introduce a minimum period of 56 days after an asylum claim is determined before an asylum claim is considered to be determined for the purposes of ending asylum support; to make provision about the serving of documentation relevant to the ending of asylum support following an asylum determination; and connected purposes.
The Asylum Support (Prescribed Period) Bill [HL] is a Lords Private Members' Bill tabled by Baroness Lister of Burtersett.
Is this Bill currently before Parliament?Yes. This Bill was introduced on 06 September 2024 and is currently before Parliament.
Whose idea is this Bill?As a Private Members' Bill, this Bill represents the individual initiative of an Member of the House of Lords (Baroness Lister of Burtersett), not the Government.
What type of Bill is this?Lords Private Members' Bills can be tabled by any member, at any time during the Session. A number of Lords may win ballot slots to receive precedence in the Lords.
So is this going to become a law?Lords PMBs are extremely unlikely to become law. Unless the Bill receives unanimous support from MPs and can pass 2nd Reading in the Commons without debate, it will not proceed further in the Bill process.
Would you like to know more?See these Glossary articles for more information: Private Members Bill, Process of a Bill
Official Bill Page Initial Briefing papers Ministerial Extracts from Debates All Bill Debates
Next Event: There is no future stage currently scheduled for this bill
Last Event: Friday 13th June 2025 - Committee stage: Minutes of Proceedings (Lords)
Bill Progession through Parliament
Lord Jamieson (Con) - Opposition Whip (Lords)
<i>The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 1 stand part of the Bill.</i>
<p>This seeks to prevent the introduction of a minimum 56-day period in which asylum support must be maintained.</p>
Lord Jamieson (Con) - Opposition Whip (Lords)
<i>The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 3 stand part of the Bill.</i>
<p>Alongside the opposition to Clause 1 standing part, this seeks to prevent the introduction of a minimum 56 day period in which asylum support must be maintained.</p>
2
Lord Jamieson (Con) - Opposition Whip (Lords)Clause 4, page 2, line 10, leave out subsections (2) and (3)
<p>This amendment seeks to prevent the provisions set out in this Bill from coming into force.</p>
1
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab)After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—<br> <b>“Issuing of biometric residence document</b><br> (1) Section 94 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (Interpretation of Part VI) is amended as follows.<br> (2) At the end of subsection (3), insert “, subject to subsection (3A)”.<br> (3) After subsection (3) insert—<br> “(3A) Where—<br> (a) the Secretary of State notifies the claimant that his decision is to accept the asylum claim,<br> (b) the Secretary of State notifies the claimant that his decision is to reject the asylum claim but at the same time notifies the claimant that he is giving the claimant limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom, or<br> (c) an appeal by the claimant against the Secretary of State’s decision has been disposed of by being allowed,<br> <span class="wrapped">then the period prescribed under subsection (3) may not begin until the claimant has access to a relevant biometric immigration document.</span><br> (3B) for the purposes of subsection (3A), a relevant biometric immigration document is a document that—<br> (a) records biometric information (as defined in section 15(1A) of the UK Borders Act 2007); and<br> (b) is evidence of leave to remain in the United Kingdom.””
<p>This new clause would require a newly recognised refugee to have access to a biometric residence document that can be used as proof of immigration status and identity before the start of the prescribed period between a refugee being granted refugee status and the ending of their eligibility for accommodation and financial support provided by the Home Office.</p>
3
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab)Clause 4, page 2, line 10, at end insert—<br> “(2A) Section 1 comes into force on such a day as the Secretary of State appoints by regulation.<br> (2B) The day appointed under subsection (2A) may not be before the completion of any trial period during which section 1(2) would have had effect.<br> (2C) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (2A) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
<p>This amendment would enable the Secretary of State to determine when the extension of the prescribed period from 28 to 56 days as set out in clause 1 would come into force. It would require any trial of the extension, such as the one currently underway, to be completed prior to commencement of clause 1.</p>
4
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab)Clause 4, page 2, line 11, leave out “1,”
<p>This amendment is consequential on the amendment above.</p>