Information between 14th September 2025 - 4th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Pochin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292 |
Speeches |
---|
Sarah Pochin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Sarah Pochin contributed 1 speech (20 words) Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Sarah Pochin speeches from: Sentencing Bill
Sarah Pochin contributed 3 speeches (712 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Sentencing Bill
139 speeches (32,312 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: John McDonnell (Ind - Hayes and Harlington) Member for Runcorn and Helsby (Sarah Pochin), in 1997—I do not know if my right hon. - Link to Speech 2: Jake Richards (Lab - Rother Valley) Member for Runcorn and Helsby (Sarah Pochin), and I say with the greatest respect that it is quite clear - Link to Speech |