Information between 26th January 2026 - 15th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Valerie Vaz voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 107 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Valerie Vaz speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Valerie Vaz contributed 1 speech (34 words) Tuesday 27th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Free Schools: Walsall
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 6 January 2026 to Question 99790 on Free Schools, if she will make it her policy to undertake a new assessment against the (a) selection criteria and (b) geographical context on Swift Academy. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The criteria for the mainstream free schools pipeline review were set out in the Written Ministerial Statement laid on 22 October 2024. The department assessed the local need for school places, value for money and whether projects would provide a distinctive local offer or risk negatively impacting other local schools. The department has offered feedback to local authorities, trusts and MPs with a related pipeline free school project. We keep all pipeline projects under review to ensure that they meet a need for places and represent value for public money. This includes the use of annually published pupil place planning data, which informs ministerial decision‑making. In 2016, the previous government ran a central free school programme application wave, which was open to all trusts to submit proposals for new free schools. All applications received were assessed against the published selection criteria in the How To Apply Guidance. Local consultation is also undertaken prior to the opening of any new free school, enabling residents and other interested parties to provide their views on the proposal.
|
|
Free Schools
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 6 January 2026 to Question 99790 on Free Schools, which trusts her Department invited in 2016. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The criteria for the mainstream free schools pipeline review were set out in the Written Ministerial Statement laid on 22 October 2024. The department assessed the local need for school places, value for money and whether projects would provide a distinctive local offer or risk negatively impacting other local schools. The department has offered feedback to local authorities, trusts and MPs with a related pipeline free school project. We keep all pipeline projects under review to ensure that they meet a need for places and represent value for public money. This includes the use of annually published pupil place planning data, which informs ministerial decision‑making. In 2016, the previous government ran a central free school programme application wave, which was open to all trusts to submit proposals for new free schools. All applications received were assessed against the published selection criteria in the How To Apply Guidance. Local consultation is also undertaken prior to the opening of any new free school, enabling residents and other interested parties to provide their views on the proposal.
|
|
Free Schools: Walsall
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 6 January 2026 to Question 99790 on Free Schools, if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of the surplus of school places in Walsall and Bloxwich constituency on the decision whether to proceed with the Swift Academy. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The criteria for the mainstream free schools pipeline review were set out in the Written Ministerial Statement laid on 22 October 2024. The department assessed the local need for school places, value for money and whether projects would provide a distinctive local offer or risk negatively impacting other local schools. The department has offered feedback to local authorities, trusts and MPs with a related pipeline free school project. We keep all pipeline projects under review to ensure that they meet a need for places and represent value for public money. This includes the use of annually published pupil place planning data, which informs ministerial decision‑making. In 2016, the previous government ran a central free school programme application wave, which was open to all trusts to submit proposals for new free schools. All applications received were assessed against the published selection criteria in the How To Apply Guidance. Local consultation is also undertaken prior to the opening of any new free school, enabling residents and other interested parties to provide their views on the proposal.
|
|
Free Schools: Walsall
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 6 January 2026 to Question 99790 on Free Schools, what steps her Department is taking to assess the (a) need for places and (b) value for money of the Swift Academy; and if she will publish that assessment. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The criteria for the mainstream free schools pipeline review were set out in the Written Ministerial Statement laid on 22 October 2024. The department assessed the local need for school places, value for money and whether projects would provide a distinctive local offer or risk negatively impacting other local schools. The department has offered feedback to local authorities, trusts and MPs with a related pipeline free school project. We keep all pipeline projects under review to ensure that they meet a need for places and represent value for public money. This includes the use of annually published pupil place planning data, which informs ministerial decision‑making. In 2016, the previous government ran a central free school programme application wave, which was open to all trusts to submit proposals for new free schools. All applications received were assessed against the published selection criteria in the How To Apply Guidance. Local consultation is also undertaken prior to the opening of any new free school, enabling residents and other interested parties to provide their views on the proposal.
|
|
Free Schools
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 6 January 2026 to Question 99790 on Free Schools, if she will publish the criteria used to determine which free schools should be proceeded with. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The criteria for the mainstream free schools pipeline review were set out in the Written Ministerial Statement laid on 22 October 2024. The department assessed the local need for school places, value for money and whether projects would provide a distinctive local offer or risk negatively impacting other local schools. The department has offered feedback to local authorities, trusts and MPs with a related pipeline free school project. We keep all pipeline projects under review to ensure that they meet a need for places and represent value for public money. This includes the use of annually published pupil place planning data, which informs ministerial decision‑making. In 2016, the previous government ran a central free school programme application wave, which was open to all trusts to submit proposals for new free schools. All applications received were assessed against the published selection criteria in the How To Apply Guidance. Local consultation is also undertaken prior to the opening of any new free school, enabling residents and other interested parties to provide their views on the proposal.
|
|
Bookshops: Business Rates
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has assessed the potential impact of the proposed changes to business rates on small independent bookshops. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) At the Budget, the VOA announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation. This revaluation is the first since the pandemic, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties as they recover from the pandemic. To respond to those who are seeing large increases, Government has already acted to limit increases in bills, announcing a support package worth £4.3 billion package at the Budget.
The Government is also introducing new permanently lower tax rates for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties. These new tax rates are worth nearly £1 billion per year and will benefit over 750,000 properties.
The Government published information on the effects of the changes to business rates made at Budget 2025 here: Effects of the business rates retail, hospitality and leisure multipliers and high-value multiplier - GOV.UK
|
|
Free Schools: Walsall
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 6 January 2026 to Question 99790 on Free Schools, how much funding her Department has provided to Swift Academy in each financial year since 2016-17. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The department provides and retains responsibility for capital funding for the acquisition of sites/land and construction of free schools. A site has not yet been acquired for this project. When a site is secured, details and costs of the acquisition will be set out on the Land Registry website. We also publish details and costs for all free school construction contracts on Contracts Finder. The department also provides revenue funding (via project development grants) directly to proposers to cover essential non-capital costs prior to each school opening. A one-off project development grant of £30,000 was paid to the trust in July 2017 following the approval of the project. |
|
Oak National Academy: Finance
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when she plans to outline funding arrangements for the Oak National Academy in 2026-2029. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The department is providing grant-in-aid of up to a maximum of £17.412 million for Oak National Academy (Oak) for financial year 2025/26. The level of funding for Oak for financial years 2026/27 to 2027/28, as with other programmes, will be confirmed through the department’s business planning process. Funding from 2028/29 onward will be subject to the 2027 Spending Review. |
|
Oak National Academy: Finance
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what the funding for the Oak Academy is in the 2025-2026 financial year. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The department is providing grant-in-aid of up to a maximum of £17.412 million for Oak National Academy (Oak) for financial year 2025/26. The level of funding for Oak for financial years 2026/27 to 2027/28, as with other programmes, will be confirmed through the department’s business planning process. Funding from 2028/29 onward will be subject to the 2027 Spending Review. |
|
Retail Trade: Business Rates
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed changes to the retail business rates multiplier on the non-domestic rating valuation of different retail property types. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government is introducing new permanently lower tax rates for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties. These new tax rates are worth nearly £1 billion per year, and will benefit over 750,000 properties.
We are paying for this through higher rates on the top one per cent of most expensive properties. This includes many large distribution warehouses, such as those used by online giants. The high value multiplier is 33% more than the multiplier for small RHL properties. |
|
Asylum: Overseas Students
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many students have claimed asylum (a) while studying in the UK and (b) after completing their studies in each of the last three years. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office publishes data on asylum in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on the number of people claiming asylum after holding a study visa as their most recent category of leave prior to claiming asylum is published in table Asy_D01a of the ‘Asylum claims and decisions detailed datasets’. The latest data relates to the year ending September 2025. Information on how to use the datasets can be found in the ‘Notes’ page of the workbook. There is no published breakdown available on whether an individual claimed asylum before or after their visa expired. |
|
Visas: Digital Technology
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many complaints she has received on the new electronic visa system. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The Home Office has received 1888 complaints about the electronic visa system from 1 July 2024 when it first categorised this issue to 31 January 2026. This comprises 1785 Stage 1 and 103 Stage 2 complaints. |
|
Visas: South Asia
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many visitors from (a) India, (b) Pakistan, (c) Bangladesh and (d) Nepal were refused visas in 2024. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The Home Office publishes data on entry clearance visas by visa route, including Visitor visas, and nationality in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on visa applications refused are published in table ‘Vis_D02’ of the detailed entry clearance visas dataset. Information on how to use the dataset can be found in the ‘Notes’ page of the workbook. The latest data is from January 2005 up to the end of September 2025. Information on future Home Office statistical release dates can be found in the ‘Research and statistics calendar’. |
|
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office: Yemen
Asked by: Valerie Vaz (Labour - Walsall and Bloxwich) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, if she will make a statement on the recent ministerial visit to Yemen. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) I updated the House on my visit to Yemen in November in my oral statement on 5 January, and my responses to oral questions on 20 January. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th February Valerie Vaz signed this EDM on Monday 23rd February 2026 British couple detained in Iran 64 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) That this House expresses deep concern regarding the ongoing detention of two British citizens, Craig and Lindsay Foreman, who have now been held in Iran for over a year without formal charges or sentencing; notes with dismay the escalating violence reported at Evin Prison and the significant risk this poses … |
|
Tuesday 6th January Valerie Vaz signed this EDM on Tuesday 3rd February 2026 Marking the 60th anniversary of the University of the Air White Paper 38 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Richard Baker (Labour - Glenrothes and Mid Fife) That this House marks the 60 years since the publication of the White Paper, “University of the Air”, which paved the way for the creation of The Open University; celebrates the legacy of Jennie Lee, Baroness Lee of Asheridge, who was the driving force behind the paper; recognises the impact … |
|
Thursday 18th December Valerie Vaz signed this EDM on Tuesday 3rd February 2026 UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons 100 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat - Torbay) That this House supports the protection of the rights of older people in the UK and globally; recognises that a UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons is an important step for establishing a global minimum standard of legal protection for older people everywhere; acknowledges the strong track record … |
|
Monday 1st September Valerie Vaz signed this EDM on Tuesday 3rd February 2026 Support for early years and the National Literacy Trust 24 signatures (Most recent: 3 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour - Poole) That this House recognises the urgent need to address falling levels of early language in the UK, as highlighted by the National Literacy Trust; notes with concern that in 2024 187,542 five-year-olds started school without the communication and language skills they need to thrive; further notes the steep decline in … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
27 Jan 2026, 11:54 a.m. - House of Commons "package that we have. >> Valerie Vaz here's another one. What assessment has the Minister " Dan Tomlinson MP, The Exchequer Secretary (Chipping Barnet, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Walsall Leather Museum
0 speeches (None words) Wednesday 11th February 2026 - Petitions Mentions: 1: None —[Presented by Valerie Vaz, Official Report, 18 December 2025; Vol. 777, c. 1174.] - Link to Speech |
|
Draft Energy-Intensive Industry Electricity Support Payments and Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2026
16 speeches (3,542 words) Wednesday 4th February 2026 - General Committees Department for Business and Trade |