Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Stephen Gethins Excerpts
Monday 9th November 2015

(8 years, 12 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Brandon Lewis Portrait Brandon Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a good point. As we have just heard, devolution provides opportunities. My hon. Friend is right to prod, encourage and cajole that local authority to make sure that a local plan is in place in the best interests of local communities, but as we have said and as we are outlining in the Housing and Planning Bill, the Government will make sure that these are done from 2017.

Stephen Gethins Portrait Stephen Gethins (North East Fife) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

8. What assessment he has made of the potential merits of further extending measures on community buy-outs of local assets.

Marcus Jones Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Mr Marcus Jones)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

All over England communities have listed over 2,600 assets with local authorities. I am undertaking a review of the community right to bid, in line with our manifesto commitment. We are consulting a wide range of stakeholders and will report our findings soon.

Stephen Gethins Portrait Stephen Gethins
- Hansard - -

The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 passed in June by the Scottish Parliament decentralises power, giving local authorities and public bodies a legal duty to consider transferring property to communities. Will the Minister consider following the lead of the Scottish Government on this issue and on further decentralisation?

Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In many ways the hon. Gentleman’s party is following the lead from our party and the Localism Act 2011. The hon. Gentleman needs to consider that community rights in England are not centrally driven or managed from the centre. We should recognise and balance the rights of the local community with the rights of property owners and individuals. We do not want red tape which affects businesses and creates additional burdens on local authorities and taxpayers. That is what the hon. Gentleman’s proposal would create.