Sarah Pochin Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Sarah Pochin

Information between 26th November 2025 - 6th December 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 5 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303


Speeches
Sarah Pochin speeches from: Criminal Court Reform
Sarah Pochin contributed 1 speech (65 words)
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Justice
Sarah Pochin speeches from: Packaging: Extended Producer Responsibility
Sarah Pochin contributed 1 speech (515 words)
Thursday 27th November 2025 - Westminster Hall
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs


Written Answers
Puberty Suppressing Hormones: Children
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Monday 1st December 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will publish all risk assessments conducted by his Department into the administration of puberty blockers for under 16 year-olds.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

In March 2024, NHS England published a suite of documentation relating to its decision to remove gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues as a routine treatment option in the National Health Service for children under 18 years old with gender dysphoria. This documentation included a review of the published evidence, which concluded that there is very limited evidence about safety, risks, benefits, and outcomes for the use of this medication in children with gender dysphoria.

Children’s healthcare must always be evidence-led. In 2024, the Government introduced an indefinite ban on the sale and supply of puberty blockers via private prescriptions for the treatment of gender incongruence and/or gender dysphoria for under 18 year olds.

As part of that legislation the Government conducted a targeted consultation and sought advice on patient safety from the independent Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) and the Cass Review. The Government response to the consultation, the full report of the CHM, and the Cass review are available publicly, and respectively, at the following three links:

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-changes-to-the-availability-of-puberty-blockers-for-under-18s/outcome/governments-response-to-the-targeted-consultation-on-proposed-changes-to-the-availability-of-puberty-blockers

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/chms-report-on-proposed-changes-to-the-availability-of-puberty-blockers/commission-on-human-medicines-report-on-proposed-permanent-order-to-restrict-the-sale-and-supply-of-gnrh-agonists-in-children-and-young-people-under-1

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250310143633/https://cass.independent-review.uk/

Puberty Suppressing Hormones: Children
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Monday 1st December 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department is taking steps to ensure that puberty blockers are not administered to under 16 year old children with a mental illness or learning disabilities.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government has introduced an indefinite ban on the sale or supply of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues, also known as puberty blockers, for gender dysphoria and/or incongruence, to under 18 year olds.

Children’s healthcare must always be evidence-led. That’s why we are following expert, independent advice from the Cass Review to implement a package of research to find out how the National Health Service can best support children and young people with gender incongruence.

This includes the PATHWAYS trial which has received independent scientific, ethical, and regulatory approvals as well as comprehensive review. The study design, including inclusion criteria and safety protocols, has been thoroughly scrutinised to protect young people's wellbeing. This includes demonstrating a good understanding of the intervention and the possible benefits and risks.

When making prescribing decisions, clinicians have a duty to work with their patient to decide on the best course of treatment, and must always satisfy themselves that the medicines they consider appropriate for their patients can be safely prescribed, taking into account any existing medical conditions or other factors including any disabilities.

Motability: Expenditure
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Wednesday 3rd December 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the annual cost was of the Motability Scheme in each of the last five years.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Motability Scheme receives no direct funding from DWP. However, it does receive the direct transfer of benefit from DWP. This is claimant benefit the claimant would otherwise be receiving, and the cost of transfer is paid for by the Motability Foundation.

The total paid to the Motability Scheme from the customers’ benefit in each financial year is as follows (inclusive of amounts for Northern Ireland Executive and Scottish Government benefits):

Financial Year

Amount

2022/23

c£2.121bn

2023/24

c£2.606bn

2024/25

c£3.075bn

Please note our financial systems only hold full year data for financial years 22/3 – 24/25.

Motability: Motor Vehicles
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Thursday 4th December 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will provide a breakdown of the value of vehicles provided under the Motability Scheme, with the number of vehicles in each of the following price ranges a) from £10,000 to £20,000, b) from £20,000 to £30,000, c) from £30,000 to £40,000, d) from £40,000 to £50,000, e) from £50,000 to £60,000, f) from £60,000 to £70,000, g) from £70,000 to £80,000, h) from £80,000 to £90,000, i) from £90,000 to £100,000 and j) above £100,000.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Motability Foundation is independent of government and regulated by the Charity Commission to help disabled people with their mobility and transport needs. They own and have oversight of the Motability Scheme which is delivered by an independent commercial company Motability Operations. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for the main benefits that provide a gateway to the Scheme. Data about the brands or values of vehicles leased under the Scheme is held by Motability Operations.

Vehicles leased to eligible disabled people as part of the Motability Scheme are exempt from Vehicle Excise Duty, including the expensive car supplement, if applicable.

We are protecting the taxpayer through changes to the Motability scheme, ensuring it supports disabled people whilst delivering efficient use of taxpayers’ money. This includes the removal of some luxury vehicles from the leasing scheme while maintaining a range of vehicles to support disabled people.

Motability: Motor Vehicles
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Thursday 4th December 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many (a) Jaguar, (b) BMW, c) Mercedes, (d) Range Rover, (e) Audi, and (f) Tesla motor vehicles have been purchased under the Motability Scheme in each of the last three years for which figures are available.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Motability Foundation is independent of government and regulated by the Charity Commission to help disabled people with their mobility and transport needs. They own and have oversight of the Motability Scheme which is delivered by an independent commercial company Motability Operations. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for the main benefits that provide a gateway to the Scheme. Data about the brands or values of vehicles leased under the Scheme is held by Motability Operations.

Vehicles leased to eligible disabled people as part of the Motability Scheme are exempt from Vehicle Excise Duty, including the expensive car supplement, if applicable.

We are protecting the taxpayer through changes to the Motability scheme, ensuring it supports disabled people whilst delivering efficient use of taxpayers’ money. This includes the removal of some luxury vehicles from the leasing scheme while maintaining a range of vehicles to support disabled people.

Motability: Motor Vehicles
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Thursday 4th December 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many vehicles issued under the Motability Scheme were subject to the Expensive Car Supplement in the last year for which figures are available.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Motability Foundation is independent of government and regulated by the Charity Commission to help disabled people with their mobility and transport needs. They own and have oversight of the Motability Scheme which is delivered by an independent commercial company Motability Operations. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for the main benefits that provide a gateway to the Scheme. Data about the brands or values of vehicles leased under the Scheme is held by Motability Operations.

Vehicles leased to eligible disabled people as part of the Motability Scheme are exempt from Vehicle Excise Duty, including the expensive car supplement, if applicable.

We are protecting the taxpayer through changes to the Motability scheme, ensuring it supports disabled people whilst delivering efficient use of taxpayers’ money. This includes the removal of some luxury vehicles from the leasing scheme while maintaining a range of vehicles to support disabled people.

Puberty Suppressing Hormones: Children
Asked by: Sarah Pochin (Reform UK - Runcorn and Helsby)
Friday 5th December 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will commit to publishing the results of the Tavistock clinical trial into puberty blockers for children.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

There have been at least two studies relating to puberty-suppressing hormones and the Tavistock clinic. The Early pubertal suppression in a carefully selected group of adolescents with gender identity disorders study, sponsored by University College London, published its findings in 2021. The Outcomes and Predictors of Outcome for Children and Young People Referred to UK Gender Identity Development Services: A longitudinal Investigation study, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, was due to end in July 2025. We would expect the study findings to be published in a peer reviewed academic journal within 12 months of the completion of the study.

In addition, NHS England, in conjunction with the National Institute for Health and Care Research, is commissioning a data linkage study, which will provide different and separately valuable evidence to both understand the experience and outcomes of former patients of the Gender Identity Development Service and inform future National Health Service gender care. We would similarly expect the study findings to be published.



Early Day Motions Signed
Monday 8th December
Sarah Pochin signed this EDM on Wednesday 10th December 2025

Cancelled mayoral elections

9 signatures (Most recent: 17 Dec 2025)
Tabled by: James McMurdock (Independent - South Basildon and East Thurrock)
That this House expresses its discontent at the decision to cancel multiple mayoral elections in 2026; notes that on Monday 1 December 2025, two days before the cancellation was revealed in the media, the Government stated in response to Written Parliamentary Question 94117 on Local Government: Essex that there were …
Wednesday 5th February
Sarah Pochin signed this EDM on Monday 8th December 2025

Injury on Duty Award Scheme

113 signatures (Most recent: 10 Dec 2025)
Tabled by: Tom Morrison (Liberal Democrat - Cheadle)
That this House acknowledges the inherent risks undertaken by police officers, firefighters, paramedics and other members of the emergency services in the line of duty; notes that severe injuries sustained in the line of duty can prematurely end their careers; further notes with concern that current recognition for such sacrifices …



Sarah Pochin mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

26 Nov 2025, 4:31 p.m. - House of Commons
">> Way Sarah Pochin me. But the the member said when he was backing Liz "
Rt Hon Tom Tugendhat MP (Tonbridge, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
2 Dec 2025, 1:30 p.m. - House of Commons
"and asking this new division within the Crown Court to deal with 18 months to three years. >> Sarah Pochin. "
Rt Hon David Lammy MP, The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Tottenham, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
2 Dec 2025, 1:30 p.m. - House of Commons
">> Sarah Pochin. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Does the Secretary of State not agree that "
- View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Packaging: Extended Producer Responsibility
37 speeches (11,489 words)
Thursday 27th November 2025 - Westminster Hall
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Mentions:
1: Neil Hudson (Con - Epping Forest) Llanelli (Dame Nia Griffith), who talked powerfully about steel packaging, for Runcorn and Helsby (Sarah Pochin - Link to Speech
2: Mary Creagh (Lab - Coventry East) Member for Runcorn and Helsby (Sarah Pochin)—to these discussions.Let us remember that these are the - Link to Speech