Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of people who were not awarded the Personal Independence Payment following (a) the initial decision and (b) mandatory reconsideration (i) lodged an appeal which then lapsed in each of the last five years and (ii) were awarded at least one enhanced component in (A) Enfield North constituency, (B) Enfield and (C) Greater London in each of the last five years.
The tables below show the number and proportion of individuals awarded Personal Independence Payment (PIP), due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and a mandatory reconsideration decision to not award PIP by the financial year of the initial decision for the specified geographical breakdown. Volumes and proportions of this group receiving at least one enhanced component of PIP have also been provided.
Table 1: Parliamentary Constituency of Enfield North
Financial Year of Initial Decision | Number of individuals awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP | Proportion of those not awarded PIP following an initial decision and MR decision, that were awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal | Number of individuals awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP and receiving at least one enhanced component | Proportion of those awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP receiving at least one enhanced component |
2018/19 | 10 | 5% | 10 | 60% |
2019/20 | 30 | 17% | 20 | 58% |
2020/21 | 20 | 18% | 20 | 77% |
2021/22 | 10 | 6% | 10 | 50% |
2022/23* | 10 | 6% | - | - |
Table 2: London Borough of Enfield
Financial Year of Initial Decision | Number of individuals awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP | Proportion of those not awarded PIP following an initial decision and MR decision, that were awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal | Number of individuals awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP and receiving at least one enhanced component | Proportion of those awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP receiving at least one enhanced component |
2018/19 | 20 | 6% | 10 | 55% |
2019/20 | 50 | 13% | 30 | 58% |
2020/21 | 50 | 13% | 30 | 68% |
2021/22 | 30 | 8% | 10 | 36% |
2022/23* | 10 | 5% | 10 | 36% |
Table 3: Greater London
Financial Year of Initial Decision | Number of individuals awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP | Proportion of those not awarded PIP following an initial decision and MR decision, that were awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal | Number of individuals awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP and receiving at least one enhanced component | Proportion of those awarded PIP due to a lapsed appeal, following an initial decision and MR decision to not award PIP receiving at least one enhanced component |
2018/19 | 760 | 8% | 410 | 54% |
2019/20 | 980 | 11% | 530 | 54% |
2020/21 | 1,140 | 14% | 630 | 55% |
2021/22 | 960 | 9% | 470 | 49% |
2022/23* | 300 | 5% | 130 | 41% |
Please note: