Review how to turn the MHRA into a fully transparent, patient first regulator

We believe the MHRA should be independently reviewed. This should cover approval and surveillance processes, funding & accountability. It should consider how to ensure the transparency of decisions, prioritisation of patient safety, and how to ensure there aren’t conflict of interests.

966 Signatures

Status
Open
Opened
Friday 6th December 2024
Last 24 hours signatures
96
Signature Deadline
Friday 6th June 2025
Estimated Final Signatures: 3,968

Reticulating Splines

You may be interested in these active petitions

1. An independent evaluation of the Cass review on child gender services - 10,413 signatures
2. Review the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme - 2,230 signatures
3. Do not reduce the Right to Buy discount - 3,200 signatures
4. Update the dangerous dogs act to specifically protect horses - 3,227 signatures
5. Hold a Public Inquiry into the state pension age change for 1950s women - 6,183 signatures

A wide range of medicines & devices approved by MHRA have caused patient harm & it often takes too long for action to be taken.

We think an urgent review of the yellowcard system is required.

We consider that the MHRA focuses too much on clinical trials of new medicines, rather than safety of existing ones.

There is a 'revolving door' between industry & the regulator, several board members declare interests.

Some information sought through FOIs has not been provided due to commercial interests.


Petition Signatures over time

Constituency Data

Reticulating Splines