Building Regulations and Fire Safety Independent Review
(asked on 4th June 2019) - View Source
Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to his Department's Building Safety Programme: Monthly Data Release published on 30 April 2019, if he will publish local authority data in the format of Table 3 in that document, for (a) all social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, (b) social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, (c) all private sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, and (d) all private sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated.
Tables A and B set out local authority areas with high-rise social sector residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations identified, and those yet to be remediated, respectively. These areas are grouped into bands. The bands used are: one to five buildings, six to ten buildings, 11 to 20 buildings, and over 20 buildings.
As at 30 April, there are 37 local authorities in England where such social sector buildings were identified, of which 31 local authorities have at least one such building yet to be remediated within their boundaries.
We exclude local authorities with fewer than ten high-rise social sector buildings (regardless of whether they have cladding) from the tables below, as their inclusion could lead to the identification of one or more buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations in these areas – hence we only list 32 local authorities in Table A and 26 in Table B.
Table A: Number of social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, by local authority England, 30 April 2019 | ||
(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Barking and Dagenham | Havering | Reading |
Barnet | Hillingdon | Sandwell |
Calderdale | Hounslow | Sefton |
Cambridge | Islington | Sheffield |
Camden | Lambeth | Stockton-on-Tees |
Croydon | Lewisham | Sunderland |
Doncaster | Newham | Wandsworth |
Hackney | Plymouth |
|
Hammersmith and Fulham | Portsmouth |
|
(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Brent | Haringey | Southwark |
Westminster |
|
|
(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Manchester | Tower Hamlets |
|
(d) Local authorities with over 20 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Salford |
|
|
Table B: Number of social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, by local authority England, 30 April 2019 | ||
(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Barking and Dagenham | Hillingdon | Portsmouth |
Barnet | Islington | Reading |
Cambridge | Lambeth | Sefton |
Camden | Lewisham | Sheffield |
Croydon | Manchester | Southwark |
Hackney | Newham | Stockton-on-Tees |
Hammersmith and Fulham | Plymouth | Wandsworth |
(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Brent | Haringey | Tower Hamlets |
Westminster |
|
|
(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Salford |
|
|
Tables C and D set out the information for private sector residential buildings. Please note that this does not include hotels or student accommodation.
As at 30 April, there are 40 local authorities in England where such private sector residential buildings were identified, of which 38 local authorities have at least one such building yet to be remediated within their boundaries.
We exclude local authorities with fewer than ten high-rise private sector residential buildings – hence only 35 local authorities are listed in Table C and 34 in Table D.
| ||
(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Barnet | Hammersmith and Fulham | Nottingham |
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | Harrow | Reading |
Bradford | Hounslow | Salford |
Brent | Islington | Sheffield |
Bristol | Kensington and Chelsea | Slough |
Bromley | Lambeth | Southwark |
Cambridge | Liverpool | Sutton |
Croydon | Medway | Waltham Forest |
Ealing | Merton |
|
Hackney | Norwich |
|
(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Leeds | Manchester | Newham |
(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Wandsworth | Westminster |
|
(d) Local authorities with over 20 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified | ||
Greenwich | Tower Hamlets |
|
Table D: Number of private sector residential buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, by local authority England, 30 April 2019 | ||
(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Barnet | Hammersmith and Fulham | Nottingham |
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | Harrow | Reading |
Bradford | Hounslow | Salford |
Brent | Islington | Sheffield |
Bristol | Kensington and Chelsea | Slough |
Bromley | Lambeth | Southwark |
Cambridge | Liverpool | Sutton |
Croydon | Medway |
|
Ealing | Merton |
|
Hackney | Norwich |
|
(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Leeds | Manchester | Newham |
(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Wandsworth | Westminster |
|
(d) Local authorities with over 20 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated | ||
Greenwich | Tower Hamlets |
|