Lord Mandelson

Debate between Scott Arthur and Wendy Morton
Wednesday 4th February 2026

(1 day, 20 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Arthur
- Hansard - -

Can we just reflect for a second? The original Humble Address was reckless. It was going to put information in the public domain that would have damaged our country. It could be argued that the original amendment was an overreaction to that, but we are getting to a good place now; we are reaching consensus.

Wendy Morton Portrait Wendy Morton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

All things being equal, would the hon. Gentleman have gone through the Aye Lobby or the No Lobby if a Division was called on the motion?

Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Arthur
- Hansard - -

I had complete confidence that the Minister would reach consensus in the House today. Seriously though, would Opposition Members have voted for their own motion, which would have put sensitive information into the public domain? I really doubt it. I think better of them than that.

Wendy Morton Portrait Wendy Morton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think our motion was and is very clear, and we know how evidence and information are brought forward when it comes to the ISC. My question was very clear: would the hon. Gentleman have voted with us on the motion, or against it?

Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Arthur
- Hansard - -

Mr Speaker, I am trying to sit down. I will do so.