Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Sarah Pochin and Keir Starmer
Wednesday 4th June 2025

(2 days, 22 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sarah Pochin Portrait Sarah Pochin (Runcorn and Helsby) (Reform)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Q4. Given the Prime Minister’s desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he—in the interests of public safety—follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others, and ban the burqa?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the hon. Lady to her place. I am not going to follow her down that line, but now she is in Parliament and safely in her place, perhaps she could tell her new party leader that his latest plan to bet £80 billion of unfunded tax cuts with no idea how he is going to pay for them is Liz Truss all over again—although, considering that I think the hon. Lady was a Conservative member when Liz Truss was leader, she probably will not.

UK-EU Summit

Debate between Sarah Pochin and Keir Starmer
Tuesday 20th May 2025

(2 weeks, 3 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

An hour and a half, and we have only just got to pet passports—but I am really glad my hon. Friend mentions it. The deal contains an advance for pet passports, along with the many other advances that will progress as soon as possible. I assume that the Conservatives are against pet passport progress as well.

Sarah Pochin Portrait Sarah Pochin (Runcorn and Helsby) (Reform)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Will the Prime Minister admit to the British people that this deal takes the country back under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, which is now able once again to overrule our courts, meaning we are surrendering our judicial sovereignty?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, that is just wrong under the agreement. There is an independent arbitration—