Information between 19th March 2026 - 18th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 273 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 161 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 167 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 149 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 158 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Defence - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 306 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Oil and Gas - View Vote Context Tony Vaughan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 297 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Tony Vaughan speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Tony Vaughan contributed 1 speech (62 words) Monday 23rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: Finance
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps are being taken to provide funding to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Funding for the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) is being provided through the Government’s Spending Review (SR) settlement, confirmed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in June 2025, which allocated £13.9 billion of capital funding for the period 2025 to 2030.
The SR settlement is the largest ever capital investment in nuclear decommissioning and demonstrates the government’s commitment to keeping the UK’s former nuclear sites and facilities safe.
This funding enables NDA to continue to perform its core mission of keeping former nuclear sites safe and secure while progressing decommissioning and nuclear waste management. |
|
Refugees
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to help support refugee integration. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Refugees can already access the labour market, benefits, employment support and funded English language support. After the introduction of our asylum reforms, we will create new work and study routes for those who are receiving protection, which will provide a faster path to lifetime settlement. And we will introduce new safe and legal routes – again, with a faster path to settlement – as we move away from unsafe and illegal routes into this country |
|
Electoral Systems
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of alternative electoral systems to the single member district system used to elect MPs. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government has no plans to change the electoral system for UK Parliamentary elections. |
|
Fly-tipping: Rural Areas
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she is taking to reduce fly tipping in rural areas. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Local councils are responsible for keeping their public land clear of fly-tipped waste, including public rural areas. Local councils have powers to take enforcement action against offenders. Anyone caught fly-tipping may be prosecuted which can lead to a significant fine, a community sentence or even imprisonment. Instead of prosecuting, local councils can choose to issue a fixed penalty notice (on-the-spot fine) of up to £1,000 to fly-tippers. Councils also have powers to seize and search vehicles of suspected fly-tippers.
We encourage and support councils to make good use of their enforcement powers. For example, we have recently published best practice guidance and case studies on the website of the National Fly-Tipping Prevention Group, which will support councils to make better use of their power to seize vehicles of suspected fly-tippers.
We are seeking powers in the Crime and Policing Bill to provide statutory fly-tipping enforcement guidance to support councils to consistently, appropriately and effectively exercise these existing powers.
Defra chairs the National Fly-Tipping Prevention Group through which we work with a wide range of stakeholders to share good practice on preventing fly-tipping.
We committed in our manifesto to force fly-tippers and vandals to clean up their mess. Defra will consult on giving local councils the powers to issue fly-tippers with conditional cautions, one of a range of pre-court community-based sanctions. These cautions could see offenders complete up to 20 hours of unpaid work, cleaning our streets or parks, and pay back the cost of cleaning up the waste that they have dumped on public land. If an offender admits to the crime, agrees to the caution and complies with the conditions, they will not face prosecution.
We are looking at measures to award penalty points on driving licences for those found guilty of fly-tipping, which could lead to them losing their licences altogether. This would make it harder for offenders to continue dumping illegally if they are disqualified from driving and send a clear warning that fly-tipping is not tolerated.
In addition to that, we recently published the Waste Crime Action Plan which sets out how we will tackle waste crime through prevention, enforcement, and accelerating the clean-up effort. More information can be found on: Waste Crime Action Plan - GOV.UK. |
|
Hospitality Industry: Business Rates
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps she is taking to financially support hospitality businesses that are dealing with the loss of business rates relief and an increase in their rateable value at the same time. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) At the Budget, the Valuation Office announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation, which came into effect on 1 April. This revaluation is the first since the pandemic, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties as they recover from the pandemic.
In recognition of the impact of the revaluation on bills, the Government has introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion, to protect against ratepayers seeing large overnight increases in bills. This includes an expanded Supporting Small Business scheme, which caps the bill increases of ratepayers who previously received retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) relief.
The Government has also introduced new permanently lower multipliers for eligible RHL properties. These new multipliers are worth nearly £1 billion per year and benefit over 750,000 properties.
Unlike RHL relief, the new multipliers are permanent, giving businesses certainty and stability, and there is no cap, meaning all qualifying properties on high streets across England benefit. The RHL multipliers are set 5 pence below their national equivalents. As they are funded by a high-value multiplier on the top one per cent of properties, making them even lower would have led to a higher multiplier for high-value properties, including high-value RHL properties and those used by Industrial Strategy sectors.
As a result of these measures, most properties seeing increases have them capped at 15 per cent or less in 2026/27, or £800 for the smallest.
|
|
Hospitality Industry: Business Rates
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has made an assessment of the merits of increasing the Business Rates discount to twenty percent for hospitality venues. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) At the Budget, the Valuation Office announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation, which came into effect on 1 April. This revaluation is the first since the pandemic, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties as they recover from the pandemic.
In recognition of the impact of the revaluation on bills, the Government has introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion, to protect against ratepayers seeing large overnight increases in bills. This includes an expanded Supporting Small Business scheme, which caps the bill increases of ratepayers who previously received retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) relief.
The Government has also introduced new permanently lower multipliers for eligible RHL properties. These new multipliers are worth nearly £1 billion per year and benefit over 750,000 properties.
Unlike RHL relief, the new multipliers are permanent, giving businesses certainty and stability, and there is no cap, meaning all qualifying properties on high streets across England benefit. The RHL multipliers are set 5 pence below their national equivalents. As they are funded by a high-value multiplier on the top one per cent of properties, making them even lower would have led to a higher multiplier for high-value properties, including high-value RHL properties and those used by Industrial Strategy sectors.
As a result of these measures, most properties seeing increases have them capped at 15 per cent or less in 2026/27, or £800 for the smallest.
|
|
Hospitality Industry: Business Rates
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has made an assessment of the merits of delaying the Business Rates revaluation for hospitality businesses. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) At the Budget, the Valuation Office announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation, which came into effect on 1 April. This revaluation is the first since the pandemic, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties as they recover from the pandemic.
In recognition of the impact of the revaluation on bills, the Government has introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion, to protect against ratepayers seeing large overnight increases in bills. This includes an expanded Supporting Small Business scheme, which caps the bill increases of ratepayers who previously received retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) relief.
The Government has also introduced new permanently lower multipliers for eligible RHL properties. These new multipliers are worth nearly £1 billion per year and benefit over 750,000 properties.
Unlike RHL relief, the new multipliers are permanent, giving businesses certainty and stability, and there is no cap, meaning all qualifying properties on high streets across England benefit. The RHL multipliers are set 5 pence below their national equivalents. As they are funded by a high-value multiplier on the top one per cent of properties, making them even lower would have led to a higher multiplier for high-value properties, including high-value RHL properties and those used by Industrial Strategy sectors.
As a result of these measures, most properties seeing increases have them capped at 15 per cent or less in 2026/27, or £800 for the smallest.
|
|
Special Educational Needs
Asked by: Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) Thursday 16th April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how Specialist Resource Provisions fit within new school bases proposed in SEND reforms. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) As part of our reforms, to clarify and simplify terminology, we will collectively describe provision such as special educational needs (SEN) units, resourced provision and pupil support units as inclusion bases, underpinned by two models:
There are many examples of inclusion bases in mainstream settings that offer high quality teaching, bespoke learning environments and flexible access to specialist education or health support, helping children thrive academically, socially, and emotionally. These will continue to play an important role. As a core component of our £3.7 billion high needs capital settlement we will invest in a transformational expansion of inclusion bases, so they become a core part of every local education offer. They will deliver high quality teaching and support to more children who benefit from provision that bridges the gap between mainstream and specialist.
|
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
13th April 2026
Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) 2. Donations and other support (including loans) for activities as an MP The Refugee, Asylum and Migration Policy Project (RAMP) - £9,945.00 Source |
|
13th April 2026
Tony Vaughan (Labour - Folkestone and Hythe) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 26 March 2026 - £1,486.04 Source |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 13th April Tony Vaughan signed this EDM on Monday 20th April 2026 100th anniversary of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 101 signatures (Most recent: 21 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme) That this House notes, with affection and respect, the 100th anniversary, on 21 April 2026 of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; reflects on the sense of loss that people throughout the United Kingdom, the realms, territories and Commonwealth still feel following Her late Majesty’s death on … |
|
Thursday 5th March Tony Vaughan signed this EDM on Tuesday 14th April 2026 Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (No. 2) 54 signatures (Most recent: 27 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Stella Creasy (Labour (Co-op) - Walthamstow) That the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, HC 1691, a copy of which was laid before this House on 5 March, be disapproved. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 27th March 2026
Report - 9th Report - Appointment of Monisha Shah as Chair of the Legal Services Board Justice Committee Found: Conservative; Solihull West and Shirley) Vikki Slade (Liberal Democrat; Mid Dorset and North Poole) Tony Vaughan |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026
Oral Evidence - The Legal Services Board (LSB) Justice Committee Found: Members present: Andy Slaughter (Chair); Pam Cox; Warinder Juss; Tessa Munt; Dr Neil Shastri-Hurst; Tony Vaughan |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026
Oral Evidence - HM Inspectorate of Probation Rehabilitation and resettlement: ending the cycle of reoffending - Justice Committee Found: Slaughter (Chair); Linsey Farnsworth; Sir Ashley Fox; Warinder Juss; Tessa Munt; Mrs Sarah Russell; Tony Vaughan |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026
Oral Evidence - HM Prison and Probation Service, HM Prison and Probation Service, and HM Prison and Probation Service Rehabilitation and resettlement: ending the cycle of reoffending - Justice Committee Found: Slaughter (Chair); Linsey Farnsworth; Sir Ashley Fox; Warinder Juss; Tessa Munt; Mrs Sarah Russell; Tony Vaughan |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026
Oral Evidence - The Law Society of England and Wales, Garden Court Chambers, and Crown Prosecution Service Legislative scrutiny: Courts and Tribunals Bill - Justice Committee Found: Bishop; Pam Cox; Warinder Juss; Tessa Munt; Sarah Russell; Dr Neil Shastri-Hurst; Vikki Slade; Tony Vaughan |
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Office for Legal Complaints Justice Committee Found: Members present: Andy Slaughter (Chair); Linsey Farnsworth; Warinder Juss; Tessa Munt; Vikki Slade; Tony Vaughan |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 2 p.m. Justice Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to Justice At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Richard Orpin - Chief Executive Officer at The Legal Services Board (LSB) Dr Monisha Shah - Incoming Chair at The Legal Services Board (LSB) At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Sarah Rapson - Chief Executive Officer at Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Anna Bradley - Board Chair at Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Aileen Armstrong - Executive Director (Strategy, Innovation and External Affairs) at Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 2 p.m. Justice Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Children and Young Adults in the Secure Estate At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Mark Scott - Governor of HMYOI Wetherby at HM Prison and Probation Service Phil Wragg - Director of Oakhill Secure Training Centre at G4S Rachel Ashurst - Service Manager, Barton Moss Secure Children's Home at Secure Children's Homes View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 2 p.m. Justice Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Ministry of Justice At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Dr Jo Farrar CB OBE - Permanent Secretary at Ministry of Justice Nick Goodwin - Chief Executive and Director General at HM Courts and Tribunals Service Adrian Hannell - Director of Financial Management, Control, Risk & Governance at Ministry of Justice James McEwen - Chief Executive and Director General at HM Prison and Probation Service View calendar - Add to calendar |