Government Departments: Public Expenditure

(asked on 25th March 2024) - View Source

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to his Department's report entitled Evaluation Task Force Output and Outcome Indicators (March 2024), published on 22 March 2024, how many and what proportion of Evaluation Accelerator Fund projects were rated (a) amber and (b) red as of 1 March 2024.


Answered by
John Glen Portrait
John Glen
This question was answered on 15th April 2024

The Evaluation Task Force (ETF) committed to publicly report on a series of output and outcome indicators in response to recommendations featured in the ‘Evaluating Government Spending’ NAO report in 2022 and the Public Accounts Committee’s recommendation for the ETF to establish quantifiable metrics on the scale and quality of evaluation across government. The indicators are not wholly controlled or ‘owned’ by the ETF. Driving progress towards the targets outlined in the ETF strategy are dependent on cross-government partners working together to build an improved evaluation ecosystem which creates more and higher quality evaluation in government.

All information related to the proportion of projects rated Red, Amber, Green across Evaluation Accelerator Fund and ETF priority projects are included in the Technical Annex published alongside the main output and outcome indicator report. This can be found at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-task-force-output-and-outcome-indicators-march-2024

For completeness, the table below outlines the number and proportion of projects that were rated Red, Amber, Green across both indicators related to this PQ. Please note these figures have been recently updated and are now included on the ETF website.

Project RAG ratings (number and proportion)

Indicator

GREEN

AMBER

RED

1.4 Proportion of Evaluation Accelerator Fund projects on track (RAG rated 'Green')

11 (58%)

6 (32%)

2 (10%)

1.6 Proportion of ETF priority projects with robust evaluation plans (cumulative)

13 (62%)

7 (33%)

1 (5%)

Reticulating Splines