Information between 12th November 2025 - 2nd December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 4 p.m. Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall Subject: Creative education in schools View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Ten Minute Rule Motion - Main Chamber Subject: Domestic Energy Efficiency (Call for Evidence) View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 309 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - against a party majority - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Simon Opher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Simon Opher speeches from: Parkinson’s Disease
Simon Opher contributed 1 speech (226 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Westminster Hall Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Elections: Social Media
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Thursday 13th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he plans to bring forward legislative proposals to protect election candidates from anonymous abuse on social media through the forthcoming Elections Bill. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Government is clear that all forms of harassment, intimidation and abuse, including online and anonymous abuse, are unacceptable and have no place in our democracy. As set out in the Restoring Trust in our Democracy strategy, we are taking forward several measures through the Elections Bill to strengthen protections for those taking part in elections. This includes the introduction of an aggravating factor to empower courts to give tougher sentences to those who are convicted of intimidatory offences targeted at candidates, campaigners, elected representatives and electoral staff.
My department is also working with the Speaker’s Conference and the Electoral Commission to develop a code of conduct for campaigning, which will promote respectful political debate and set clear expectations for behaviour. This is a complex issue which requires a comprehensive response from all parts of government. We continue to work closely with departments across government and through the Defending Democracy Taskforce to tackle unacceptable abuse and better protect candidates. |
|
Gender Based Violence
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions her Department has had with Ofcom on ensuring that the steps it is taking to implement the Online Safety Act (2023) contribute to the delivery of its target to halve the level of violence against women and girls. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Reducing online violence against women and girls and fraud are priorities for this government. Ofcom’s Illegal Harms Codes require platforms to proactively address serious illegal content, much of which disproportionately impacts women and girls. The codes also require platforms to implement strong measures to protect users against fraud. The Government and Ofcom are actively monitoring changes to platforms' behaviour and the levels of harm experienced online following Ofcom’s codes coming into effect. This work will track the effect of the online safety regime and feed into a statutory Post Implementation Review. |
|
Gender Based Violence
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of Ofcom's Online Safety Act Illegal Content Codes of Practice on levels of online violence against women and girls. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Reducing online violence against women and girls and fraud are priorities for this government. Ofcom’s Illegal Harms Codes require platforms to proactively address serious illegal content, much of which disproportionately impacts women and girls. The codes also require platforms to implement strong measures to protect users against fraud. The Government and Ofcom are actively monitoring changes to platforms' behaviour and the levels of harm experienced online following Ofcom’s codes coming into effect. This work will track the effect of the online safety regime and feed into a statutory Post Implementation Review. |
|
Fraud: Internet
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of Ofcom's Online Safety Act Illegal Content Codes of Practice on levels of fraud against UK consumers. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Reducing online violence against women and girls and fraud are priorities for this government. Ofcom’s Illegal Harms Codes require platforms to proactively address serious illegal content, much of which disproportionately impacts women and girls. The codes also require platforms to implement strong measures to protect users against fraud. The Government and Ofcom are actively monitoring changes to platforms' behaviour and the levels of harm experienced online following Ofcom’s codes coming into effect. This work will track the effect of the online safety regime and feed into a statutory Post Implementation Review. |
|
Elections: Social Media
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of allegations of foreign interference in recent elections in Romania and Germany through social media; and what steps he is taking to help prevent foreign interference in UK elections. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Government takes any attempts to intervene in democratic processes very seriously. It is, and always will be, an absolute priority to protect our democratic and electoral processes, including from foreign interference.
The Defending Democracy Taskforce brings together Whitehall departments, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies to monitor and mitigate risks, including foreign interference. The Joint Election Security and Preparedness unit (JESP) leads cross-government efforts in preparation for the 2026 elections, which are taking place across the UK.
The Government’s strategy for modern, secure and inclusive elections, published in July, sets out our plan to strengthen oversight of and safeguards against known and emerging threats, including foreign interference through covert political funding. We are introducing tougher rules on political donations to protect UK elections, striking the right balance between safeguarding against foreign interference whilst making sure that legitimate donors can continue to fund electoral campaigns. |
|
Elections: Social Media
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he plans to bring forward legislative proposals to help protect UK citizens from (a) foreign influence and (b) manipulation operations using fake accounts on social media through the forthcoming Elections Bill. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Government takes any attempts to intervene in democratic processes very seriously. It is, and always will be, an absolute priority to protect our democratic and electoral processes, including from foreign interference.
The Defending Democracy Taskforce brings together Whitehall departments, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies to monitor and mitigate risks, including foreign interference. The Joint Election Security and Preparedness unit (JESP) leads cross-government efforts in preparation for the 2026 elections, which are taking place across the UK.
The Government’s strategy for modern, secure and inclusive elections, published in July, sets out our plan to strengthen oversight of and safeguards against known and emerging threats, including foreign interference through covert political funding. We are introducing tougher rules on political donations to protect UK elections, striking the right balance between safeguarding against foreign interference whilst making sure that legitimate donors can continue to fund electoral campaigns. |
|
Cancer: Health Services
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will increase funding for (a) the pathology (i) workforce, (ii) estates and (iii) IT infrastructure and (b) pathology disciplines involved in the pathways for cancer patients. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The 2025 Spending Review prioritised health, with record investment in the health and social care system. The Spending Review announced that annual National Health Service day-to-day spending will increase by £29 billion in real terms, a £53 billion cash increase, by 2028/29 compared to 2023/24. To provide stability and ensure public services and industries have certainty in their funding, the Government has committed to holding a Spending Review every two years. The 2025 Spending Review sets departmental budgets for day-to-day spending up to 2028/29 and for capital for five years, to 2029/30. The envelope for the next Spending Review, due to be held in 2027, will be set in due course. We will also publish a 10 Year Workforce Plan to ensure the NHS has the right people in the right places, with the right skills to deliver the best care for patients, when they need it. As part of the £600 million in capital for diagnostics in 2025/26, announced as part of the Spending Review, the NHS is investing in histopathology automation technology, which will speed up pathology test reporting across England, helping to ensure that patients get their diagnoses faster and supporting reductions in elective waiting lists. We are funding all pathology networks to increase digital capabilities by March 2026. This will reduce unnecessary waits and repeat tests to ensure that patients receive their blood test results sooner. These actions will help improve patient pathways, including for cancer. |
|
NHS: Software
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will ensure that (a) universal lay terminology is used in the NHS app and (b) there is signposting to Lab Tests Online UK to enable patients to interpret their diagnostic results correctly. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The NHS App aims to use clear, universal lay terminology that is easy for the general public to understand. The content follows the National Health Service content style guide, which mandates writing in plain English to a reading age of nine to 11 years old. As part of the delivery of the 10-Year Health Plan, the NHS App will provide an improved and personalised experience for users, empowering them to access key elements of their health conditions like test results, and providing patients with advice and guidance 24 hours a day, seven days a week, that will help them to understand their health and make informed choices about what to do next. We regularly test our content with patients to ensure it is clear and effective. This includes working with users who have access needs, low digital literacy, or are from seldom-heard groups. This work builds on the current test results feature in the NHS App that is successfully used by millions of people each month to access the results of tests they have conducted with their general practitioner. There is signposting to Lab Tests Online-UK (LTO-UK) to help patients interpret their diagnostic results, though this may depend on how the patient's general practice (GP) has configured its systems. We currently provide links to LTO-UK for approximately 70 of the most common test types. While the NHS App itself primarily displays results along with any accompanying doctor’s comments or actions, GP systems can have embedded links to LTO-UK alongside the test results, providing a direct route for patients to access reliable information at the point of care. |
|
Fractures: Health Services
Asked by: Simon Opher (Labour - Stroud) Wednesday 26th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make it his policy to publish an implementation plan to ensure that each Integrated Care Board commissions a Fracture Liaison Service. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Fracture liaison services are commissioned by integrated care boards, which are well-placed to make decisions according to local need. Our 10-Year Health Plan committed to rolling out fracture liaison services across every part of the country by 2030. Officials continue to work closely with NHS England to explore a range of options to provide better quality and access to these important preventative services. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th January Simon Opher signed this EDM on Wednesday 10th December 2025 Compensation for Equitable Life policyholders 22 signatures (Most recent: 10 Dec 2025)Tabled by: Bob Blackman (Conservative - Harrow East) That this House notes the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report into Equitable Life; acknowledges its finding of a decade of maladministration by Government Departments and their regulators and its recommendation for full financial redress; further notes the then Government’s acceptance of the report’s findings and how much individuals lost … |
|
Monday 1st December Simon Opher signed this EDM on Tuesday 9th December 2025 Palestine Action hunger strike 54 signatures (Most recent: 16 Dec 2025)Tabled by: John McDonnell (Labour - Hayes and Harlington) That this House expresses its extreme concern that six prisoners associated with Palestine Action have felt that they had no other recourse to protest against their prison conditions but to launch a hunger strike; and calls upon the Secretary of State for Justice to intervene urgently to ensure their treatment … |
|
Thursday 4th December Simon Opher signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 8th December 2025 38 signatures (Most recent: 15 Dec 2025) Tabled by: Chris Hinchliff (Labour - North East Hertfordshire) That this House recognises that the public overwhelmingly values nature, and expresses concern that recommendations 11 and 12 of the Nuclear Regulatory Review propose a weakening of the Habitats Regulations; believes that this would constitute a sledgehammer to crack a nut; notes that the Habitats Regulations applied in full during … |
|
Tuesday 2nd December Simon Opher signed this EDM on Monday 8th December 2025 34 signatures (Most recent: 16 Dec 2025) Tabled by: Karl Turner (Labour - Kingston upon Hull East) That this House expresses grave concern at recent Government proposals to abolish or severely restrict the right to trial by jury in England and Wales by limiting jury trials to cases attracting sentences of less than three years; notes that trial by jury has been a centuries-old constitutional safeguard and … |
|
Thursday 4th December Simon Opher signed this EDM on Monday 8th December 2025 74 signatures (Most recent: 16 Dec 2025) Tabled by: Lee Barron (Labour - Corby and East Northamptonshire) That this House notes that a majority of Britons, 54 percent, intend to send their Christmas gifts this year using Royal Mail, an increase from 30 percent in 2024; recognises the vital role Royal Mail continues to play in connecting families and communities; and expresses its sincere thanks to every … |
|
Tuesday 4th November Simon Opher signed this EDM on Thursday 4th December 2025 68 Is Too Late report by the Prison Officers' Association 28 signatures (Most recent: 4 Dec 2025)Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House welcomes the publication of the 68 Is Too Late report by the Prison Officers' Association (POA) union, based on its survey of members about the pension age of prison officers, which received the largest response to any member consultation the union has undertaken; notes that the 68 … |
|
Wednesday 26th November Simon Opher signed this EDM on Monday 1st December 2025 Israel’s use of cluster munitions 49 signatures (Most recent: 15 Dec 2025)Tabled by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East) That this House expresses its alarm at evidence showing Israel used cluster munitions in its 2023 onwards invasion and bombings of Lebanon, which has killed more than 4,000 people in total; highlights that under the Convention on Cluster Munitions, an international treaty signed by Britain and more than 100 other … |
|
Tuesday 18th November Simon Opher signed this EDM as a sponsor on Wednesday 19th November 2025 New private capital in the NHS in the Autumn Budget 48 signatures (Most recent: 15 Dec 2025)Tabled by: Cat Eccles (Labour - Stourbridge) That this House welcomes the Government’s ambition to bring care closer to communities, but notes with grave concern proposals to reintroduce the use of private capital for building NHS Neighbourhood Health Centres (NHC); believes that similar past arrangements, such as PFI and PF2, are still damaging the NHS, with one … |
|
Tuesday 11th November Simon Opher signed this EDM on Monday 17th November 2025 51 signatures (Most recent: 24 Nov 2025) Tabled by: Peter Prinsley (Labour - Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) That this House recognises the importance of the BBC in providing impartial and factual news coverage; supports the principle of an independent BBC free from the influence of Government; and urges renewed efforts to defend public service broadcasting in the face of current challenges and opposition. |
|
Wednesday 12th November Simon Opher signed this EDM on Thursday 13th November 2025 Cumulative disruption proposals and the right to protest 96 signatures (Most recent: 15 Dec 2025)Tabled by: Andy McDonald (Labour - Middlesbrough and Thornaby East) That this House expresses deep alarm at recent proposals to require senior police officers to take into account any so-called cumulative disruption caused by past or planned future protests when considering whether to impose conditions on protests; notes these powers represent a significant expansion of state authority to ration the … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
25 Nov 2025, 5:18 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Doctor Simon Opher. >> Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Can I thank the Minister who was " Siân Berry MP (Brighton Pavilion, Green Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Dec 2025, 2:35 p.m. - House of Commons "debate. We now move on to the ten minute rule motion. Doctor Simon Opher. " Judith Cummins MP (Bradford South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Dec 2025, 2:43 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Simon Opher. >> Thank you very much. " Dr Simon Opher MP (Stroud, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |