Information between 29th October 2025 - 8th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 63 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 314 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 65 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 311 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 63 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 323 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 65 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 328 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - European Convention on Human Rights (Withdrawal) - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 64 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 154 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 62 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 63 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 155 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 150 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 63 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 153 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 80 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 62 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 152 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Susan Murray voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 403 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Immigration: Children
Asked by: Susan Murray (Liberal Democrat - Mid Dunbartonshire) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she has made an assessment of the potential impact of extending the qualifying period for Indefinite Leave to Remain to ten years on the finances of families with children; and what steps she is taking to ensure that this change does not affect (a) integration and (b) long-term stability for families with children. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Fees for immigration and nationality applications are kept under review.
Relevant impact assessments will be carried out in relation to the earned settlement proposals, which were set out in the Immigration White Paper. |
|
Immigration
Asked by: Susan Murray (Liberal Democrat - Mid Dunbartonshire) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the additional (a) visa fees and (b) immigration health surcharge costs that (i) applicants and (ii) their families will be required to pay following the extension of the qualifying period for Indefinite Leave to Remain from five years to ten years. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Fees for immigration and nationality applications are kept under review.
Relevant impact assessments will be carried out in relation to the earned settlement proposals, which were set out in the Immigration White Paper. |
|
Punjab: Human Rights
Asked by: Susan Murray (Liberal Democrat - Mid Dunbartonshire) Wednesday 29th October 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential implications for her policies of reports regarding extrajudicial killings in the Punjab region. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) We are aware of the human rights concerns raised about the activities of the Crime Control Department in Punjab, and we are monitoring the situation closely. Promoting human rights and the rule of law is a core part of the UK's diplomatic engagement in Pakistan, and we consistently urge the Pakistani authorities to investigate and address any breaches of those standards. Through UK Official Development Assistance (ODA), we are also supporting progress on human rights in Pakistan through dialogue, technical assistance, and targeted programming. |
|
Gaza: Detainees
Asked by: Susan Murray (Liberal Democrat - Mid Dunbartonshire) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that (a) Dr Abu Safiya and (b) other Gazan healthcare workers who remain imprisoned in Israel are (i) released and (ii) allowed to return to providing healthcare in Gaza. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) I refer the Hon. Member to the answer provided on 6 August to question 68153. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 11th November Susan Murray signed this EDM on Monday 17th November 2025 50 signatures (Most recent: 17 Nov 2025) Tabled by: Peter Prinsley (Labour - Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) That this House recognises the importance of the BBC in providing impartial and factual news coverage; supports the principle of an independent BBC free from the influence of Government; and urges renewed efforts to defend public service broadcasting in the face of current challenges and opposition. |
|
Monday 3rd November Susan Murray signed this EDM on Wednesday 12th November 2025 Local government and social care 46 signatures (Most recent: 18 Nov 2025)Tabled by: Zöe Franklin (Liberal Democrat - Guildford) That this House recognises that adult social care is the largest area of council spending after SEND provision; notes that in 2024-25 the gross current expenditure for local authorities in England on adult social care totalled £29.4 billion which was a 9% increase on the previous year in cash terms; … |
|
Tuesday 11th November Susan Murray signed this EDM on Wednesday 12th November 2025 RAF Photographic Reconnaissance Units 23 signatures (Most recent: 20 Nov 2025)Tabled by: Manuela Perteghella (Liberal Democrat - Stratford-on-Avon) That this House supports calls for a national memorial to commemorate the service and sacrifice of the Royal Air Force’s Photographic Reconnaissance Units (PRU); notes that the PRU, formed on 24 September 1939, undertook highly dangerous, unarmed intelligence missions across all theatres of the Second World War, capturing more than … |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 6th November 2025
Formal Minutes - Scottish Affairs Committee Formal Minutes 2025 - 2026 Scottish Affairs Committee Found: the Chair2 Maureen Burke Harriet Cross Lillian Jones Mr Angus MacDonald Douglas McAllister Susan Murray |
|
Tuesday 28th October 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-10-28 09:30:00+00:00 Scottish Affairs Committee Found: meeting Members present: Patricia Ferguson (Chair); Harriet Cross; Dave Doogan; Douglas McAllister; Susan Murray |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 17th November 2025 10 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: GB Energy and the net zero transition View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 26th November 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Securing Scotland’s Future: Defence Skills and Jobs View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
11 Nov 2025
The future of Scotland’s high streets Scottish Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions In Scotland, as in other parts of the UK, concerns have been raised about how high streets and town centres are changing. Scotland’s high streets face multiple challenges, and many have been described as being in ‘decline’. However, possible new models for resilient and thriving high streets are emerging, while there continues to be interest in community-led regeneration. This inquiry will engage with local communities and other stakeholders to explore what a positive vision for the future of Scottish high streets and town centres might look like, and to examine what role government might play in making this vision a reality. Read the call for evidence for more details about the inquiry. |
|
31 Oct 2025
Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links Scottish Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 12 Dec 2025) Transport infrastructure plays an important role among island communities, supporting local economies and ensuring access to essential services. In Scotland, geographic barriers and limited transport options can restrict mobility and contribute to depopulation. This inquiry will examine the strategic case for permanent transport links—such as tunnels and bridges—between Scotland’s islands and assess whether there is a role for the UK Government in supporting such projects. Read the call for evidence for more details about the inquiry. |
|
14 Nov 2025
Connectivity in Scotland: Digital connectivity Scottish Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 12 Dec 2025) Reliable digital infrastructure is essential for enabling economic growth, public service delivery and social inclusion—especially in Scotland’s rural and island communities. These areas often face unique challenges due to geographic isolation and low population density, which can make the rollout of broadband and mobile networks more complex and costly. This inquiry will explore how digital connectivity can be improved across Scotland, and whether current UK and Scottish Government initiatives are delivering for the communities that need them most. Read the call for evidence for more details about the inquiry. This is one of two inquiries looking into connectivity in Scotland. We have also launched an inquiry into fixed transport links. For more information, visit - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Committees - UK Parliament
|