Information between 2nd April 2026 - 22nd April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 231 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party No votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 156 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Ulster Unionist Party Aye votes vs 0 Ulster Unionist Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Ferries: Northern Ireland
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard (Ulster Unionist Party - Life peer) Tuesday 7th April 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the additional cost to ferry travellers between Great Britain and Northern Ireland as a result of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Impact Assessment does not identify significant consumer price impacts and finds that compliance costs for domestic maritime operators are modest relative to their overall operating costs, with fuel and carbon costs forming only one part of total running costs. These findings are consistent with international evidence showing changes to ferry ticket prices in the low single digit range under equivalent carbon pricing.
The Government will review the maritime element of the United Kingdom Emissions Trading Scheme in 2028 to ensure that its impacts remain accurate, proportionate and fully assessed as the sector continues to decarbonise. |
|
Ferries: Northern Ireland
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard (Ulster Unionist Party - Life peer) Tuesday 7th April 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to provide an exemption to passenger ferry operators between Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the provisions of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026 which is similar to the exemption for operators to the Scottish Islands. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) There is a high bar for any exemptions from the UK ETS. We are exempting ferries serving Scotland’s islands and peninsula communities given the unique and pressing challenges they face and the legal duties to consider island populations under the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018.
We will be evaluating the impacts of the scheme, as well as the existing exemptions, in a review of the maritime regime in 2028. We will not be extending this exemption to other UK islands at this time. |
|
UK Internal Trade: Northern Ireland
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Ballinamallard (Ulster Unionist Party - Life peer) Thursday 2nd April 2026 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what aspects of the Safeguarding the Union Command Paper (CP 1021), published on 31 January 2024, have been (1) fully implemented, (2) partially implemented, and (3) not implemented. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government is committed to continuing to take forward the Safeguarding the Union command paper, and to protecting Northern Ireland’s place in the UK Internal Market.
We continue to make progress on the implementation of the commitments made in the command paper. For instance, the digitisation of the News Letter was completed last year and there remains no Border Control Post at Cairnryan. In January, the East-West Council met for the third time where the Government announced there would be a pilot for the UK school twinning programme, which is being developed between the UK Government’s Department for Education and the Northern Ireland Executive’s Department of Education.
Other recent steps include the allocation of £2.25 million for Intertrade UK over the next three years and the opening of round two of the Connect Fund to support community and voluntary groups. In line with commitments made in the command paper, in December the Government published our response to Lord Murphy’s Independent Review of the Windsor Framework, and is now taking action on all of its recommendations.
|