Tony Vaughan Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Tony Vaughan

Information between 27th June 2025 - 7th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
30 Jun 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 4
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 42 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 328
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 49 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168
2 Jul 2025 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 9 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 385 Noes - 26
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158
2 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79
2 Jul 2025 - Prisons - View Vote Context
Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168


Speeches
Tony Vaughan speeches from: West Bank: Forced Displacement
Tony Vaughan contributed 1 speech (482 words)
Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Westminster Hall
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Tony Vaughan speeches from: Welfare Reform
Tony Vaughan contributed 1 speech (46 words)
Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions


Written Answers
Stalking
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe)
Tuesday 1st July 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department plans to implement stalking protection notices that would be issued by police officers pending a full application to court.

Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

Stalking Protection Orders (SPOs) are civil orders which can be imposed on anyone who has carried out acts associated with stalking and who poses a risk. They are available to the police on application to the court and can impose restrictions considered necessary. The police may also apply for an interim SPO, for example, if there is an immediate risk of harm but further investigation is required to meet the criteria for a full SPO, or when the court is unable to provide the full order in time.

We are legislating through the Crime and Policing Bill to enable the courts to impose SPOs on conviction and acquittal of their own volition.

Housing: Sales
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe)
Friday 4th July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the equitability of service charge terms in TP1 documents for use by freeholders when purchasing properties from developers.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

My Department has not conducted a specific assessment about the equitability of service charge terms in TP1 documents for use by freeholders when purhcasing properties from developers.

The level of charges that residential freeholders pay will vary based on several factors, including the types of facilities or services that estate managers need to maintain, and the number of properties required to contribute.

The government remain committed to protecting residential freeholders on private and mixed-tenure housing estates from unfair charges.

We will consult this year on implementing the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act’s new consumer protection provisions for the up to 1.75m homes that are subject to these charges, and bring these measures into force as quickly as possible thereafter. These include ensuring that homeowners who pay an estate management charge have better access to information they need to understand what they are paying for, the right to challenge the reasonableness at the First-tier Tribunal (in England), and to go to the tribunal to appoint a substitute manager.

The government is also determined to end the injustice of 'fleecehold' entirely and we will consult this year on legislative and policy options to reduce the prevalence of private estate management arrangements, which are the root cause of the problems experienced by many residential freeholders.



MP Financial Interests
30th June 2025
Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe)
1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment received on 12 June 2025 - £11,925.00
Source
30th June 2025
Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe)
4. Visits outside the UK
International visit to France on 12 June 2025
Source


Early Day Motions Signed
Wednesday 9th July
Tony Vaughan signed this EDM on Monday 14th July 2025

Government policy on the Hillsborough Law

61 signatures (Most recent: 16 Jul 2025)
Tabled by: Ian Byrne (Labour - Liverpool West Derby)
That this House notes the Prime Minister’s promise to introduce the Hillsborough Law to Parliament before the 36th anniversary of the disaster on 15 April 2025; deeply regrets that this commitment was not met and that the Government has yet to table the legislation; expresses grave concern at reports that …



Tony Vaughan mentioned

Bill Documents
Jun. 18 2025
All proceedings up to 18 June 2025 at Report Stage
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26
Bill proceedings: Commons

Found: Sarah Green Martin Wrigley Jen Craft James Asser Daniel Francis Rachel Blake Perran Moon Tony Vaughan

Jun. 17 2025
Report Stage Proceedings as at 17 June 2025
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26
Bill proceedings: Commons

Found: Sarah Green Martin Wrigley Jen Craft James Asser Daniel Francis Rachel Blake Perran Moon Tony Vaughan