High Speed 2 Railway Line: Chesham and Amersham

(asked on 14th January 2016) - View Source

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many applications for the High Speed 2 (a) need to sell scheme and (b) exceptional hardship scheme have been received from constituents in Chesham and Amersham constituency; how many of those applications have been completed with the property now in the ownership of the Government or HS2 Ltd; how many of those properties in the ownership of the Government or HS2 Ltd have been (i) sold, (ii) rented and (iii) remain vacant; for how many of those applications that have been accepted the price has not been agreed; how many of those applications are awaiting a decision on whether they will be accepted; how many of those applications have been rejected; and of those rejected how many times each such application has been rejected and for what reasons.


Answered by
Robert Goodwill Portrait
Robert Goodwill
This question was answered on 19th January 2016

The information requested is in the table below:

Chesham and Amersham constituency


(a) Need to Sell (NTS) scheme

(b) Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS)




Applications received

34

49

Applications accepted

17

12

Applications rejected

8

31

Applications withdrawn

1

6

Applications pending a final decision

8

0

offers made

12

12

offers accepted

10

9

offers declined/no longer active

0

3

Properties acquired

6

9


How many of those properties in the ownership of the Government or HS2 Ltd have been:

(i) sold

0

(ii) rented

10 (with 2 under offer)

(iii) remain vacant

3


(a) Need to Sell (NTS) scheme

(b) Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS)

Total number of unsuccessful applications (of which were reapplications)

8 (1)

31 (5)*

Unsuccessful for reasons including criterion 1 (Property Type)

1

1

Unsuccesful for reasons including criterion 2 (Location of property)

2

18

Unsuccesful for reasons including criterion 3 (Effort to Sell and impact of blight)

3

23

Unsuccesful for reasons including criterion 4 (No prior knowledge)

0

0

Unsuccesful for reasons including criterion 5 (NTS-Compelling reason to sell/EHS- Exceptional Hardship)

6

25

*of the five rejected reapplications none are from the same applicant.


Reticulating Splines