Debates between Shabana Mahmood and Chris Huhne during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Shabana Mahmood and Chris Huhne
Thursday 1st December 2011

(12 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I certainly believe that a levy—a bunker fuels duty or whatever—is one potential way of raising the finance necessary. That was a recommendation in the report of the advisory group on finance, which was set up by the UN Secretary-General and in which I was honoured to participate. That is one of the most likely ways forward in breaking the back of that particular problem.

Shabana Mahmood Portrait Shabana Mahmood (Birmingham, Ladywood) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

11. What progress he has made in establishing the green deal.

--- Later in debate ---
Chris Huhne Portrait The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Chris Huhne)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The green deal is a coalition agreement and a priority for this Government. We established the legal underpinning for green deal through the Energy Act 2011 and recently launched our consultation on secondary legislation, which will guide the detailed operation of the scheme. I am encouraged by the support we have had in developing this policy and the interest shown by a broad range of organisations in playing a role.

Shabana Mahmood Portrait Shabana Mahmood
- Hansard - -

The green deal consultation sets out the Government’s plan to give three times as much subsidy to able-to-pay households than to fuel-poor households that take up the green deal. Why are Ministers giving three times more help to home owners who can afford to pay for improvements than to people living in fuel poverty?

Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady should be aware that the eco-subsidy is replacing two elements that we inherited from the previous Government: the Warm Front scheme, which was aimed at helping those in fuel poverty, and the carbon emissions reduction target and community energy saving programme schemes, which were aimed generally at householders. The proportions are broadly similar, so I do not accept that this is a departure in policy in terms of prioritisation. She will be aware that the warm home discount is aimed at those in fuel poverty—it will give two thirds more support to those in fuel poverty and will be targeted on the 600,000 most needy pensioners. That is a statutory scheme, which compares with the voluntary one under the previous Labour Government.