Information between 5th May 2025 - 25th May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 363 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 294 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 287 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 295 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 95 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 402 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 318 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 404 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 315 |
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 102 |
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 402 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 98 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 168 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 68 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 98 |
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 200 Labour No votes vs 129 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 279 |
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 206 Labour Aye votes vs 127 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 239 |
21 May 2025 - Immigration - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 242 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 267 |
21 May 2025 - Business and the Economy - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 253 |
22 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Tulip Siddiq voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 124 |
Speeches |
---|
Tulip Siddiq speeches from: EU-UK Summit
Tulip Siddiq contributed 3 speeches (148 words) Thursday 22nd May 2025 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office |
Tulip Siddiq speeches from: UK-EU Summit
Tulip Siddiq contributed 1 speech (105 words) Tuesday 20th May 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Tulip Siddiq speeches from: Flooding: Planning and Developer Responsibilities
Tulip Siddiq contributed 1 speech (179 words) Tuesday 13th May 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
Tulip Siddiq speeches from: Immigration System
Tulip Siddiq contributed 1 speech (97 words) Monday 12th May 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
Tulip Siddiq speeches from: Defence Sector Financing
Tulip Siddiq contributed 1 speech (132 words) Wednesday 7th May 2025 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury |
Written Answers |
---|
Cohabitation: Succession
Asked by: Tulip Siddiq (Labour - Hampstead and Highgate) Wednesday 7th May 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps her Department is taking to help improve the inheritance rights of unmarried couples in cases were the couple where cohabiters for an extended period. Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) The current law allows people to make a will to set out their wishes on who should inherit their assets after their death, including cohabitees. At present, unmarried cohabiting partners have no automatic inheritance rights under the current intestacy rules (which apply if an individual dies without a valid will). However, cohabitees may apply for family provision claims from the estate of the deceased if they cohabited with the deceased for a continuous period of at least two years, ending immediately before the death of the deceased. The Government shares concerns about these limited existing protections for cohabiting couples. It is particularly concerning that the weakness of these protections disproportionately affects the vulnerable, including survivors of domestic and economic abuse, and women, who are often the more financially vulnerable party in a relationship. For these reasons, the Government made a 2024 manifesto commitment to “strengthen the rights and protections available to women in cohabiting couples”. The Government is working to deliver this manifesto commitment and plans to issue a formal consultation as a next step later this year to build public consensus on what cohabitation reform should look like. |
Patients: Protection
Asked by: Tulip Siddiq (Labour - Hampstead and Highgate) Wednesday 21st May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of abolishing NHS England on the NHS’s statutory duty to safeguarding. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) It is only right that with such significant reform, we commit to carefully assessing and understanding the potential impacts. Evidence from these ongoing assessments will inform our programme as appropriate. NHS England will continue to carry out its statutory duties until Parliamentary time allows for legislation to be brought forward to amend the Department’s responsibilities. We will ensure our decisions are guided by evidence, and above all, focused on improving outcomes for people. |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Tuesday 6th May Tulip Siddiq signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 6th May 2025 Legal protection of the nurse job title 36 signatures (Most recent: 6 Jun 2025)Tabled by: Dawn Butler (Labour - Brent East) That this House notes with concern that the job title of nurse is not currently a legally protected term, despite the high levels of public trust placed in the profession; further notes that, while the title of registered nurse is protected, the widespread and unregulated use of the term nurse … |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Flooding: Planning and Developer Responsibilities
61 speeches (10,543 words) Tuesday 13th May 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Mentions: 1: Matt Rodda (Lab - Reading Central) Friend the Member for Hampstead and Highgate (Tulip Siddiq), who mentioned that issue.Residents face - Link to Speech 2: Emma Hardy (Lab - Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice) Friend the Member for Hampstead and Highgate (Tulip Siddiq) for raising the issue of surface water flooding - Link to Speech |
Defence Sector Financing
23 speeches (4,340 words) Wednesday 7th May 2025 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Emma Reynolds (Lab - Wycombe) Friends the Members for Stockton North (Chris McDonald) and for Hampstead and Highgate (Tulip Siddiq) - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Friday 16th May 2025
Written Evidence - Cambridge University RES0077 - The UK-EU reset The UK-EU reset - European Affairs Committee Found: through “a closer economic relationship between the UK and the EU”.1 The former City minister, Tulip Siddiq |