Information between 25th January 2026 - 14th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (First sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 11 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Sureena Brackenridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 107 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Sureena Brackenridge speeches from: Place-based Employment Support Programmes
Sureena Brackenridge contributed 1 speech (500 words) Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Sureena Brackenridge speeches from: Key Stage 1 Curriculum
Sureena Brackenridge contributed 1 speech (499 words) Monday 26th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Education |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Further Education and Industry
Asked by: Sureena Brackenridge (Labour - Wolverhampton North East) Thursday 29th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to support the use of industry specialists within further education colleges to provide masterclasses, staff training and professional development; and whether funding is available to expand such industry-FE partnerships. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) As part of the Construction Skills package the department announced that areas with Local Skills Improvement Plans would benefit from £20 million to form partnerships between further education (FE) providers and construction employers, helping boost the number of teachers with construction experience in colleges through a teacher industry exchange scheme. The scheme will launch later this year and will facilitate opportunities for construction professionals to share their expertise in FE settings. This work will inform expansion into other priority sectors.
In addition, through our Taking Teaching Further programme, the department is supporting industry specialists across a range of technical sectors who are interested in teaching in FE. This programme provides funding to FE colleges and independent training providers for initial teacher education courses and early career support for technical experts moving into teaching. We are also working with the Gatsby Charitable Foundation as they pilot a new training offer for industry professionals coming into teaching in the FE sector. This will help industry professionals to receive a solid grounding in the skills and knowledge they need to be effective as teachers of technical and vocational students. |
|
Employment: Apprentices and Further Education
Asked by: Sureena Brackenridge (Labour - Wolverhampton North East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what incentives are available to employers to support day-release arrangements for young people in further education and apprenticeships; and whether she plans to introduce additional measures to encourage employer participation in such schemes. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) T Levels include a substantive industry placement, with 96% of students completing their placement last year.
The Skills for Life campaign raises awareness of T Levels and other training, ensuring businesses understand their value. The department is increasing awareness of T Level industry placements and encouraging employers to take part through a network of T Level ambassadors, a targeted small and medium businesses (SME) campaign, and investing £6.3 million in the employer support fund. As part of the construction skills package, £100 million is committed to support 40,000 industry placements each year for construction learners.
An apprenticeship is a job with a formal programme of off-the-job training. The government is transforming the apprenticeships offer into a new growth and skills offer, giving greater flexibility to employers and learners. To support our ambition of 50,000 more young people into apprenticeships, we will expand foundation apprenticeships, launch a £140 million pilot with mayors to better connect young people to local apprenticeships, and fully fund SME apprenticeships for eligible 16 to 24-year-olds. |
|
Further Education: Finance
Asked by: Sureena Brackenridge (Labour - Wolverhampton North East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she plans to introduce a multi-year funding settlement for the further education sector, and what assessment she has made of the potential benefits of a three-year funding cycle for workforce planning and financial sustainability in FE colleges. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Further education colleges have a number of different funding streams, including funding for 16-19 year-olds.
Funding for 16-19 year-olds is through a lagged funding system whereby the funding for each college is based on its student numbers in the previous year. However, for those institutions with a significant growth in students, the department recognises that there are additional costs and provides in-year growth funding to help with these.
This system allows funding for colleges to respond to changes in their delivery and give them confidence on 16-19 funding in the year ahead. Colleges are informed of their allocations several months before the start of the academic year to help them finalise their financial and workforce planning. Ensuring that funding directly reflects the number of students recruited enables institutions to recruit with confidence, whereas a fixed multi-year funding allocation would not. The department keeps the effectiveness of the funding system under review. |
|
Further Education: Conditions of Employment and Pay
Asked by: Sureena Brackenridge (Labour - Wolverhampton North East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to improve staff (a) pay and (b) conditions in further education colleges. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Further education (FE) colleges, rather than government, are responsible for setting and negotiating staff pay and terms and conditions within colleges.
In May 2025, the department announced a further £190 million investment for colleges and other 16 to19 providers in addition to the £400 million of extra funding we already planned to spend on 16 to 19 education in the 2025/26 financial year.
Across the Spending review period, we will provide £1.2 billion of additional investment per year in skills by 2028/29. This significant investment will ensure there is increased funding to colleges and other 16 to 19 providers to enable the recruitment and retention of excellent staff, including expert teachers in high value subject areas, and interventions to retain top teaching talent.
Targeted Recruitment Incentives of up to £6,000 (after tax) are available for eligible early career FE teachers working in key science, technology, engineering and mathematics and technical shortage subjects, in disadvantaged schools and colleges, including in sixth form colleges. This payment is separate to teachers’ usual pay. |
|
Further Education: VAT Exemptions
Asked by: Sureena Brackenridge (Labour - Wolverhampton North East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has made an assessment of the potential impact of extending VAT exemption to further education colleges on (a) college finances, (b) learner outcomes and (c) skills provision; and whether she has had discussions with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on this matter. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) While VAT is a matter for His Majesty’s Treasury, we are aware that the VAT status of providers is an area of interest for the sector. Many public bodies cannot recover the VAT they incur. The government keeps all taxes under review, and any proposals to change the tax system would need to be considered in the context of the broader public finances.
|
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Place-based Employment Support Programmes
31 speeches (8,958 words) Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Diana Johnson (Lab - Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham) Friend the Member for Wolverhampton North East (Sureena Brackenridge) spoke about NEETs and about the - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026
Report - 7th Report - Foundations of Learning: replacing RAAC and securing school buildings Education Committee Found: membership Helen Hayes (Labour; Dulwich and West Norwood) (Chair) Jess Asato (Labour; Lowestoft) Sureena Brackenridge |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 2 p.m. Education Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 2 p.m. Education Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 9 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Reading for Pleasure At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Teresa Cremin CBE - Professor of Education (Literacy) at Open University Dr Helen Hendry - Senior Lecturer in Education (Primary) at Open University Professor Jessie Ricketts - Professor of Psychology at Royal Holloway, University of London Dr Jeanne Shinskey - Department of Psychology at Royal Holloway, University of London Dr Jo Taylor - Department of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences at University College London (UCL) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Early Years: Improving Support for Children and Families At 10:00am: Oral evidence Ann Graham - Director of Children's Services Haringey Council at Association of Directors of Children's Services (ADCS) Mike Short - Head of local government and education at UNISON Clare Reid - Children’s Services Director at Early Years Alliance Clare Roberts OBE - Founder and Chief Executive of Kids Planet at National Partnership in Early Learning and Childcare Jayne Coward - Deputy Director for Early Years Regulatory Policy and Practice at Ofsted View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Historical Forced Adoption At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Gordon Harold - Professor of the Psychology of Education and Mental Health at University of Cambridge Dr Michael Lambert - Lecturer in Medical Humanities at Lancaster University Dr Janet Greenlees - Reader in Health History at Glasgow Caledonian University Dr James Gallen - Associate Professor, School of Law and Government at Dublin City University At 11:00am: Oral evidence Emma Crowther-Duncan - National Development Lead at PAC-UK Brenda Farrell - UK Director for Fostering, Adoption & Children In Care at Barnardo's Colonel Peter Forrest - Chief Secretary at The Salvation Army UK and Ireland Emily Frith - CEO at Adoption UK View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd March 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Reading for Pleasure At 10:00am: Oral evidence Jonathan Douglas - Chief Executive at The National Literacy Trust Annie Crombie - Co-Chief Executive at Booktrust Mrs Debbie Hicks - Creative Director at The Reading Agency At 11:00am: Oral evidence Luke Taylor - Senior Researcher at Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) Ellen Broomé - Chief Executive at British Dyslexia Association Ms Anjali Patel - Lead Advisory Teacher at The Centre for Literacy in Primary Education (CLPE) Onyinye Iwu - children's author, illustrator and art teacher at (None) View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
13 Feb 2026
Children and Young People's Mental Health Education Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 27 Mar 2026) The Education Select Committee and the Health and Social Care Select Committee have jointly launched an inquiry into the mental health of children and young people. This inquiry will examine mental health support and services provided in education and community settings, available to children and young people up to the age of 25. The Committees wish to understand how this provision is integrated with specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), acute and other statutory NHS services. The Committees will shortly launch a survey to gather anonymised personal experiences from individuals. People who wish to share their own experiences may therefore prefer to wait to do so via this route rather than through a written submission. Information about the survey will be posted here. The Committees hope to specifically explore the relationship between children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing, the support that is available to them and how well they are able to thrive and succeed in education. This is important for all children and young people, but there are particular groups for whom it is critical, including children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), care experienced children and young people and others who have suffered adverse childhood experiences. We will examine these issues in relation to education settings from the early years to further and higher education. In carrying out this work, the Committees will consider the Government’s commitment to expand Mental Health Support Teams to 100% of schools in England by 2029/30. They will also take account of forthcoming initiatives such as the establishment of a network of Young Futures Hubs and Best Start Family Hubs, to ensure a comprehensive and up‑to‑date understanding of the challenges and opportunities within the system. The Committees will also consider how far there is sufficient alignment between recent government strategies and reviews, including but not limited to the 10 Year Health Plan, the Best Start for Life Strategy, SEND reform, the Review into mental health, ADHD and autism services and the National Youth Strategy, education and NHS workforce plans. The Committees are now accepting written evidence submissions until 27 March 2026 (by 23:59pm).
Safeguarding and support If you have immediate concerns about yourself or someone else, you should contact 999. In addition to your GP, the following organisations may be able to offer support or further information:
|
|
24 Feb 2026
The use of Artificial Intelligence and EdTech in Education Education Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 10 Apr 2026) The Education Committee is looking to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) and EdTech are reshaping education across England, from early years settings to schools, colleges and universities. The Committee will explore the opportunities these technologies present for improving learning and teaching, as well as the risks they pose - including their potential impact on children’s digital rights, safeguarding, inequalities and assessment. The deadline for receiving written submissions is Friday 10 April at 23.59 |