Defence Budget and Transformation Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Defence Budget and Transformation

John Bercow Excerpts
Monday 14th May 2012

(12 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
None Portrait Several hon. Members
- Hansard -

rose

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

Order. There is much interest in this matter among right hon. and hon. Members. Accommodating that level of interest will require brevity in questions and answers alike.

Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston Portrait Ms Gisela Stuart (Birmingham, Edgbaston) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Secretary of State was enormously helpful last Thursday when he told me that procuring an aircraft carrier was slightly more complicated than buying a bottle of milk or a box of eggs. I wonder whether he will be equally helpful today. He keeps referring to the £38 billion black hole. Will he tell us how much of that £38 billion he assesses as being due to contractual commitments and therefore outside the scope of his cuts, and how much of it as being outside those contractual commitments?

--- Later in debate ---
None Portrait Several hon. Members
- Hansard -

rose

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

Order. Given the number of right hon. and hon. Members still seeking to catch my eye, and the fact that the debate to follow is very heavily subscribed, I repeat my exhortation to single, short supplementary questions and the Secretary of State’s typically pithy replies.

Bob Russell Portrait Sir Bob Russell (Colchester) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Britain’s national and international defence interests are not best served by having a smaller Army, a smaller Navy and a smaller Air Force. We are now told that the budget is in balance, so, looking to the home front, can the upgrade and modernisation of the family accommodation be brought forward?

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait Mr Hammond
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is an interesting question, because the Labour party’s position is to deny that there was a £38 billion black hole. It is rather helpful to us that we have in our possession a letter from the right hon. Member for East Renfrewshire to the Leader of the Opposition, setting out his view that the £38 billion black hole was Labour’s greatest weakness and vulnerability when it came to defence.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the Secretary of State and to colleagues.