Exclusions and Reviews) (England) Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/1033) are amended as follows.
(2) In regulation 6, after paragraph (3) insert—
“(3A) For any pupil engaged in any of the circumstances set out in sub-paragraphs (a) to (c), the presumption should be that the governing body must not reinstate the pupil unless a risk assessment has been carried out which demonstrates that the students does not present a heightened risk factor to other students and staff—
(a) where a pupil’s possession of a knife or other offensive weapon was a factor in the decision to exclude the child;
(b) where the pupil’s behaviour which led to their being excluded included sexual assault;
(c) where the pupil’s behaviour which led to their being excluded included assault against a teacher.
(3B) Any risk assessment required under paragraph (3A) must demonstrate how this risk has been eliminated or negated.
(3C) Where a pupil has not been reinstated as a result of conditions under paragraph (3A), the pupil must be relocated to an environment that is more suitable to their challenging behaviour, such as a People Referral Unit or Alternative Provision or similar.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the Government’s willingness to introduce a presumption against the reinstatement of a child who has been excluded for possession of a knife or other offensive weapon, sexual assault, or assault against a teacher. It would instead mean that the pupil must be relocated to an environment that is more suitable to challenging behaviour.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 8, page 13, line 25, at end insert—
“(e) enabling care leavers to maintain, strengthen and build family and social relationships.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 8, page 13, line 29, at end insert—
“(2C) A local authority must publish an annual summary of actions taken under this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to make local authorities’ performance in relation to local offers for care leavers more visible, so as to drive improvement.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Behaviour improvement: presumption against reinstatement in a mainstream school for children who have been permanently excluded on two occasions
(1) The School Discipline (Pupil Exclusions and Reviews) (England) Regulations 2012 (2012/1033) are amended as follows.
(2) In regulation 6, after paragraph (3) insert—
“(3A) Where a pupil has been permanently excluded on two occasions, the presumption should be the governing body, of any mainstream school, must not reinstate the pupil unless a risk assessment has been carried out which demonstrates that the students does not present a heightened risk factor to other students and staff, in which case the school must be able to demonstrate how this risk has been eliminated or negated.
(3B) Where a pupil has not been reinstated as a result of conditions under paragraph (3A), the pupil must be relocated to an environment that is more suitable to their challenging behaviour, such as a People Referral Unit or Alternative Provision or similar.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the Government’s willingness to introduce a presumption against the reinstatement of a child who has been permanently excluded on two occasions from any mainstream school from being moved to another mainstream school and relocated to an environment that is more suitable to their challenging behaviour, such as a Pupil Referral Unit or Alternative Provision or similar.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Report: impact of behaviour of school children on teacher recruitment and retention
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a report on the impact of the behaviour of school children on teacher recruitment and retention.
(2) In producing the report under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) local authorities,
(b) parents,
(c) school governing bodies,
(d) teachers,
(e) The Office for Standards in Education, and
(f) any other persons the Secretary of State deems appropriate.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the Department for Education to undertake and publish a report on the impact of behaviour of school children on teacher recruitment and retention.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 8, insert the following new Clause—
“National offer for care leavers
After section 2 of the Children and Social Work Act 2017 insert—
“2A National offer for care leavers
(1) The Secretary of State must publish information about services which care leavers in all areas of England should be able to access to assist them in adulthood and independent living or in preparing for adulthood and independent living.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), services which may assist care leavers in adulthood and independent living or in preparing for adulthood and independent living include services relating to—
(a) health and well-being;
(b) relationships;
(c) education and training;
(d) employment;
(e) accommodation;
(f) participation in society.
(3) Information published by the Secretary of State under this section is to be known as the “National Offer for Care Leavers”.
(4) The Secretary of State must update the National Offer for Care Leavers from time to time.
(5) Before publishing or updating the National Offer for Care Leavers the Secretary of State must consult with relevant persons about which services may assist care leavers in adulthood and independent living or in preparing for adulthood and independent living.
(6) In this section—
“care leavers” means—
(a) eligible children within the meaning given by paragraph 19B of Schedule 2 to the Children Act 1989;
(b) relevant children within the meaning given by section 23A(2) of that Act;
(c) persons aged under 25 who are former relevant children within the meaning given by section 23C(1) of that Act;
(d) persons qualifying for advice and assistance within the meaning given by section 24 of that Act;
“relevant persons” means—
(a) such care leavers as appear to the Secretary of State to be representative of care leavers in England;
(b) other Ministers of State who have a role in arranging services that may assist care leavers in or preparing for independent living.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would introduce a new requirement on the Secretary of State for Education to publish a national offer detailing what support care leavers are entitled to claim by expanding the provisions in the Children and Social Work Act 2017 which require local authorities to produce a “Local offer”.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Extension of priority need status to under 25s
(1) The Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order 2002 (S.I. 2022/2051) is amended as follows.
(2) In article (4), paragraph (1)(a), for “twenty-one” substitute “twenty-five”.
(3) In article (5), omit paragraph (1).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Report: impact of behaviour of school children on educational outcomes
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a report on the impact of the behaviour of school children on educational outcomes for their fellow schoolchildren.
(2) In producing the report under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) local authorities,
(b) parents,
(c) school governing bodies,
(d) teachers,
(e) academy trusts,
(f) The Office for Standards in Education, and
(g) any other persons the Secretary of State deems appropriate.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the Department for Education to undertake and publish a report on the impact of behaviour of school children on educational outcomes.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to exclude under section 51A of the Education Act 2002
(1) The Secretary of State has a duty to ensure that agreements or schemes to create local “no exclusion” areas do not infringe on headteachers’ right to exclude pupils in England under section 51A of the Education Act 2002 (Exclusion of pupils: England).
(2) The Secretary of State must publish a review to assess—
(a) whether headteachers’ right to exclude under section 51A of the Education Act 2002 is being upheld, and
(b) whether headteachers are subject to undue pressure to sign up to “no exclusion” agreements or schemes.
(3) In preparing the review under subsection (2), the Secretary of State must consult such persons they consider appropriate.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Promoting relationships for looked after children
In section 22(3A) of the Children Act 1989, at end insert “and a duty to promote the child’s family and social relationships in ways which are consistent with the child’s welfare.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Sibling contact for looked after children
(1) In section 34(1) of the Children Act 1989, after paragraph (d) insert—
“(e) their siblings (whether of the whole or half blood).”
(2) In paragraph 15(1) of Schedule 2 to the Children Act 1989, after paragraph (c) insert—
“(d) their siblings (whether of the whole or half blood).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would place the same emphasis on promoting looked after children’s relationships with their siblings, as already exists with parents.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 65, page 123, line 33, at end insert—
“(b) section (Employment of children in Scotland) extends to Scotland only.”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides for the clause inserted after clause 26 (by my amendment) to extend to Scotland.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Extension of pupil premium to children subject to a kinship care arrangement
(1) The Secretary of State must, for the financial year beginning 1 April 2026 and for each year thereafter, provide that an amount is payable from the pupil premium grant to schools and local authorities in respect of each registered pupil in England who is who is a child living in kinship care.
(2) The amount payable under subsection (1) must be equal to the amount that is payable for a pupil who is a looked after child.
(3) In this section—
“a child living in kinship care” is to be interpreted in the same manner as given in section 22I of the Children Act 1989, as inserted by section 5 of this Act;
“looked after child” has the same meaning as in the Children Act 1989;
“pupil premium grant” means the grant of that name paid to a school or a local authority by the Secretary of State under section 14 of the Education Act 2002 (power of Secretary of State and Senedd Cymru to give financial assistance for purposes related to education or children etc).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would extend the pupil premium to children subject to a kinship care arrangement.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 4, at end insert, “, but no part of Sections 30 to 35 and Schedule 2 may be commenced earlier than the day on which the National Cyber Security Centre (or an equivalent body designated by the Secretary of State) certifies that the arrangements for the security of the register of children not in school are in line with best practice and that testing of its systems is complete.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Kinship care allowance
(1) A person is entitled to a kinship care allowance for any week in which that person is engaged as a kinship carer in England.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a “kinship carer” has the meaning given in section 22I of the Children Act 1989, as inserted by section 5 of this Act.
(3) A person is not entitled to an allowance under this section unless that person satisfies conditions prescribed in regulations made by the Secretary of State.
(4) A person may claim an allowance under this section in respect of more than one child.
(5) Where two or more persons would be entitled for the same week to such an allowance in respect of the same child, only one allowance may be claimed on the behalf of—
(a) the person jointly elected by those two for that purpose, or
(b) in default of such an election, the person determined by, and at the discretion of, the Secretary of State.
(6) Regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which a person is or is not to be treated for the purposes of this section as engaged, or regularly and substantially engaged, in caring for a child under an eligible kinship care arrangement.
(7) An allowance under this section is payable at the weekly rate specified by the Secretary of State in regulations.
(8) Regulations under subsection (7) may specify—
(a) different weekly rates for different ages of children being cared for, or
(b) different weekly rates for different regions of England.
(9) Regulations under subsection (7) must specify a weekly rate that is no lower than the minimum weekly allowance for foster carers published by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 23 of the Care Standards Act 2000.
(10) A statutory instrument containing regulations underthis section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would mean a person is entitled to a kinship care allowance for any week in which that person is engaged as a kinship carer in England.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 4, at end insert “, subject to subsection (2A)”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 4, at end insert—
“(aa) section (Guidance for schools on gender questioning children);”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures another amendment in the name of Baroness Barran would take effect on the day the Act is passed.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Register of foster carers
(1) The Secretary of State must introduce a register of local authority foster parents and independent foster parents who are—
(a) currently fostering children, or
(b) available to foster children.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), “local authority foster parent” is defined in accordance with section 105 of the Children Act 1989.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would introduce a register of foster carers. The intention is that having such a register, as exists for social workers, would improve the safeguarding of children, and matching and sufficiency of placements, and improve the status of foster carers.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN AFTER DEBATE
Clause 66, page 124, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Section (Abolition of common law defence of reasonable punishment) comes into force at the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is consequential on a new clause amendment by Baroness Finlay of Llandaff.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of disparities affecting care leavers
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, undertake a review of the disparities that a relevant child, or former relevant child, may face compared to other children or young adults.
(2) The review must in particular consider the social issues which a relevant child, or former relevant child, may face, including—
(a) education and training,
(b) employment,
(c) forming and sustaining relationships with family, friends or other persons,
(d) financial security and poverty,
(e) health (which includes both mental and physical health),
(f) housing,
(g) interaction with the justice system.
(3) The review must also in particular consider any potential discrimination a relevant child, or former relevant child, may face because of their status as a relevant child, or former relevant child.
(4) The Secretary of State must within 24 months of the day on which this Act is passed—
(a) prepare and publish a report of the review, and
(b) lay a copy of the report before Parliament.
(5) In this section—
“relevant child” —
(a) in England and Wales, has the meaning given by section 23A(2) of the Children Act 1989,
(b) in Scotland, is to be construed in accordance with section 26A of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995;
“former relevant child” —
(a) in England and Wales, has the meaning given by section 23C(1) of the Children Act 1989 and is aged under 25,
(b) in Scotland, applies to anyone who is could qualify for the after-care provisions in section 29 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995;
“young adult” means a person aged 18 or over but under 25.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)Member's explanatory statement
This new Clause requires the Secretary of State to undertake a review of the disparities which care leavers face, prepare a report of the review and lay the report before Parliament.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Adoption and special guardianship support fund review
(1) Within one month of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must conduct a review of the level of funding available per child from the adoption and special guardianship support fund.
(2) The review must produce recommendations regarding any steps necessary to increase the funds available per child.
(3) The review must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Section 15 may not come into force until the Secretary of State has published a report that contains—
(a) details of the number of available placements in relevant establishments or agencies, and
(b) an analysis of the expected impact of this section on the number of available placements in relevant establishments or agencies.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require a report that would clarify the supply and capacity of independent children’s homes and independent fostering agencies before the clause is commenced.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Section 27 may only come into force after the Secretary of State has laid before Parliament a report containing the following information—
(a) what form breakfast club provision by schools currently takes;
(b) how much breakfast club provision costs schools, and how much is charged by schools for such provision;
(c) how much funding is estimated to be required to enable schools to meet the requirements of section 27;
(d) what additional staff will be required to deliver the breakfast clubs;
(e) the grounds on which the Secretary of State would use the power under section 551C of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would delay the commencement of clause 27 until the Secretary of State has laid before Parliament a report containing information on breakfast club provision, costs and resources.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“General Practice Services for care leavers
When negotiating contracts under The National Health Service (General Medical Services Contracts) Regulations 2015 the Secretary of State must have due regard to the potential negative impact on care leavers under 25 of not having adequate levels of access to GP services.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This probing amendment would place a duty on the Secretary of State to have due regard to the needs of care leavers when negotiating general practice contracts in the future.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Remedial orders for children in care
After section 42 of the Children Act 1989 (right of officer of the Service to have access to local authority records) insert—
“42A Remedial orders for children in care
(1) Where a court is satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe that a child who is in the care of a local authority is experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing, significant harm, on an application by or for that child, the court may—
(a) prohibit a local authority from taking any act (or proposed act) which it otherwise would be entitled to take in exercising its parental responsibility for the child, or
(b) require a local authority with parental responsibility for the child to take such action as is necessary to safeguard or promote the child’s welfare.
(2) A child making an application to the court for an order under this section shall be presumed to have sufficient understanding unless evidence to the contrary is presented to the court.
(3) The following persons are entitled to apply to the court for an order under this section with respect to a child in the care of a local authority—
(a) any parent or person who has parental responsibility for the child;
(b) the child’s independent reviewing officer;
(c) a local authority foster parent if the child has lived with him for a period of at least one year;
(d) an independent advocate acting for the child.
(4) Before making an application to the court for an order under this section with respect to a child, a person in subsection (3) must obtain the ascertainable views, wishes and feelings of the child about the proposed application, and these shall be provided in the application to the court.
(5) In this section—
“in the care of a local authority” means a child who is the subject of a care order or interim care order;
“harm” has the same meaning as in section 31(9);
“significant” in respect of the child’s health or development has the same meaning as in section 31(10).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would provide new protections for looked after children as recommended by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Sections 12 to 18 may not come into force until the Secretary of State has published a statement regarding the human rights obligations of publicly-funded private providers of children’s social care.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Restoration of funding to the adoption and special guardianship support fund
Within one month of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must increase the funding available per child per year under the adoption and special guardianship support fund to a level equal to or greater than the funding available per child under the fund in March 2025.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would reverse the cut to the adoption and special guardianship support fund.
This amendment was QUESTION PROPOSED
Clause 66, page 124, line 19, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) Subject to subsection (1), the following come into force, in relation to Wales, on such day as the Welsh Ministers may by regulations made by statutory instrument appoint—
(a) section (Employment of children in England and Wales);
(b) sections 30 to 35 and Schedule 2.
(3A) Subject to subsection (1), section (Employment of children in Scotland) comes into force on such day as the Scottish Ministers may by regulations appoint.”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides for certain provision for Wales or Scotland to be brought into force by (respectively) the Welsh Ministers or Scottish Ministers.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 21, at end insert—
“(3A) Section 47 comes into force when all the following conditions are met—
(a) the period of six months, beginning on the day that the Secretary of State publishes the final report of the Curriculum and Assessment Review, has elapsed;
(b) the Secretary of State has published a draft Bill making legislative provision for the changes recommended by the Curriculum and Assessment Review;
(c) the Secretary of State has undertaken a consultation on the findings of the Curriculum and Assessment Review.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 10, page 14, line 32, at end insert—
“(2A) Regional co-operation arrangements must include the local integrated care board in their development, delivery and governance.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bellingham (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The amendment aims to highlight the need to include health agencies in the regional cooperation arrangements.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 21, at end insert—
“(3A) Section 11 may not come into force until regulations under section 11 (qualifying for civil legal aid) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 providing legal aid on a non-means tested basis in relation to proceedings that may result in the deprivation of a child’s liberty have come into force.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would provide that the provisions in the Bill on accommodation for the deprivation of liberty for children cannot come into force until legal aid has been provided on a non-means tested basis for children at risk of this and their families.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 14, line 35, after “accommodation” insert “to meet the needs”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 14, line 36, at end insert “as close to home as reasonably practicable”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 21, at end insert—
“(3A) Section 10 may not come into force until the Secretary of State has published an evaluation of the impact, cost and effectiveness of the Regional Care Cooperatives pathfinder areas.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bellingham (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would delay the implementation of regional cooperation arrangements until the pilots can be fully evaluated.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 21, at end insert—
“(3A) Section 37(2) may not be brought into force until the review required by section (Review of independent educational institution standards) has been published and laid before Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, and another in the name of Baroness Barran, seeks to prevent section 37(2) of the Act from coming into force until the Secretary of State has published a report on the predicted impact of that subsection on the academic institutions set out in the new clause amendment.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 14, line 37, leave out “for meeting those requirements” and insert “to ensure a range of accommodation that is within, or near to, the local authority’s area, and that is capable of meeting the differing needs of children being looked after by the local authority”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 1, leave out “for” and insert “to meet the needs of”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 22, leave out “(3)” and insert “(3A)”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to clause 66 inserting new subsection (3A).
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 1, after “of” insert “sufficient local”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 23, at end insert—
“(4A) Section 3 may not come into force until the Secretary of State has made a statement confirming that safeguarding partners which are party to an agreement under section 16J(1) of the Children Act 2004 (combining safeguarding partner areas and delegating functions) have equal responsibility for the effective delivery of the multi-agency child protection team.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to clarify that safeguarding partners which are party to an agreement under section 16J of the Children Act 2004 have equal responsibility for the effective delivery of the MACPT.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 23, at end insert—
“(4A) Section 3 may not come into force until the Secretary of State has published guidance to clarify how the duties in section 3 will be delivered and funded, including for non-statutory agencies.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify what resources and funding will be provided to ensure effective delivery of the additional duties set out in clause 3.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 2, at end insert “as close to home as reasonably practicable”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 5, after “of,” insert “sufficient”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 24, after “(3)” insert “, (3A)”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to clause 66 inserting new subsection (3A).
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 28, leave out from “Act” to end of line 29 and insert “other than—
(a) the provisions listed in subsection (3) in relation to Wales;
(b) section (Employment of children in Scotland).”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is consequential on my amendments to clause 66 inserting new subsections (3), (3A) and (7A).
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 5, after “new” insert “local”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 7, after “authority” insert “as close to home as reasonably practicable”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, leave out line 32 and insert “any provision listed in subsection (3) in relation to Wales.”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to clause 66 inserting new subsection (3).
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 32, at end insert—
“(7A) The Scottish Ministers may by regulations make transitional or saving provision in connection with the coming into force of section (Employment of children in Scotland).”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides for the Scottish Ministers to make transitional and saving provision in connection with certain provision relating to Scotland.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, leave out lines 8 to 10
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the Secretary of State’s power to add to the list of strategic accommodation functions for local authorities.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 10, at end insert—
“(3A) Each local authority participating in a regional care arrangement must assess, on an ongoing basis, whether there is sufficient provision of placements to meet the current and foreseeable needs of looked after children for whom it is responsible.
(3B) Where any insufficiency is identified under subsection (3A), the authority must publish and implement a plan to address gaps in provision, with particular regard to—
(a) fostering and residential placements,
(b) placements for children with complex or specialist needs, and
(c) the availability of not-for-profit, public sector and kinship-based care.
(3C) In carrying out the functions under subsections (3A) and (3B), the authority must consult with Integrated Care Boards, NHS England, and relevant education bodies.
(3D) Each local authority participating in a regional care arrangement must ensure that the commissioning of placements under the arrangement supports, where it is safe to do so, the maintenance of—
(a) sibling relationships,
(b) contact with birth family and connected persons, and
(c) children’s ties to their local community, school, and cultural environment.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Cash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment places duties on local authorities participating in regional care arrangements to assess sufficiency, plan for complex needs, and protect the relational and community ties of children in care.
NO DECISION has been made on this amendment
Clause 66, page 124, line 33, leave out “or (7)” and insert “, (7) or (7A)”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to clause 66 inserting new subsection (7A).
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 15, line 13, at end insert—
“(aa) children and young people who are and have been looked after by local authorities, and”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure that the views of children and young people are considered before making regulations in relation to local authority duties to secure accommodation for looked after children.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 10, page 15, line 15, at end insert—
“(4A) No regulations may be made under subsection (3)(f) until regulations under section 11 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 on providing legal aid on a non-means tested basis in relation to proceedings that may result in the deprivation of a child’s liberty have come into force.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would provide that the provisions in the Bill on accommodation for the deprivation of liberty for children cannot come into force until legal aid has been provided on a non-means tested basis for children at risk of this.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 16, line 2, at end insert—
“(11) Regional co-operation arrangements must –
(a) be included in Ofsted local authority inspections, and
(b) include both registered and unregistered provision.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require Ofsted to inspect regional cooperation arrangements.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 16, line 2, at end insert—
“(11) Nothing in this section shall be taken to discharge or modify the duties of local authorities in relation to the placement of looked after children under this Act and associated regulations, including the duty to place children in accordance with section 22C(7) of this Act.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Cash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment makes clear that the creation of regional care arrangements does not alter existing legal duties on local authorities to act in the best interests of children when making placements.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 16, line 2, at end insert—
“(11) All local authorities, either individually or collectively within a regional care arrangement, must collect and report to the Secretary of State at regular intervals no less than quarterly, the following additional data relating to the provision of placements—
(a) the number of placement breakdowns by—
(i) category of provision type;
(ii) cause;
(iii) proximity to home;
(b) the number of children re-entering care by—
(i) category pf provision;
(ii) cause;
(iii) proximity to home;
(c) their projections of future demand for placements, disaggregated by type, location and level of need;
(d) where the supplier is not a foster carer or a public supplier, the average cost per placement disaggregated by—
(i) category of provision;
(ii) level of need;
(iii) location.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Cash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment inserts a duty on local authorities within regional care arrangements to collect and report key data on placement sufficiency, cost and outcomes for improved transparency.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 10, page 16, line 2, at end insert—
“(11) the Secretary of State must publish an annual summary of data collected under this section, and must share that summary with—
(a) Ofsted, to inform its annual report on placement sufficiency and stability, and
(b) the Competition and Markets Authority, to inform any market studies or investigations concerning the children’s care placements sector.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Cash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that placement data collected by local authorities is used to inform national reports and market oversight by existing public bodies.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause—
“Accommodation of looked after children: restrictions
After section 22J of the Children Act 1989 (inserted by section 10), insert—
“22K Accommodation of looked after children: restrictions
Looked after children may not be accommodated in adult homes or hostels.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause—
“Boarding school offer for looked after children
All looked after children of secondary school age must be offered a funded boarding school place in a state secondary school in their local authority area.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause—
“Principles for local authority commissioned accommodation
When accommodation is commissioned for looked after children under Section 22J of the Children Act 1989, the relevant local authorities must seek to—
(a) only commission whole homes, not individual places;
(b) ensure homes commissioned solely work with the relevant local authorities;
(c) place children within, or a close as possible to, the local authority area in which they currently reside;
(d) ensure the responsibility for decision making in respect of a child’s placement remains with the local authority rather than the regional care cooperative;
(e) commission homes in areas as agreed by an annual sufficiency strategy to meet need;
(f) ensure accommodation providers remain relationally connected to children even when they move on;
(g) ensure emergency accommodation is commissioned within the local area;
(h) accurately record and report the number of placements;
(i) ensure all homes have embedded speech and language therapy and clinical psychology provision;
(j) ensure homes aim to provide permanence and have links to connected foster care provision;
(k) ensure homes provide an edge of care service in partnership with local authorities who are using the places when the relevant home is not full;
(l) ensure residential care is used to stabilise and act as a bridge to permanence.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to establish a series of core principles for local authorities to follow when accommodation is commissioned for looked after children under Section 22J of the Children Act 1989 (inserted by Clause 10).
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Arrangements for remaining in a residential children’s home after reaching adulthood
(1) The Children Act 1989 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 23CZA (arrangements for certain former relevant children to live with former foster parents)—
(a) at the end of the title insert “or at a residential children’s home”,
(b) at the end of subsection (2) insert “or by which a person who is a former relevant child by virtue of section 23C(1)(b) continues to live at the residential children’s home at which they were resident when they were looked after.”
(3) In paragraph 19BA in Part 2 of Schedule 2 (local authority support for looked after children)—
(a) in sub-paragraph (1), after “parent” insert “or in a residential children’s home”;
(b) in sub-paragraph (3)(b), after “parent” insert “or residential children’s home”.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would extend the “staying put” arrangements that currently exist for young people placed with foster parents to those living in a residential children’s home.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 11, page 16, line 19, after “local authority”, insert “or who has an EHCP and is in receipt of residential care”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include children with EHCPs in residential care and allow residential schools to use deprivation of liberty in specific settings for specific children rather than moving them to a residential home.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 16, leave out lines 28 to 30
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe what is meant by ‘likely to injure themselves or others’ and how this threshold is applied.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 16, line 30, at end insert—
“(1AA) A child who is being looked after by a local authority in England and is under the age of 13 may not, whilst being kept in relevant accommodation in England, be deprived of their liberty in that accommodation unless this has been authorised by the Secretary of State.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure that deprivation of liberty orders could not be issued to children under the age of 13 unless expressly authorised by the Secretary of State, in line with provisions relating to children’s homes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 16, line 33, after “care” insert “, education”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that children deprived of their liberty have access to education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 16, line 37, at end insert “, and this is reflected in its statement of purpose, and”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, along with another in the name of Baroness Barran, seek to ensure only registered children’s homes can be used as relevant accommodation, and that this purpose is reflected in the establishment’s statement of purpose.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 16, line 37, at end insert—
“(c) is a registered children’s home.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, along with another in the name of Baroness Barran, seek to ensure only registered children’s homes can be used as relevant accommodation, and that this purpose is reflected in the establishment’s statement of purpose.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 16, line 37, at end insert—
“(1C) The Director of Children’s Services must review a deprivation of liberty order under this section every 4 weeks to ensure that it is appropriate for the order to remain in place.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require a review of deprivation of liberty orders to ensure that they remain appropriate for the relevant child.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 17, line 4, at end insert—
“(4A) After subsection (2) insert—
“(2A) Regulations made under subsection (2) must apply equally to children deprived of their liberty, whether in secure accommodation or relevant accommodation, and the Secretary of State must consult any persons they consider appropriate before making such regulations.
(2B) It is the duty of a court hearing an application under this section to have regard to the general principle that the deprivation of liberty of a child is a measure of last resort.
(2C) Unless it would not be consistent with the child’s welfare, a local authority making an application to the court under this section must propose accommodation for the child which—
(a) has been judged to be providing high quality care and treatment within the last 12 months by the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills or the Care Inspectorate Wales,
(b) has other children living there,
(c) is near the child’s home, and
(d) has been approved by the local authority’s Director of Children’s Services.
(2D) Where an application is made under this section with respect to a child, the appropriate local authority must, within such time as the court may direct, prepare a plan setting out the action to be taken to end the deprivation of liberty of that child (a “recovery plan”).””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to introduce additional protections for all looked-after children deprived of their liberty under section 25 of the Children Act 1989, in both secure accommodation and relevant accommodation.
This amendment was AGREED
Clause 11, page 17, line 12, at end insert—
“(6A) In subsection (5A), for “restrict the child’s” substitute “deprive the child of their”.”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures consistency with the terminology in section 25 of the Children Act 1989 as amended by clause 11.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 17, line 23, at end insert—
“(8ZB) For the purposes of this section, any children deprived of their liberty under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court shall be deemed to be looked after children.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Berridge (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 11, page 17, line 23, at end insert—
“(8A) After subsection (9) insert—
“(10) Where a child is kept in secure accommodation under this section, the relevant local authority has a duty to provide therapeutic treatment for the child.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would place a duty on local authorities to provide therapeutic treatment for children subject to a deprivation of liberty order.
This amendment was AGREED
Clause 11, page 17, line 24, leave out subsection (9) and insert—
“(9) In section 93 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 (interpretation)—
(a) in the definition of “secure accommodation”, omit paragraph (b);
(b) after that definition insert—
“
“secure accommodation” , in relation to England, means secure accommodation within the meaning of section 25 of the Children Act 1989 or relevant accommodation within the meaning of that section;”.
(10) In section 202(1) of the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (asp 1) (interpretation)—
(a) in the definition of “secure accommodation”, omit paragraph (b);
(b) after that definition insert—
“
“secure accommodation” , in relation to England, means secure accommodation within the meaning of section 25 of the Children Act 1989 or relevant accommodation within the meaning of that section,”.”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that the clause 11 amendments to section 25 of the Children Act 1989, to allow local authorities in England and Wales to seek authorisation for the deprivation of liberty of children in accommodation provided for care and treatment in England, extend to local authorities in Scotland.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Amending the sufficiency duty to prevent children being moved far away from home
(1) Section 22G of the Children Act 1989 is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1), for “steps that secure, so far as reasonably practicable” substitute “all reasonable steps to secure”.
(3) In subsection (2)(a), after “within” insert “or is near to”.
(4) In subsection (3)(c), for “in” substitute “within, or is near to”.
(5) In subsection (4), omit from “having” to the end and substitute “there being a range of accommodation that—
(a) is within, or near to, the authority’s area, and
(b) is capable of meeting the differing needs of the children mentioned in subsection (3).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause amends the sufficiency duty to prevent children being moved far away from home.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Extending “staying put arrangements” to the age of 25
In section 23CZA(6) of the Children Act 1989, for “21” substitute “25”.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would extend the Staying Put scheme to the age of 25.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Use of restraint on children in care and subject to deprivation of liberty orders
The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, lay before Parliament a report on the use of restraint on children—
(a) in care settings, and
(b) subject to deprivation of liberty orders.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Independent reviewing officer functions in relation to deprivation of liberty
(1) Section 25B of the Children Act 1989 (functions of the independent reviewing officer) is amended as follows.
(2) After subsection (3) insert—
“(3A) It shall be the duty of the independent reviewing officer to refer a child’s case to an officer of the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service if the child’s recovery plan made under section 25 is not effectively implemented by the local authority or any other body or person.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 3
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to expand the legal duties of the independent reviewing officer, building upon section 25B of the Children Act 1989 and Regulation 45(3) of the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Local Authority support for children subject to deprivation of liberty orders in their relationships
Information required to be published by a local authority includes information about the authority’s arrangements for enabling children subject to deprivation of liberty orders to maintain, strengthen and build family and social relationships.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Foster care: room sharing
In section 23 of the Care Standards Act 2000 after subsection (4) insert—
“(5) The national minimum standards under this section must include a clear statement that it is appropriate for children over the age of three years to share a room provided the fostering service provider takes into account any potential for bullying, any history of abuse or abusive behaviour, the wishes of the children concerned and all other pertinent facts.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to update the Fostering Services: National Minimum Standards and include a clear statement that it is appropriate for children over the age of three years to share a room provided the fostering service provider has taken into account the same issues which are currently to be taken into account when a room-sharing decision is made under the existing standards.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Children’s homes: transparency of cost
All local authorities must annually publish the prices they pay for private placements in children’s homes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Sanderson of Welton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This intends to enhance transparency and enable local authorities to negotiate effectively with providers to secure the best placement for children at the lowest possible cost. It implements a commitment in the Government’s Keeping Children Safe, Helping Families Thrive policy paper.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: planning process for children’s homes
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must publish a review of whether the distinction for the purposes of the planning regime between small children’s homes and domestic dwelling houses should be removed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Sanderson of Welton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is a probing amendment into the effect of the planning regime on the quantity and location of children’s homes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Affirmative procedure for deprivation of liberty orders
(1) Section 25 of the Children Act 1989 (use of accommodation for restricting liberty) is amended as follows.
(2) After subsection (2) insert—
“(2A) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (2) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
(3) After subsection (7) insert—
“(7A) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (7) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
(4) In section 104 of that Act (regulations and orders), in subsection (2), after “17(4),” insert “25(2), 25(7),”.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that any changes to the time a deprivation of liberty order lasts, the type of accommodation used or the descriptions of children to whom the section applies are subject to affirmative procedure.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 12, page 17, line 34, leave out “Improvement plan notice” and insert “Requirement for inspection”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 12, page 17, line 35, leave out from “may” to end of line 36 and insert, “order an inspection of a parent undertaking, or any of its subsidiaries, if it has—”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require an inspection rather than an improvement plan notice.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 12, page 18, line 18, at end insert—
“(3A) The CIECSS may require an unannounced visit by a Regulation 44 visitor to a children’s home, if it reasonably suspects that there are administrative breaches or minor concerns about the quality of care being provided.
(3B) After a Regulation 44 visitor has inspected the relevant children’s home or homes, the local authority may issue an improvement plan notice based on their findings.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would rely on the use of Regulation 44 visitors to inform the content of an improvement plan notice where the CIECSS has concerns about minor or technical breaches.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 12, page 18, line 19, leave out from beginning to end of line 10 on page 19
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe how the Department for Education intend improvement plans to work in practice.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 12, page 19, line 22, at end insert—
“(3) The CIECSS must inform the relevant commissioning local authorities when an improvement plan notice is served.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to inform commissioning local authorities when an improvement plan notice is served.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 12, page 20, line 27, at end insert—
“(6) The CIECSS must inform the relevant commissioning local authorities when an improvement plan is cancelled.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to inform commissioning local authorities when an improvement plan is cancelled.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 12, page 21, line 27, at end insert—
“(8) The CIECSS must inform the relevant commissioning local authorities when an improvement plan is appealed.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to inform commissioning local authorities when an improvement plan is appealed.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 13, page 22, line 11, after “person” insert “(except natural persons)”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the financial penalties that can be imposed upon the operators of children’s homes to exclude natural persons.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 13, page 22, line 20, after “person” insert “(except natural persons)”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the financial penalties that can be imposed upon the operators of children’s homes to exclude natural persons.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 13, page 22, line 25, at end insert—
“(2A) The CIECSS must pursue the imposition of fines against parents where one or more of their children are attending school for less than 80% of the designated time required.
(2B) The CIECSS must, when deciding the amount of fine to be levied, take account of the reason for non attendance.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that parents who allow their children to be persistently absent must be fined by the CIECSS.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 13, page 23, line 2, at end insert—
“(5A) Nothing in Schedule 1A shall allow a monetary penalty to be imposed on a natural person.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the financial penalties that can be imposed upon the operators of children’s homes to exclude natural persons.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 13 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 14, page 25, line 3, at end insert—
“(c) a supported accommodation setting in England;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment extends financial oversight measures to supported accommodation.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 14, page 27, line 38, at end insert—
“(e) the proposed actions set out in any recovery and resolution plan by the reviewed person.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require a review and resolution plan as part of the independent business review.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 14 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the proposed financial oversight regime for providers of children’s care homes and fostering services.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 15, page 29, line 34, at end insert—
“(c) independent schools wholly or mainly concerned with the provision of education and care for pupils with SEND.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Addington (LD - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to include independent special schools within the profit cap provision.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 15, page 29, line 34, at end insert—
“(c) a supported accommodation setting in England.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Longfield (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 15 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is intended to probe how the power to limit profits will work in practice.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 16, page 31, line 8, after “person”, insert “(except natural persons)”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the financial penalties that can be imposed upon the operators of children’s homes to exclude natural persons.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 17, page 33, line 38, at end insert “except that in no circumstances may the amount exceed 10% of that person’s last annual turnover.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the financial penalties that can be imposed upon the operators of children’s homes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 17, page 33, line 38, at end insert “except that in no circumstances may the amount exceed 10% of the relevant organisation’s last annual turnover, or if the fine is imposed on a natural person, £100,000.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit the financial penalties that can be imposed upon the operators of children’s homes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 18, insert the following new Clause—
“National foster care strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, launch a dedicated foster care strategy.
(2) The strategy may examine—
(a) the sufficiency of foster carer provision, and make recommendations for how this could be improved;
(b) inefficiencies, if any, in current foster care commissioning practices, and make recommendations for improvement;
(c) where further research is required to gain a fully comprehensive view of the foster care sector.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 18, insert the following new Clause—
“Extension of the ban on unregulated accommodation for 16 and 17 year-olds
(1) In the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010—
(a) in Regulation 27A (Prohibition on placing a child under 16 in an unregulated setting)—
(i) in the title, for “16” substitute “18”, and
(ii) for “16” substitute “18”,
(b) in Regulation 27B (Exception to the prohibition on placing a child under 16 in other arrangements), after paragraph (1), insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State must ensure that all accommodation provided to looked after children aged 16 and 17 meets the standards of regulated children’s homes or other regulated supported accommodation.”
(2) In section 22C of the Children Act 1989 (Ways in which looked after children are to be accommodated and maintained), after subsection (6) insert—
“(6A) A local authority must not place a looked after child aged 16 or 17 in unregulated accommodation that does not meet the requirements set out in subsection (7).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would ensure that all accommodation provided to looked after children aged 16 and 17 meets the standards of regulated children’s homes or other regulated supported accommodation.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 18, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of adoption support offered by local authorities
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, conduct a review of the adequacy and effectiveness of adoption support services provided by local authorities.
(2) The review must include services provided by adoption agencies which have been commissioned by local authorities.
(3) The review must consider in particular—
(a) any updates required to existing regulations and guidance relating to adoption, and
(b) the support needs of, and support services currently available or provided to—
(i) relevant parties in relation to birth family contact;
(ii) young adult adoptees in relation to their transition to adulthood;
(iii) adult adoptees.
(4) Within six months of the completion of the review, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the findings and conclusions of the review.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would introduce a requirement on the Secretary of State for Education to conduct a review of adoption support services provided by local authorities and publish the findings.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Barran gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 19 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is to clarify how the scope of regulation of agency workers used in children’s social care will differ from the current situation.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 20, insert the following new Clause—
“Kinship care leave
(1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, entitle an individual to be absent from work on care leave under this section where—
(a) the individual is a kinship carer, and
(b) the individual satisfies conditions specified in the regulations.
(2) Regulations made under subsection (1) must include provision for determining—
(a) the extent of an individual’s entitlement to leave under this section, and
(b) when leave under this section may be taken.
(3) Provision under subsection (2)(a) must secure that—
(a) where one individual is entitled to leave under this section, they are entitled to at least 52 weeks of leave, or
(b) where more than one individual is entitled to leave under this section in respect of the same child, those individuals are entitled to share at least 52 weeks of leave between them.
(4) An employee is entitled to leave under this section only if the eligible kinship care arrangement is intended to last—
(a) at least one year, and
(b) until the child being cared for attains the age of 18.
(5) For the purposes of this section, a “kinship carer” has the meaning given in section 22I of the Children Act 1989, as inserted by section 5 of this Act.
(6) Regulations made under this section may make provision about how leave under this section is to be taken.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would introduce an entitlement for an individual to be absent from work on care leave where the individual is a kinship carer.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 21, page 39, line 21, at end insert—
(e) to have due regard to the need to remove or minimise the disadvantages suffered by looked-after children and relevant young persons.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)Member's explanatory statement
The amendment seeks to expand and strengthen Clause 21 by replacing the light-touch duty to be “alert to” their needs with a stronger requirement for public bodies to have “due regard” to eliminating disadvantage and to take reasonable steps to mitigate any harmful effects of their policies. The amendment intends to create a legally enforceable, lifelong safeguard for anyone who has ever been in care.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 21, page 39, line 21, at end insert—
“(1A) When discharging its duty under subsection (1), the relevant authority must consider the right to British citizenship of looked-after and relevant young people and how that entitlement can be secured to avoid adverse effect on their wellbeing.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 21, page 39, line 21, at end insert—
“(e) to provide care to any child as would be reasonable to expect a parent to give to them.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the level of parental care expected for children within their own families also applies to corporate parents and to the children’s care system.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 21, page 39, line 27, at end insert—
“(2A) A relevant authority exercising the duty under subsection (1) shall take reasonable steps to avoid, reduce or otherwise mitigate any adverse impact of its policies and practices on looked-after children and relevant young persons.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)Member's explanatory statement
The amendment seeks to expand and strengthen Clause 21 by replacing the light-touch duty to be “alert to” their needs with a stronger requirement for public bodies to have “due regard” to eliminating disadvantage and to take reasonable steps to mitigate any harmful effects of their policies. The amendment intends to create a legally enforceable, lifelong safeguard for anyone who has ever been in care.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 22, page 40, line 3, leave out paragraph (a)
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that the duty, of every relevant authority to looked-after children and relevant young people, contained in section 21(1), also applies when the Secretary of State in exercising immigration, asylum and nationality functions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 24, page 41, line 29, at end insert—
“(2A) Guidance given by the Secretary of State under subsection (1) shall be laid before Parliament in draft form and is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that guidance issued under Clause 24 is subject to draft negative procedure, as recommended by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 25, insert the following new Clause—
“Care-experience in equality impact assessments
A public authority undertaking an equality impact assessment in the exercise of its duties under—
(a) section 149 of the Equality Act 2010;
(b) the Equality Act 2010 (Statutory Duties) (Wales) Regulations 2011;
(c) the Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) (Scotland) Regulations 2012;
(d) section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998,
must include an assessment of the impact on persons who are or have been looked after by a local authority.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)Member's explanatory statement
By including Care Experience in Equality Impact Assessments, this amendment provides a mechanism that public bodies already understand and use, helping to support the extension of Corporate Parenting responsibilities in a way that is structured, measurable, and embedded in existing decision-making processes.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Impact assessment: child poverty and children’s social care
(1) Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish an assessment of the impact of child poverty on social care leavers and the provision of children’s social care services.
(2) The assessment under subsection (1) must include consideration of—
(a) the long-term impact of child poverty on care leavers’ employment opportunities,
(b) the disproportionate representation of care leavers in prison,
(c) the cost to the state of the provision of children’s social care necessitated by child poverty, and
(d) any other matters which the Secretary of State considers appropriate or relevant.
(3) In preparing the impact assessment under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) providers of children’s social care in England and Wales;
(b) care leavers;
(c) local authorities;
(d) the Office for Budget Responsibility (in relation to the long-term costs of providing children’s social care, long-term unemployment among care-leavers, numbers of care-leavers in prison, and any other ways in which the numbers of children in care and care-leavers might affect the sustainability of public finances);
(e) any other such persons which the Secretary of State such persons they consider appropriate or relevant.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay the assessment under subsection (1) before both Houses of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wills (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This probing amendment seeks to require the Government to assess the relationship between child poverty and children’s social care.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“National statutory inquiry into grooming gangs
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 3 months of the day on which this Act is passed, set up a statutory inquiry into grooming gangs.
(2) An inquiry established under subsection (1) must seek to—
(a) identify common patterns of behaviour and offending between grooming gangs;
(b) identify the type, extent and volume of crimes committed by grooming gangs;
(c) identify the number of victims of crimes committed by grooming gangs;
(d) identify the ethnicity of members of grooming gangs;
(e) identify any failings, by action, omission or deliberate suppression, by—
(i) police,
(ii) local authorities,
(iii) prosecutors,
(iv) charities,
(v) political parties,
(vi) local and national government,
(vii) healthcare providers and heatlh services, or
(viii) other agencies or bodies,
in the committal of crimes by grooming gangs, including by considering whether the ethnicity of the perpetrators of such crimes affected the response by such agencies or bodies;
(f) identify such national safeguarding actions as may be required to minimise the risk of further such offending occurring in future;
(g) identify good practice in protecting children.
(3) The inquiry may do anything it considers is calculated to facilitate, or is incidental or conducive to, the carrying out of its functions and the achievement of the requirements of subsection (2).
(4) An inquiry established under this section must publish a report within two years of the launch of the inquiry.
(5) For the purposes of this section—
“gang” means a group of at least three adult males whose purpose or intention is to commit a sexual offence against the same victim or group of victims;
“grooming” means—
(a) activity carried out with the primary intention of committing sexual offences against the victim who is a child;
(b) activity that is carried out, or predominantly carried out, in person;
(c) activity that includes the provision of illicit substances and/or alcohol either as part of the grooming or concurrent with the commission of the sexual offence.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Coffey (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would set up a national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 26, page 43, line 8, leave out “, or to require a child to have a medical examination,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 26, page 43, leave out lines 39 to 44
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate on whether children being paid as performers can continue to be licensed to do so.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 26, page 44, line 5, leave out “, health or development” and insert “or health”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the definition of development of children, given the role which technology plays in modern jobs.
This amendment was AGREED
Leave out Clause 26 and insert the following new Clause—
“Employment of children in England and Wales
(1) The Children and Young Persons Act 1933 is amended as follows.
(2) For section 18 substitute—
“18 Restrictions on employment of children
(1) A child may not be employed to work—
(a) so long as the child is under the age of 14 (subject to regulations under subsection (2));
(b) to do any work other than light work;
(c) to do work of a description specified in regulations made by the appropriate national authority;
(d) before 7.00 a.m. or after 8.00 p.m. on any day;
(e) on any day on which the child is required to attend school—
(i) for more than one hour before the start of school hours,
(ii) during school hours, or
(iii) for more than two hours in total in the day;
(f) for more than 12 hours in any week in which the child is required to attend school;
(g) for more than eight hours or, if the child is under 15, for more than five hours in any day on which the child is not required to attend school;
(h) for more than 35 hours or, if the child is under 15, for more than 25 hours in any week in which the child is not required to attend school;
(i) for more than four hours in any day without a break of one hour;
(j) at any time in a year unless at that time a person employing the child is satisfied that the child has had, or could still have, a period of at least two consecutive weeks without employment during a period in the year in which the child is not required to attend school.
(2) The appropriate national authority may by regulations authorise the employment of children aged 13 to do specified descriptions of light work.
(3) A child may not be employed to work except in accordance with a permit (a “child employment permit”) granted by a local authority on an application made in accordance with regulations made by the appropriate national authority.
(4) The appropriate national authority may by regulations—
(a) make provision in relation to child employment permits;
(b) provide that subsection (3) does not apply in specified cases or circumstances;
(c) make provision about the keeping of records.
(5) The provision that may be made in reliance on subsection (4)(a) includes provision—
(a) authorising a local authority to request such information as the authority considers appropriate, or to require a child to have a medical examination, for the purpose of enabling the authority to determine an application;
(b) requiring a local authority to have regard to specified matters when determining an application;
(c) for the grant of a child employment permit subject to conditions determined by a local authority;
(d) requiring a child employment permit to contain specified information;
(e) authorising a local authority to vary, suspend or revoke a child employment permit in specified circumstances;
(f) about appeals against—
(i) a decision to reject an application, or
(ii) the revocation of a child employment permit;
(g) imposing requirements on persons employing children (including requirements to produce child employment permits for inspection);
(h) requiring or authorising a local authority, in specified circumstances, to disclose information about a child employment permit to another local authority in England or Wales or to a local authority in Scotland.
(6) The appropriate national authority may by regulations make provision (subject to subsection (1) and regulations under subsection (2))—
(a) specifying the number of hours in each day, or in each week, for which children may be employed, and the times of day at which they may be employed;
(b) specifying the intervals to be allowed to children for meals and breaks, when in employment;
(c) about entitlement to leave;
(d) specifying other conditions to be met in relation to the employment of children.
(7) Nothing in this section, or in regulations made under any provision of this section, prevents a child from doing anything—
(a) under the authority of a licence granted under this Part, or
(b) in a case where by virtue of subsection (3) of section 37 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 no licence under that section is required for the child to do it.
(8) In this section—
“appropriate national authority” means—
(a) in relation to England, the Secretary of State;
(b) in relation to Wales, the Welsh Ministers;
“light work” means work which, on account of the inherent nature of the tasks which it involves and the particular conditions under which they are performed—
(a) is not likely to be harmful to the safety, health or development of children, and
(b) is not such as to be harmful to their education (through attendance at school or otherwise) as required by section 7 of the Education Act 1996 or to their participation in work experience in accordance with section 560 of that Act, or their capacity to benefit from the education received or the experience gained (as the case may be);
“local authority in Scotland” means a council constituted under section 2 of the Local Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994;
“specified” , in relation to regulations made under any provision of this section, means specified in the regulations;
“week” means any period of seven consecutive days;
“year” means a period of 12 months beginning with 1 January.
18A Regulations under section 18: further provision
(1) Regulations under section 18 may—
(a) make different provision for different purposes or areas;
(b) make provision subject to exceptions;
(c) make transitional or saving provision.
(2) Except as provided by subsection (3), regulations under section 18 may provide for the processing of information in accordance with the regulations not to be in breach of—
(a) any obligation of confidence owed by the person processing the information, or
(b) any other restriction on the processing of information (however imposed).
(3) Regulations under section 18 are not to be read as requiring or authorising the processing of information that would contravene the data protection legislation (but in determining whether particular processing of data would do so, take into account the duty imposed or power conferred by the provision of the regulations in question).
(4) Regulations under section 18 are to be made by statutory instrument.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations made by the Secretary of State under section 18 is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
(6) A statutory instrument containing regulations made by the Welsh Ministers under section 18 is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of Senedd Cymru.
(7) In this section “the data protection legislation” and “processing” have the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act 2018 (see section 3 of that Act).”
(3) In section 21 (penalties and legal proceedings in respect of general provisions as to employment), in subsection (1), after “byelaw” insert “or regulations”.
(4) In section 28 (powers of entry), in subsection (1), after “byelaw” insert “or regulations”.
(5) In section 30 (interpretation), in subsection (1), after “byelaws” insert “or regulations”.
(6) In Schedule 36A to the Education Act 1996, in the table, omit the entry for section 18 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (including the title of that Act).
(7) In Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Act 2012 (anaw 2), in the table, in the English language and Welsh language texts, omit the entry that relates to byelaws made under section 18 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (referred to as “adran 18 o Ddeddf Plant a Phobl Ifanc 1933” in the Welsh language text).”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
Clause 26 makes provision for England restricting employed work by children. This amendment replaces that clause to extend the application of that provision to Wales. It also includes a change to the definition of “light work” in the inserted section 18(8) to reflect that children may receive their compulsory education outside of school.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Action to promote the wellbeing of children in relation to social media
(1) Within 12 months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must, for the purposes of promoting the wellbeing of children—
(a) direct the Chief Medical Officers of the United Kingdom (“the UK CMOs”) to prepare and publish advice for parents and carers on the use of social media by children at different ages and developmental stages, and
(b) by regulations made my statutory instrument require all regulated user-to-user services to use highly-effective age assurance measures to prevent children under the age of 16 from becoming or being users.
(2) Any advice published under subsection (1)(a) must have regard to—
(a) the paper published on 7 February 2019 entitled “United Kingdom Chief Medical Officers’ commentary on 'Screen-based activities and children and young people’s mental health and psychosocial wellbeing: a systematic map of reviews'”, and
(b) any scientific or other developments since the publication of that paper which appear to the UK CMOs to be relevant.
(3) Any regulations under subsection (1)(b) must be treated as an enforceable requirement within the meaning of section 131 (and for the purposes of Part 7) of the Online Safety Act 2023.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (1)(b) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(5) For the purposes of this section—
“the Chief Medical Officers of the United Kingdom” means the Chief Medical Officers for—
(a) England,
(b) Wales,
(c) Scotland, and
(d) Northern Ireland;
“regulated user-to-user services” is as defined in the Online Safety Act 2023.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Nash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to take action to promote children’s wellbeing in relation to their use of social media by commissioning advice from the Chief Medical Officers and introducing regulations to prevent under 16s from accessing social media.
This amendment was AGREED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Employment of children in Scotland
(1) The Children and Young Persons (Scotland) Act 1937 is amended as follows.
(2) For section 28 substitute—
“28 Restrictions on employment of children
(1) A child may not be employed to work—
(a) so long as the child is under the age of 14 (subject to regulations under subsection (2));
(b) to do any work other than light work;
(c) to do work of a description specified in regulations made by the Scottish Ministers;
(d) before 7.00 a.m. or after 8.00 p.m. on any day;
(e) on any day on which the child is required to attend school—
(i) for more than one hour before the start of school hours,
(ii) during school hours, or
(iii) for more than two hours in total in the day;
(f) for more than 12 hours in any week in which the child is required to attend school;
(g) for more than eight hours or, if the child is under 15, for more than five hours in any day on which the child is not required to attend school;
(h) for more than 35 hours or, if the child is under 15, for more than 25 hours in any week in which the child is not required to attend school;
(i) for more than four hours in any day without a break of one hour;
(j) at any time in a year unless at that time a person employing the child is satisfied that the child has had, or could still have, a period of at least two consecutive weeks without employment during a period in the year in which the child is not required to attend school.
(2) The Scottish Ministers may by regulations authorise the employment of children aged 13 to do specified descriptions of light work.
(3) A child may not be employed to work except in accordance with a permit (a “child employment permit”) granted by a local authority on an application made in accordance with regulations made by the Scottish Ministers.
(4) The Scottish Ministers may by regulations—
(a) make provision in relation to child employment permits;
(b) provide that subsection (3) does not apply in specified cases or circumstances;
(c) make provision about the keeping of records.
(5) The provision that may be made in reliance on subsection (4)(a) includes provision—
(a) authorising a local authority to request such information as the authority considers appropriate, or to require a child to have a medical examination, for the purpose of enabling the authority to determine an application;
(b) requiring a local authority to have regard to specified matters when determining an application;
(c) for the grant of a child employment permit subject to conditions determined by a local authority;
(d) requiring a child employment permit to contain specified information;
(e) authorising a local authority to vary, suspend or revoke a child employment permit in specified circumstances;
(f) about appeals against—
(i) a decision to reject an application, or
(ii) the revocation of a child employment permit;
(g) imposing requirements on persons employing children (including requirements to produce child employment permits for inspection);
(h) requiring or authorising a local authority, in specified circumstances, to disclose information about a child employment permit to another local authority in Scotland, to a local authority in England or to a local authority in Wales.
(6) The Scottish Ministers may by regulations make provision (subject to subsection (1) and regulations under subsection (2))—
(a) specifying the number of hours in each day, or in each week, for which children may be employed, and the times of day at which they may be employed;
(b) specifying the intervals to be allowed to children for meals and breaks, when in employment;
(c) about entitlement to leave;
(d) specifying other conditions to be met in relation to the employment of children.
(7) Nothing in this section, or in regulations made under any provision of this section, prevents a child from doing anything—
(a) under the authority of a licence granted under this Part, or
(b) in a case where by virtue of subsection (3) of section 37 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 no licence under that section is required for the child to do it.
(8) In this section—
“light work” means work which, on account of the inherent nature of the tasks which it involves and the particular conditions under which they are performed—
(a) is not likely to be harmful to the safety, health or development of children, and
(b) is not such as to be harmful to their education (through attendance at school or otherwise) as required by section 30 of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 or to their participation in work experience in accordance with section 123 of that Act, or their capacity to benefit from the education received or the experience gained (as the case may be);
“local authority in England” and “local authority in Wales” have the same meaning as in the Education Act 1996 (see section 579(1) of that Act);
“specified” , in relation to regulations made under any provision of this section, means specified in the regulations;
“week” means any period of seven consecutive days;
“year” means a period of 12 months beginning with 1 January.
28A Regulations under section 28: further provision
(1) Regulations under section 28 may—
(a) make different provision for different purposes or areas;
(b) make provision subject to exceptions;
(c) make transitional or saving provision.
(2) Except as provided by subsection (3), regulations under section 28 may provide for the processing of information in accordance with the regulations not to be in breach of—
(a) any obligation of confidence owed by the person processing the information, or
(b) any other restriction on the processing of information (however imposed).
(3) Regulations under section 28 are not to be read as requiring or authorising the processing of information that would contravene the data protection legislation (but in determining whether particular processing of data would do so, take into account the duty imposed or power conferred by the provision of the regulations in question).
(4) Regulations under section 28 are subject to the negative procedure (see Part 2 of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 (asp 10)).
(5) In this section “the data protection legislation” and “processing” have the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act 2018 (see section 3 of that Act).”
(3) In section 31 (penalties and legal proceedings in respect of general provisions as to employment), in subsection (1), after “byelaw” insert “or regulations”.
(4) In section 35 (confirmation of byelaws), in subsection (1), for “Secretary of State” substitute “Scottish Ministers”.
(5) In section 36 (powers of entry), in subsection (1), after “byelaw” insert “or regulations”.
(6) In section 37 (interpretation), after “byelaws” insert “or regulations”.
(7) In section 38 (savings)—
(a) omit subsection (3);
(b) in subsection (4), for “The said provisions” substitute “The provisions of this Part relating to employment”.
(8) In section 110(1) (interpretation), omit the definitions of “borstal institution” and “residential establishment”.”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause makes equivalent provision for Scotland to that made for England and Wales by my amendment to replace clause 26.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Establishment of Child Protection Authority
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a Child Protection Authority for England.
(2) The purpose of the Authority is to—
(a) improve practice in child protection,
(b) provide advice and make recommendations to the Government on child protection policy and reforms to improve child protection,
(c) inspect institutions and settings at some times and in such ways as it considers necessary and appropriate to ensure compliance with child protection standards, and
(d) monitor the implementation of the recommendations of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse and other inquiries relating to the protection of children.
(3) The Authority must act with a view to—
(a) safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children;
(b) ensuring that institutions and settings fulfil their responsibilities in relation to child protection.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment establishes the Child Protection Authority for England.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“National standards for children in need thresholds
(1) The Secretary of State must, within one year of the day on which this Act is passed, conduct a review of the operation of section 17 of the Children Act 1989 (provision of services for children in need, their families and others).
(2) The review must assess regional and national variation in the type, frequency, and duration of support provided to children through child in need plans.
(3) The recommendations of the review must include the—
(a) setting of metrics in the Department for Education’s Children’s Social Care Dashboard for assessing the progress of children on child in need plans, and
(b) publication of national guidance to local authorities defining the thresholds of need that children and families must meet to be offered children in need support.
(4) The national guidance published under subsection (3)(b) must include—
(a) national triggers for an automatic referral to children’s social care, including when a primary care giver enters custody or inpatient mental health provision, and when a child is arrested,
(b) the Secretary of State’s expectations on how often children should receive help,
(c) the Secretary of State’s expectations on how frequently a child’s support should be reviewed when they have a child in need plan, and
(d) any other matters that the Secretary of State deems appropriate.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The purpose of this new clause is to reduce regional variations in the type, frequency and duration of support that children receive through child in need plans.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Automatic enrolment for Healthy Start scheme
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passing of this Act, introduce a scheme to automatically enrol certain individuals for the purposes of the Healthy Start scheme.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “certain individuals” means people who are eligible for the Healthy Start scheme on the basis of having a child under the age of 4.
(3) The scheme must provide the means for individuals to opt out of enrolment for the Healthy Start scheme.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides for the auto-enrollment of certain individuals on to the Healthy Start scheme.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Child poverty targets
(1) The Secretary of State must, as soon as reasonably practicable after the publication of the Child Poverty Strategy and no later than 31 March 2026 if that strategy has not been published, lay regulations made by statutory instrument that establish binding child poverty targets.
(2) Child poverty targets must include—
(a) targets for reducing the number of children living in poverty, and
(b) timescales by which each target must be achieved.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay an annual report before Parliament setting out—
(a) steps they have taken to deliver on the child poverty targets, and
(b) progress that has been made towards the child poverty targets.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Bird (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would place a duty on the Secretary of State to set binding child poverty reduction targets in regulations.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“National Care Offer
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 18 months of the passing of this Act, publish a document (the “National Care Offer”) which sets out the minimum standards of information that local authorities must publish under section 2 of the Children and Social Work Act 2017 (local offer for care leavers).
(2) Before publishing or revising the National Care Offer, the Secretary of State must consult with persons that appear to the Secretary of State to represent the interests of care leavers.
(3) Where a consultation under subsection (2) results in recommendations to be made to the National Care Offer, the Secretary of State must—
(a) make the recommended changes or otherwise implement the recommendations, or
(b) where not intending to make the recommended changes or otherwise implement the recommendations, publish a response to the consultation outlining the reasons for the Secretary of State’s decision and the action that will be taken instead.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Notification when a child is placed into temporary accommodation
(1) This section applies where a local authority is exercising its duty under Section 189B of the Housing Act 1996 (initial duty owed to all eligible persons who are homeless) to allocate temporary accommodation to a household which includes a child.
(2) A local authority must notify the following of the household’s homelessness status—
(a) the child’s school, and
(b) the child’s registered GP practice.
(3) The Secretary of State must issue guidance to schools and GPs on how to safeguard and promote a child’s welfare and wellbeing following receipt of a notification under subsection (2).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Russell of Liverpool (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would establish a notification system requiring local authorities to alert schools and GPs, when a child is placed into temporary accommodation.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Independent Guardians
(1) The Modern Slavery Act 2015 is amended as follows.
(2) For section 48 substitute—
“Independent guardians
(1) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to enable persons (“independent guardians”) to be available to represent and support children to whom this section applies.
(2) This section applies to a child if—
(a) a reference relating to that child has been, or is about to be, made to a competent authority for a determination for the purposes of Article 10 of the Trafficking Convention as to whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the child is a victim of modern slavery or human trafficking, and
(b) there has not been a conclusive determination that the child is not such a victim; and for the purposes of this subsection a determination which has been challenged by way of proceedings for judicial review shall not be treated as conclusive until those proceedings are finally determined.
(3) This section also applies to a child who appears to the Secretary of State to be a separated child.”
(3) After section 48 insert—
“48A Independent Guardians: functions
(1) This section defines the functions and duties of person appointed as an independent guardian under section 48.
(2) The functions of an independent guardian are to—
(a) ascertain and communicate the views of the child in relation to matters affecting the child;
(b) consult regularly with the child and keeping the child informed of legal and other proceedings affecting the child and any other matters affecting the child;
(c) contribute to a plan to safeguard and promote the future welfare of the child based on an individual assessment of that child’s best interests in line with leaving care services.
(3) In the discharge of their functions, the independent guardian must at all times act in the best interests of the child.
(4) The advocate will assist the child to obtain legal or other advice, assistance and representation, including by appointing and instructing legal representatives to act on the child's behalf.
(5) For the purposes of this Act—
“separated child” means a child who—
(a) is not ordinarily resident in England and Wales, and
(b) is separated from all persons who—
(i) have parental responsibility for the child, or
(ii) before the child’s arrival in England and Wales, were responsible for the child whether by law or custom.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to incorporate the entitlement to independent guardians for separated and trafficked children and set out their functions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Reporting on early intervention services
(1) Local authorities in England exercising social services functions under the Children Act 1989 must report annually to the Secretary of State on early intervention services for children and families in their area funded by statutory safeguarding partners as defined in Section 16E of the Children Act 2004.
(2) Reports under subsection (1) must include—
(a) the number of children and families receiving early intervention support;
(b) demographic data relating to the children and families receiving support, including information on protected characteristics as defined in Section 4 of the Equality Act 2010;
(c) the types of early intervention services provided;
(d) measures taken to ensure accessibility and effectiveness of these services;
(e) sources through which children and families are referred to early intervention services;
(f) any other information the Secretary of State may require by regulations made by statutory instrument.
(3) In order to inform those reports—
(a) Integrated Care Boards must provide all necessary information to the reporting local authority;
(b) the Chief Officer of Police must provide all necessary information to the reporting local authority.
(4) The Secretary of State must compile and publish all reports submitted under subsection (1).
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Child performers’ earnings
In regulation 14 (Earnings) of the Children (Performances and Activities)(England) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3309), at end insert—
“(2) The licensing authority must include a condition in the licence that 15% of the sums earned by the child for taking part in the performance or activity must be paid by the employer into an account to be held in trust until the child reaches the age of 18 within thirty calendar days of the conclusion of the engagement.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Benjamin (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Post-removal support for parents to prevent further removals
(1) Where a baby is removed at birth from the care of a parent further to any order made pursuant to—
(a) section 31 of the Children Act 1989 (care and supervision orders),
(b) section 22 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (placement orders),
(c) section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (adoption orders), or
(d) section 14A of the Children Act 1989 (special guardianship orders),
the local authority must provide support to the parent, where the parent is identified as being at risk of experiencing further child removals.
(2) In discharging their duty under subsection (1), the local authority must provide a range of services, including specialist therapeutic support, appropriate to the particular needs of the parent to reduce the risk of further child removals.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 3
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces a new clause which seeks to ensure that local authorities offer evidence based support to reduce the risk of a baby being removed from a mother who has already had a child or children removed from her care.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“National capacity plan for children’s homes
(1) As soon as reasonably practicable after the end of each financial year, the Secretary of State must publish a national capacity plan for children’s homes.
(2) A national capacity plan under subsection (1) must include the following—
(a) the number of children looked after who are living in homes that are not in line with their care plan, or are living in distance placements due to a lack of local placements that are able to meet their needs;
(b) how far from their primary location those children are living and which terms of their care plan are not being met, if any;
(c) information about the total number of each type of care settings that are required to ensure that local authorities are meeting the requirements of Section 22G of the Children Act 1989 and the number of each type of setting by area;
(d) an assessment of the efficacy of the support that Government provided to local authorities to meet the requirements of Section 22G of the Children Act 1989, and to prevent children looked after being moved to distance placements;
(e) what support the Government will be providing to local authorities to address any deficiencies identified under subsection (2)(d) above to meet the requirements of Section 22G of the Children Act 1989, and to prevent children looked after being moved to distance placements.
(3) The Secretary of State may delegate the compilation of the national capacity plan under subsection (1).
(4) In subsection (2) the term “distance placements” means a placement for a child looked after by the local authority more than 20 miles from their home.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Cash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to introduce a national plan to ensure there are sufficient children’s homes in the right places for looked after children.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Bereavement support services for children
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations establish a protocol for the collection and dissemination of information relating to bereavement support services for children.
(2) A protocol made under subsection (1) must—
(a) define the bereavement support services to which the protocol applies, which must include services provided by—
(i) local authorities,
(ii) NHS bodies, and
(iii) charities and other third sector organisations;
(b) place a duty on the Secretary of State to publish information, including online, about services to which the protocol applies;
(c) place a duty on specified public bodies and other persons to provide information to children about services to which the protocol applies, including—
(i) specialist services for children,
(ii) services provided online, and
(iii) accessible services for deaf and disabled children;
(d) where a duty under paragraph (c) applies, require the identification of children who may require a service to which the protocol applies.
(3) The Secretary of State must make regulations under this section by statutory instrument.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.
(5) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a draft statutory instrument containing regulations under this section within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to establish a protocol for the collection and dissemination of information about bereavement support services to children and young people.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Post-removal support for parents to prevent further removals (No. 2)
(1) Where a child—
(a) is removed from the care of a parent further to any order made pursuant to—
(i) section 31 of the Children Act 1989 (care and supervision orders),
(ii) section 22 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (placement orders),
(iii) section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (adoption orders), or
(iv) section 14A of the Children Act 1989 (special guardianship orders), or
(b) becomes a looked after child further to an arrangement or order made pursuant to—
(i) section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (provision of accommodation for children: voluntary arrangements), or
(ii) section 25 of the Children Act 1989 (secure accommodation orders),
the local authority shall provide support to the parent, where the parent is identified as being at risk of experiencing further child removals.
(2) In discharging their duty under subsection (1), the local authority shall provide a range of services, including specialist therapeutic support, appropriate to the particular needs of the parent to reduce the risk of further child removals.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 3
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces a new clause which seeks to ensure that local authorities offer evidence based support to reduce the risk of a child being removed from a mother who has already had a child or children removed from her care.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“National neglect strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a national neglect strategy that explores and addresses the causes and impacts of child neglect, for the purposes of ensuring that children do not experience neglect.
(2) In preparing a national neglect strategy the Secretary of State must consider what measures ought to be taken in each of the following areas—
(a) the sharing of local and national best practice in dealing with neglect as soon as it is identified;
(b) promoting awareness of child neglect to relevant public agencies;
(c) the provision of information, advice and training to professionals working with families on the presentation of neglect;
(d) the provision of local authorities in identifying and responding to neglect;
(e) the provision of information, advice and assistance to parents and the promotion of neglect awareness training to parents;
(f) reviewing the definition of neglect within statutory guidance, to ensure it is fit for purpose.
(3) When preparing the strategy, the Secretary of State must, in addition—
(a) consider which groups of children may be disproportionately affected by neglect;
(b) consider the likely impact on neglect of each measure within each of those groups;
(c) consider the role that socio-economic disadvantage has on levels of neglect;
(d) consult with local authorities and other relevant individuals and agencies, including children and families, to inform the strategy.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to prepare a national neglect strategy to better understand and address the causes and impacts of child neglect, providing greater protection and support for children and families.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Prohibition of delivery of children’s social care services by for-profit companies
(1) Any new organisations created to deliver the provisions related to children’s social care in this Part must not be operated by for-profit companies.
(2) Within five years of the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must ensure that any such organisations in the control of for-profit companies are transferred to not-for-profit or state entities.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the profit motive from children’s social care services covered by this Part.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Holiday meals and activity programmes for pupils in receipt of free school meals
(1) A local authority must—
(a) provide, or
(b) coordinate the provision of programmes which provide
free meals and activities to relevant children during school holidays.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “relevant children” means children in receipt of free school meals.
(3) The Secretary of State may, by regulations made by statutory instrument—
(a) specify minimum standards for meals and activities during school holidays;
(b) specify criteria that organisations involved in the delivery of meals and activities during school holidays must meet.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would place a duty on local authorities to provide or coordinate free meals and activities for children eligible for free school meals during school holidays.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Impact assessment: weekend jobs
(1) The Secretary of State must carry out an assessment of the likely impact of section 26 (Employment of children in England) on the ability of children to get employment during the weekend.
(2) The Secretary of State must lay a report setting out the findings of the assessment before each House of Parliament.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Fosters carers’ delegated authority for children in their care
(1) Where a child (“C”) who is looked after by the local authority is placed with a foster parent (“F”) by a local authority, F may make decisions on C’s behalf in relation to the matters set out in subsection (2) where C’s placement plan does not specify an alternative decision maker.
(2) The matters referred to in subsection (1) are—
(a) medical and dental treatment,
(b) education,
(c) leisure and home life,
(d) faith and religious observance,
(e) use of social media,
(f) personal care, and
(g) any other matters which F considers appropriate.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that foster carers have a clear delegated authority to make the day to day decisions in a child’s life.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“English local authorities: duties relating to Start for Life offer
(1) An English local authority must publish a Start for Life offer for its area on its website under the heading “Start for Life”.
(2) A “Start for Life offer” for an English local authority’s area is information about the following services that the authority is aware are available in its area for infants, parents, or carers of infants—
(a) health visiting services provided by or on behalf of a public authority;
(b) services promoting positive relationships between infants and their parents or carers provided by or on behalf of a public authority;
(c) breastfeeding and other infant feeding services provided by or on behalf of a public authority;
(d) mental health services provided by or on behalf of a public authority;
(e) such other kinds of services that are—
(i) likely to support infants, parents, or carers of infants, and
(ii) provided by or on behalf of a public authority, as the Secretary of State may specify by regulations made by statutory instrument;
(f) such services that are likely to support infants, parents, or carers of infants being—
(i) services of a kind mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (e) provided other than by or on behalf of a public authority, or
(ii) other services, whether or not provided by or on behalf of a public authority, as the local authority considers it appropriate to include information about in the Start for Life offer for its area.
(4) An English local authority must also—
(a) publish a Start for Life offer for its area by any other means it considers appropriate,
(b) take such steps as it considers appropriate to bring the Start for Life offer to the attention of parents and carers of infants in its area, and
(c) take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that the Start for Life offer is kept up to date.
(5) An English local authority must have regard to guidance published by the Secretary of State under section (Guidance) when complying with its duties under this section.
(6) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (2)(e) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This and the following four clauses require local authorities to make information available about support for infants, parents and carers of infants and include reporting requirements relating to such support, to help ensure children's safety and well-being in the critical first two years of life.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Guidance
(1) The Secretary of State must publish guidance to English local authorities relating to their duties under section (English local authorities: duties relating to Start for Life offer).
(2) Before publishing guidance under subsection (1), and any revisions to the guidance that the Secretary of State considers substantive, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) English local authorities, and
(b) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) If—
(a) consultation was undertaken during a period before the day (“The commencement day”) on which this section comes into force (including during a period that occurred before the day on which this Act is passed), and
(b) the consultation would to any extent have satisfied subsection (2) had it occurred on or after the commencement day,
then, on the commencement day, the consultation is taken to satisfy subsection (2) to that extent.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Secretary of State’s duty to report
(1) The Secretary of State must publish a report each year relating to support available in England for infants, parents and carers of infants.
(2) The report must include—
(a) an overview of support that is available for such persons through services of the kind covered by section (English local authorities: duties relating to Start for Life offer)(2)(a) to (f), and
(b) such other information as the Secretary of State considers is appropriate to include in the report (for example, information about any impacts of support on outcomes for such persons, or steps that are being taken in relation to the collection of information relating to such impacts).
(3) A report under subsection (1) must be published on a government website as soon as reasonably practicable after 1 April in the relevant year.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Data protection
(1) Sections (English local authorities: duties relating to Start for Life offer) and (Secretary of State’s duty to report) do not require a publication of information if the publication would contravene the data protection legislation (but in determining whether the publication would do so, take into account the duties imposed by those sections).
(2) In subsection (1), “the data protection legislation” has the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act 2018 (see section 3(9) of that Act).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Interpretation
(1) In sections (English local authorities: duties relating to Start for Life offer) and (Guidance)—
“English local authority” means—
(a) a county council in England,
(b) a district council for an area in England for which there is no county council,
(c) a London borough council,
(d) the Common Council of the City of London in its capacity as a local authority, or
(e) the Council of the Isles of Scilly;
“infant” means a child under the age of two years.
(2) In section (English local authorities: duties relating to Start for Life offer), a service is “provided by or on behalf of a public authority” if—
(a) the service is provided by or on behalf of a person who has a function of a public nature, and
(b) the service is provided in the performance of that function.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Equalising Universal Credit
(1) The Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/376) are amended as follows.
(2) In regulation 36 (table showing amounts of elements), under “Standard allowance”—
“(a) after “single claimant aged under 25” insert “, other than a care leaver”, and
(b) after “single claimant aged 25 or over” insert “or a care leaver aged under 25”.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would amend the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 to increase the standard allowance entitlement of universal credit for individuals leaving care once they turn 18 to match the amount available to claimants aged 25 or over.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Strategy for early childhood development and school readiness
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a national strategy to promote the health, development, and school readiness of all children from birth to the age of five.
(2) The strategy under section (1) must include—
(a) delivery of the Healthy Child Programme (0–5 years) whether by placing on a statutory footing or otherwise to provide at least the following five developmental reviews—
(i) an antenatal health promoting visit;
(ii) a new baby review (10–14 days);
(iii) a 6–8 week review;
(iv) a 1-year review;
(v) a 2–2½ year review;
(b) the means to ensure children identified as at risk of developmental delay, neglect, or early adversity through the mandated reviews are referred to appropriate early intervention services without delay;
(c) the integration and sharing of data between health visiting, maternity, general practice, early years education, and safeguarding services;
(d) support for children’s development in the early years through access to high-quality early education and care, including in maintained, private, and voluntary sector settings;
(e) support for parents and carers through accessible information, advice, and locally commissioned services from the birth of their child to school entry;
(f) improved coordination between health, early years, social care and education professionals through multi-agency working at local level;
(g) the establishment of a national early years data and monitoring system to enable anonymised tracking of—
(i) coverage and completion rates of developmental reviews;
(ii) key indicators of child development and school readiness;
(iii) patterns of referral and access to early intervention services;
(h) reduction of inequalities in early childhood development and improved access to support for children from all socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on the implementation of this strategy, including—
(a) progress made in delivering the Healthy Child Programme or equivalent programme nationally;
(b) developmental and school readiness outcomes at age 5, disaggregated by region and demographic group;
(c) an assessment of workforce capacity and local delivery arrangements for the reviews and support under this clause;
(d) any disparities or deficiencies in service access or outcomes.
(4) For the purposes of this section, “school readiness” includes a child’s ability, by the beginning of the academic year in which they turn five, to—
(a) manage basic personal needs including toileting, handwashing, and eating with minimal assistance;
(b) understand and follow simple instructions in a structured environment;
(c) express themselves using age-appropriate spoken language or alternative communication;
(d) regulate their emotions and behaviour in a way appropriate for learning with peers;
(e) sustain attention and participate in group activities for short periods;
(f) engage in cooperative play and early social interaction;
(g) demonstrate emerging fine and gross motor skills, including early mark-making, drawing, or movement.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Cash (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This clause introduces a duty on the Secretary of State to review and improve the national infrastructure for early childhood development monitoring and support to ensure that every child receives regular checks in their first five years and that local systems are better integrated to support school readiness.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Court ordered reports
Any court ordered report produced for the purposes of either private or public law cases in family court proceedings under the Children Act 1989 must be done by a qualified social worker.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that all court ordered reports are produced by qualified social workers, for example those under Section 7 of the Children Act 1989.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Guidance on the use of screens and technology in early years settings
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, update the early years foundation stage statutory framework for children aged 0-5 in early years settings to include guidance on the appropriate and safe use of screens and technology in early years settings.
(2) The guidance must include recommendations concerning—
(a) limits for screen time for children (specific to their age) in early years settings;
(b) safeguarding policies for the use of personal devices and other screens in early years settings;
(c) any benefits, harms or risk of harm associated with the exposure of children of differing ages to personal devices and other screens in early years settings;
(d) any benefits, harms or risk of harms associated specifically with the exposure of children with special educational needs or disabilities to personal devices and other screens in early years settings;
(e) any other positive or negative effects associated with the use or presence of personal devices for early years development and play;
(f) the balancing of screen-based and non-digital activities for children in early years settings.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Penn (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Public information campaign on the use of screens and technology for children aged 0-5
(1) The Secretary of State must, within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a public information campaign concerning the impact of screen time on the wellbeing of children aged 0-5.
(2) The campaign must include, but is not limited to—
(a) guidance on the impact of screens on whole child health, both immediate and long term, including—
(i) cognitive,
(ii) social,
(iii) eyesight,
(iv) neurodevelopmental,
(v) speech, and
(vi) language issues.
(b) clear recommended boundaries on appropriate screen time limits for children, including times and places that should be screen-free, such as mealtimes and bedtimes;
(c) the impact of carers' usage of personal devices and screens on child development;
(d) guidance on the importance of screen-free time, outside time and child and parent interaction with examples of alternatives, such as—
(i) bedtime stories,
(ii) helping with chores, and
(iii) interacting with the environment;
(e) guidance that digital "educational" apps are not necessary for healthy development, and the risks of screen usage for young children still apply when using these apps.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Penn (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
Review: child maintenance enforcement
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review considering whether the overall wellbeing of children is being harmed by the non-commencement of section 34 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (transfer of arrears) and the uncommenced sections of both the Child Support Collection (Domestic Abuse) Act 2023 and the Child Support (Enforcement) Act 2023.
(2) If the review considers that the overall wellbeing of children is being harmed by the non-commencement of those provisions, the Secretary of State must, within two months of the publication of the review, make a statement setting out the Government’s position on the commencement of those provisions.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Coffey (Con - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 26, insert the following new Clause—
“Early intervention and screening at first contact with the justice system
(1) Within two years of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a strategy to protect and promote the wellbeing of children in police custody.
(2) The strategy must set out—
(a) steps which should be taken to ensure that all children taken into police custody are screened for SEND and neurodivergence using a nationally approved methodology,
(b) the accredited training police officers and legal representatives of the children must complete to support the child’s wellbeing and to aid recognition of SEND and neurodivergence,
(c) mandatory access to sources of wellbeing support during any police interview, and
(d) minimum standards for the treatment and conditions of children detained in police custody.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 45, line 29, at end insert “and for all pupils attending special schools”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the delivery of school breakfast provision to all pupils in special schools, regardless of their age.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 45, line 29, at end insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to underwrite the full cost impact of the provision in subsection (1), including—
(a) recompense for teachers’ directed time diverted from teaching,
(b) additional non-teaching staff required for catering and supervision, and
(c) the cost of good quality ingredients to ensure that the meals are nutritious.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the Secretary of State underwrites the cost of providing free breakfast club provision.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 45, line 35, at end insert “and,
(c) the provision before the start of the first school session on each school day of voluntary activities known to improve wellbeing, including—
(i) community sports programmes,
(ii) art, music and cultural activities, and
(iii) youth clubs and mentoring.
(2A) When providing voluntary activities in subsection (2)(c), schools must—
(a) identify and engage with local voluntary and community organisations,
(b) ensure pupils and families are informed about available opportunities, and
(c) consider access and inclusion for disadvantaged or vulnerable pupils.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Addington (LD - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 45, line 35, at end insert “and,
(c) the provision of activities consisting of physical activity which contributes to the UK Chief Medical Officers' Physical Activity Guidelines before the start of the first school session on each school day.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 46, line 10, at end insert—
“(5A) The appropriate authority must take all reasonable measures to ensure that provision under this section is accessible to all qualifying pupils with special educational needs or who are disabled.
(5B) In the case of a child who has special educational needs or is disabled, the local authority who is responsible for that child must co-operate with the appropriate authority in discharging its duties under this section in respect of that child.
(5C) Co-operation under subsection (5B) must include, but not be limited to—
(a) ensuring that any provision of home to school transport for that child is scheduled so that the child can attend the breakfast club, and
(b) reviewing any Education, Health and Care Plan to ensure that appropriate support is in place to enable the child to attend the breakfast club.
(5D) Where a child is receiving education otherwise than at school but would have been a qualifying pupil were they attending school, the local authority who is responsible for that child must endeavour to make arrangements for breakfast provision for that child, taking into account any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 46, line 30, at end insert—
““special schools” has the meaning set out in section 337 of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment defines special schools and is consequential on another amendment to clause 27 in the name of Lord Watson of Invergowrie.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 47, line 10, leave out from “may” to “by” in line 11
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This probing amendment would allow the Secretary of State to lift the duty to provide free breakfast clubs on schools by notice without prior application from the appropriate authority of a relevant school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 47, line 17, at end insert—
“(c) teachers at the relevant schools.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 47, line 35, at end insert—
“551CA Promotion of supplementary models of breakfast club provision
The Secretary of State must seek to promote and support the development of supplementary models of breakfast club provision where appropriate, including—
(a) classroom based provision,
(b) nurture group services, and
(c) any other model that the Secretary of State reasonably considers to have added benefits beyond the provision of food.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to promote supplementary models of school breakfast provision.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 27, page 48, line 10, at end insert—
“551E Publication of data
The Secretary of State must acquire and regularly publish data on breakfast club provision in schools, including data on—
(a) characteristics of those receiving breakfast in schools (including eligibility for free school meals);
(b) uptake levels;
(c) satisfaction levels amongst pupils and parents;
(d) any assessment of the impact of provision on attendance, behaviour, health and wellbeing.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to acquire and regularly publish data on breakfast club provision in schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 27, insert the following new Clause—
“Impact assessment on the provision of longer breakfast clubs
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish an impact assessment on the impact of the changes made by section 27 on the provision of paid breakfast clubs of more than 30 minutes in length.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require an impact assessment to see how the introduction of a 30 minute free breakfast club will impact the existing longer paid breakfast clubs used by working parents.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause—
“Free school meals: provision and eligibility
Section 512ZB of the Education Act 1996 (provision of free school lunches and milk) is amended as follows—
(a) after subsection (4)(c), insert—
“(ca) C meets any conditions prescribed for the purposes of this paragraph and belongs to a household whose income is less than £20,000 per year after tax.”
(b) after paragraph (4B), insert—
“(4BA) The Secretary of State must ensure that free school meals are provided to all children in England who are eligible to receive free school meals.”.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would expand eligibility for free school meals for children from families earning less than £20,000 after tax.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of free school meal eligibility and pupil premium registration
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, conduct a review of—
(a) the number of children in England who are eligible for free school meals but are not claiming them,
(b) the number of children who are eligible for free school meals but are not registered for the purposes of pupil premium funding,
(c) the number of additional children who would be eligible for free school meals if the income thresholds had been uprated in line with inflation since 2018, and
(d) the number of additional children who would be eligible for free school meals if the income thresholds were set at £20,000 per annum after tax.
(2) A review under subsection (1) must include an assessment of—
(a) barriers preventing eligible children from claiming free school meals,
(b) disparities in take-up rates across different regions and demographics, and
(c) the financial and educational impact of under-registration on schools and local authorities.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a report before Parliament setting out the findings of the review, including any recommendations for improving registration for and take-up of free school meals and pupil premium funding.
(4) The review and report required under this section must be repeated annually.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires a review of free school meal eligibility and pupil premium registration.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause—
“School food improvement scheme
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must review the national school food standards, including breakfasts, and institute a scheme for monitoring compliance with the standards in England, and supporting schools and school caterers in England to meet those standards (‘the national school food improvement scheme’).
(2) The purpose of the national school food improvement scheme will be to determine whether applicable food standards duties are being met in the provision of all food in schools in England and to assist schools and school caterers in meeting applicable food standards duties in England.
(3) The national school food improvement scheme may from time to time publish reports highlighting achievements, sharing successful approaches, and offering guidance as it sees fit relating to school food standards in England.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would improve the national school food standards and establish a national school food improvement scheme, to ensure that the breakfast club provision included within this Bill, along with all other school food, follows school food standards, and to support schools to meet those standards.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause—
“Auto-enrolment for free school meals
After section 512ZA of the Education Act 1996 (power to charge for meals etc.) insert—
“512ZAA Identification of children eligible for free school meals
(1) The Secretary of State must identify all children eligible for free school meals in England.
(2) A child’s eligibility for free school meals is not dependent on any application having been made for free school meals on their behalf.
(3) Where a child has been identified as eligible for free school meals, the Secretary of State must provide for this information to be shared with—
(a) the school at which the child is registered, and
(b) the relevant local education authority.
(4) Where a school has been informed that a child on its pupil roll is eligible for free school meals, the school must provide that child with a free school meal.
(5) A local education authority must provide the means for a parent or guardian of a child who has been identified as eligible for free school meals to opt out of the provision of a free school meal under subsection (4).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to proactively identify all children eligible for free school meals in England, making the application process for free school meals opt-out rather than opt-in.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause—
“Free school meals for all primary school pupils
(1) Section 512ZB of the Education Act 1996 (provision of free school lunches and milk) is amended as follows.
(2) In paragraph (4A)(b), after “year 2” insert “, year 3, year 4, year 5, year 6”.
(3) In subsection (4C), after the definition of “year 2” insert—
““year 3” means a year group in which the majority of children will, in the school year, attain the age of 8;
“year 4” means a year group in which the majority of children will, in the school year, attain the age of 9;
“year 5” means a year group in which the majority of children will, in the school year, attain the age of 10;
“year 6” means a year group in which the majority of children will, in the school year, attain the age of 11.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This new clause would extend free school lunches to all primary school age children in state funded schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause —
“Registration of children eligible for free school meals
After section 512ZA of the Education Act 1996 (power to charge for meals etc.) insert—
“512ZAA Registration of children eligible for free school meals
The Secretary of State must ensure that free school meals are provided to—
(a) all children in England who are eligible to receive free school meals, and
(b) all children whose household income is less than £20,000 per year.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures auto-enrolment to free school meals for eligible children.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 28, insert the following new Clause—
“School food standards: breakfasts and lunch
The Secretary of State must—
(a) update the school food standards to ensure that—
(i) a variety of fruit is made available at both breakfast and lunchtime;
(ii) no food, condiment or spread is served at either breakfast or lunch that contains more than 5g of sugar per 100g;
(iii) two portions of vegetables are served with every lunch;
(iv) only water, dairy milk, or non-sweetened plant-based milk drinks are served at both breakfast and lunch;
(b) update the school food standards annually to ensure they—
(i) conform to the most recent nutritional advice according to the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition;
(ii) have regard to the country’s sustainability and food security needs.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Baroness Boycott (XB - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 29, page 49, leave out lines 9 to 16 and insert—
“(1) The appropriate authority of a relevant school in England may not require a pupil at the school to have to buy branded items of school uniform for use during a school year which cost more in total to purchase than a specified monetary amount, to be reviewed annually.
(1A) The Secretary of State may by regulations specify the monetary amount that may apply to—
(a) a primary pupil, and
(b) a secondary pupil.
(1B) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (1A) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment imposes a monetary cap, rather than an item cap, on branded uniform items.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 10, leave out “have” and insert “buy”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would enable schools to require pupils to wear more than three branded items of school uniform as long as parents have not had to pay for them.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 13, leave out “have” and insert “buy”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would enable schools to require pupils to wear more than three branded items of school uniform as long as parents have not had to pay for them.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 14, leave out “three” and insert “five”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment raises the item limit on branded secondary school uniform that a school can mandate from three to five items.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 15, leave out “four” and insert “six”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment raises the item limit on branded secondary school uniform that a school can mandate from four to six items when including a tie.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 16, at end insert—
“unless the branded item of school uniform has been provided or lent to the primary pupil or the secondary pupil free of charge by the appropriate authority or by anyone else.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Young of Acton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
The amendment would exclude from the restriction on branded clothing items of school uniform which have been provided or lent to a pupil free of charge.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Where the appropriate authority of a relevant school provides second-hand branded items which—
(a) comply with the school’s uniform requirements,
(b) are in an acceptable condition, and
(c) can be purchased for significantly less than the cost of buying the item new,
the appropriate authority may require a pupil to have more than three branded items of uniform.
(2B) Where the appropriate authority provides branded items which—
(a) comply with the school’s uniform requirements,
(b) are new, and
(c) can be purchased for significantly less than the cost of buying the item non-branded,
the appropriate authority may require a pupil to have more than three branded items of uniform.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow schools to require more than three branded items of uniform if they are making them available, whether new or second-hand, at a lower cost than buying non-branded items.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 27, at end insert “except items of kit required when representing the school in sporting activities”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to exclude items of PE kit required when representing the school in sporting activities from the limit on branded items of school uniform.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 29, page 49, line 27, at end insert “except items of kit required for sporting activities”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Sater (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to exclude items of PE kit from the limit on branded items of school uniform.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 29, page 50, line 25, at end insert—
“(5) After section 551A, insert—
“Regulations for levels of PFAS chemicals and transparency
551B School uniforms: transparency and materials
(1) The Secretary of State must, within three months of the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 comes into force, issue regulations to—
(a) ban the use of PFAS in school uniforms;
(b) require producers of school uniforms to provide a digital product passport listing the chemicals in the product to enable safe end of life disposal or recycling.
(2) The ban in section (1)(a) must set the limit for residual PFAS in textiles to no more than 50 mg F/kg (50 ppm).
(3) in this section—
“PFAS” means per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as defined and listed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);
“School uniforms” has the same meaning as in section 29(3) and (4).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Parminter (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure that branded school uniform items do not contain PFAS chemicals, and would require producers of non-branded school uniform items to state whether any PFAS chemicals have been used, and to provide a digital product passport to improve the recyclability of school uniform products.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Leave out Clause 29, and insert the following new Clause—
“School uniforms
(1) Members of academy trusts must oversee the cost of school uniforms and all other apparel that is needed by pupils in their school in the course of an academic year.
(2) Members of academy trusts must require that the board of the academy trust that they oversee produces an annual report on—
(a) the cost of this uniform and apparel,
(b) what actions are being taken to minimise the cost of this uniform and apparel, and
(c) how effective the academy board has been in administering its duties in relation to uniform and apparel.
(3) The report in subsection (2) must be published on the Academy Trust website within 14 days of its submission to the members by the board.
(4) The Director of Children’s Services must oversee the cost of school uniforms and all other apparel that is needed by pupils in the local authority schools for which they have responsibility in the course of an academic year.
(5) Academy trusts or local authority schools must maintain and publish information on the cost of specific apparel needed by pupils in its schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to increase scrutiny and transparency in relation to the cost of bespoke uniform and apparel required by schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 29, insert the following new Clause—
“VAT zero-rating for certain items of school uniform
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, make provision by regulations for certain items of school uniform to be zero-rated for the purposes of VAT.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “certain items of school uniform” means items of school uniform for pupils up to the age of 16.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment makes provision for certain items of school uniform to be zero-rated for the purposes of VAT.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 29, insert the following new Clause—
“School uniforms: second-hand provision
(1) The appropriate authority of a relevant school must provide access to second hand items of school uniform.
(2) In this section, “the appropriate authority” means—
(a) in relation to an Academy school, an alternative provision Academy, a non-maintained special school, a city technology college or a city college for the technology of the arts, the proprietor;
(b) in relation to a maintained school, the governing body;
(c) in relation to a pupil referral unit, the local authority.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Parminter (LD - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 29, insert the following new Clause—
“School uniforms: transparency and materials
After section 551ZA of the Education Act 1996, insert—
“Regulations for levels of PFAS chemicals and transparency
551ZB School uniforms: transparency and materials
(1) The Secretary of State must, within three months of the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 comes into force, issue regulations to—
(a) ban the use of PFAS in school uniforms;
(b) require producers of school uniforms to provide a digital product passport listing the chemicals in the product to enable safe end of life disposal or recycling.
(2) The ban in section (1)(a) must set the limit for residual PFAS in textiles to no more than 50 mg F/kg (50 ppm).
(3) in this section—
“PFAS” means per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as defined and listed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD);
“School uniforms” has the same meaning as in section 29(3) and (4).””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Parminter (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure that branded school uniform items do not contain PFAS chemicals, and would require producers of non-branded school uniform items to state whether any PFAS chemicals have been used, and to provide a digital product passport to improve the recyclability of school uniform products.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 29, insert the following new Clause—
“Uniform safety: regulations and requirements
After section 551ZA of the Education Act 1996, insert—
“551ZB Uniform safety: regulations and requirements
Within one year of the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 is passed, the Secretary of State must, by regulation, make provision to reduce risks of school uniform items if, when used as intended or under conditions which can reasonably be foreseen, they could—
(a) endanger the health or safety of persons, or
(b) cause unreasonable public health or environmental health risk.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow the Secretary of State to regulate school uniforms, given the human and environmental health risks they represent from artificial fibres and chemical constituents.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 30, page 50, line 32, leave out “withdraw the child from school” and insert “remove the child’s name from the school roll”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Frost (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is a probing amendment seeking to establish how these provisions would relate to flexischooling children, that is, children who are not full-time in school with the agreement of their school and therefore remain on the school roll.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 2 to 23 and insert—
“(c) a local authority is—
(i) conducting enquiries under section 47 of the Children Act 1989 (duty to investigate) in respect of the child, or
(ii) taking action under section 47(8) of that Act to safeguard or promote the child's welfare, in a case where the enquiries mentioned in sub-paragraph (i) have led the local authority to conclude that the child is suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm (within the meaning of section 31(9) and (10) of that Act).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment limits consent requirements to safeguarding cases under section 47 of the Children Act 1989. It removes subsection (3) of 434A, recognising special school placement as supportive, not suspicious, and ensures local authorities must evidence actual harm risk, rather than requiring parents to justify withdrawal.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 30, page 51, line 2, leave out “condition A or”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment, along with another in the name of Baroness Barran, seeks to remove the requirement for local authorities to consent to the withdrawal of a child with SEND from school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 3 to 14
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow a general debate on condition A.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 16 and 17
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow a debate on the effects of this clause and of the reasons for section 47 enquiries, and the intersection with abusive relationships.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, line 17, after “child” insert “which bear directly upon the suitability of the child’s home as a location for their education, and are not prompted by the allegations of the other parent, or by the decision to home educate”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow a debate of whether section 47 investigations can be excluded from being taken into account.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, line 23, at end insert—
“(c) providing services to the child or their family under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 (provision of services for children in need, their families and others), or
(d) has ever provided services to the child or their family under section 47 of the Children Act 1989 (local authority’s duty to investigate).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure local authorities had to consent to withdrawing children from school if there is a child protection plan in place or if a child is a “child in need”, or if there has ever been a child protection plan in place, in relation to the relevant child or their family.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 30 and 31
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe how school proprietors have knowledge of the information referenced in this paragraph.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, line 31, at end insert—
“(5A) If a local authority in England receives a notification relating to a child who is a young carer, then it must ensure that a Young Carers’ Needs Assessment is offered under section 17ZA of the Children Act 1989 prior to the child being withdrawn from the school.
(5B) If a local authority in Wales receives a notification relating to a child who is a young carer, then it must ensure that a Needs Assessment is offered under section 24 of the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 prior to the child being withdrawn from the school.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that withdrawing a young carer from school does not result in increases in their caring responsibilities or the loss of support.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, line 36, after “delay” insert “and, in any event, within 28 days”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the meaning of “without undue delay”.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 39 and 40 and insert—
“(i) that the enquiries mentioned in subsection (4)(a) have led the authority to conclude that the child is suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm (within the meaning of sections 9 and 10 of the Children Act 1989), or”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 39 to 43 and insert “that there exists clear, documented evidence, of a standard sufficient to satisfy a court, that withdrawal from school would result in harm to the child but otherwise must grant consent,
(c) must not refuse consent where the parent is reasonably concerned that the child is experiencing harm as a result of attending their current school, unless there is compelling evidence, of a standard sufficient to satisfy a court, that withdrawal would result in greater harm.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that a parent’s reasonable concern about the harm their child is experiencing in school is given due weight in decisions about elective home education. Local authorities may only refuse consent to withdraw where they can provide clear, documented evidence — of a standard sufficient to satisfy a court — that withdrawal would result in greater harm to the child. This aims to protect the child’s welfare while upholding the parent’s primary responsibility for their child’s education and well-being.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 30, page 51, leave out lines 39 and 40
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to restore the current relationship between state and parents with regard to education.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 30, page 51, line 39, after “interests” insert “, intellectually, emotionally and physically,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the meaning of “best interests”
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, line 43, at end insert—
“(6A) In making a decision under subsection (6)(b)(i), a local authority must make a realistic assessment of similar children in the school where the child is to be placed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that any refusal is taken against the background of the actual characteristics of the school that the child might attend.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 51, line 43, at end insert—
“(6A) Before they deregister a child from a maintained school for the purpose of elective home education, the relevant local authority must offer the parent a voluntary information session, which must include—
(a) an explanation of the parent’s legal rights and responsibilities involved in home education,
(b) information on available support services, and
(c) information on the process and implications of withdrawal.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures parents receive clear, factual information about their legal rights and duties before deciding to deregister their child from school.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 30, page 51, line 43, at end insert—
“(c) must offer the parent a voluntary information session before they deregister a child from a maintained school for the purpose of elective home education, which must include—
(i) an explanation of the parent’s legal rights and responsibilities involved in home education,
(ii) available support services, and
(iii) the process and implications of withdrawal.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures parents receive clear, factual information about their legal rights and duties before deciding to deregister their child from school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 52, leave out lines 8 and 9
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow discussion of “exceptional circumstances” and safeguards.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 52, line 11, at end insert—
“(8A) In subsection (8)(b), exceptional circumstances will always apply where domestic abuse is alleged or established, with or without the existence of a court order, unless the local authority has reasonable cause to think that the allegations are not true.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the intersection of domestic abuse and subsection (8)(b).
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 52, line 11, at end insert—
“(8A) A local authority representative must not make any decision under this section in relation to elective home education unless that representative has at least two years of personal experience of home educating their own children.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires officials overseeing home education to have at least two years of personal experience, to ensure that decisions are informed by genuine understanding, reducing conflict, and improving trust, fairness, and oversight quality.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 52, line 11, at end insert—
“(8A) Where a local authority refuses consent in respect of a child who meets the criteria for Condition A, the local authority must provide the parents or carers of the relevant child with a statement of reasons for the decision.
(8B) A statement of reasons provided under subsection (8A) must include an assessment of the costs and benefits to the child.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require a local authority to submit a statement of reasons when they do not agree for a child who meets Condition A to be home educated.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 52, line 18, after “child” insert “unless such other circumstances apply which make it unreasonable not to do so”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to cover such events as children relocating including out of the UK.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 52, leave out lines 24 to 35 and insert—
“(10) A parent may appeal to the Tribunal against a decision of the local authority to refuse consent to withdraw the child from school, or the local authority’s failure to grant such consent within 28 days of the parent’s application for consent.
(10A) An appeal under subsection (10) must be brought within a period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the local authority’s decision was notified to the parent.
(10B) On an appeal, the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision of the local authority, or
(b) direct that consent for withdrawal is given.
(10C) The Tribunal may, if the parent submits evidence from a suitably qualifies medical practitioner as to the likely harm to the child if they remain in school, and evidence as to the parent’s suitability to care for the child at home, direct that the child be allowed to remain at home pending determination of the appeal.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would afford a parent a right of appeal against a local authority decision to refuse home schooling.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 53, line 10, at end insert “, unless—
(a) substantial new evidence is available which could change that decision, or
(b) the child is being disadvantaged by the decision.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 53, line 10, at end insert—
“(12A) If a parent is not satisfied with the determination of the Secretary of State or Welsh Ministers under subsections (10) or (11), they can refer that determination to an independent ombudsman who must investigate whether there have been any instances of local authority overreach in carrying out their duties in relation to subsection (6).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment establishes an independent ombudsman to review complaints about any local authority overreach in the parents’ requests to educate otherwise, strengthening accountability and ensuring parents have recourse when treated unfairly.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 53, line 10, at end insert—
“(12A) Where a local authority is in the process of making a decision about the removal of a child from the roll, all absences must be recorded as authorised by the proprietor of the school.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
Deregistration from school is often triggered by crises – mental health, safeguarding issues in school, flat refusal by the child to attend, etc. Unauthorised absence can lead to fines. This amendment would avoid a parent being fined or otherwise penalised in the scenario where the parent clearly no longer consents to the educational arrangement with the school (which is a voluntary arrangement at the point of enrollment) and the decision is still in the process of being taken.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 30, page 53, leave out lines 11 to 24
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to discuss whether the definition of “relevant local authority” is right.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 30, insert the following new Clause—
“Local authority duties in respect of children missing school
After Section 436A of the Education Act 1996 (Duty to make arrangements to identify children not receiving education), insert—
“436AB Local authority duties in respect of children missing school
Local authorities must—
(a) implement and, where necessary, enforce consistent arrangements with all schools for the local authority to be promptly informed of any child missing education by reason of persistent non-attendance or irregular attendance at school for which no satisfactory or verifiable explanation is provided by those with parental responsibility for that child;
(b) take urgent steps to trace any child known or believed by that local authority to be missing school without authorisation of the school or without satisfactory explanation;
(c) provide appropriate support for that child as soon as the child has been traced;
(d) inform any court dealing with proceedings relating to the welfare of the child of the measures taken under this section, either directly or through Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Meston (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require local authorities to trace and support children identified as missing school, and to inform the courts of this if proceedings relating to the welfare of the child are underway.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Lord Hacking gives notice of his intention to oppose the Question that Clause 30 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, leave out lines 6 to 12
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow discussion of how these provisions will work in practice, and the meanings of “some of the time” and “part-time”, and to avoid duplication and confusion.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 31, insert the following new Clause—
“Self-certification for SEN students
A child with special educational needs must not be required to be registered under section 436B of the Education Act 1996 if the parent provides a written statement that—
(a) identifies the child’s special educational needs or the basis on which such needs are reasonably suspected,
(b) describes the tailored educational provision being made to meet those needs, and
(c) outlines a reasonable approach for monitoring progress or outcomes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment allows parents to self-certify SEN provision, provided they identify the child’s needs, describe tailored provision, and outline how they will monitor progress. It seeks to ensure educational adequacy while respecting family flexibility and protecting against misuse.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 31, insert the following new Clause—
“Multi-year registration certificates
A home-educating parent may apply for a certificate valid for five years that exempts them from annual oversight under section 436D of the Education Act 1996, provided no safeguarding concerns are present and educational provision has been deemed suitable.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to reduce unnecessary oversight by allowing families with a strong record to receive a five-year exemption certificate, recognising consistent good practice and reducing administrative burden.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 8, after “school,” insert—
“but does not include where an alternative arrangement has been agreed between the proprietor of the school and a parent of the child, where the child will receive a full-time education, partly in school, and partly under the supervision of the parent,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Frost (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This is a probing amendment seeking to establish what the arrangements would be for flexischooling children, that is, children who are not full-time in school with the agreement of their school, and whether they would be exempt from the children not in school register.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 12, at end insert—
“(5A) Subsection (5)(b) does not apply where a child has been granted a licence or an authorisation to perform under a Body of Persons Approval by a licensing authority under the Children (Performances and Activities) (England) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3309).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Benjamin (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would mean a local authority does not need to register a child where their absence is due to licensed performance granted under the 2014 Regulations, as licence conditions if applicable stipulate a child must receive an education during the licensing period.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 18, at end insert—
“(c) for the maintenance by central government of a register of Gypsy, traveller, boat dwellers and show people and others who do not have a fixed local authority and move frequently.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seek to adjust how itinerant populations, who often home educate for cultural reasons, and whose children need targeted support, are kept in view.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 54, line 18, at end insert—
“(6A) A child is not required to be registered under this section if the parent provides evidence that any one of the following conditions is met—
(a) a competent home educator with at least five years of personal or professional experience has provided a sworn affidavit affirming that, in their judgment, the parent will be capable of providing a suitable education consistent with their educational philosophy,
(b) the parent has arranged and paid for the child to sit at least three externally assessed national qualifications, including but not limited to GCSEs, A-Levels, or accredited vocational awards, or
(c) the child is enrolled with a national online school or flexible provision provider known to support home-educated or otherwise educated children to a suitable standard.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Wei exempt families from registration and data submission requirements where they can show credible evidence of suitable education through endorsement by an experienced educator, formal qualification entry, or enrolment in a recognised online provider.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 54, line 18, at end insert—
“(6A) A child is not required to be registered under this section if the parent has submitted a portfolio annually demonstrating suitable education and learning progress.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment allows an educational portfolio as an alternative to registration, offering a less intrusive way for parents to demonstrate their child is receiving suitable education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 18, at end insert—
“(6A) A child is not required to be registered under this section if the parent has previously home-educated a child who progressed to university, employment, or vocational training.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment exempts families from the register where they have successfully home-educated another child into further education, training, or work, recognising proven parental competence.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 18, at end insert—
“(6A) A child is not required to be registered under this section if the parent holds Qualified Teacher Status or an education-related degree from a United Kingdom-accredited institution.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment exempts parents with formal teaching qualifications or degrees in education from registration, recognising their professional capacity to provide suitable education without additional oversight
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 36, leave out from beginning to end of line 9 on page 57
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 37, leave out from beginning to end of line 15 on page 55
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe why this particular set of information is needed, and whether it is collected for non-elective home educated children.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 54, line 38, at end insert “, except where the collection of such information would be incompatible with the rights guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights, including Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 2 of Protocol 1 (parental right to education in line with convictions)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that data collection under section 436B respects rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, including Article 8 and Article 2 of Protocol 1. It prevents disproportionate interference with family life or educational convictions and upholds privacy and parental choice in home education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 40, at end insert “, subject to such safeguards as the Secretary of State may specify”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe how abused parents and children will be safeguarded.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 40 at end insert “, except in cases in which—
(i) one parent has been found guilty in a Criminal Court of an offence of which the child is a victim, including assault, sexual assault including rape, or domestic abuse;
(ii) there has been a finding of fact in a Family Court in which the child is a victim, including assault, sexual assault including rape, or domestic abuse by one parent;
(iii) there is an open police investigation against one parent for charges in which the child is a victim, including assault, sexual assault including rape, or domestic abuse;
(iv) there is a risk of harm to the child or other members of the family if the address of the non-residential parent is required;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 54, leave out lines 40 to 44 and insert—
“(b) the names and home addresses of the parent or parents who are taking responsibility for the education of the child;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to identify the minimum requirement for providing information for the register and ensures that information is only included on parents who have responsibility for educating the child.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, leave out lines 41 to 44
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe why this data is needed and how it will be used.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, leave out lines 43 and 44
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove a requirement for the register of children not in school to include details of how much time a child spends being educated by parents.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 54, line 44, after “from” insert “or under the supervision of”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the exact meaning of paragraph (d).
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, leave out lines 1 to 15
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable a discussion of the justification for and practicality of this provision, and the effect on providers.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 55, line 1, after “receives” insert “more than a specified amount of a specified type of”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate of how the effect of this paragraph might be limited.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 2, at end insert “in respect of each individual or organisation which provides such education for more than six hours a week”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that information relating to short activities such as those operated by museums, libraries, companies and charities, as well as individual private tutoring activities, would only need to be recorded on the register of children not in school if they are provided for more than six hours a week.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 3, leave out “individuals and organisations” and insert “organisations (or, where no organisation is involved, individuals)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to avoid having to provide details of all the staff at, for example, an online school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 4, at end insert “, unless the address concerned is a private residence and the child never visits it”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
Private tutors will often not provide parents with their home address so this amendment would remove the requirement to provide it in circumstances where the child never visits it.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 10, at end insert “, or a general description of the type of place if there is no fixed location”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, leave out lines 11 to 15
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable a general discussion of the practicability of this sub-paragraph.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 11, at beginning insert “a rough estimate of”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the record-keeping required of parents under this sub-paragraph.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“unless the provision is provided on weekends or during school holidays.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that the requirements of paragraph (e) do not apply to education provided on weekends or during holidays.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(f) the reasons why a parent of a child has chosen to opt for elective home education.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Whitaker (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the recording of the reasons parents opt for elective home education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(f) in the case of a child who is in the area of a local authority in England, whether the child is a young carer, including whether a young carers needs assessment has been carried out;
(g) in the case of a child who is in the area of a local authority in Wales, whether the child is a young carer, including whether a needs assessment has been carried out.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that local authorities are aware of which children in their area being educated other than in a school who have caring responsibilities.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(1A) In subsection (1), “education” includes every experience which may result in a child learning.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow discussion of where, in the context of home education, the boundary is between education and other aspects of life.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(1A) A child who is not regarded as eligible for registration under section 436B(6A) shall not be subject to the information requirements under this section.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Wei exempt families from registration and data submission requirements where they can show credible evidence of suitable education through endorsement by an experienced educator, formal qualification entry, or enrolment in a recognised online provider.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(1A) The requirement to provide information under subsection (1)(b) does not apply where a safeguarding concern in respect of either parent has been identified.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment removes the necessity of having the details of both parents where there is a safeguarding concern.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(1A) The requirement to provide the information set out in subsection (1)(e) only applies to providers which are providing regular education sessions amounting to 10 hours or more a week, which are not primarily social or recreational in nature, and where the information has not already been provided to the authority in other formats such as an Annual Report.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent subsection (1)(e) applying to one-off or largely recreational activities, and to reduce the burden of duplicating information for both parents and local authorities.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 55, line 15, at end insert—
“(1A) In subsection (1) a child receives education from a person other than their parent if and only if that person is specifically employed (whether for remuneration or not) to provide education to that specific child.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is intended to probe the definition of a child receiving education from a person other than their parent.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 55, leave out lines 20 and 21
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe whether the wording of this paragraph is compatible with ECHR rulings regarding requirements to disclose religion.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, leave out lines 30 to 35
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe whether the wording of this paragraph could result in an enquiry which found no safeguarding concern being held on record without good cause.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 55, leave out lines 36 to 42
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to object to the inclusion of this paragraph and explore the reasons for it.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, line 4, at end insert—
“(fa) in the case of a child who is in the area of a local authority in England, whether the child is a young carer including whether a Young Carer’s Needs Assessment has been carried out;
(fb) in the case of a child who is in the area of a local authority in Wales, whether the child is a young carer including whether a Needs Assessment has been carried out;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Young of Cookham (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that local authorities are aware of which children in their area being educated other than in a school have caring responsibilities.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, line 8, at end insert “, and the reasons why the child was looked after and the duration of that arrangement”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is intended to address situations such as one where a parent rushed into hospital might result in their children being classified as looked after for a few days until discharge, without that being a reflection on the care they provide the rest of the time.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, leave out lines 9 to 12
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to explore the reasons and need for this paragraph, and whether it is an unreasonable invasion of privacy.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, leave out lines 26 to 31
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment removes the ability of the Secretary of State to require additional information to be included in the register of children not in school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, leave out lines 32 and 33
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Frost (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable a discussion about the breadth of this power and the lack of restrictions on it.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, leave out lines 36 to 39
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe what it is anticipated this provision requires.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 56, leave out line 41
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe whether the register would be published if it contains sensitive data relating to children.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 56, leave out lines 43 and 44
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to explore what is envisaged by this paragraph, the proposed purpose of time recording and limitations upon it.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, leave out lines 1 to 9
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe data protection measures generally in relation to the register.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert “or information likely to be held by an abusive parent or partner”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe how safeguarding obligations may be fully protected.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) All information on the register must be destroyed by the local authority when a child reaches the age of 18.
(7) The local authority must ensure that all information shared from the register with other bodies is also destroyed.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Whitaker (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to destroy information held on the register once a child reaches the age of 18.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) A local authority is liable for the consequences of data breaches from the register.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to incentivise due care by local authorities.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) Each local authority must establish a parental advisory board, composed primarily of home-educating parents, to advise on and scrutinise the authority’s home education policies and procedures.
(7) Where a local authority acts in a way that is contrary to the formal advice of the parental advisory board, it must publish a written statement setting out its reasons for doing so and make that statement available to the public within 28 days.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces a statutory requirement for each local authority to create a home education parental advisory board. It also requires authorities to provide public justification if they act against the advice of the board, ensuring greater accountability and transparency in decisions affecting home-educating families.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) The register of children not in school created under section 436B must be maintained solely by the local authority and must not be compiled into or made accessible through a national database.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment prohibits the creation of a centralised national database of home-educated children. It ensures that all data collected under section 436B remains under local control, in line with principles of data minimisation, family privacy, and proportionality.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) No information provided for the purposes of this section may be disclosed to any third party without the explicit written consent of the parent or guardian, unless the disclosure is necessary to comply with a statutory duty under the Children Act 1989.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that personal information collected under this section cannot be shared without parental consent, except where disclosure is required to fulfil statutory safeguarding duties under the Children Act 1989. It seeks to balance privacy protections with the need to act in a child’s best interests.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) All information collected under section 436B must be automatically deleted when the child reaches the age of 18, or re-enrols in a registered school.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment sets clear data retention limits, ensuring that children's personal information is deleted once they are no longer of compulsory education age or return to formal schooling.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) The register established under section 436B shall expire two years after its creation unless the Secretary of State publishes evidence that it has demonstrably improved safeguarding outcomes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces a sunset clause to ensure the register remains under review and is retained only if shown to be effective in improving safeguarding outcomes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) If any data collected under this section is subject to a breach, the responsible local authority must notify affected parents within 14 days and offer compensation.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides accountability for data breaches by requiring prompt notification and compensation for families affected by unauthorised disclosure of personal information.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) The registration system established under section 436B expires two years after the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 is passed, unless it is shown to improve safeguarding outcomes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces an automatic sunset clause requiring the registration system to demonstrate measurable safeguarding benefits to remain in effect.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 57, line 9, at end insert—
“(6) A parent—
(a) must be provided with full access to the register;
(b) may request the local authority to add to or to amend the register, and the local authority must do so if they are satisfied that the register requires amendment, or note the parent’s request in the appropriate place in the register if they are not so satisfied;
insofar as it concerns the children in their care.
(7) A parent may appeal to the Tribunal against a decision of the local authority to refuse access to the register, or to amend or annotate the register, or to the manner in which the register has been amended or annotated.
(8) An appeal under subsection (7) must be brought within a period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the local authority’s decision was notified to the parent.
(9) On an appeal, the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision of the local authority, or
(b) direct that the local authority complies with the Tribunal’s decision.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would enable parents to see what is in the register (subject to anti-abuse measures) and ask for amendments.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 10, leave out from beginning to end of line 16 on page 58
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This would remove the obligation on parents to register or update information about their educational provision separate from the existing duties they have to respond to enquiries from local authorities.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 16, at end insert “, in their own words”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would make it clear that a parent may provide information on, for example, the type of provider, in their own words.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 16, at end insert—
“(c) allow the local authority to inspect the materials being used in the child’s education and to see the child’s work.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Nash (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 20, at end insert “but such a request may not be made more than once in any twelve-month period unless the local authority has reasonable cause to suspect that the child will suffer harm, as defined in section 31(9) of the Children Act 1989, if the information is not provided,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that local authorities may request information from parents no more than once per year, unless there is reasonable cause to suspect the child will otherwise suffer harm as defined in the Children Act 1989. It is intended to limit intrusion while preserving safeguarding powers.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 21, after “a” insert “substantial”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 25, at end insert—
“(2A) Nothing in subsection (2) requires a parent to provide information to a local authority more than once in any period of 12 months.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate on the record-keeping and reporting required of parents.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 30, leave out “15” and insert “30”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would allow more time for parents to register their children as the events which lead to this necessity are often traumatic and chaotic.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, leave out lines 32 to 36 and insert—
“(b) in the case of duties under subsections (2)(a) and (2)(b), a period of 30 days following the request or event, or following the expiry of 12 months following the person’s previous response, whichever period ends later;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, line 40, at end insert—
“(4A) A local authority may make no more than one request in any 12-month period for a meeting with the parent, to collect data submissions, or a visit to the child’s home, unless it has reasonable cause to suspect the child is at risk of harm.
(4B) A failure by a parent to meet or to provide information annually under subsection (2)(a) shall not, by itself, be treated as evidence that the child is not receiving suitable education.
(4C) Any unauthorised visit, investigation, or data request by a local authority in breach of this Part shall be subject to a civil penalty not exceeding £5,000.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit local authority requests to once per year unless there are safeguarding concerns, prevent assumptions of neglect based on non-cooperation alone, and introduce penalties for unauthorised actions. It reinforces proportionality, safeguards family privacy, and ensures statutory limits are respected.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 57, leave out from line 41 to line 14 on page 58
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe checks and balances on SEND provision.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 16, at end insert—
“(7) Where a parent does not provide information following a request under this Part, the local authority may not initiate further investigatory steps unless authorised by a magistrate or independent tribunal.
(8) A magistrate or tribunal may grant authorisation under subsection (7) only if the authority demonstrates—
(a) reasonable grounds to believe the child is not receiving suitable education, and
(b) that less intrusive alternatives have been attempted and exhausted.
(9) The authorisation under subsection (7) must specify—
(a) the purpose and limits of the investigation,
(b) the period of time for which it is valid, and
(c) how it complies with the child and family’s rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces a judicial oversight mechanism, requiring local authorities to seek authorisation from a magistrate or independent tribunal before undertaking intrusive investigations where a parent has not voluntarily provided information. It seeks to protect families from disproportionate interference and mirrors safeguards in criminal and child protection law.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 58, leave out from beginning of line 17 to end of line 30 on page 59
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would enable discussion about new inserted section 436E.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, leave out lines 19 to 22 and insert—
“(a) a person or organisation is providing regular out-of-school education to a child not registered in school, for more than 10 hours in a week, where the activity—
(i) is not primarily social or recreational,
(ii) takes place without any parent of the child being actively involved in the tuition or education supervision of the child,
(iii) takes place during normal school hours, and
(iv) is not a period of work experience, and”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to limit this section so that it does not apply to one-off or short-term activities, or to largely social or recreational activities that have some educational content such as Guides or sports training.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 58, line 20, after “time” insert “(which must not be less than 10 hours per week)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the intention of paragraph (1)(a) and enable debate on any consequences of this provision.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 27, leave out “structured”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe what is meant by “structured”.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 29, at end insert “but does not include any person or provider that is providing out-of-school education to home-educated children on weekends or during school holidays”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the requirement that providers of out-of-school education must provide information to local authorities in respect of education they provide on weekends or during school holidays to home-schooled children.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, leave out line 36
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment probes why the provision in sub-paragraph (iii) is required.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 36, at end insert—
“but may not refer to an amount of time that is less than or equal to six hours a week.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the requirement that providers of out-of-school education must provide information to local authorities where they provide education for fewer than six hours a week.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 39, leave out “as mentioned in subsection (1)(a)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to clarify how the provider might know this information.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 42, leave out “the following information” and insert “any of the following information they possess”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that providers will not risk fines for not having information.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 58, line 42, after “information” insert “(if they have it)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe this provision in relation to the case of websites, AI-assisted or otherwise, that the parents have signed up to.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, leave out line 3
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that ministers and Ofsted do not have access to individual-level personal data.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, line 5, after “child,” insert, “measured by the time elapsed between the child clocking in and clocking out,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to explore how time will be measured, and the requirements imposed by this provision.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, line 7, leave out from the first “child” to end of line 9
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to explore the meaning of the omitted words, and how the provider can know this information.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, leave out lines 10 to 12
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate on virtual and overseas providers.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, line 17, leave out “15” and insert “30”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, line 18, at end insert “, or on the date on which the provider next opens for business”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment addresses the fact that some providers close for substantial periods, for example, over the summer.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, line 22, at beginning insert “intentionally”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, line 22, after “(5)” insert—
“(ab) is a substantial provider of out-of-school education,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to discuss the effects of making small providers liable for fines.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 59, leave out from beginning of line 31 to end of line 43 on page 60
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable debate on safeguarding.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 60, line 43, at end insert—
“(9) The Secretary of State must publish annually the GCSE results of children listed on the register.
(10) The Secretary of State must ensure that the GCSE results of children on the register are included for each set of outcome data published by the Government.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to record outcome data for children on the register as a subsection of each set of performance data published by the Department for Education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 60, line 43, at end insert—
“436FA Duty to maintain a transparency register of information processing
(1) The relevant person must maintain a record of processing of the use of information under section 463F, in a publicly available register.
(2) The record of processing under subsection (1) must contain the following information—
(a) the date on which the data was processed;
(b) the name of the organisation given access;
(c) the purpose for which the data was processed;
(d) a list of any of the types of data items accessed (as specified in sections 436C, 436D and 436E);
(e) whether the processing included automated-decision making;
(f) the date after which it is expected that the data must not be preserved in a form which permits identification of the data subjects.
(3) The relevant person must make the transparency register public.
(4) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about—
(a) the form in which the record of processing under subsection (2) is to be kept and made public;
(b) the period for which information in the record is to be retained;
(c) the circumstances in which information in the record may be disclosed, including any restrictions or safeguards that apply to such disclosures;
(d) the circumstances in which information in the record must be disclosed to the data subject or their legal guardian.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment should provide the same level of transparency to home educators and others in the new registers, as the Department for Education provides in an online transparency register of its national distribution of identifying state pupil data. This creates an oversight tool to mitigate risks of uncontrolled disclosure. This should promote public trust in use of the new data powers.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 60, line 43, at end insert—
“436FA Use of information in the register at national level
(1) A local authority must, if the Secretary of State so directs in relation to a local authority in England, or the Welsh Ministers so direct in relation to a local authority in Wales, provide the Secretary of State or the Welsh Ministers (as the case may be) with information of a prescribed description from their register under section 436B (whether that is information relating to an individual child or aggregated information as specified in subsection (2)).
(2) The Secretary of State may collect and process—
(a) information relating to an individual child only on a case-by-case basis for the purposes of giving a direction on a school attendance order following a parental request under section 442 and in accordance with UK data protection law;
(b) statistics regarding children in receipt of Elective Home Education (EHE), or Children Missing Education (CME) for the purposes of monitoring educational trends and informing policy.
(3) The data collected under subsection (2)(b) must be limited to prior aggregated statistical information and may not include any personal data that would enable the identification of individual children or linkage with other data that would do so.
(4) The statistical information may include, but is not limited to—
(a) the collective number of children on any requested date;
(b) the collective number of children throughout a year;
(c) the percentage of children in each category relative to the overall child population.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment separates the Ministerial powers for use of individual level data and aggregated data that are conflated in 436F as drafted. This new clause explicitly enables the Secretary of State and Welsh Ministers to collect case-specific individual data for adjudication of school attendance orders which is the case today but for no other purpose. It prevents bulk national-level collection of identifiable home education data about individual children and their family members, as listed in clauses 436C, 436D, and 436E.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 31, page 61, line 2, leave out from beginning to “provide” on line 3 and insert “A local authority must offer to”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Whitaker (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to offer appropriate support to the parent of a child on the register.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 5, at end insert "in a language which the parent understands."
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seek to ensure that families parents who speak English as a second or other language are informed about the requirements in a language they understand.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 6, leave out from “provided” to end of line 7 and insert “must”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Whitaker (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would require local authorities to offer appropriate support to the parent of a child on the register.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 7, after “request” insert “and the needs of the child and the educational preferences of its parents”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 11, at end insert—
“(2A) A local authority must, on request, secure the provision of an examination centre within a reasonable distance where a child registered under section 436B may take any examination that the Secretary of State has authorised for administration by a relevant school.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would ensure that elective home educated children are able to access an examination centre within a reasonable distance.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 11, at end insert—
“(2A) A local authority must facilitate or make arrangements for children registered under section 436B—
(a) to be offered facilities and training on the same terms as the local authority offers them to pupils at relevant schools,
(b) to be offered facilities and training (e.g. student discounts) on the same terms as organisations other than the local authority offer them to pupils at relevant schools,
(c) to have access to colleges for courses for 14–16 year-olds, and for level 3 courses at colleges for which a home educated child has the aptitude but not standard qualifications,
(d) to have access to venues for taking public exams,
(e) to be offered signposting and support to access SEN referrals and assessments, support for older SEN students transitioning into adulthood, and access SEN provision such as speech therapists if not in school,
(f) to be offered, on request, the provision of alternative provision such as equine therapy which ordinarily requires a school referral,
(g) to be offered, on request, the provision of speciality equipment for children with SEND (such as braille readers),
(h) where they have an ECHP, to have personal budgets and independent payments in line with provision to children in schools, and
(i) to have access to work experience.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment sets out how local authorities should facilitate the education of children who are being home educated by giving them access to appropriate local authority services and facilitating their access to services provided by other organisations. It recognises that they have responsibilities to all the children in their area.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Performance reporting
A local authority must report annually, in a form specified by the Secretary of State, on the educational performance of children who attained the age of 19 in the previous year and who did belong to one of the following categories—
(a) children under section 19 (exceptional provision of education in pupil referral units or elsewhere: England);
(b) children educated under section 61 of the Children and Families Act 2014 (special education provision otherwise than in schools, post-16 institutions etc);
(c) children who are “looked after”;
(d) children who are on the register established by section 436B.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“if (taken together with the local authority’s other actions) to do so is in the best interests of the child concerned”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“(4) It is the duty of a local authority—
(a) to respect the right of parents to determine how their children are educated,
(b) as far as possible, to maintain good relationships with, consult with, and support local elective home education groups,
(c) as far as possible, to build positive and mutually respectful relationships with home education families and support them with the intellectual, emotional and physical development and wellbeing of their children,
(d) to employ staff to manage their elective home education functions who are suitably trained and experienced, with knowledge and understanding of approaches to home education, SEND, Gypsy, Roma and Traveller people, human rights & GDPR, and
(e) to organise supportive and informal events where the local authority officials can meet home educating families and facilitate question and answer sessions between home educators and the officials.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to build positive relationships between local authorities and home educating parents by ensuring that local authorities meet with home educating children in informal settings and establish support structures, with a view to making the local authority’s work constructive and efficient.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“(4) Where a parent has made a request for support, no action under section 436H may be taken in relation to educational suitability in the area where support has been requested.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
A request for support could be taken as an indication that the education is currently not suitable. This amendment would avoid penalising any parents coming forward to improve their provision in this way.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Arrangement for national examinations for children not in school
Where a child is eligible to be registered by the authority under section 436B, the authority must—
(a) provide for the child to be able to sit any relevant national examination, and
(b) provide financial assistance to enable the child to sit any relevant national examination,
where requested by the parent or carer of the child.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would mean that where a child is required to be placed on the register, that child qualifies for financial assistance to sit any relevant national exam.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA No oversight in rural areas
Families living more than ten miles from the nearest maintained school shall not be required to be registered under section 436B unless safeguarding concerns are present.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to provide a practical exemption from registration for families in remote areas, in the light of any difficulty in accessing schools and to reduce any unnecessary administrative burden.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Rolling review requirement
(1) The Secretary of State shall review the operation and impact of sections 436B to 436G every two years and lay the findings before Parliament.
(2) Sections 436B to 436G shall cease to have effect 12 months after the review, unless a resolution approving their continuation has been passed by both Houses of Parliament.
(3) Any such resolution may be subject to conditions, modifications, or time limits as Parliament sees fit.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment mandates a biennial review of the home education register to ensure transparency, accountability, and continuous policy evaluation.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Automatic home education registration exemption for chess masters
A child who has achieved chess grandmaster status shall be considered to be receiving a suitable education and shall be exempt from registration under section 436B.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment recognises that children who attain chess grandmaster status demonstrate exceptional intellectual achievement. It automatically treats them as receiving a sufficient education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Recognition of nomadic learning lifestyles
Families who live a nomadic lifestyle, including but not limited to travelling performers, van-dwellers, or digital nomads, shall be exempt from registration under section 436B, provided education is demonstrably provided.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to recognise the requirements of nomadic families and seeks to exempt them from fixed-registration rules, while preserving the requirement to provide suitable education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Diplomatic immunity for international educators
A parent temporarily residing in the United Kingdom whose child is actively engaged in a recognised international education program shall be exempt from registration requirements under section 436B to 436D.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment exempts families temporarily based in the UK while participating in international education programs, allowing them to maintain their existing educational arrangements without regulatory interference.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Right of asylum-seeking families to home educate
(1) A family awaiting a decision on an asylum application shall have the right to educate their child at home without being subject to registration under section 436B.
(2) The parent must provide a written statement confirming they are providing suitable home education and, to the best of their knowledge, have done so prior to arrival in the United Kingdom.
(3) A local authority may not require further information unless it has reasonable grounds to believe the child is at risk of significant harm, as defined in section 31(9) of the Children Act 1989.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure families seeking asylum retain the right to home educate without added procedural burdens while awaiting immigration decisions, with the intention of minimising disruption to children’s education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Age-based reduction of oversight
A child aged 14 or over may, with parental agreement, register as a self-directed learner and shall not be subject to oversight under section 436B unless safeguarding concerns arise.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow children aged 14 and older to register as self-directed learners, free from routine oversight. It seeks to respect the autonomy of older students to take control of their education outside of formal systems.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Crisis exemption from educational requirements
A child shall not be required to be registered under section 436B or comply with formal education duties if their family is displaced or severely affected by war, natural disaster, or economic collapse.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to provide compassionate exemptions from educational regulation during periods of personal or national crisis.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Prohibition on data sharing with immigration authorities
Data collected under section 436B must not be shared with immigration enforcement bodies under any circumstances.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that data collected under section 436B may not be shared with immigration enforcement bodies under any circumstances.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Independent review board
The Secretary of State must establish a board composed of home educators and education law experts to monitor and evaluate the impact of section 436B.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment creates a board to independently assess the register’s operation and ensure home educators are represented in the evaluation process.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Pilot scheme before national implementation
Sections 436B to 436G must not come into full effect until a two-year pilot programme of the registration requirements has been completed in at least three local authorities.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment introduces a pilot phase to test the registration scheme before full national rollout, in order to allow for evidence-led refinement of the provisions.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Privacy-preserving AI reporting tool for home education
(1) A home-educating parent may satisfy a local authority request for information under section 436D(2)(a) by submitting progress data to an approved AI-based reporting tool.
(2) A tool under subsection (1) may generate an anonymised summary report accessible to the local authority.
(3) The report must not be stored, copied, or reused, and must be automatically destroyed after 30 days.
(4) The local authority may not request such a report from any given home-educating family more than once in any 12-month period.
(5) Any AI tool used must be open source or subject to independent peer review to ensure fairness and transparency.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment allows parents to submit education data to a privacy-preserving AI system that generates a temporary, anonymised report for local authorities. The tool must be transparent, and data cannot be retained or reused. The amendment seeks to limit requests to once per year, with the intention of protecting family privacy and preventing misuse.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 31, page 61, line 23, at end insert—
“436GA Appeal rights for older children
A child aged 14 to 18 shall have the right to appeal to an independent tribunal against a local authority decision under sections 436B to 436G.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to give older children the right to challenge decisions that affect their education, ensuring their voice is included in home education matters.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 31, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of impact on home educators and reduction of unnecessary reporting
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, conduct a review and report of the impact of section 31 on home educators in England.
(2) The review must include an assessment of—
(a) the administrative and reporting requirements placed on home educators as a result of section 31,
(b) the administrative and reporting requirements placed on local authorities as a result of section 31,
(c) the extent to which such requirements are necessary for safeguarding purposes, and
(d) any data or reporting obligations that can be reduced or removed for home educators where they are not essential for safeguarding.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a report before Parliament setting out the findings of the review, including—
(a) an analysis of the impact of section 31 on home educators,
(b) a clear outline of any data or reporting obligations that will no longer be required from home educators, and
(c) a timeline for the removal of unnecessary reporting obligations, which must not exceed 12 months from the publication of the report.
(4) In conducting the review, the Secretary of State must consult with representatives of home educators and relevant stakeholders.
(5) The report must be made publicly available.
(6) The Secretary of State must ensure that any reporting obligations identified as unnecessary under subsection (3)(b) are removed within the timeframe specified in subsection (3)(c).”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to conduct a review and report of the impact of section 31 on home educators in England.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 31, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of safeguarding protections in private tuition settings
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review of—
(a) the adequacy of safeguards in place to protect children who receive private tuition, either online or in-person,
(b) the extent to which providers of private tuition carry out background checks on their tutors, and
(c) the impact, if any, of the activities defined as “Regulated activity relating to children” in Schedule 4 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 on safeguarding in private tuition settings.
(2) Within six months of the completion of the review, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the findings of the review and any recommendations to improve safeguarding protections in private tuition.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hampton (XB - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require the Government to assess the adequacy of safeguarding protections for children with private tutors, who may not have to undergo an enhanced DBS check under current requirements.
This amendment was STOOD PART
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 31 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This is intended to probe how Clause 31 relates to Clause 4, whether all children will now be included in registers or whether some are still left out, and how children will come to the local authority’s attention as needing to be registered.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 32, page 64, line 28, leave out from beginning to end of line 3 on page 66
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 64, line 29, leave out “must” and insert “may”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that a local authority does not have to serve a preliminary notice, if this would be better for the child’s wellbeing.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 64, line 32, after “age” insert—
“(ab) all relevant support has been offered to the parent,”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that local authorities have offered support to parents, before they can serve a preliminary notice.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 64, leave out lines 34 to 36
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, line 1, leave out “, C or D”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, leave out lines 3 and 4
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment probes the circumstances in which the “best interest” test would be applied.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, leave out lines 9 to 11
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment probes the circumstances in which a local authority enquiry would satisfy condition B.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, line 10, at end insert “if those enquiries meet a specified threshold”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to explore the circumstances under which this would satisfy condition B.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, leave out lines 20 and 21
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent local authorities from judging when it would be in a child’s best interest for them to receive education by regular attendance at school.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, leave out lines 22 to 35
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, line 29, at end insert—
“and the information not provided, or the inaccuracy of the information provided, is of sufficient importance to justify a school attendance order.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require a parent’s serious error in relation to the provision of information before a preliminary notice can be justified under Condition C.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, leave out lines 30 to 35
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment probes the circumstances under which Condition D could justify the serving of a preliminary notice.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, line 35, at end insert—
“and the information not provided, or the inaccuracy of the information provided, is of sufficient importance to justify a school attendance order.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require that a preliminary notice can only be justified under Condition D if there is a serious error in the information provided by the parent.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, line 37, leave out “to D” and insert “or B”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 65, line 39, leave out from “delay” to “and” in line 42
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the five day deadline for serving a preliminary notice.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 32, page 66, line 4, leave out from beginning to end of line 36 on page 67
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to facilitate debate of school attendance orders
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 66, leave out lines 24 to 27
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This probing amendment seeks to remove the “suitable education” test from provision preventing the serving of a school attendance order.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 66, line 34, at end insert—
“(2A) A local authority must not serve an order under this section on a child’s parents if the child—
(a) has an education, health and care plan,
(b) experiences emotionally-based school avoidance, or
(c) is eligible for special educational needs support.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to prevent school attendance orders being applied to children with certain health, emotional and learning needs.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 66, line 37 leave out “all of the” and insert “the major”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the requirement for local authorities to consider all of a child’s educational settings when determining whether to serve a school attendance order, as this could require them to consider an infeasibly large number of settings. Instead, the amendment proposes that local authorities consider “the major” settings.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 66, line 38, leave out “and where the child lives”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to avoid any discrimination based on the location of a child’s residence, when a local authority is considering settings for the purposes of determining whether a school attendance order must be served.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 66, line 39, leave out “how the child is being educated” and insert “the form the child’s education takes”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to avoid any implied ability to make financial enquiries.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 32, page 66, line 42, leave out from beginning to end of line 2 on page 67
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to remove the local authority’s power to request to visit a child at home, for the purpose of determining whether a school attendance order should be served.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 67, line 2, at end insert “, subject to a court order to that effect.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require that a local authority must possess a court order before visiting a child at home, for the purpose of determining whether a school attendance order should be served.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 67, line 2, at end insert—
“(d) must consider what the local authority knows of the child’s reaction to strangers, schools and persons in authority.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 67, line 11, leave out from “delay” to “and” in line 14
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the deadline for informing the governing body and headteacher when a maintained school is named in a school attendance order.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 67, line 15, at end insert—
“(c) must describe the reasons for the decision to serve the order.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to give parents the information needed to be able to challenge a school attendance order, or if they wish to make changes and then request revocation.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 67, line 21, at end insert—
“(c) the child relocates outside the jurisdiction.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 67, line 24, leave out from “delay” to “inform” in line 26
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe the deadline for informing the governing body and headteacher when a maintained school is named in a school attendance order.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
Clause 32, page 67, leave out from line 37 to line 19 on page 68
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is connected to another in the name of Lord Storey which seeks to prevent school attendance orders being applied to children with an education, health and care plan.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 68, line 4, leave out “amend” and insert “review”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 68, leave out lines 7 to 10
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to probe how this subsection could result in an inappropriate school being named if no review is held.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 70, leave out line 10 and insert—
“the parent shall be considered as having fulfilled their duty to provide suitable education to the child.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that if a parent enrolled their child into an independent school and their financial circumstances changed, they would not be forced to pay unaffordable bills.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 72, line 40, leave out from “than” to “a” on line 41
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is connected to another in the name of Lord Storey which seeks to prevent school attendance orders being applied to children with an education, health and care plan.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 73, line 42, at end insert—
“(5) If a child subject to a notice leaves the jurisdiction, the local authority must revoke the order.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 74, line 37, at end insert—
“(4A) In arriving at an opinion under subsection (4) the local authority must consult a panel, established for that purpose, including established home-educating parents.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 74, leave out lines 38 to 42 and insert—
“(5) A parent may appeal to the Tribunal against a decision of the local authority to refuse to comply with a request under subsection (3).
(5A) An appeal under subsection (5) must be brought within a period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the local authority’s decision was notified to the parent.
(5B) On an appeal, the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision of the local authority, or
(b) direct that the parent’s request should be granted.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Crisp (XB - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would afford a parent a right of appeal against a local authority decision to refuse to end or revise a school attendance order.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 74, line 43, leave out from beginning to end of line 12 on page 75
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 75, leave out lines 4 to 12
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Lord Storey (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment is connected to another in the name of Lord Storey which seeks to prevent school attendance orders being applied to children with an education, health and care plan.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 76, line 9, at end insert “, unless the child is no longer resident within the jurisdiction.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 76, line 24, leave out “may” and insert “must”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Hacking (Lab - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 76, leave out lines 30 to 33 and insert—
“(8) A person who commits an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 3
Baroness Whitaker (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment would retain the maximum fine at level 3 (£1000) rather than level 4 (£2500) and would remove the possibility of imprisonment.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 76, leave out lines 30 to 37 and insert—
“(8) A person who commits an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the equivalent of one day’s wages at the National Minimum Wage.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment sets a reasonable upper limit on fines for failure to comply with school attendance orders to ensure they remain proportionate and do not unfairly burden low-income families.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 32, page 76, line 32, leave out “4” and insert “5”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Blackstone (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to make the fine for school attendance order offences unlimited where there are serious breaches of such offences.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 32, page 76, line 33, at end insert “but the child’s best interests shall be taken fully into account when deciding the sentence.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was STOOD PART
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 32 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 4
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)Member's explanatory statement
This is intended to allow a general discussion of school attendance orders.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 32, insert the following new Clause—
“Non-criminalisation of home education
(1) A parent shall not be subject to criminal conviction, and no criminal record shall result, solely from a failure to comply with the registration requirements under section 436D of the Education Act 1996 (inserted by this Act).
(2) Any enforcement action for non-registration must be civil in nature and proportionate to the educational context.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment prevents parents from acquiring a criminal record solely due to a failure to register under new section 436D. It would ensure that enforcement is civil, not criminal, to avoid long-term harm to the family and child, while still allowing proportionate oversight where needed.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 32, insert the following new Clause—
“Exemption from penalty for mental health or bullying
A parent must not be subject to penalty or enforcement under section 436Q of the Education Act 1996 if the withdrawal of their child from school was supported by a medical professional due to bullying or mental health concerns.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment protects families from penalties where withdrawal is supported by clinical advice due to bullying or mental health risks.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 32, insert the following new Clause—
“No fines for off-grid families
A family that produces its own energy and food and lives more than ten miles from the nearest maintained school shall be exempt from penalties for non-attendance under section 436Q of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to exempt off-grid families from education-related fines where conventional schooling is impractical or unnecessary.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Clause 33, page 78, line 28, at end insert—
“(5) A parent is entitled to claim compensation in respect of any breaches of data protection in relation to actions under this Act.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Lord Lucas (Con - Excepted Hereditary)This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 33 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 34, insert the following new Clause—
“Notification and registration of licence or Body of Persons Approval to local authority
In the Children (Performances and Activities) (England) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3309), after regulation 31, insert the following—
“32 Notification and registration of licence approval to local authorities
(1) Where a licensing authority approves a licence or authorises a performance under a Body of Persons Approval, they must notify the local authority in which the child resides, including information about the—
(a) type of licence or Body of Persons Approval;
(b) duration of performance;
(c) duration of absence from school setting;
(d) details of any alternative education provision during performance.
(2) Where a local authority receives notification of an approved licence and must register a child under section 436B of the Education Act 1996, they must update the register to specify the reason of absence as performance-related.
(3) Where a local authority is also the licensing authority and must register a child under section 436B of the Education Act 1996, they must update the register to specify the reason of absence as performance-related.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 2
Baroness Benjamin (LD - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires licensing authorities that approve a licence or authorise a performance under a Body of Persons Approval for a child to perform to notify the local authority in which the child resides.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 34, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of The Children (Performances and Activities) (England) Regulations 2014
Within 6 months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must conduct a review of the effect of the provisions in this Act on the operation of The Children (Performances and Activities) (England) Regulations 2014.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Benjamin (LD - Life peer)This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 34 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Presumption of parental competence
In assessing whether a child is receiving suitable education, a local authority shall presume that the parent is competent to provide such education, unless the authority can demonstrate, with clear and documented evidence, beyond reasonable doubt, that the education being provided is unsuitable.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment creates a legal presumption that parents are competent to educate their children. It requires local authorities to prove, beyond reasonable doubt and with clear evidence, that the education is unsuitable before intervening—ensuring parental rights are protected against speculative or unjustified action.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Protection of home education rights during emergency or authoritarian rule
(1) In the event of a national emergency or authoritarian governance, the courts shall have the final authority to safeguard the right to home educate in accordance with this Act.
(2) Authoritarian governance shall be defined as any period during which emergency regulations or executive actions suspend, limit, or derogate from rights protected under the Human Rights Act 1998 or the European Convention on Human Rights.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to protect the legal right to home educate in exceptional national circumstances by placing judicial oversight above executive restrictions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Limit on review duration without cause
(1) A home-educating family must not remain under continued review or monitoring by a local authority for more than 30 days unless the authority has reasonable cause to suspect that the child is at risk of significant harm, as defined in section 31(9) of the Children Act 1989.
(2) Where no such risk is found, the case must be closed, and the family notified in writing within 10 working days.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that home-educating families are not subject to prolonged review without specific concerns. If no safeguarding risk is identified within 30 days, local authorities must close the case and notify the family, protecting against unnecessary surveillance or open-ended monitoring.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Protection from reporting bias
If more than 50% of home education reports from a local authority in any calendar year are negative, an independent review must be triggered to assess objectivity and fairness.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that if local authority reports about home educators show consistent negativity, an independent review will assess potential bias, promoting fair and balanced oversight.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Inclusion of home educators on safeguarding panels
(1) Any safeguarding panel considering cases involving home-educated children must include at least one person with direct home education experience.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a “safeguarding panel” means any joint inter-agency structure, entity, local authority or other authority making decisions about children who are home-educated, or may be home-educated in the future, for safeguarding purposes or to prevent them from harm.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures home education is fairly represented on safeguarding panels, adding practical insight to decision-making processes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home Education Ombudsman
(1) The Secretary of State must appoint an independent Home Education Ombudsman.
(2) The Ombudsman’s function is to investigate complaints from parents relating to the conduct, decisions, or practices of local authorities in the exercise of their functions under sections 436B to 436U of the Education Act 1996 (inserted by this Act).
(3) The Ombudsman must be independent of the Government and of local authorities.
(4) The Ombudsman must publish an annual report of findings and recommendations, designed to support any relevant judicial reviews undertaken by parents or carers who provide home education who are dissatisfied with the response of the Secretary of State to any written complaints made by those parents or carers about their treatment by local authorities and the impact of such treatment upon their activities or their rights to privacy, family life, and ability to home educate.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment creates a statutory office of an independent Home Education Ombudsman, empowered to investigate complaints from families about how local authorities are exercising their duties in relation to elective home education. This would strengthen accountability and protect families from unjustified or inconsistent local practice.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Exam support for home-educated children
The Secretary of State must ensure that home-educated children are entitled to the same exam fee support and access to recent past papers as children enrolled in maintained schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures exam access parity by providing home-educated children with equivalent support to their peers in schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Parity of treatment for home education
A local authority, in exercising its functions under sections 436B to 436G of the Education Act 1996, must treat home education provision on a par with that of independent schools, including respecting the right of parents to determine curriculum, teaching methods, and educational philosophy, provided the education is suitable within the meaning of section 7 of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires local authorities to apply the same level of respect and discretion to home education as is afforded to independent schools, provided the education is suitable under section 7 of the Education Act 1996. It affirms parental discretion over curriculum, pedagogy, and educational approach.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to sue for educational failure
A child compelled into formal schooling by a local authority may bring legal action against that authority for educational harm or failure to provide a suitable education if it can be demonstrated to have been as a result of being taken out of home education.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment gives children the right to seek redress where forced schooling leads to demonstrable harm or failure, holding authorities accountable for poor educational outcomes.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“No regulation of educational content
A local authority must not comment on or assess the content or methodology of home education provided by a parent, provided it meets the standard of suitability under section 7 of the Education Act 1996.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment protects curriculum freedom by preventing local authorities from regulating or judging the materials and pedagogical approaches used in lawful home education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Children’s advisory board for home education policy
The Secretary of State shall establish an annual review panel comprising at least 12 home-educated children aged 10 to 16, selected by lottery, to advise on education legislation affecting home education.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to empower children who are home educated to contribute directly to policy through an annual children’s jury, ensuring their experiences and views are considered in law-making.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home education workers’ union
Home-educating parents have the right to form, join, and collectively organise in a registered home education workers’ union, including the right to petition and collectively bargain on education policy, on a par with other unions such as teachers’ unions.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that home-educating parents have the legal right to form and join a recognised union, giving them formal standing to be consulted on education policy, seek legal redress collectively, and advocate for resources. It mirrors protections available to teachers’ unions and enables fair representation in law and policy making.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Tax relief for home education expenses
The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act comes into force, introduce a scheme allowing parents who home educate to deduct education-related expenses from their taxable income.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow home educators to deduct educational costs such as books, tutoring, and exams from their taxable income.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to jury trial in forced school attendance cases
No child may be compelled to attend school against the wishes of their parent or guardian unless the decision is upheld by a jury trial in a Magistrates’ Court or Crown Court.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that families facing forced school attendance orders have the right to a jury trial, providing stronger procedural safeguards and a community-based judgment in contested cases.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Protection from truancy penalties in lawful home education
After section 447 of the Education Act 1996 insert—
“447A Protection from truancy penalties in lawful home education
(1) No parent shall be subject to prosecution or penalty under sections 444 to 447 of this Act for non-attendance, where—
(a) the child has been lawfully withdrawn from school, and
(b) the parent is providing, or intends to provide, suitable education in accordance with section 7.
(2) This section does not prevent a local authority from issuing a School Attendance Order under section 437, but no such order may be issued solely on the basis of non-attendance, without first assessing the suitability of education being provided.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment protects parents from truancy-related penalties when they have lawfully withdrawn their child for home education. It ensures that enforcement action is only taken where there is clear evidence that suitable education is not being provided, not merely on the basis of school non-attendance.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to delay formal education
A parent may elect to delay the start of their child’s formal education until the academic year following their seventh birthday without penalty.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment allows parents to delay formal education to age seven, aligning with international practice and supporting readiness-based learning.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Study into privacy-preserving technologies
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission an independent study into the use of zero-knowledge proof technology as a method to verify educational provision in elective home educating families without compromising the privacy of those families.
(2) The findings of the study must be published and laid before Parliament.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to commission an independent study into the use of zero-knowledge proof technologies as a means of verifying education provision without compromising family privacy in elective home-educating families. It supports innovation in safeguarding and accountability while upholding principles of data minimisation and proportionality.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Local authority transparency reports
Each local authority must publish an annual report detailing its engagement with home-educating families, including data on support, complaints, and outcomes.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to increase transparency by requiring annual reporting of local authority practice, with the intention of supporting public accountability in the regulation of home education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Independent research into home education
The Secretary of State must fund independent academic research into effective home education practices and publish findings every three years.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to commit the government to funding research into home education methods, ensuring evidence-based policy and best practice guidance.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Parental referendum on regulatory expansion
No new national regulatory measure concerning home education may be introduced unless approved by a majority of registered home-educating families through a parental referendum.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment intends to creates a democratic safeguard requiring parental approval before introducing new national home education regulations.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Protections for parents with disabilities
Parents with disabilities who home educate must not be subjected to more oversight than other parents solely on the basis of disability.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to protect parents with disabilities from unequal treatment in home education oversight, with the intention of ensuring non-discrimination.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Children’s right to refuse school attendance
A child aged eight or over has the right to express a preference for home education or school attendance, and this preference must be taken into account in any local authority or court decision.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that children aged eight and older have a say in their educational setting, with the intention of recognising their developing autonomy and right to participate in decisions affecting them.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Petition system for policy review
If 10,000 or more home-educating parents sign a verified petition on any home education matter, the Secretary of State must publish a formal response and conduct a policy review within six months.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow the home education community to initiate a government review on key issues, with the intention of promoting responsiveness and democratic engagement in education policy.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home education rebate for school place shortages
Where no school place is available within a reasonable distance, a parent who home educates shall be entitled to claim a rebate equal to the per-pupil education funding allocation.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures parents who home educate due to lack of available school places are not financially penalised, by enabling them to reclaim equivalent funding.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Council tax exemption for home educators
A local authority must reduce the council tax bill of any household educating a child at home by an amount equivalent to the funding per pupil provided to schools by local authorities.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that home-educating families are not required to contribute financially to local school services they do not use, through a council tax adjustment.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Emergency hearings: home education cases
Where a child is removed or proposed to be removed from the care of a parent due to concerns arising from home education, the parent shall have the right to an emergency court hearing within 48 hours.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to provide a legal right to parents to a prompt court hearing if a local authority seeks to remove a child due to concerns about home education.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Ban on algorithmic school allocation
A child withdrawn from school for elective home education may not be automatically re-enrolled in another school through an algorithmic or automated placement process without parental consent.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that families who choose home education are not automatically re-enrolled into a different school by local authorities. It seeks to protect the family’s right to decide on home education without interference from algorithmic school allocation systems.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Local authorities: requirement for proof of educational superiority
A local authority may not interfere with a child’s home education under section 436B of the Education Act 1996 unless it can demonstrate that its own maintained schools consistently outperform the education provided by the parent.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment requires councils to show that their state schools offer superior outcomes before intervening with a home-educating family, preventing arbitrary enforcement.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Qualifications for local authority officers making determinations about home education suitability
No local authority officer may make determinations about home education suitability unless they have passed an accredited assessment in alternative education methods.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that officials overseeing home education are qualified in alternative education, with the intention of improving the quality and fairness of their decisions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home education funding parity
The Secretary of State must ensure that home-educating families are eligible to receive per-pupil funding equivalent to that provided to maintained schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to give home educators access to public education funding, with the intention of supporting fairer distribution of educational resources.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Equal access to SEN and mental health services
A child educated at home must be entitled to the same access to publicly funded special educational needs and mental health support as children attending maintained schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that home-educated children are not excluded from essential services provided to school pupils.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Child-led school closure mechanism
Where at least 80% of pupils in a maintained school, aged 10 or over, express a preference for home education through a verified process, the Secretary of State must consult on transitioning that school into a home education support hub.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides a mechanism for students to initiate the transformation of a school into a home education hub if the vast majority prefer home-based learning, with the intention of supporting child-led educational reform.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“National home education TV channel
The Secretary of State must fund and maintain a public broadcast service dedicated to delivering curriculum-aligned educational content for home-educated children.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment establishes a government-funded educational TV channel to support home-educating families.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“National Insurance credits for full-time home educators
A parent who provides full-time home education must be treated as having limited capability for work for the purpose of receiving National Insurance credits.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable parents who home educate full-time to receive pension protection through NI credits, similar to unpaid carers.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Access to school facilities
A child educated at home shall be entitled to reasonable access to facilities and extracurricular activities offered by local maintained schools, including sports facilities and libraries.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment provides home-educated children with access to public school resources, supporting enrichment and inclusion.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Multi-generational home education tax break
A grandparent, aunt, uncle, or other extended family member who materially contributes to a child’s home education may claim a pro-rata tax rebate equivalent to 20% of the average per-pupil state funding allocation.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment offers a tax rebate to extended family members who actively support home education, recognising multi-generational educational care and relieving household financial burdens.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Removal of school-based legal custody
A school may not exercise in loco parentis responsibilities for a child unless the parent has provided explicit written consent, renewed annually.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that schools may only assume parental responsibility (in loco parentis) with explicit, annually renewed parental consent. It seeks to protect part-time home-educating families by preventing schools from automatically claiming authority over a child’s welfare or educational decisions without the parent’s ongoing approval.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Mandatory secondment for education officials
Any Department for Education employee involved in home education policy must undertake a twelve-month secondment in an alternative education setting before drafting or revising guidance.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that DfE staff have real-world experience with alternative education before shaping policy, improving relevance and reducing bias.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Oath of non-coercion for teachers
A teacher employed by a maintained school must not attempt to coerce or pressure a child or parent to attend or remain in school if they express a desire to home educate, and must swear or affirm an annual oath in writing to that effect as part of their professional responsibilities.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment prevents teachers from using undue influence to discourage or obstruct home education. It reinforces the right of families to choose education freely without coercion from school personnel.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home education and the school year
When making a decision under a provision in this Act, a Local Authority cannot consider the educational calendar or timetable used by a family whose child has been withdrawn from school.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment grants home-educating families freedom from the school term calendar, allowing them to provide flexible, continuous education suited to their child’s needs. It also protects explicitly against local authorities penalising them for following a non-traditional timetable.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Penalties for false allegations against home educators
Where a report concerning a home-educating family is found to be malicious or knowingly false, the local authority shall refer the reporting individual for review, and a civil penalty may be imposed by a magistrate.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to deter false or malicious claims against home-educating families by introducing consequences for those who make unfounded reports, while maintaining proper safeguards and due process.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Funding eligibility for home education cooperatives
A home education cooperative comprising 50 or more families shall be eligible to apply for per-pupil public education funding equivalent to that received by maintained schools.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow large home education cooperatives to access public funding on a similar basis to schools.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Disqualification of inspectors by parent report
If three or more home-educating families submit documented complaints of misconduct by a local authority inspector, that individual shall be suspended from duties relating to home education pending review.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to protect home educators from any bias or inappropriate conduct by officials by requiring their temporary removal from oversight roles following multiple complaints.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home educators may vote on local school budgets
A home-educating parent who pays local education-related taxes shall have the right to vote on local authority education budgets and school funding allocations.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to grants home educators a say in how local education funds are spent.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Minimum wage compensation for mandated oversight
Where home educators are required to submit reports, attend meetings, or be subject to oversight, they shall be entitled to compensation equal to the prevailing hourly minimum wage for time spent complying.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to ensure that home educators are compensated for time spent complying with oversight requirements, in the light of their role as unpaid educators and protecting against any uncompensated administrative burdens.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
““Education as trade” model
(1) A home-educated child is permitted to demonstrate educational attainment through the provision of services, mentoring, or trade in knowledge-based activities as evidence of learning.
(2) Such activities are to be considered education for the purposes of section 7 of the Education Act 1996 (Duty of parents to secure education of children of compulsory school age).”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow children to demonstrate learning through trade, mentorship, or service-based contributions.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Home educator policy initiative
A local authority must formally consider and respond to any education policy proposal signed by at least 500 home-educating families in its area.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to enable home educators to initiate policy discussions with local authorities, who must respond if 500 home-educating families sign a proposal.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Sunset clauses on home education legislation
Any legislation or regulation concerning home education shall automatically expire five years after enactment unless reviewed and reapproved by Parliament following public consultation.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that all laws concerning home education are regularly reviewed and renewed only with public and parliamentary input, promoting accountability and adaptability in policy.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“Exam access at independent schools
(1) An independent school must not deny access to sit examinations to a home-educated child solely on the basis that the child is not enrolled.
(2) Reasonable fees may be charged for administration.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Wei (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to require independent schools to allow home-educated children to sit exams even if they are not enrolled.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
After Clause 35, insert the following new Clause—
“CIECSS: attendance enforcement
After section 448 of the Education Act 1996 (Exemption where child becomes five during term) insert—
“448A CIECSS: attendance enforcement
(1) His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (the CIECSS) may impose fines against parents where one or more of their children are attending school for less than 80% of the designated time required.
(2) The CIECSS must, when determining the amount of fine to be levied, take account the reason for non-attendance.
(3) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, make provision for the establishment of the enforcement function in this section within six months of the day on which the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2025 comes into force.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.””
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow the Chief Inspector of Schools to levy fines for poor attendance in parallel to school attendance orders.
This amendment was STOOD PART
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 35 stand part of the Bill.
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer)This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
After Clause 47, insert the following new Clause—
“Exemption from requirement to follow National Curriculum in the interests of improving standards
In the Education Act 2002, after section 95 (Appeals against directions under section 93 etc) insert—
“95A Exception in the interests of improving standards
Where the proprietor of an Academy school or a local authority maintained school believes that the raising of standards in the school would be better served by the school’s curriculum not including the National Curriculum, any provisions of this Act or any other Act do not apply so far as they require the school’s curriculum to include or follow the National Curriculum.””
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 1
Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to allow schools to narrow their curriculum if it would result in improving standards.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN BEFORE DEBATE
[Withdrawn]
Clause 66, page 124, line 22, leave out “(3)” and insert “(3A)”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated - Life peer)This amendment was AGREED
Schedule 1, page 126, line 2, after “board” insert “established under section 14Z25 of the National Health Service Act 2006”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment clarifies the entry in Schedule 1 relating to integrated care boards.
This amendment was AGREED
Schedule 1, page 126, line 3, after “trust” insert “within the meaning given by section 30 of the National Health Service Act 2006”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment clarifies the entry in Schedule 1 relating to NHS foundation trusts.
This amendment was AGREED
Schedule 1, page 126, line 4, after “trust” insert “established under section 25 of the National Health Service Act 2006”
Type: Government
Signatures: 1
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment ensures that the reference in Schedule 1 to an NHS trust is a reference to an NHS trust in England.
This amendment was NOT MOVED
Schedule 1, page 126, line 6, at end insert—
“15 Jobcentre Plus.”
Type: Opposition
Signatures: 2
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con - Life peer)Member's explanatory statement
This amendment seeks to add Jobcentre Plus to the list of relevant authorities.
This amendment was WITHDRAWN
In subsection (6), at end insert “, including the establishment of an Earned Autonomy funding scheme.”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)This amendment was NOT MOVED
In subsection (7), after the definition “children and parents”, insert—
““Earned Autonomy” means that local authorities can obtain exemption from any centrally determined funding specifications for family support services;”
Type: Backbencher
Signatures: 1
Lord Farmer (Con - Life peer)