Debates between Sarah Sackman and Josh Fenton-Glynn during the 2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Sarah Sackman and Josh Fenton-Glynn
Tuesday 30th June 2026

(1 month, 2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sarah Sackman Portrait Sarah Sackman
- View Speech - Hansard - -

In individual cases, how those financial settlements are made is a matter for the judiciary. I agree with the hon. Gentleman that, as in so many cases, the family court is downstream of decisions that have been made elsewhere, and it is quite right that there should be join-up between areas of Government. I am happy to take away his direction that we should liaise with DWP colleagues to ensure that child maintenance is addressed fairly.

Josh Fenton-Glynn Portrait Josh Fenton-Glynn (Calder Valley) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister reassure me that we remain committed to repealing in this Parliament the presumption of contact in family courts, to bring full justice to the 67 children murdered at the hands of abusive ex-partners with whom contact should never have been granted?

Sarah Sackman Portrait Sarah Sackman
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We are resolute and committed to repealing the presumption of parental involvement in the Children Act 1989. The campaigning efforts of the likes of Claire Throssell have been little short of heroic, and we will redouble our efforts to ensure that the repeal of that presumption comes about through the Courts and Tribunals Bill.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Sarah Sackman and Josh Fenton-Glynn
Tuesday 8th July 2025

(1 year, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Josh Fenton-Glynn Portrait Josh Fenton-Glynn (Calder Valley) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Minister will be aware that the recent pathfinder family court pilots have been seen as largely successful. This is an opportunity to put children at the centre of these cases and to end the presumption of contact which puts partners and children of abusers at risk. Will she please advise me as to the next steps in this process?

Sarah Sackman Portrait Sarah Sackman
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I welcome my hon. Friend’s question and I am grateful to him for raising the pathfinder court. These pilots are proving incredibly successful. They front-load a lot of the evidence gathering, they put the safety of children and family arrangements right at their heart, and they are proving a really successful model, which is why we plan to roll them out further. As part of that, as he has heard, we will be publishing our response to the presumption review very shortly.