Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Northern Ireland Office
Tom Elliott
Main Page: Tom Elliott (Ulster Unionist Party - Fermanagh and South Tyrone)Department Debates - View all Tom Elliott's debates with the Northern Ireland Office
Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) Bill
Tom Elliott Excerpts(8 years, 5 months ago)
Commons ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Durkan
In response to my hon. Friend the Member for South Down, I said that some of these amendments are cost-neutral. That was what the Minister told us at the time, and some of those points can be repeated for this exception. The Minister in the Assembly said that some of these proposals were cost-neutral. However, some of them will not be cost-neutral, and I make no pretence in that regard.
Proposed new subsection 3A would deny the Secretary of State the right to
“make any limit on the number of children for which any child benefit, child tax credit or child element of universal credit can be claimed”.
Many people have opposed the two-child rule, and the amendment would mean that we do not hand that rule to the Tory Secretary of State when many of us are opposed to it.
Tom Elliott
To follow up the question from the hon. Member for East Antrim (Sammy Wilson), if some of the amendments are not cost-neutral, where does the hon. Gentleman think the money will come from? Will it come from the block grant and the £585 million currently in place, or from Her Majesty’s Government?