Tom Clarke
Main Page: Tom Clarke (Labour - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill)Department Debates - View all Tom Clarke's debates with the Department for Work and Pensions
(11 years, 10 months ago)
Commons Chamber Esther McVey
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Esther McVey 
        
    
        
    
        For the people of the UK, I find that deeply saddening. For me, it is not something to be chanting and cheering about. The Opposition need to reflect—for about the next 20 years—on what they did to UK plc, while we get it right. For those reasons, and many, many more—mainly its inaccuracy—I reject the Opposition day motion. Instead, I welcome the promising signs that we are delivering for jobs and growth: the fastest growth in the G7 this quarter, more people in work, more businesses going, more exports, more work for everybody. That is why we object to the motion and welcome what we are doing on this side of the House.
 Mr Tom Clarke (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) (Lab)
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Mr Tom Clarke (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) (Lab) 
        
    
        
    
        On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. Given the huge interest in this debate, not least among our constituents, is it within your power to extend the time for the debate?
 Madam Deputy Speaker
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Madam Deputy Speaker 
        
    
        
    
        I fully appreciate the right hon. Gentleman’s point. Another way to phrase it would be: if Members had behaved with decorum during the Front-Bench speeches, would there be more time for Back Benchers? He is right that there is a lot of interest in the debate, but sadly it is not within my power to extend the time available. I am glad he made his point of order, however, because it gives me the opportunity to ask hon. Members to be courteous to other hon. Members and keep their speeches as brief as possible.