Investigatory Powers Bill (Eighth sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office
Committee Debate: 8th sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 19th April 2016

(8 years, 7 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 19 April 2016 - (19 Apr 2016)
Gavin Newlands Portrait Gavin Newlands
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my hon. and learned Friend. We are not opposed to every measure in the Bill. There are benefits, but unfortunately they are not covered by enough safeguards and are not drawn tightly enough. I would like to make progress but I will give way once more.

Simon Hoare Portrait Simon Hoare (North Dorset) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I apologise if I missed the hon. Gentleman outlining the Departments, but could he tell me which ones should be excluded and not have access to this?

Gavin Newlands Portrait Gavin Newlands
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That has been dealt with at length. I have already mentioned the Food Standards Agency as one of the regulatory bodies. Schedule 4 does currently provide a lengthy list of bodies that should be able to access the data. New clause 7 would ensure that only the police forces and security agencies may request a communications data warrant, except where the warrant is issued for the purpose of preventing death, in which circumstances emergency and rescue services also fall within the definition.

New clause 10 outlines the requirements that must be met by warrants.

Simon Hoare Portrait Simon Hoare
- Hansard - -

As, for example, the Food Standards Agency cannot itself bring a prosecution, may I conjure in the hon. Gentleman’s mind a situation whereby a criminal gang, as part of its activities, seeks to bring into the United Kingdom for sale to the British public a contaminated food source? Is that not something to which the Food Standards Agency should have access to information in order to ensure that citizens and consumers are safe?

Gavin Newlands Portrait Gavin Newlands
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point, but surely the police would be interested in that scenario and would have access.

Simon Hoare Portrait Simon Hoare
- Hansard - -

In the abstract—by golly, isn’t this debate being held in the abstract?—the hon. Gentleman is absolutely right, but we invest the powers with the agency. The police are not an infinite resource. If we have the many who are charged with multiple areas of our lives—

None Portrait The Chair
- Hansard -

Order. Mr Hoare, can we keep it to an intervention, please, not a speech?

Simon Hoare Portrait Simon Hoare
- Hansard - -

Forgive me. The hon. Gentleman knows my point.

Gavin Newlands Portrait Gavin Newlands
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

These powers are very large and we should limit who has access to them. The police can pass on the relevant information to the agencies that can deal with that particular incident, but in my view, only the police and security forces should have access. I want to finish my point on new clause 10 but I will allow one last intervention.