Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Tim Loughton and Jo Swinson
Monday 27th February 2012

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton
- Hansard - -

I think we are all trying to achieve the same thing. The hon. Gentleman mentions a disastrous statistic, but the problem is not just abortions among teenagers: I have been particularly alarmed about the repeat abortions among teenagers, so we must get the message across clearly. I want all children in this country to have access to good quality sex and relationship education. The problem has been that the picture is very mixed. I want more experts from outside schools who have real skills communicating that message to as many children as possible.

Jo Swinson Portrait Jo Swinson (East Dunbartonshire) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

A survey of more than 1,000 parents for mumsnet last November found that nine out of 10 parents think there should be a statutory duty on all schools to deliver comprehensive sex and relationship education. I welcome what the Minister says about the importance of relationships, particularly given the worrying statistic showing high levels of abuse and sexual pressure in teenage relationships. Does he think that the relationship aspect should therefore be put on the same footing as the requirement for schools to deliver the facts about sex?

Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton
- Hansard - -

Again, my hon. Friend, who has great expertise in this area, makes some pertinent points. I do not want to pre-empt what the consultation will focus on, given the findings already received. Relationships are absolutely a really important part of this. We have heard a lot about the mechanics of sex; we need to hear much more about the ways sex is carried on through relationships—hopefully consensual. The teaching of sexual consent will be strengthened through the planned revision of PSHE guidance. As I say, relationships are a really important part of it.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Tim Loughton and Jo Swinson
Monday 11th October 2010

(14 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jo Swinson Portrait Jo Swinson (East Dunbartonshire) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

1. What recent representations he has received on the bullying in schools of children with allergies.

Tim Loughton Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Tim Loughton)
- Hansard - -

The Secretary of State and the ministerial team have not received any recent representation on the bullying of children with allergies.

Jo Swinson Portrait Jo Swinson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister for that answer. I chaired a meeting of the all-party group on allergies at which a number of children spoke about their experiences of potentially life-threatening bullying in schools. For example, they had foods to which they are severely allergic forced upon them. Some schools’ response to that was commendable, but in others it was not taken seriously. Would the Minister be happy to meet me and a group of these children to discuss their experiences of that problem and potential solutions?

Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising that point. I pay tribute to the good work that she has done with the all-party group. She secured a debate on the subject and has raised the matter on numerous other occasions. I would be delighted to meet a group of representatives. I met a large body of young people who have long-term conditions who came to lobby us about their circumstances at school. The problem affects 18 million people throughout the country and it shows no sign of abating among younger people, so I am more than happy to take forward her offer.