All 2 Debates between Sheryll Murray and Andrew Stephenson

Fri 18th Nov 2016

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Sheryll Murray and Andrew Stephenson
Thursday 11th March 2021

(3 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sheryll Murray Portrait Mrs Sheryll Murray (South East Cornwall) (Con)
- Hansard - -

What steps his Department is taking to accelerate the delivery of transport infrastructure projects.

Andrew Stephenson Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Andrew Stephenson)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Transport infrastructure is central to the Government’s plans to build back better from covid-19, and the Department for Transport is at the forefront of Project Speed. We have also created our own acceleration unit as well as establishing the Northern Transport Acceleration Council, through which we have identified 112 schemes to progress.

--- Later in debate ---
Andrew Stephenson Portrait Andrew Stephenson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As my hon. Friend will be aware, last week marked one year since the Government stepped in to take over the ailing Northern Rail franchise. Since then, Northern has transformed services with a huge investment in new trains and the retirement of Pacers, and completed the extension of platforms at more than 70 stations. He makes a strong case for increasing local services, and I know that the Minister of State, Department for Transport, my hon. Friend the Member for Daventry (Chris Heaton-Harris), the Rail Minister, will be happy to meet him to discuss this issue.

Sheryll Murray Portrait Mrs Murray [V]
- Hansard - -

As my hon. Friend knows, I have long campaigned for the much-needed upgrade to the A38, which is the main trunk road through my constituency to the nearest city, Plymouth. I am working with Highways England and undertaking surveys, but in the light of the fantastic news that Plymouth is to become a freeport, will my hon. Friend revaluate the urgency of improvements, so that the whole of Cornwall can take advantage of Plymouth’s new status?

Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill

Debate between Sheryll Murray and Andrew Stephenson
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 18th November 2016

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 View all Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 Debates Read Hansard Text
Sheryll Murray Portrait Mrs Murray
- Hansard - -

It is a case of treating other Members, no matter what their political affiliation, with some respect.

Andrew Stephenson Portrait Andrew Stephenson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is making an eloquent point. The Guardian today cites people saying they are against Cornwall being split in half. Any Member they contact should be telling them that there is a 12-week consultation. We are well into it now, but people can still submit representations through the Boundary Commission website. They can still lobby and they can still change things. More than 40,000 representations were made by members of the public during the 2013 abandoned review. Surely, as Members of Parliament, we should be encouraging people to engage with the process, not trying to scrap or abort it, so that we have a general election based on electoral figures that are 20 years out of date.

Sheryll Murray Portrait Mrs Murray
- Hansard - -

I completely agree with my hon. Friend.

I would like to quote the right hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam (Mr Clegg). I know that he has already been quoted today and it is not something that I do often in this place, but he outlined well how we compare around the world. He said:

“Reducing the number of MPs allows us to bring our oversized House of Commons into line with legislatures across the world. The House of Commons is the largest directly elected chamber in the European Union, and it’s half as big again as the US House of Representatives.”

My right hon. Friend the Member for West Dorset (Sir Oliver Letwin) mentioned that last point earlier. The Government have estimated that the reduction in the number of MPs will save £66 million over the course of the Parliament. I am quite disappointed with Opposition Members who seem to have made light of that figure. That money could be focused on looking after and benefiting our constituents.