Oral Answers to Questions

Stephen Metcalfe Excerpts
Monday 25th June 2012

(11 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Stephen Hammond Portrait Stephen Hammond (Wimbledon) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

6. What recent assessment he has made of the benefits for jobseekers of undertaking work experience.

Stephen Metcalfe Portrait Stephen Metcalfe (South Basildon and East Thurrock) (Con)
- Hansard - -

11. What recent assessment he has made of the benefits for jobseekers of undertaking work experience.

Eric Ollerenshaw Portrait Eric Ollerenshaw (Lancaster and Fleetwood) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. What recent assessment he has made of the benefits for jobseekers of undertaking work experience.

--- Later in debate ---
Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It compares very favourably. First, it is better. Secondly, it costs a lot less. Labour paid huge sums of money up front, whereas we pay the jobseeker’s allowance. The key point is that not once has any Opposition Front-Bench Member got up to defend this work experience programme, which many of their colleagues attack and try to destroy.

Stephen Metcalfe Portrait Stephen Metcalfe
- Hansard - -

Will my right hon. Friend remind us how long a young person can stay on the work experience scheme before they lose their benefit, and how that compares with the situation under the previous Government?

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is the interesting bit, because the previous Government legislated for work experience before they left office and now attack it, but they allowed people only two weeks, which was not enough time for them to get the experience they needed. We have given people two months, and a third month if the employer offers them either an apprenticeship or a job.