Sale of Park Homes Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Sarah Wollaston

Main Page: Sarah Wollaston (Liberal Democrat - Totnes)

Sale of Park Homes

Sarah Wollaston Excerpts
Thursday 30th October 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Annette Brooke Portrait Annette Brooke (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move,

That this House calls on the Government to set up a review of the current fee of up to 10 per cent of the sale price of a park home payable to the park home site owner.

I start by thanking the Backbench Business Committee for selecting this debate. I am reminded of a previous Back-Bench debate on park homes that I led in 2010. That debate was attended by a very large number of Members, and it was an important step in achieving the passage of the Mobile Homes Act 2013, ably piloted through the House by my hon. Friend the Member for Waveney (Peter Aldous). Although our numbers are smaller today, I have received messages of support from several MPs who are unable to attend and speak for various very good reasons.

On many occasions over the years, the House has heard about how mobile park home owners have been exploited and badly treated by some site owners. It is a matter for some celebration that appalling practices can now be prevented through the implementation of the 2013 Act, and there is also the ability to make use of the residential property tribunals. However, there is still work to do to protect and ensure fairness for a fairly vulnerable population.

Today we are focusing on the 10% commission charge that is payable to the site owner on the sale of a park home site. Well over 30,000 park home residents from 975 parks have signed a petition against the up-to-10% commission on the sale price of their homes that is payable to the site owner.

Sarah Wollaston Portrait Dr Sarah Wollaston (Totnes) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does the right hon. Lady know of any other circumstances in which residents would have to pay this iniquitous charge of 10%, particularly when it often applies to an older and vulnerable group of people?

Annette Brooke Portrait Annette Brooke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a valid point. It is difficult to think of anybody in a leasehold property who would have to pay such an additional charge. We need to look at what the money is used for, and I shall expand on that later.