Courts: West Midlands

(asked on 13th April 2026) - View Source

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many crown courts and magistrates’ courts there are in each of the boroughs in West Midlands County; and what is the case backlog in each of those courts.


Answered by
Baroness Levitt Portrait
Baroness Levitt
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)
This question was answered on 27th April 2026

Table 1 - Crown Court open cases in West Midlands by court (December 2025)

Court

Open cases

Birmingham

2,525

Wolverhampton

1,711

West Midlands LCJB

4,236

Table 2 - Magistrates’ courts open cases in West Midlands by court (December 2025)

Court

Open cases

Birmingham

10,063

Coventry

1,845

Dudley

1,262

Sandwell*

22

Solihull*

80

Sutton Coldfield*

4

Walsall

1,591

West Bromwich*

8

Wolverhampton

1,433

West Midlands LCJB

16,308

notes

1) Open cases are those without a final result record. At the Crown Court this excludes cases where one or more defendants is absent and have a live bench warrant.
2) Court location relates to where a case was first received.

3) * signifies magistrates’ courts which have permanently closed. Open cases for these courts will have been transferred to other courts but workload will continue to be reported under the initial location.

The Crown Court backlog currently stands at over 80,000 cases and, without decisive action, would rise to 100,000 by 2028. Behind each of those cases is someone awaiting justice – defendants seeking to clear their name and victims putting their lives on hold. The record and rising Crown Court caseload means that thousands of victims and witnesses are waiting years for their day in court. Justice delayed is justice denied and the status quo is unacceptable.

That is why we asked Sir Brian Leveson, one of our most distinguished judges, to conduct an independent review of the criminal justice system and make recommendations for the modernisation of the system and ways to tackle the backlog. His expert panel gathered evidence over many months. They concluded that reform is essential alongside additional investment in sitting days and the workforce, and a programme of efficiencies. Part 1 of the Review set out a blueprint for pragmatic structural reform in our criminal courts and made clear that action across all aspects of the criminal justice process is needed. Reform, investment and modernisation are all necessary to ensure that our courts deliver justice effectively and efficiently.

The Government has already invested significantly in the system – in record sitting days (increasing judicial capacity), court buildings and technology, and in legal professionals with significant investment in legal aid. However, these investments in growing the workforce, whilst vital, will take years to take effect.

The Government is committed to doing whatever is necessary to deliver swifter justice for victims. Only by pulling every lever we have – investment, efficiency and reform – can we turn the tide on the backlog and begin to deliver faster and fairer justice.

Reticulating Splines