All 2 Debates between Tom Tugendhat and Chloe Smith

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Tom Tugendhat and Chloe Smith
Wednesday 12th September 2018

(6 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat (Tonbridge and Malling) (Con)
- Hansard - -

10. Whether he has made an assessment of the operation of recent voter ID pilots; and if he will make a statement.

Chloe Smith Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Chloe Smith)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Cabinet Office and the independent Electoral Commission published their respective findings in July that the pilots worked well. The overwhelming majority of people were able to cast their vote without a problem, and there was no notable adverse effect on turnout. The success of the pilots proves that the measures are reasonable and proportionate.

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is correct. Our surveying alongside the pilots found no indication that the ID requirements changed the reasons for not voting for any specific demographic group across the participating authorities. That is important evidence.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend knows well that elections are expensive to conduct. Sevenoaks District Council and Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council do excellent jobs of conducting elections not just for themselves, but for this place and for the county council. Is she planning to consider ways of speeding up payments to those borough and district councils?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I am working with the Association of Electoral Administrators to see how the process can be improved. I take this opportunity to thank all the electoral staff in my hon. Friend’s council and elsewhere, who work so hard. The fact is that they have six months in which to submit an account. These things can sometimes be left to the last minute, which creates a bulge in the process, but we want to improve that.

European Union Referendum Bill

Debate between Tom Tugendhat and Chloe Smith
Thursday 18th June 2015

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I take that point, but I still think the evidence is mixed. We have one—very strong—example. Ruth Davidson is one Conservative, and I am another, who reflects positively on that experience and thinks that we should learn from it, but other evidence in this arena is scant and not concrete.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and allowing me to make a point in response to the hon. Member for Arfon (Hywel Williams). In fact, the evidence is not quite as clear as he suggests. The Scottish referendum was on a simple yes/no question and we know that such questions attract higher turnouts of every age, so the question whether 16 and 17-year-olds’ participation attracted a higher turnout is moot.

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend places me in a difficult position. As he was responding to the hon. Member for Arfon, he will have to allow me to skip his intervention and return to my speech.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - -

Sorry, I apologise.

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If I may, Mr Howarth, I will suggest that the two hon. Members sort themselves out. [Laughter.]

--- Later in debate ---
Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman kindly brings me to my next point, which is the nature of making a change as important and as necessary as this through an ad hoc means. I am arguing for a lasting change for young people, not for an ad hoc change, as represented by making it on a one-time referendum. As good as referendums are, they are by their nature one-timers.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - -

I fully agree that there is a strong argument for lowering the voting age in this country and I would welcome a full debate on the issue in this place in due course, but I am not sure whether the British public, who have waited more than 40 years for a referendum on Europe, would forgive us for squabbling over the franchise at this point. Does my hon. Friend agree that a full and frank discussion about the enfranchisement of 16 and 17-year-olds is needed in this place in the fullness of time and that such a discussion should not be rushed?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is exactly right: we should do this properly. The Bill is not the place for that.